Thread: ALERT: These 7 Cities Want to KEEP Illegals… Do You Live Near One…

ALERT: These 7 Cities Want to KEEP Illegals… Do You Live Near One…

One of the hallmarks of President-elect Donald Trump’s campaign was his pledge to crack down on illegal immigration, most notably through construction of a more secure border wall and through the deportation of illegals who have committed further criminal acts while in the country.

However, a number of Democrat-dominated urban centers across the land have in turn pledged to resist Trump’s efforts by doubling down on their self-proclaimed status as “sanctuary cities” that won’t cooperate with federal officials in the enforcement of immigration laws.

While there have been numerous sanctuary cities, counties and states for several years under the non-leadership of President Barack Obama, there are seven cities that have distinctly reiterated their non-cooperative stance following Trump’s election.

Those cities are: Chicago, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, New York City, Philadelphia, San Francisco and Seattle.



The purported leaders of these cities, both political and in law enforcement, have vowed to oppose the incoming Trump administration’s efforts at upholding federal laws, in effect choosing to protect criminal illegal immigrants over their own citizens and the rest of the country.

A Trump administration could attempt to bring these cities in line with federal law through the court system, but that could prove expensive and time-consuming.

However, there is perhaps a better, more cost-efficient manner by which these cities could be compelled to cooperate with federal agencies, and that is through the withholding of federal funds to those particular jurisdictions.

The Trump administration wouldn’t necessarily even have to cut off all federal funds to those cities immediately, but could instead roll out new targeted cuts to various funds in a stepped manner over a period of time, always with the offer that funds will be fully restored once the specific jurisdiction drops its opposition and begins to cooperate in upholding the law.

Money talks and BS walks, and it seems almost a certainty that these functionally bankrupt liberal cities will quickly change their tune regarding their “sanctuary” status once the funding they so desperately rely on for a number of things starts to dry up and go away.


http://conservativetribune.com/7-cit...keep-illegals/

Mayor Barry: Nashville cops aren't 'immigration police' The Tennessean As President-elect Donald Trump vows to deport between two and three million undocumented immigrants who have committed crimes, Nashville ...

Denver, Aurora police say they will not start enforcing federal immigration laws
The Denver Post‎ - 2 days ago

UPDATE: City of Madison leaders pledge to protect immigrant ...

Local Source-WKOW-20 hours ago


Worcester police stay out of immigration enforcement

Worcester Telegram-Nov 15, 2016
But as in sanctuary cities, Worcester police have adopted a policy of not asking about the immigration status of people being arrested. Several ...


Phoenix Mayor reg Stanton vows city police will stay out of ...

KTAR.com-3 hours ago
PHOENIX — Phoenix Mayor Greg Stanton promised his city's police ... have said they will not be part of deporting undocumented immigrants.

Map: Sanctuary Cities, Counties, and States

Sanctuary Cities Continue to Obstruct Enforcement, Threaten Public Safety

By Bryan Griffith, Jessica Vaughan January 2016

(Click link to see map.)

http://cis.org/Sanctuary-Cities-Map

If Trump reinvigorates ICE, I believe they will be able to do their job. Now there are so many illegals here that the federal detention centers would be swamped.

Tucson leaving immigration enforcement to federal authorities
Tucson News Now
Much of the law was overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court but one ... Police Department to become a part of any federal immigration enforcement ...

These cities officials are all on the take with the drug cartels. They aren't representing American Citizens, they're actually violating US immigration law by openly aiding, abetting and harboring illegal aliens. They all need to be arrested for that, if you ask me. What they're doing is against the law, punish them.

Originally Posted by Judy

These cities officials are all on the take with the drug cartels. . .

Do you have any proof of that or did you just make that up?
A link to data supporting your claim would be nice.

It's my opinion based on common sense and good judgment. There is no reason other than being on the take that would induce Mayors of these cities to aid, abet and harbor illegal aliens in violation of US immigration law. None. Nada. Zero. Zip. Illegal aliens can't vote. Legal immigrants don't want their pedophile "cousins" showing up on their doorsteps, running drugs and stealing their jobs, plus legal immigrants can't vote. Illegal aliens cost these cities a lot of money, cause a lot of problems that cost a lot of money. So, there's no reason whatsoever for Mayors to take such outlandish illegal positions UNLESS they're being paid to do so and the only paying entity with that kind of money are the drug cartels who require an open border to run the drugs in and haul the money out as well as require millions of drug runners and operators they control to run the business inside the United States.

But please, don't expect me to be surprised that you can't connect those dots.