Thread: CHICAGO POLICE: ILLEGAL ALIEN RAPES SLEEPING WOMAN

by KATIE MCHUGH
14 Oct 2015
Chicago, IL
1,864 comments

Illegal alien Crescencio Heredia raped a sleeping Chicago woman last week, police say, while she was groggy with prescribed pain medications.

Heredia had been at the victim’s residence drinking beer when she went to sleep, she told police. She woke to to find him raping her. She told him to stop, but he began attacking her shortly later.

After she reported Heredia to police, authorities charged him with “two counts of criminal sexual assault, two counts of criminal sexual abuse and two counts of possession of a firearm without a Firearm Owner’s Identification card,” according to the Daily Herald. Police confiscated ammunition and two guns from his apartment, noting “defendant is an illegal alien and unable to possess a Firearm Owner’s Identification card.”

Heredia faces up to 15 years in prison and possible deportation. But if his home country, which the Daily Herald doesn’t identify, refuses to take him back, he’ll be free to live in the U.S. after his sentence thanks to the Supreme Court decision Zadvydas v. Davis (2001).

As with many other immigrant sex crimes that the media ignore and Breitbart News exposes, Heredia was simply identified as a “man” in the local news headline and the victim’s rape elicited no interest from other news outlets.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...leeping-woman/

The depravity is almost incurable!

This is the article from the Daily Herald.

Elgin man accused of raping woman groggy from pain meds



Crescencio Heredia

Harry Hitzeman

10/13/2015 6:24 PM

A 34-year-old Elgin man is accused of raping a woman last week while she was groggy from pain medication, according to police and court records.


Crescencio Heredia, of the 800 block of Van Street, has been charged with two counts of criminal sexual assault, two counts of criminal sexual abuse and two counts of possession of a firearm without a Firearm Owner's Identification card, according to Kane County court records.
Heredia was arrested last weekend after the victim told police she was assaulted by Heredia, according to a police report.


The woman told police she was asleep in her bedroom at about 2 a.m. Oct. 7 and had taken prescribed pain medication, according to a police report.


Heredia was at the woman's residence in Elgin drinking beer. The woman woke up to Heredia fondling her and sexually assaulting her even though she told him to stop, the report said.
Heredia stopped, fell asleep for a little bit but woke up again and began doing the same thing, the report said.


Heredia was arrested two days later in Pingree Grove after the woman told police what happened.


Authorities also seized two guns and ammunition from his residence because "defendant is an illegal alien and unable to possess a Firearm Owner's Identification card," the police report said.


Heredia was being held on $150,000 bail, meaning he must post $15,000 to be released from the Kane County jail while the charges are pending.


If convicted, he faces up to 15 years in prison, along with possible deportation.

http://www.dailyherald.com/article/2...ews/151019572/

Court Rules Illegal Aliens Have Second Amendment Rights

Posted by Bob Owens on August 25, 2015 at 6:58 am

A recent decision by the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals that says illegal aliens—what the left likes to call “undocumented immigrants”—enjoy a Second Amendment right to bear arms, even if their presence in this nation is criminal.

In the case of a Milwaukee man deported over a single .22 caliber cartridge, a federal appeals court ruled last week that even unlawful immigrants can be part of “the public” that enjoys a Second Amendment right to keep a gun for self defense.

The U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeas said even undocumented immigrants can be part of “the people” protected by the Bill of Rights, though it upheld the man’s conviction on a specific law that prohibits most such persons from having guns.

“It is now clear that the Second Amendment right to bear arms is no second-class entitlement, (and) we see no principled way to carve out the Second Amendment and say that the unauthorized (or maybe all noncitizens) are excluded,” Judge Diane Wood wrote for a panel that included judges Richard Easterbrook and Joel Flaum.

“No language in the Amendment supports such a conclusion, nor, as we have said, does a broader consideration of the Bill of Rights.”

Because four other federal circuit courts have come to the opposite conclusion, legal commentators were quick to suggest the issue of whether undocumented immigrants have Second Amendment rights could now be headed for the U.S. Supreme Court.

While rejecting the idea that undocumented immigrants could never have any rights under the Second Amendment, Wood noted that even for citizens, those rights are not unlimited. She found that a federal law tailored to keep guns out of the hands of undocumented immigrants — like gun restrictions imposed on felons and those convicted of domestic violence — was constitutional, and upheld the conviction on those grounds.

My basic, over-riding belief on the Second Amendment is that any case involving the right to keep and bear arms should be held to the legal standard of strict scrutiny, and that all law-abiding citizens and legal resident aliens should have the right to keep and bear arms.

This case, however, is stating that criminals who aren’t citizens nor legal resident aliens have Second Amendment rights… and I’m having a hard problem with that. I’m apparently not alone, as the Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Circuit court aren’t buying the argument, either. The split among the courts suggests that the basic issue will head to the U.S. Supreme court at some point.

Something that makes me even more leery about this case is that the progressives at Think Progress gleefully predict that if the Seventh Circuit’s views hold, they could use it to win even more rights for illegal aliens. In specific, they’re hoping these illegals will get expanded First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendment protections if United States vs. Meza-Rodriguez holds. Put another way, they’re hoping this Second Amendment case will turn into an “anchor baby” that makes it more difficult to send criminal aliens back home.

Call me a “butter” if you want, but I don’t think for a second that the Founding Fathers would support the concept of granting criminal invaders the same legal status as legal immigrants, legal resident aliens, and citizens. Let’s hope that when this case makes it to the Supreme Court that the justices with the Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth circuit courts.

http://bearingarms.com/judge-rules-i...ndment-rights/

Why is the ACLU so concerned with the "rights' of these dirtbags? Criminals not only hurt their victim they cost us a fortune to take care of.