Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree3Likes
  • 2 Post By JohnDoe2
  • 1 Post By southBronx

Thread: Georgia to start enforcing tough new immigration law

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    59,982

    Georgia to start enforcing tough new immigration law

    Posted: 10:43 a.m. Tuesday, Dec. 11, 2012

    Georgia to start enforcing tough new immigration law

    By Jeremy Redmon
    The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

    Georgia state and local police may start enforcing one of the most controversial parts of the state’s immigration law for the first time now that a federal judge has lifted a legal hold he placed on it.

    The law gives police the option to investigate the immigration status of suspects they believe have committed state or federal crimes and who cannot provide identification or other information that could help police identify them. It also empowers police to detain people determined to be in the country illegally and take them to jail.

    Partly modeled after a similar measure in Arizona, Georgia’s law is aimed at pushing illegal immigrants out of the state. Georgia has the ninth-largest population among states. But it ranked sixth last year for the estimated number of illegal immigrants living within its borders, at 440,000, according to the Homeland Security Department.

    U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Thrash placed Georgia’s law on hold before it could go into effect last year after civil and immigrant rights activists sued to block it. Critics say the statute is unconstitutional and that it could interfere with the nation’s foreign diplomacy. They also argue it could lead to racial profiling even though the statute explicitly prohibits that.

    The state appealed to the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta, which reversed Thrash’s ruling in August. On Tuesday, Thrash signed an order complying with the appeals court’s decision.

    Thrash’s order could represent the end of the long-running legal battle over this law. But the activists who sued to block it say they won’t hesitate to file suit again if they find evidence police are violating people’s civil rights with it through prolonged traffic stops.

    The courts are also concerned about such civil rights violations.


    For example, in sustaining a similar law in Arizona in June, the U.S. Supreme Court said detaining people “solely to verify their immigration status would raise constitutional concerns.”

    Atlanta area police agencies have been putting off training and other planning to enforce the law because it has been tied up in federal court. In September, state officials confirmed they were postponing training police officers on the law after learning the legal battle was not over.

    State Rep. Matt Ramsey, who sponsored the law, underscored that it is discretionary and predicted police agencies across the state will enforce it differently, based on their manpower.

    “It will be on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis,” he said in an interview last week.
    The same has been true in Alabama, where a similar law has been in effect since last year. Some police agencies there are enforcing the law, while others are not. For example, the police chief in Clanton – a small town between Montgomery and Birmingham – said he stopped enforcing the law partly because it sometimes takes hours for federal authorities to respond to his officers’ queries about the immigration status of suspects.

    Thrash’s order comes as state officials are considering whether to appeal an 11th Circuit Court’s decision against another part of Georgia’s immigration law. That provision would punish people who knowingly transport or harbor illegal immigrants while committing other crimes. The appeals court ruled the measure is pre-empted by federal law, which already prohibits such activities.

    Meanwhile, President Barack Obama is pledging to tackle comprehensive immigration reform after his inauguration. Among his goals: creating a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants.

    Ramsey predicted such reform would not affect Georgia’s statute because it was written with the understanding that “federal immigration law is evolving.” He added that federal authorities, not state officials, are responsible for determining someone’s legal status.

    http://www.ajc.com/news/news/state-regional-govt-politics/georgia-to-start-enforcing-tough-new-immigration-l/nTSM4/
    HAPPY2BME and Kiara like this.
    NO AMNESTY

    DON'T REWARD THE CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS

    BY GIVING THEM CITIZENSHIP

  2. #2
    Senior Member southBronx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    3,132
    good for you Georgia
    now every other state should do the same thing .
    No amnesty or dream
    Kiara likes this.

  3. #3
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    49,685

    Georgia to start enforcing key part of its immigration law

    This article has been updated since posted to the following:
    ~~~

    December 11, 2012
    By Jeremy Redmon
    The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

    Georgia state and local police may start enforcing one of the most controversial parts of the state’s immigration law for the first time now that a federal judge has lifted an injunction he placed against it.

    The statute — nicknamed by critics as “the show-me-your-papers law” — gives police the option to investigate the immigration status of certain suspects. It also empowers police to detain people determined to be in the country illegally and take them to jail.

    Partly modeled after a similar measure in Arizona, Georgia’s law is aimed at protecting taxpayer resources by pushing illegal immigrants out of the state. Georgia has the ninth-largest population among states. But it ranked sixth last year for the estimated number of illegal immigrants living within its borders, at 440,000, according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

    U.S. District Judge Thomas Thrash placed Georgia’s law on hold before it could go into effect last year after civil and immigrant rights activists sued to block it. Critics say the statute is unconstitutional and that it could interfere with the nation’s foreign diplomacy. They also say it could lead to racial profiling even though the statute explicitly prohibits that.

    The state appealed to the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta, which reversed Thrash’s ruling in August. On Tuesday, Thrash signed an order complying with the appeals court’s decision. Thrash’s order, attorneys in the case said, lifted the preliminary injunction he issued against the law last year.

    Thrash’s order could represent the end of the long-running legal battle over this law. But the activists who sued to block it say they won’t hesitate to file suit again if they find evidence police are violating people’s civil rights through prolonged traffic stops.

    “Any type of violations of individuals’ rights — including prolonged detention — is something we will be looking for, documenting and will bring back to court,” said Karen Tumlin, a managing attorney for the National Immigration Law Center, which is part of a coalition of civil and immigrant rights groups that sued to block the statute.

    The courts have also shown concern about the possibility of civil rights violations. For example, in sustaining Arizona’s similar law in June, the U.S. Supreme Court said detaining people “solely to verify their immigration status would raise constitutional concerns.”

    State officials said during the court battle over the law that police already have the authority to check the immigration status of people they have detained in connection with other crimes. State Rep. Matt Ramsey, who sponsored the law, underscored that it is discretionary and predicted police agencies across the state will enforce it differently, based on their manpower.

    “It will be on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis,” he said in an interview last week.

    The same has been true in Alabama, where a similar law has been in effect since last year. Some police agencies there are enforcing the law, while others are not. For example, the police chief in Clanton — a small town between Montgomery and Birmingham — said he stopped enforcing the law partly because it sometimes takes hours for federal authorities to respond to his officers’ queries about the immigration status of suspects.

    Atlanta-area police agencies had put off training and other planning to enforce the law because it had been tied up in federal court.

    Like Ramsey, Lt. Col. Ron Hunton, the field operations commander for the Cherokee County Sheriff’s Office, pointed out Tuesday the law is discretionary for police. Cherokee deputies typically contact federal immigration authorities when they are attempting to verify suspects’ legal status, he said. When deputies confirm suspects are in the country illegally, Hunton said, they contact the local U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement office. ICE officials could then ask the county to notify them before the suspects are released from jail so they may have the chance to detain and deport them.

    “We have limited space in our detention facility and certainly do not have the resources to deal solely with immigration issues,” Hunton said in an email.

    A Gwinnett County police spokesman said his agency doesn’t see the need to change its policies or procedures since it already participates in a federal program — called 287(g) – that gives some county authorities immigration enforcement powers.

    Thrash’s order comes as state officials are considering whether to appeal an 11th Circuit Court decision against another part of Georgia’s immigration law. That provision would punish people who knowingly transport or harbor illegal immigrants while committing other crimes. The appeals court ruled the measure is pre-empted by federal law, which already prohibits such activities.

    Meanwhile, President Barack Obama is pledging to attempt a comprehensive immigration overhaul after his inauguration. Among his goals: creating a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants.

    Ramsey predicted such a change would not affect Georgia’s statute because it was written with the understanding that “federal immigration law is evolving.”

    Georgia’s immigration law

    A federal judge lifted an injunction against a key part of Georgia’s immigration law Tuesday, allowing state and local police to begin enforcing it for the first time. Among other things, the law:

    Gives police the option to investigate the immigration status of suspects they have probable cause to believe have committed state or federal crimes and who cannot provide identification — such as a passport or state-issued driver’s license — or other information that could help police identify them.

    Authorizes police to attempt to determine the immigration status of suspects through “any reasonable means available” or by contacting federal authorities and using federal identification databases and electronic fingerprint readers.

    Empowers police to detain people determined to be in the country illegally, contact federal immigration authorities about them and take them to federal or state detention centers.

    Prohibits police from considering race, color or national origin in enforcing the statute except as permitted by the Georgia or U.S. constitutions.

    Bars authorities from investigating the immigration status of people who contact state or local police or prosecutors to report crimes or seek help as crime victims.

    Provides legal immunity from damages and liability to police, prosecutors and other government officials who act “in good faith” to carry out provisions of the law.

    Unmatched coverage

    The Atlanta Journal-Constitution has closely followed Georgia’s sweeping immigration law in the state Legislature, federal courts and our communities. Today we report how a federal judge has lifted an injunction against a key part of the law, allowing state and local police to begin enforcing it for the first time.

    Tomorrow: Read how Atlanta-area police plan to train for and enforce this controversial part of Georgia’s immigration law.

    By the numbers

    9.8 million: Georgia’s population

    440,000: Illegal immigrants believed to be living in Georgia

    325,000: Illegal immigrants who held jobs in Georgia in 2010

    8.7 percent: Georgia’s unemployment rate for October

    10,206: Immigrants in Georgia who applied to the government for a two-year reprieve from deportation — or “deferred action” — between Aug. 15 and Nov. 15.

    Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Pew Hispanic Center, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security

    Georgia to start enforcing key part of its immigration law | www.ajc.com
    We have immigration laws that just need to be enforced.

  4. #4
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    49,685

    Georgia: Illegal Immigration — Judge right to uphold state’s tough law

    December 14, 2012 01:10 AM
    The Marietta Daily Journal

    Those seeking stronger enforcement of this country’s laws against illegal immigration — which needless to say is long overdue — can take heart from a decision this week by U.S. District Judge Tom Thrash in Atlanta and, prior to that, a decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Thrash cleared the way for Georgia law enforcement authorities to begin checking the immigration status of criminal suspects who fail to produce proper identification.

    The decision came in connection with Georgia’s Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act (HB 87) passed last year. Judge Thrash had put preliminary injunctions in place last year preventing enforcement of two provisions of the law, pending the outcome of a legal challenge against it by various “pro-illegal” groups.

    One of Thrash’s injunctions blocks the part of the law that makes it illegal to knowingly harbor or transport an illegal immigrant during the commission of a crime. That injunction remains in place.

    The other provision in question — and the far more significant of the two — makes clear that it is legal for police, sheriffs, etc., to verify the immigration status of criminal suspects. Opponents of the law like to call this the “show me your papers” statute in an effort to make opponents sound like the Gestapo, when in fact, they merely favor strict enforcement of our laws. Had the courts struck down that provision, it might have weakened the underpinnings of the federal 287(g) immigration program that allows local law enforcers to check the immigration status of those taken to jail on other charges. Cobb Sheriff Neil Warren, who was the first in Georgia to make use of 287(g) back in 2007, has turned over about 10,000 inmates to ICE since then. Opponents of the section of HB 87 in question and of the 287(g) program claim that they encourage racial profiling, but have never been able to produce verifiable evidence that is the case.

    A three-judge panel from the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had said in August that police could start enforcing that provision unless the state or the plaintiffs asked for a rehearing by the full court. Thrash quietly signed an order that showed up in an online filing system on Tuesday which lifts that part of the injunction. It means that law enforcement agencies can immediately start enforcing that section of the law.

    It’s worth reiterating that Georgia (and other states like Arizona and Alabama) only passed such laws because of Washington’s failure to lead. We now have the spectacle of a president using an executive order to open the door to millions of illegals already in this country in order to allow them to compete for your job.

    But thanks to HB 87 and the courts, and to Georgia Attorney General Sam Olens of east Cobb, who defended the state’s law in court, it is now clear that state and local governments have at least a measure of legal authority to protect themselves from the ill effects of illegal immigration.

    One Old Vet

    The Marietta Daily Journal - Illegal Immigration
    Last edited by Jean; 12-18-2012 at 01:03 AM.
    We have immigration laws that just need to be enforced.

  5. #5
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    49,685
    Added an article from above to the Homepage:
    http://www.alipac.us/content/georgia...ough-law-1222/
    We have immigration laws that just need to be enforced.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •