Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member CountFloyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Occupied Territories, Alta Mexico
    Posts
    3,008

    House GOP Expected To Yield On Immigration Legislation

    May 26, 2006

    The House is the only obstacle that stands between President Bush and a comprehensive immigration bill, and the White House yesterday predicted that the chamber's Republicans will give in.

    White House press secretary Tony Snow said House Republicans will want to pass border security badly enough to back down from the fight against what many consider amnesty for illegal aliens, knowing there is a "heavier political price for failing to act, than for acting."

    "If you are a Republican member of Congress and you're concerned about illegal immigration, do you really want to say to your constituents: You know, I'm going to wait a couple of years before I take up the issue of people knowingly hiring illegal aliens, I want to wait a couple of years before I go ahead and try to identify who the illegal aliens are, I want to wait a couple of years before I start grappling with what to do with these 11 or 12 million people who are here illegally," Mr. Snow said.

    A president always has the most influence in the backroom House-Senate negotiations, but yesterday, Mr. Snow wouldn't tip the administration's hand when asked how they would approach the conference committee.

    "At this point, let's get a bill through the Senate, let's figure out where the fault lines are," he said.

    But those fault lines between the House and Senate are fairly public, deep and fundamental.

    The House passed a bill in December that stepped up border enforcement and interior enforcement, enabled local law enforcement in border areas to help enforce immigration laws and cracked down on employers who hired illegal aliens.

    The Senate included some of those measures but put far more emphasis on future foreign workers and a pathway to citizenship for the current estimated 10 million to 12 million illegal aliens, a move House Republicans consider an unacceptable amnesty.

    "If both parties in a negotiation are running the other way, they will never meet in any middle," said Don Stewart, spokesman for Sen. John Cornyn, Texas Republican.

    "The question for the House is some agreement to do more than just border security. The question for the Senate is: Are they willing to be less generous than the Senate bill? Without a yes on both of those two questions, there's no point in the conference going forward."

    From the House side, Majority Leader John A. Boehner acknowledged there were "two very separate and distinct directions that we're going," but said he still thinks they can reach an agreement with the Senate.

    Still, the Ohio Republican said, the House position is clear.

    "You can't control the problem without first strengthening the borders and beginning to enforce the laws," said Mr. Boehner.

    Mr. Bush last week called the Senate measure "a good immigration bill." He also recently reversed his administration's earlier position and now endorses the idea of a path to citizenship for some illegal aliens.

    He said any final bill must include border security, employer sanctions, a temporary-worker program and a way to handle the current illegal alien population.

    Rep. Jack Kingston, Georgia Republican, said the House has some areas in common with the Senate, including provisions to build more fencing -- 370 miles in the Senate version and 698 miles in the House version.

    Mr. Kingston said House Republicans are willing to accept a temporary-worker program for future workers but, in exchange, would have to win agreement on delaying it until the borders are secure and adopting some sort of biometric identification card.

    "We think probably we might be able to do something on a temporary visa basis, but where we will have a line in the sand is on the pathway to citizenship, because pathway to citizenship, by almost any angle, leads to somebody's definition of amnesty," he said. "We don't want 'Republican' and 'amnesty' in the same sentence."

    He estimated that there are 180 members of the House "just adamant about no amnesty."

    Although Mr. Bush has generally favored the Senate's approach and has recently said some illegal aliens can gain citizenship, he has been insistent that future foreign workers not have a path to citizenship. That sets up a major conflict with the Senate, where the bill that passed yesterday does grant that right to future workers.

    Mr. Bush did win an unlikely ally in former President Jimmy Carter, a Democrat, who this week said Mr. Bush's efforts to create a right to citizenship have been "quite admirable."

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/national ... -3671r.htm
    It's like hell vomited and the Bush administration appeared.

  2. #2
    Senior Member WavTek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,431
    White House press secretary Tony Snow said House Republicans will want to pass border security badly enough to back down from the fight against what many consider amnesty for illegal aliens, knowing there is a "heavier political price for failing to act, than for acting."
    This is plain BS! No bill is better than the abortion the Senate passed. If the House members want to be re-elected, they'd better heed our warning.
    REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER!

  3. #3
    Senior Member lsmith1338's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,638
    I agree Wavtek many of them are up for re-election and fear that the voters will take it out on them if the they vote for it. And they are right in that american citizens are not going to forget the sellout politicians of this government. Mr. Snow can go pound sand for all I care I care nothing about anything that comes out of that guys mouth
    Freedom isn't free... Don't forget the men who died and gave that right to all of us....
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  4. #4
    Senior Member WavTek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,431
    Actually, ALL of the house members are up for re-election. We have the ability to kick all of them out of office, if we so choose. I think we really need to focus our efforts on the leaders of the House. People like Dennis Hastert, John Boehner and James Sensenbrenner. Hastert has always, in the past, refused to put any bill up for a vote, that did not have republican majority support. We need to insist that he keep it that way. I don't think there's any way they can get a majority of republicans to vote for amnesty, in the House. It would take nearly all of the Democrats and about 20 republican traitors, to from a coalition big enough to pass amnesty. If the republicans let amnesty pass in the House, then we should vote ALL of them out and put some real Americans in office.
    REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER!

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,207
    Hoepfully the House will stay true to their constituients, and do what they know is the right thing to do,and forget about Tony Snow Job!

    Hang tight Congress, America is behind you 100%!!

  6. #6
    Senior Member Bowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    North Mexico aka Aztlan
    Posts
    7,055
    Now the US Chamber is going to start lobbying the House members. They have gotten that weasel Pence to come up with another "it's not amnesty" amnesty plan I am sure they will propose in conference.

    What the Republicans really need to do is impeach Bush. He is absolutely determined to turn this place into Mexico. He wants to give a path to citizenship for Mexican illegals already here, but not for guest workers from other countries?

    PS. I just called my Republican Congressman who opposes amnesty, and asked if he would impeach Bush for pushing this amnesty bill, since it is treason. They said no. So I said I will vote for Democrats in November, since they are likely to impeach him.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •