Thread: How Should The U.S. React To Mexico's Drug Violence?

by S. L. Wheeler

Mexico, a country that in recent years has become a playground for Drug Cartels is one of the closest neighbors that the United States has. How should the U.S. react in response to the escalating drug violence currently plaguing that country?

Perhaps the first step that the United States should to take is to realize that the drug violence that is currently wreaking havoc in Mexico has already begun to infiltrate U.S. borders. The United States must realize that this is a shared problem and one that is going to require an aggressive approach.

The United States has already begun to increase border patrol agents along the United States and Mexico border, and this appears to be a step in the right direction. But, if the drug war continues to escalate at the rate that it has, a U.S. military presence may be the next step in protecting U.S. borders.

Banning assault weapons, a step that already appears to be in the works by the Obama administration, would also be a step in the right direction.

The United States should increase the number of roadside check points along the U.S./Mexico border. Perhaps by doing so the United States may be able to crack down on the numbers of vehicles smuggling illegal drugs, cash and weapons between the two countries.

Assembling a special task force, one whose main focus is on monitoring the activities of the Mexican Drug Cartels, their growth as well as their whereabouts, should be the next step for the Obama Administration.

The United States should also continue in its efforts to warn United States citizens who are planning to travel to Mexico, alerting them of the potential violence that the could encounter if they choose to travel to Mexico.

Finally, the United States needs to take a tough approach here at home when it comes to anti-drug education. Years ago there was the DARE campaign which focused on preventing young people from becoming involved in drugs. Perhaps its time to appeal to the youth of today with a similar type of message, one that warns them not only of the dangers of drugs, but the entire drug culture.

As the drug violence in Mexico escalates and the blood shed begins to run across the border into the United States, the U.S. will need to be prepared to fight. The Mexican Drug Cartels have already taken root in hundreds of cities throughout the United States, and if U.S. officials don't act soon, there may be no hope of winning what might be one of the worst drug wars of this generation.

Author, S. L. Wheeler.

www.helium.com/knowledge/top_item/233241-how-should-the

The Mexican Drug Cartels have already taken root in hundreds of cities throughout the United States, and if U.S. officials don't act soon, there may be no hope of winning what might be one of the worst drug wars of this generation.

I continue to repeat it will soon happen if we do not take actions quickly to prevent it from happening.

Posted on Thursday, February 3, 2011
By Tim Johnson | McClatchy Newspapers

MEXICO CITY — Over a 48-hour period this week, gangsters tossed grenades, torched buses, set up roadblocks and strafed police units in Mexico's second and third largest cities.

Assailants in Guadalajara and Monterrey used a variety of tactics. In several assaults, they acted like hit-and-run guerrillas. In other skirmishes, they mimicked small army units. Elsewhere, they hijacked vehicles like common criminals.

As gangsters demonstrate an ample repertoire of fighting skills, it is little wonder that four years into President Felipe Calderon's battle against organized crime, many Mexicans aren't sure what to call the turmoil in their country. Is Mexico at war? Does it face a criminal insurgency? Or is it locked in sustained gangland violence?

Calderon himself shies away from uttering the "w" word — war.

"I haven't used it, and I invite you to review all my public and private remarks," Calderon told a group of civic leaders Jan. 12, one of whom talked about war. "You said it. You chose this concept of 'war.' I didn't choose it."

Calderon said that he preferred to use the phrase the "struggle against organized crime . . . and I will continue using it."

The linguistic debate came further to the fore when a German think tank, the Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research, issued its 19th annual rankings of worldwide conflict last month, elevating the status of the conflict in Mexico from "crisis" to "war," putting it alongside Afghanistan, Sudan, Iraq and Somalia.

"Clashes, especially between security forces and drug gang members, rose dramatically in comparison to past years, adding up to several hundred incidents all over the country," the institute said, explaining that it believed Mexico's conflict had "escalated to a full scale war."

According to a database offered by the government, last year's 15,273 violent deaths marked the bloodiest year since the president launched a head-on confrontation with the cartels in late 2006. Since then, the death toll stands at 34,612 deaths.

Like Calderon, some Mexican analysts shy away from saying that the nation is at war with organized crime groups.

"It is a generalized combat against powerful criminals. It's not exactly a war, because that would imply there are two armies," said Jorge Chabat, an expert on security issues at the Center for Research and Teaching on Economics.

Employing the word "war" may summon a sense of patriotic urgency among Mexicans, Chabat said, but it also creates expectations.

"With a war, you either win or lose. And with this one, how are we going to win it?" he asked.

Calderon called the White House in September to protest after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton suggested that some drug gangs in Mexico were "morphing into, or making common cause with, what we would consider an insurgency."

On a visit to Mexico last week, Clinton watched her words carefully, declaring that Calderon's intention to smash the cartels is "absolutely necessary. If it were easy, it would have been done before. It is not easy. . . . But there is no alternative."

U.S.-based analysts of Mexico's violence aren't so reluctant to use "war" to describe the ambushes of convoys, attacks on military and police outposts, and use of grenades and high-caliber weaponry that now characterize the conflict in parts of Mexico, particularly in the states of Tamaulipas, Nuevo Leon, Chihuahua, Sonora, Guerrero and Michoacan.

"Drug trafficking organizations in Mexico have gone way beyond organized crime, and should be considered as hybrids between a mafia, insurgency, and terrorist group based solely on the tactics they're using," said Sylvia Longmire, an analyst and frequent writer on Mexico's internal conflict.

"You definitely have a war on your hands because the cartels — while not wanting to take direct control of the state apparatus — want to control it enough through intimidation of state institutions to allow them to operate as a parallel society," she said.

Crime groups increasingly are resorting to the use of military hand grenades.

Since the beginning of the year, outlaws have thrown grenades at a prison, at police facilities and at police roadblocks within the city limits of Monterrey, the industrial capital in the northeast. In one attack Monday, a grenade blast hurt five, including a university professor and a police officer. Grenade attacks occurred Tuesday in both Monterrey and Guadalajara.

Longmire called the grenade attacks "a tool of intimidation" used "mostly against the police and media outlets."

Grupo Savant, a security consulting firm with offices in Alexandria, Va., said in an analysis of violence in Nuevo Leon, the state that surrounds Monterrey, that drug gangs have gravitated to the tactics to frighten civilians.

Grenade attacks and strafings "are by their nature frightful events that serve not only to drive fear into the intended targets but also result in generating a substantial amount of trepidation in the hearts and minds of the civilians that are living in the midst of the war zone," the Grupo Savant report said.

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/02/03/1 ... z1CzvKIZkj