Thread: Number of refugees admitted to U.S. falls 23%

http://www.dallasnews.com

Number of refugees admitted to U.S. falls 23%

10:32 PM CDT on Wednesday, September 27, 2006

The New York Times


WASHINGTON – The number of refugees admitted to the United States fell 23 percent this year because of provisions in two antiterrorism laws that have sharply reduced the number of refugees resettled here, State Department officials said on Wednesday.

The laws, the USA Patriot Act and the Real ID Act, deny entry to anyone who belongs to or has provided material support to armed rebel groups, even if that support was coerced and even if the armed groups fought alongside U.S. troops or opposed authoritarian governments criticized by the Bush administration.

The provisions have derailed the resettlement of thousands of refugees fleeing the authoritarian government of Myanmar, formerly known as Burma; hundreds of refugees from Vietnam and Laos who fought alongside U.S. troops during the Vietnam War and dozens of Cubans who supported armed groups opposed to Fidel Castro in the 1960s, according to the State Department and the U.N. refugee agency.

Many of these refugees were barred from the United States because, under the new laws, they are deemed supporters of terrorist groups, even though the organizations they support do not appear on the State Department's list of designated terrorist groups. The statutes have broadened the definition of terrorist groups to include any organization that has a subgroup that uses weapons, even if the groups support American foreign policy aims.

The result, State Department officials say, is that administration officials will resettle only 41,200 of the 54,000 refugees they had expected to admit by the end of the current fiscal year, which ends on Sept. 30. That figure is the lowest since refugee admissions plunged for two nearly years after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

The State Department can grant waivers for specific populations that have supported armed groups, if they pose no threat to the United States. In May and in August, the department issued waivers for Burmese refugees who have supported the Karen National Union, a group that opposes the government in Myanmar.

But the laws do not allow waivers for refugees who were combatants, received military training from groups deemed to be terrorist organizations or were members of such groups. State Department officials say a change in the law is required to address those populations. In recent weeks, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has met with lawmakers in the House and Senate to discuss such changes.

Ellen Sauerbrey, an assistant secretary of state, told senators on Wednesday that the antiterrorism provisions had prevented the United States from resettling 9,500 Burmese this fiscal year. Of that group, only about 1,500 are expected to enter by Sept. 30 under the waivers issued.

"We had anticipated bringing the majority, if not all of those, to the United States," Sauerbrey said at a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee's immigration subcommittee.

She said the limited nature of the waivers had meant that the resettlement of many refugees had been delayed indefinitely. In addition to the Burmese, Sauerbrey pointed to the Cubans and Vietnamese Montagnards.

"We are eagerly looking forward to expanding resettlement," Sauerbrey said, "to the degree that we can resolve some of these difficulties."

But refugee advocacy groups, including Human Rights First and Human Rights Watch, and conservative groups like Concerned Women for America, the National Association of Evangelicals, and American Values,say officials are not moving swiftly enough.

State Department officials say that a legislative solution is not expected before Election Day. And many advocates for refugees fear that administration officials and members of Congress are delaying action because they do not want to be viewed as easing up on terrorism in an election year.


(STORY CAN END HERE. OPTIONAL MATERIAL FOLLOWS.)


Michael J. Horowitz, a neoconservative who worked in the White House of President Ronald Reagan and testified at Wednesday's hearing, said in a statement that it was "inexcusable that for more than two years the administration has dragged its feet" in finding a solution for the refugees who fought alongside Americans in Vietnam.

Sarah Petrin of the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, an advocacy group, also described the situation as unacceptable. "The administration is showing no urgency whatsoever," Petrin said.

The antiterrorism provisions have also affected about 500 asylum seekers in the United States, whose cases have been put on hold and has prevented about 700 people, who have already been deemed refugees or granted asylum, from becoming permanent residents here.

Sen. Sam Brownback, Republican of Kansas, urged the administration to redouble its efforts on behalf of the Burmese refugees and others who are in desperate need of resettlement in the United States.

"I know we have a lot security concerns to watch for," Brownback said at the hearing, "but there are huge populations that are absolutely persecuted and have no other option."

Sen. Sam Brownback, Republican of Kansas, urged the administration to redouble its efforts on behalf of the Burmese refugees and others who are in desperate need of resettlement in the United States.

"I know we have a lot security concerns to watch for," Brownback said at the hearing, "but there are huge populations that are absolutely persecuted and have no other option."

That's funny, our BP agents get persecuted everyday for doing their jobs and you don't seem too concerned about that. We have millions of American citizens of all races who can't find a job no thanks to the flood of immigrants and illegals crossing our borders and stealing our jobs, no concern there. How about we emigrate all these refugees into your gated community? I bet Mr Bushbrownnoser wouldn't like that too much, but he has no problem shoving them on us.

How about these refugees stay in their own country and fight for their rights there? Nobody has a right to migrate here, migration is a privilege, not a right (much like having a drivers license). So how about instead of advancing your own agenda Mr Bushbrownnoser, how about you advance the agenda of those who voted for you?