Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Brian503a's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    California or ground zero of the invasion
    Posts
    16,029

    Our Opinion: Immigration is not an issue for the states

    http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/news/opini ... 06b4_edits

    Monday, January 23, 2006
    Our Opinion: Immigration is not an issue for the states
    Tucson Citizen

    On the issue of illegal immigration, there can be no disagreement on one statement: The federal government is failing to control this nation's borders, and something must be done.

    Nonetheless, we are conflicted by proposals in several states - including in Arizona - to give states a much larger role in preventing illegal immigration.

    We are especially troubled by proposals from Gov. Janet Napolitano to spend $100 million of Arizonans' money on border-related enforcement. And we don't like her plea to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to pay Arizona to station National Guardsmen along the border.

    Napolitano has consistently maintained that immigration and border enforcement are strictly federal responsibilities. She reiterated that point two weeks ago in her State of the State speech.

    But she then said that until and unless the federal government acts, the state should step in "because the situation demands it and our citizens deserve it."

    Other states feel the same way. Last year, states considered nearly 300 immigration-related bills and passed 36 of them, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

    This is an obvious problem. This nation should have one federal immigration policy, not 50 different policies and packages of laws promulgated by the individual states.

    The federal government has been hiring Border Patrol agents and deploying them at a breakneck pace. Technology is being increasingly used along the border to detect illegal incursions.

    Napolitano says that is not happening quickly enough. We agree. We do not, however, agree with her proposed solution: to seek federal money for more National Guardsmen on the border.

    There now are 174 National Guardsmen on the Arizona-Mexico border, assisting the Border Patrol and other officers. The additional troops would not arrest suspected illegal immigrants but would patrol back roads and report on suspicious people, under Napolitano's plan.

    Moves to increase military presence on the border are disturbing. This is law enforcement work that should be performed by properly trained law enforcement officers.

    We also are worried about state moves to require that employers prove that workers they hire are in the country legally. There already are federal laws covering this - laws that are not adequately enforced. Layering on additional state laws is not the answer. And state money should be spent on state issues, not on what is clearly a federal matter.

    Napolitano said "tough and realistic immigration reform, including a guest worker program, must be enacted this year." We agree. Pushing for such federal legislation should be the state's priority - not further muddying the waters with a hodgepodge of state laws.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    8,399
    Who is this "Tucson Citizen". I wonder what his name is and why he keeps referring to "we" as if he has a rat in his pocket.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •