Results 1 to 6 of 6
Like Tree6Likes

Thread: Paul Ryan Portrays Mass Immigration As GOP Principle

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443

    Paul Ryan Portrays Mass Immigration As GOP Principle

    by NEIL MUNRO
    6 May 2016

    House Speaker Paul Ryan apparently wants the GOP to keep importing foreign workers — even though the party’s actual voters are instead backing Donald Trump and his anti-illegal immigration platform.

    The little-noticed reveal came in a Thursday interview on CNN, when Ryan declared that “this is the party of [President Abraham] Lincoln and [President Ronald] Reagan and Jack Kemp.”

    O.K. everyone knows Lincoln and Reagan — but who is Kemp? He’s a former football star, House Representative, cabinet secretary, and failed vice-presidential candidate in 1996.

    The key point is that Ryan worked for Kemp in the 1990s. Kemp was a very forceful personality, with a California-style 1960s can-do-anything personal story. He seems to have persuaded Ryan that the U.S. economy could provide middle-class jobs to endless waves of striving unskilled immigrants, who would then back GOP candidates as they campaigned for smaller government, spending cuts and capital gains rollbacks.

    Ryan’s invocation of Kemp alongside wartime Lincoln and tax-cutting Reagan “is an absurd equation — Kemp has done noting comparable to Lincoln or Reagan,” said Mark Krikorian, the director of the Center for Immigration Studies, which favors reductions in migrant inflows. But Ryan’s vision of the GOP trinity “means that Kemp is his guy, his mentor, his guru.”

    “Americans and immigrants share the same values of work, family and opportunity,” Kemp wrote in 2006.”There is no reason to fear the newcomers arriving on our shores today. If anything, they will energize what is best about our country,” he wrote, while insisting the Americans need a “robust annual flow required to keep our economy growing.”

    Kemp’s immigration principles may have been great for Wall Street and the Chamber of Commerce — but a disaster for blue-collar Americans, GOP politicians and Trump’s establishment rivals in the 2016 race.

    So now Trump is heading towards the 2016 nomination largely because voters picked Trump’s promise of a strong border wall to stop illegals, plus a pause in legal immigration, plus cutbacks in guest-workers, plus a ban against further immigration of Islamic adherents, with their murderous doctrine of jihad and their Islamic scriptures that repeatedly urge hatred towards Christians and Jews, women and gays, secularists, apostates and modernizers.

    But Ryan really doesn’t like Trump’s foreign labor policy, and he laid it on thick in his CNN interview.

    "I’m just not ready to [support Trump] at this point. I’m not there right now … The bulk of the burden on unifying the party will have to come from our presumptive nominee…"

    "We don’t always nominate a Lincoln or a Reagan every four years, but we hope that our nominee aspires to be Lincoln- or Reagan-esque — that that person advances the principles of our party and appeals to a wide, vast majority of Americans … I think what is necessary to make this work, for this to unify, is to actually take our principles and advance them."

    Ryan’s public invocation of Kemp’s immigration principles shows that he’s still wrapped around Kemp’s utterly idealistic vision — even though Kemp’s high immigration/low-wages principles converted his home state, the once Golden State, into political lead for the GOP because poor voters elect Democrats to heavily tax the state’s corps of millionaires and billionaires.

    Kemp’s principles invited the immigrants who helped elect Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012, and welcomed the low-skill immigrants who have flat-lined U.S. productivity and white-collar and blue-collar wages since at least 2000.

    Roughly speaking, 4 million Americans turn 18 each year and begin looking for jobs.

    But the federal government imports roughly 1 million legal immigrants, plus roughly 700,000 guest workers to refresh a standing population of roughly 1.2 million blue-collar and white-collar guest-workers, plus it ignores the resident population of roughly 10 million working illegal immigrants, and also ignores the arrival of several hundred thousand new illegal immigrants. That adds up to two millions foreign workers each year to compete against 4 million new American workers.

    Unsurprisingly, foreign-borne workers now comprise one-sixth of America’s workforce, leaving many millions of Americans unemployed or underemployed.

    Ryan’s own actions also show he’s still entranced by Kemp’s pro-immigration vision.

    In 2014, for example, his secretly drafted legislation to bring in more cheap foreign workers was derailed as the last moment when GOP voters defeated GOP majority Leader Eric Cantor in his primary.

    In December 2015, he backed a House plan that now allow companies to bring in an extra 200,000 cheap foreign workers to take Americans’ jobs in kitchens and hotels, golf courses and resorts. His plan bumped up the annual inflow of guest-workers to roughly 900,000.

    Also, there’s no public evidence that Ryan backed away from his support for the “any willing worker” plan that would allow employers to offer very low wages for jobs and then hire any willing foreign worker once Americans decline the poverty wages.

    And there’s no evidence yet that Trump is backing away from his campaign platform, which is on track to convert Ryan’s cheap-labor GOP into a low-immigration, high-wage party for blue-collar and white-collar Americans.

    “I am not ready to support Speaker Ryan’s agenda,” Trump responded to Ryan in an emailed statement after the CNN interview.

    “Perhaps in the future we can work together and come to an agreement about what is best for the American people. They have been treated so badly for so long that it is about time for politicians to put them first!”

    “It is not clear that the two can stay in the same party,” said Krikorian, who opposed Trump in the 2016 nomination race.

    Ryan sees Trump “as fundamentally non-American in an ideological sense … [because] the [immigration] platform he ran on is fundamentally in contrast to everything Paul Ryan” thinks about the world’s migrants flocking to America, Krikorian added.

    In some way, Ryan share the same beliefs as President Barack Obama, Krikorian said.

    In 2014, for example, Obama told a Democratic audience that Americans do not have the right to exclude migrants. “There have been periods where the folks who were already here suddenly say, ‘Well, I don’t want those folks,’ even though the only people who have the right to say that are some Native Americans,” Obama said.

    "Sometimes we get attached to our particular tribe, our particular race, our particular religion, and then we start treating other folks differently… that, sometimes, has been a bottleneck to how we think about immigration … Whether we cross the Atlantic, or the Pacific, or the Rio Grande, we all shared one thing, and that’s the hope that America would be the place where we could believe as we choose… and that the law would be enforced equally for everybody, regardless of what you look like or what your last name was,” said the president. … That’s the ideal that binds us all together. That’s what’s at stake when we have conversations about immigration."

    Late Thursday, GOP chairman Reince Priebus tried to smooth over Ryan’s cheap-labor and immigration challenge to Trump. “I talked to [Ryan] this afternoon after he made his comments,” Priebus said. “And I talked to Donald Trump, too. And they’re both committed to sitting down and actually talking this out and actually, they’re likely to be meeting next week.”

    http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presid...mpdonaldtrump/
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member posylady's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,553
    Ryan sees Trump “as fundamentally non-American in an ideological sense …
    Does this make Voters Non-American as well. These career politicians have become so out of touch with voters. They are still stumbling around from voters supporting Trump. They still don't get it! Never will these professional politicians need to go all of them no more career politicians that get greedy stuffing their pockets and forget who put them in office.
    Last edited by posylady; 05-06-2016 at 06:36 PM.

  3. #3
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    67,646
    Trump needs to win the Presidency in 2016 then focus on sweeping the RINOs out of Congress in 2018! And he needs to be wise enough to choose the man who's endorsement did the most for him in the primary as a running mate / VP.... Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions!

    W
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Moderator Beezer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    30,785
    I agree on Jeff Session 100%, have always thought he would be best pick. All the Trump supporters like Sessions policies and those two could really get things done and clean house.

    This is the change we need and we need it now. Both parties need an overhaul. No more kicking the can down the road, no more waffling on issues.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    Scott Brown is the best VP pick. DEM Elizabeth Warren beat him in the US Senate race in Massachusetts. And look what she's done? NOTHING. Another DEM incumbent woman beat him in New Hampshire Senate race when he tried to run there. And look what she's done? NOTHING.

    Scott Brown is the perfect VP candidate to defeat the "woman card". Our country has so many talented competent women, but for some reason they are not in politics and we have ended up with too many women in government who didn't deliver, not because they were women, simply because they were the wrong people to serve our country with the wrong backgrounds, wrong philosophies, wrong views, and wrong "whatever".

    Scott Brown is with US and has always been with US on trade and immigration.

    I adore Jeff Sessions but I don't see him agreeing to the VP slot, because I think he knows that he can't help the ticket from other standpoints and his running would just create a huge vacuum in the Senate for our issues. Where would the Senate be without Sessions? We don't progress if we move good people in crucial positions to new high-risk positions leaving sink-holes behind them with a new high-risk unproven someone.

    Scott Brown is available, heis a retired Army Colonel with 35 years of military experience, he can whup Lindsey Graham in any argument, any time, anywhere. Scott Brown has almost 15 years of legislative experience, 12 as a state rep and state senator of Massachusetts and 3 as a US Senator. He knows how the process works and how to pass legislation. He's articulate, personable, tough, pleasant, and smart. He's Tufts University BA in history cum laude and Boston College Law School, not globalist Harvard or Yale.

    Brown is perfect for this job. He was the first to endorse Trump and has had his back on target every time every day since before New Hampshire. Trump and Brown can win this thing. Brown is also a social liberal like many of US, but tough on trade and immigration like all of US here. Brown can help Trump win the General Election.

    Besides, he's gorgeous.



    And anyone who says looks don't matter in politics when you have brains, experience and courage to go with it .... well, they're just wrong.

    SCOTT BROWN FOR VP

    Plus: Brown says he doesn't want it and is pushing John Thune for VP. What does this mean? It means Brown puts the country before himself, he's not ambitious for his own purposes, and you know what that means, right? Yup. That means he's not a wannabe, it means he cares more for our country than himself, which means: he's Trump II.
    Last edited by Judy; 05-07-2016 at 10:50 AM.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  6. #6
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012
    Not consistent.

    Paul Ryan on Immigration

    Republican nominee for Vice President; U.S. Rep. (WI-1)
    Send illegal immigrant kids back to Central America

    Q: On immigration, you voted to support a law that basically created a situation we have now, which is those who come to the border from Central America have to be put into a process where they are evaluated before they can be instantly deported. Do you have a different view of how that should happen now? Do you think these children and others, tens of thousands of them, should be sent back home?REP. PAUL RYAN: Yes, I do. Otherwise the humanitarian crisis will continue. Otherwise families in countries far away, on the other side of Mexico will be giving thousands of dollars to traffickers to take their children over the border and the humanitarian crisis will get worse. So I do believe we need to amend this law, which never intended for this to happen, to make sure that you can treat people in noncontiguous countries just like we do Mexicans and Canadians so that we can stop this crisis.
    Source: Meet the Press 2014 interviews of 2016 presidential hopefuls , Jul 27, 2014

    Immigration reform possible after the border is secure

    Q: Listening to both you and President Obama this week, it does sound like you could reach a compromise on immigration reform, one that opens a path to citizenship to for the undocumented, but doesn't necessarily have a special path for the undocumented. But this talk of compromise has unleashed a furious debate inside your own party.RYAN: We don't know who's coming and going in this country. We don't have control of our border. We don't have control of interior enforcement. Here's the issue that all Republicans agree on--we don't trust the president to enforce the law. So if you actually look at the standards that the Republican leadership put out: first we have to secure the border, have interior enforcement, which is a worker verification system, a visa tracking program. Those things have to be in law, in practice and independently verified before the rest of the law can occur. So it's a security force first, non-amnesty approach.
    Source: ABC This Week 2014 series of 2016 presidential hopefuls , Feb 16, 2014

    Not "trust but verify"; need "verify then trust" approach

    Q: A "Weekly Standard" editorial said, "Bringing immigration to the floor ensures a circular GOP firing squad. There's really no need to act this year on immigration; don't even try." Your response?RYAN: This is not one of those issues where it has some kind of a deadline behind it, like, say, a government shutdown, which forces us into a compromise we might not like to take. This is a "here are our standards; this is what we're willing to do." And we're still having a debate in our caucus about even that. But we don't think that we can allow this border to continue to be overrun. And if we can get security first, no amnesty, before anything happens, we think that's a good approach. This is not a trust but verify, this is a verify then trust approach.
    Q: Can you put something on the president's desk that he can sign?
    RYAN: I really don't know the answer to that question. It depends on whether we can do that, where it's security first, no amnesty, then we might be able to get somewhere.
    Source: ABC This Week 2014 series of 2016 presidential hopefuls , Feb 16, 2014

    Step-by-step approach, not a big massive immigration bill

    Q: Sen. Lindsey Graham says the GOP is in a downward demographic death spiral unless you figure out some way to reform immigration.RYAN: I disagree that we should approach this issue based on what's right for us politically. We should approach this issue on what we think is the right thing to do. We have been listening to the American people. So what we're going to do is take a step-by-step approach to get immigration right, not a big massive bill. Number one, we don't have control of our border. And we need interior enforcement to know who's coming and going. And right now, people come to this country based on family relations, not based on skills. Most other countries have a legal immigration system that's good for their country, we should do the same. And when it comes to the undocumented, people who came here illegally, we want to give people a chance to get right with the law while not doing an amnesty. Pay fines, pay back taxes, get a background check, learn English, learn civics.
    Source: CBS Face the Nation 2013 series: 2016 presidential hopefuls , Aug 4, 2013

    Earned legalization while respecting the rule of law

    Q: You have said that you would support an immigration bill that included a pathway for citizenship, correct?RYAN: Yes, absolutely, because we think there's a way to do this through earned legalization without rewarding people for having come in with undocumented status, illegally. We don't want to give them an advantage over those who came here legally and we think there's a way to do this while still respecting the rule of law. It's clear that what the president is talking about does not do that. I have a long record of immigration reform. I'm not a Johnny-come-lately on this issue. We've always believed that there is a way of doing this while respecting the rule of law, that's the delicate balance that needs to be achieved for this to be bipartisan and the president on most of these issues and this one now, like the others, seems to be looking for a partisan advantage and not bringing the parties together.
    Source: ABC This Week 2013 interviews: 2016 presidential hopefuls , Feb 17, 2013

    Demand enforcement of immigration laws, without amnesty


    • Fighting to secure our border & combat illegal immigration.
    • I believe that the failure of our nation's immigration policy is both a national security issue and an economic issue.
    • Committed to strengthening legal immigration, ensuring that we have a fair and effective process for those seeking to take part in the American Dream legally.
    • Introduced an enforceable employee verification system that combats identity theft and avoids a 'big brother' verification system.

    It is abundantly clear that our immigration system is broken, and Congress' efforts to reform our broken system have failed. I have supported past efforts to strengthen our immigration laws and demanded enforcement of them, opposing any proposals that include amnesty for those that have violated our laws. We need solutions that preserve the rule of law and do not reward illegal behavior. Illegal immigration, which is a direct result of this flawed system, is an affront to the rule of law and an unacceptable security riskSource: 2012 House campaign website, ryanforcongress.com, "Issues" , Aug 11, 2012

    Make border fence construction a top priority

    Operational control of our borders should be among the highest priorities of Congress. Every nation has the right to control entry and exit across its border. Porous borders leave us susceptible to the illegal crossing of terrorists, drug lords, and gang members, placing our homeland security in serious jeopardy. I have been a vocal proponent in calling upon Congress to make border fence construction a top priority, and will continue working toward enforcement of our nation's borders.Source: 2012 House campaign website, ryanforcongress.com, "Issues" , Aug 11, 2012

    More employer penalties but no "big brother" database

    In order to allow employers to easily and accurately verify an employee's legal status in a timely matter, I have introduced the New Employee Verification Act. This bipartisan proposal protects an employee's information from identity theft while creating a verification tool that is accurate, secure, and immediate. It provides enhanced employer penalties for those who knowingly violate our laws and avoids a "big brother" law enforcement agency building new databases on law abiding citizens.Source: 2012 House campaign website, ryanforcongress.com, "Issues" , Aug 11, 2012

    Voted YES on building a fence along the Mexican border.

    Within 18 months, achieves operational control over U.S. land and maritime borders, including:
    1. systematic border surveillance through more effective use of personnel and technology; and
    2. physical infrastructure enhancements to prevent unlawful border entry



    Defines "operational control" as the prevention of all unlawful U.S. entries, including entries by terrorists, other unlawful aliens, narcotics, and other contraband.

    Proponents support voting YES because:
    It is obvious there is no more defining issue in our Nation today than stopping illegal immigration. The most basic obligation of any government is to secure the Nation's borders. One issue in which there appears to be a consensus between the Senate and the House is on the issue of building a secure fence. So rather than wait until comprehensive legislation is enacted, we should move forward on targeted legislation which is effective and meaningful. The legislation today provides over 700 miles of two-layered reinforced fencing, and for the rest of the border provides a virtual fence, via integrated surveillance technology.

    Opponents support voting NO because:
    Just to build the fence is going to cost us at least $7 billion. Where is the money coming from to pay for it? How much is it going to cost to maintain this 700-mile fence? Who is going to do it? This bill contains no funding.
    This bill also ignores real enforcement measures, like hiring more Border Patrol personnel, and instead builds a Berlin Wall on our southern border. So long as employers need workers in this country, and while our immigration systems impede rather than facilitate timely access of willing workers to those opportunities, undocumented immigration will never be controlled.
    Walls, barriers, and military patrols will only force those immigrants to utilize ever more dangerous routes and increase the number of people who die in search of an opportunity to feed and clothe their families.
    Reference: Secure Fence Act; Bill H R 6061 ; vote number 2006-446 on Sep 14, 2006

    Voted YES on preventing tipping off Mexicans about Minuteman Project.

    Voting YES on this amendment supports the Minuteman Project, a group of volunteers who have taken on surveillance of the Mexican border for illegal immigrants. The amendment states that US funds will not be used to tell the Mexican government about the whereabouts of the Minuteman Project volunteers. Proponents of the Minuteman Project say that they are volunteer citizens doing what the federal government SHOULD be doing, but has failed to do. Opponents of the Minuteman Project say that they are vigilantes at best and anti-Mexican racists at worst. The amendment states:
    None of the funds made available by this Act may be used to provide a foreign government information relating to the activities of an organized volunteer civilian action group, operating in the State of California, Texas, New Mexico, or Arizona, unless required by international treaty.

    • The amendment's sponsor said on its behalf:
    • What this amendment does is it clarifies Congress' position on a Border Patrol practice or a practice of the US Government that tips off illegal immigrants as to where citizen patrols may be located.
    • As a response to the lawlessness along the Mexican border, a group has sprung up called the Minutemen Project, and the Minutemen Project is definitely not politically correct in Washington DC. However, they filled a void which the government was unable to fill.
    • There are over 7,000 volunteers in the Minutemen organization, and their help has been productive and good.
    • What my amendment does is simply says that the U.S. Government cannot tip off the Mexican officials as to where these folks are located. Plain and simple, nothing fancy about it. I am sure the Border Patrol will say, oh, no, we are not doing that, and yet one of the Web pages of the Secretary of Mexico had the information very explicit, and we just do not believe that is a good practice.

    Reference: Department of Homeland Security appropriations; Bill HR 5441 Amendment 968 ; vote number 2006-224 on Jun 6, 2006

    Voted NO on reporting illegal aliens who receive hospital treatment.

    Vote to pass the bill that would require hospitals to gather and report information on possible illegal aliens before hospitals can be reimbursed for treating them. The bill would also make employers liable for the reimbursements if an undocumented employee seeks medical attention, unless the employer meets particular conditions for exemption. The bill would specify that hospitals aren't required to provide care to undocumented aliens if they can be transported to their home country without a significant chance of worsening their condition.Reference: Undocumented Alien Emergency Medical Assistance Amendments; Bill HR 3722 ; vote number 2004-182 on May 20, 2004

    Voted YES on extending Immigrant Residency rules.

    Vote on motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill that would extend by four months a law allowing some immigrants to remain in the country while pursuing legal residency.Reference: Motion sponsoerd by Gekas, R-PA; Bill HR1885 ; vote number 2001-127 on May 21, 2001

    Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.

    Ryan scores 0% by FAIR on immigration issuesThe Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) is a national, non-profit, public interest membership organization of concerned citizens united by their belief in the need for immigration reform. Founded in 1979, FAIR believes that the U.S. can and must have an immigration policy that is non-discriminatory and designed to serve the environmental, economic, and social needs of our country.
    FAIR seeks to improve border security, to stop illegal immigration, and to promote immigration levels consistent with the national interest—more traditional rates of about 300,000 a year.
    With more than 70,000 members nationwide, FAIR is a non-partisan group whose membership runs the gamut from liberal to conservative.
    The ratings are based on the votes the organization considered most important; the numbers reflect the percentage of time the representative voted the organization's preferred position.
    Source: FAIR website 03n-FAIR on Dec 31, 2003

    Comprehensive immigration reform without amnesty.

    Ryan co-sponsored for comprehensive immigration reform without amnesty

    SPONSOR'S INTRODUCTORY REMARKS: Sen. McCAIN: This bipartisan, comprehensive immigration reform legislation is designed to fix our Nation's broken immigration system. While in previous years we worked independently on immigration reform legislation, we are coming together today to introduce what we believe is groundbreaking, comprehensive legislation. Over a year ago, the President laid out a framework for what comprehensive immigration reform should look like. We have used the President's framework to craft this package.

    The simple fact is that America's immigration system is broken. Recent vigilante activities along the southwestern border have shown that the current situation is not sustainable. Americans are frustrated with our lack of border security and our inability to control illegal immigration.
    Make no mistake, this is not an amnesty bill. We are not here to reward law-breakers, and any accusations to the contrary are patently untrue. This bill recognizes the problems inherent in the current system and provides a logical and effective means to address these problems. It would be impossible to identify and round up all 10 to 11 million of the current undocumented, and if we did, it would ground our Nation's economy to a halt. These millions of people are working. Aliens will not come forward to simply "report and deport." We have a national interest in identifying these individuals, incentivizing them to come forward out of the shadows, go through security background checks, pay back taxes, pay penalties for breaking the law, learn to speak English, and regularize their status. Anyone who thinks this goal can be achieved without providing an eventual path to a permanent legal status is not serious about solving this problem.

    LEGISLATIVE OUTCOME:

    Referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary; never came to a vote. [The famous McCain-Kennedy legislation which DID come to a vote was the 2007 version of this bill].

    Source: Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act (S.1033/H.R.2330) 05-S1033 on May 12, 2005

    Rated 83% by USBC, indicating a sealed-border stance.

    Ryan scores 83% by USBC on immigration issues

    OnTheIssues.org interprets the 2005-2006 USBC scores as follows:

    • 0%-30%: open-border stance (approx. 197 members)
    • 30%-70%: mixed record on open borders (approx. 70 members)
    • 70%-100%: sealed-border stance (approx. 202 members)

    About USBC (from their website, www.usbc.org):U.S. Border Control, founded in 1988, is a non-profit, tax-exempt, citizen's lobby. USBC is dedicated to ending illegal immigration by securing our nation's borders and reforming our immigration policies. USBC [works with] Congressmen to stop amnesty; seal our borders against terrorism and illegal immigration; and, preserve our nation's language, culture and American way of life for future generations.

    Our organization accepts no financial support from any branch of government. All our support comes from concerned citizens who appreciate the work we are doing to seal our borders against drugs, disease, illegal migration and terrorism and wish to preserve our nation's language, culture and heritage for the next generations.
    Source: USBC website 06n-USBC on Dec 31, 2006


    2012 Governor, House and Senate candidates on Immigration: Paul Ryan on other issues:
    WI Gubernatorial:
    Scott Walker
    WI Senatorial:
    Tammy Baldwin

    Newly-elected Democrats taking office Jan.2015:
    AZ-7: Rep.-Elect Ruben Gallego
    CA-11:Rep.-Elect Mark DeSaulnier
    CA-31:Rep.-Elect Pete Aguilar(R⇒D)
    CA-33:Rep.-Elect Ted Lieu
    CA-35:Rep.-Elect Norma Torres
    FL-2: Rep.-Elect Gwen Graham(R⇒D)
    HI-1: Rep.-Elect Mark Takai
    MA-6: Rep.-Elect Seth Moulton
    MI-12:Rep.-Elect Debbie Dingell
    MI-14:Rep.-Elect Brenda Lawrence
    NE-2: Rep.-Elect Brad Ashford(R⇒D)
    NJ-12:Rep.-Elect Bonnie Coleman
    NY-4: Rep.-Elect Kathleen Rice
    PA-13:Rep.-Elect Brendan Boyle
    VA-8: Rep.-Elect Donald Beyer
    Seated in special elections 2013-2014:
    AL-1: Bradley Byrne(R)
    FL-13:David Jolly(R)
    FL-19:Curt Clawson(R)
    IL-2: Robin Kelly(D)
    LA-5: Vance McAllister(R)
    MA-5: Katherine Clark(D)
    MO-8: Jason Smith(R)
    NC-12:Alma Adams(D)
    NJ-1: Donald Norcross(D)
    SC-1: Mark Sanford(R)
    VA-7: Dave Brat(R)

    Newly-elected Republicans taking office Jan.2015:
    AR-2: Rep.-Elect French Hill
    AR-4: Rep.-Elect Bruce Westerman
    AL-6: Rep.-Elect Gary Palmer
    CA-25:Rep.-Elect Steve Knight
    CA-45:Rep.-Elect Mimi Walters
    CO-4: Rep.-Elect Ken Buck
    FL-26:Rep.-Elect Carlos Curbelo(D⇒R)
    GA-1: Rep.-Elect Buddy Carter
    GA-10:Rep.-Elect Jody Hice
    GA-11:Rep.-Elect Barry Loudermilk
    GA-12:Rep.-Elect Rick Allen(D⇒R)
    IA-1: Rep.-Elect Rod Blum(D⇒R)
    IA-3: Rep.-Elect David Young
    IL-10:Rep.-Elect Robert Dold(D⇒R)
    IL-12:Rep.-Elect Mike Bost(D⇒R)
    More newly-elected Republicans taking office Jan.2015:
    LA-5: Rep.-Elect Ralph Abraham
    LA-6: Rep.-Elect Garret Graves
    ME-2: Rep.-Elect Bruce Poliquin(D⇒R)
    MI-4: Rep.-Elect John Moolenaar
    MI-8: Rep.-Elect Mike Bishop
    MI-11:Rep.-Elect Dave Trott
    MN-6: Rep.-Elect Tom Emmer
    MT-0: Rep.-Elect Ryan Zinke
    NC-6: Rep.-Elect Mark Walker
    NC-7: Rep.-Elect David Rouzer(D⇒R)
    NH-1: Rep.-Elect Frank Guinta(D⇒R)
    NJ-3: Rep.-Elect Tom MacArthur
    NV-4: Rep.-Elect Cresent Hardy(D⇒R)
    NY-1: Rep.-Elect Lee Zeldin(D⇒R)
    NY-21:Rep.-Elect Elise Stefanik(D⇒R)
    NY-24:Rep.-Elect John Katko
    OK-5: Rep.-Elect Steve Russell
    PA-6: Rep.-Elect Ryan Costello
    TX-4: Rep.-Elect John Ratcliffe
    TX-23:Rep.-Elect Will Hurd
    TX-36:Rep.-Elect Brian Babin
    UT-4: Rep.-Elect Mia Love(D⇒R)
    VA-10:Rep.-Elect Barbara Comstock
    WA-4: Rep.-Elect Dan Newhouse
    WI-6: Rep.-Elect Glenn Grothman
    WV-2: Rep.-Elect Alex Mooney
    WV-3: Rep.-Elect Evan Jenkins(D⇒R)




    http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Pau...mmigration.htm

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-08-2016, 02:36 PM
  2. Paul Ryan Objects to ‘Mass Deportation’ of Illegal Immigrants
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-28-2016, 09:48 AM
  3. After Backing Paul Ryan Amnesty Push, Mick Mulvaney Gets Skittish On Ryan Speakership
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-19-2015, 09:52 AM
  4. ‘VOTE FOR PAUL RYAN IS VOTE FOR AMNESTY': LUIS GUTIERREZ ENDORSES PAUL RYAN FOR SPEAK
    By Newmexican in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-12-2015, 12:41 AM
  5. A tale of two Pauls: Rand Paul and Paul Ryan differ on immigration reform
    By kathyet in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-24-2013, 05:11 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •