Thread: 'Sanctuary' Granting Officials May Be Prosecuted

'Sanctuary' Granting Officials May Be Prosecuted

By James Walsh
Friday, 02 Dec 2016 09:55 AM

Some state governors, mayors, and others that boastfully claim they will not obey the federal law pertaining to immigration are subjecting themselves to possible federal criminal prosecution. State and local officials are not exempt from prosecution if they are encouraging or inducing an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States without inspection, or if they are harboring or protecting aliens in the United States without inspection.

The mayors of cities like New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Oakland, Washington, D.C., and numerous other governmental units speak with the bravado of carnival hucksters as they pedal "sanctuary" protection for illegal aliens and visa overstays. These officials are not speaking responsibly as their duty is the protection, safety, and well-being of their residents and concern for national security.

The illegal aliens in America have not been inspected and properly vetted for criminal activities, health maladies, or terrorist ties. There are too many examples of illegal aliens committing crimes against citizens, engaging in terrorist endeavors, and causing injuries to citizens due to driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol to ignore. The political elders of San Francisco have a history of favoring freedom and protection of illegal aliens over the safety and welfare of American citizens. The death of Kate Steinle is an example.

In late November 2016 at Ohio State University, a Somali refugee student, allegedly 18 years of age and in the United States for 2 years, attempted to kill people with his car and a knife. His terrorist act injured 11 people. Many questions surround this criminal’s refugee status and his age.

The U.S. Attorney General has the duty to enforce the laws of the United States and present evidence of all possible criminal violations of federal immigration laws to grand juries. The grand juries determine whether or not probable cause exists that any person violated federal laws, regardless of rank and privilege.

In addition to possibly withholding federal monies programmed for the state and local venues that violate immigration laws the federal government may bring criminal actions against the state and local officials.

Acts and statements by state or local officials declaring their venues "sanctuary" locations and impede federal officers in performance of their duties may constitute criminal violations of federal laws. There is no such thing as "sanctuary" in American jurisprudence — it is a myth created by open border advocates, Democrats, anarchists, and the newsmedia.

The United States Attorneys’ Manual sets out instructions apropos to indicting and trying persons who violate federal immigration laws. Federal courts have ruled that local law enforcement officers are authorized to make arrests for violations of federal statutes. (8 USC sections 3041 and 1324 (c))

Three of the federal statutes that are specifically applicable to state and local officials and others who may be violating federal law include:

8 USC section 1324 (a) (1) (A) (iii) makes it an offense for any person who knowingly or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection such alien.

8 USC section 1324 (a) (1) (A) (iv) makes it an offense for any person who encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowingly or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of the law.

8 USC section 1324 (a) (1) (A) (v) expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or to aid or abet the commission of the above offenses.

The state and local government officials that boast about violating the immigration laws have adopted the same elitist blasé attitude and arrogance that Hillary Clinton exhibited for her violations of federal laws. These officials are mainly Democrats that consider open borders a necessity to globalize America, deny America’s exceptionalism, and blame America for the ills of the world.

Wily Democrat politicians like Boston mayor Martin J. Walsh speak with forked tongues. Walsh derides President-elect Trump’s immigration plans, but does not go so far as to proclaim Boston as a "sanctuary" city. Such artful politicians give genuine patriotic politicians a bad name.

The incoming Attorney General should determine whether it would be appropriate for U.S. Attorneys around the country to present to their respective grand juries the actions of "sanctuary"-endorsing officials for violating federal laws.

If this occurs, the myth of "sanctuary" would vaporize into oblivion.

Americans need to be assured that we are still a nation of laws and no one is above the law.

James H. Walsh was associate general counsel with the U.S. Department of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Service from 1983 to 1994.

http://www.newsmax.com/JamesWalsh/sa.../02/id/761801/

Beezer found this great article and asked me to post it. Thank you Beezer. Very good information on these lawbreaking sanctuary cities. They should be prosecuted to the letter and verse.

PLEASE start prosecuting them in L.A.....used to live there.....start with one....succeed ....and then watch the others have a change of heart!!!!!!

Thanks for posting for me. I would like to know how this affects the Driver's Licenses issued to illegal aliens and can Trump deem them NULL and VOID? This is directly aiding and abetting illegal aliens and giving them State issued ID's using taxpayer funds.

Also, California DMV automatically registered illegals to vote...they need to be PURGED from the Voter Registration. These DMVs need to be severely punished for this.

Americans need to be assured that we are still a nation of laws and no one is above the law.

Right on! What a concept!

I hope this applies to the Sanctuary Churches...they are NOT above the Law either.

Go do your good deeds in Mexico...we are a Nation of Laws and this is NOT acceptable.

These churches aiding and abetting illegal aliens aren't doing this for "good deeds'. They're doing it for money. Donations from drug-cartels and drug-cartel backed illegal aliens. It's why the Catholic Church sides with illegal aliens instead of citizens. It's all about the money, not "good deeds".

If any of these 501 C 3 outfits that take in over $1.4 trillion a year in revenue were interested in "good deeds", we wouldn't need a government Medicaid program which together with SCHIP, food stamps, free school lunch and HUD add up to less than what 501 C 3 "charity" organizations collect annually. So if they were interested in "good deeds", like feeding the poor, healing the sick or providing shelter for those stuck on the "cold prairie", we wouldn't need a Medicaid, SCHIP, Food Stamp, Free School Lunch or HUD program to begin with. The income tax has defrauded the American People out of everything we once believed in.

I heard a former rich CEO named Ballmer talking today on the Cavuto Show about his big plan to donate his fortune to "charity". And this guy made the most unbelievable statement, as if he knows the problem but has no intention of doing anything to fix it, he says "my wife and I are looking around trying to figure out what to do with it, and we can't decide, after all we're not going to give it to people directly who need it, because that's of course government's responsibility."

WHAT?!! Why is it government's responsibility when our government is bankrupt? Well, I know the answer of why he said it. He said it because if you give money directly to people who need it, a homeless person, a starving child, someone who is sick, it's NOT TAX DEDUCTIBLE.

You give it to the Heritage Foundation to pay the highly educated big salaries, because that is tax-deductible.

GO FIGURE.

The income tax is evil, it leads people into evil acts and distorts the natural order. The income tax has made government the controller of poverty and suffering, preventing those who want to help others from actually doing so. It's wickedness in its truest form.

SO LOCK 'EM UP!!

I know...I was trying to be "polite"...LOL

They do their "good deeds" in the guise of raking in the money. These Churches have turned into nothing but big money making schemes and they should all lose their tax exempt status.

Let them pay for their liberals ideas and New World Order in the form of taxation! Then they will change their tune when it hits THEIR pockets.

I agree 1000%

Yeah, exactly. And under the FairTax, they operate like a business, which is what they are, on the same rules. You sell it, you collect the tax, you give it away you don't. Very simple, and the way it ought to be. Under the FairTax, people who can and want to help others directly can do so without any tax penalty. You can go into a city, find the worst situations, and help those people to get a better home, to find a job, to get a car, to afford day care, to relocate to a better area where there are jobs, to help someone who needs an operation, to help a family dealing with a sick family member, whatever it is that you see that you want to solve, you can do it without losing a tax deduction. With the FairTax there is no income tax and nothing to deduct from.

http://www.fairtaxfraud.com/fallout.asp