Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
02-01-2013, 12:06 AM #1
Schumer: Legalizing Illegal immigrants won’t be stopped by border security needs
4:21 PM 01/31/2013
The Daily Caller
New York Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer said securing the nation’s borders should not be used as “a barrier” to giving illegal immigrants living in the U.S. a pathway to citizenship.
“We want the border to be secure. It’s more secure than it was several years ago, but it has a ways to go. And different sectors need different types of security. It’s a lot different having security in the Tucson sector than off the stretch in Texas, which is bounded by the Rio Grande,” Schumer said on Thursday.
“But we’re not using border security as an excuse or block to the path of citizenship. We just want to make sure — and this is very important both substantively and politically — that there is a secure border, and we’re going to work for that. But it’s not — and Dick [Durbin] and I and Bob [Menendez], as well as our three Republican friends, want to make sure the border’s secure but not to use it as a barrier to prevent the 11 million from eventually gaining a path to citizenship.”
Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, who joined a bipartisan group to announce an immigration reform blueprint earlier this week, argues that increased border security should come before a pathway to citizenship.
“The only way that I know to incentivize the enforcement part is to say that the green card stuff doesn’t even begin to happen until the enforcement happens first,” said Rubio.
“That trigger is critically important, otherwise it will never happen. That’s why we are where we are today. Because when they did this in 1986, they did not do the enforcement, and that led to 11 million people. We will be right back here again in ten years or less if we don’t do the enforcement.”
The Obama administration’s latest reports on the state of security on the U.S.-Mexico border paint a bleak picture.
The Department of Justice’s National Drug Intelligence Center (NDIC), which is now closed, reported in 2011 that Mexican drug cartels “control access” to the U.S.-Mexico border. The NDIC said the U.S.-Mexico border remains “the primary gateway for moving the bulk of illicit drugs into the United States.”
The NDIC’s last report warned that conditions within “border communities along both sides of the Texas-Mexico border are tantamount to living in a war zone in which civil authorities, law enforcement agencies as well as citizens are under attack around the clock.”
The Obama administration decided to reduce the number of troops on the U.S.-Mexico border in December of 2011.
The Government Accountability Office reported in February 2011 that only 129 of the nearly 2,000 mile U.S.-Mexico border have been classified as “controlled” by Customs and Border Protection.
“Border Patrol reported achieving varying levels of operational control for 873 of the nearly 2,000 southwest border miles at the end of fiscal year 2010,” said the GAO’s Preliminary Observations on Border Control Measures for the Southwest Border report released February 15, 2011.
“GAO’s preliminary analysis of the 873 border miles under operational control in 2010 showed that about 129 miles (15 percent) were classified as ‘controlled’ and the remaining 85 percent were classified as ‘managed.’”
A spokesperson for the GAO told TheDC that their border report from almost two years ago is the latest on record.
Schumer: Border security should not block legalizing illegals | The Daily CallerWe have immigration laws that just need to be enforced.
02-01-2013, 01:22 AM #2We have immigration laws that just need to be enforced.
02-01-2013, 02:26 AM #3
Bill Clinton needs to get Chuck on a plane to the Dominican Republic as quickly as possible ..U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: GUARANTEES AMERICA FROM INVASION!
02-01-2013, 02:28 AM #4
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
Quote: "Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, who joined a bipartisan group to announce an immigration reform blueprint earlier this week, argues that increased border security should come before a pathway to citizenship."
Rubio misses the point, or wants to trick us into missing the key point that is not about border security coming "before a pathway to citizenship."
Under Rubio's scheme, illegal aliens would get probationary status, i.e., amnesty, the first minute -- before any so-called enforcement triggers or "increased border security" kicked in.
So it's not "path to citizenship" or even citizenship, it would be their instant legal status with NO guarantee of real enforcement. In other words, a repeat of 1986 all over again.
If Rubio was sincere, he would insist on E-Verify and real border security before any probationary legal status, not just before a "path to citizenship."
02-01-2013, 02:21 PM #5
Oh Lord forgive me, but my hatred for this smarmy, ugly "man" knows no bounds. His simpering whiney voice is like nails down a chalk board to me.
He is effectively telling us that our safety does not matter, just his precious illegals.
The Dominican Republic is too good for him. The bottom of an abandoned well in messico is far more suitable.It's immoral to vote for any candidate who is not going to uphold the fundamental tenets of our Constitution ~ Chuck Baldwin