Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member xanadu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    958

    Senate refuses to discuss Hawaiian sovererignty

    http://insider.washingtontimes.com/a...8-111752-1736r

    Senate blocks floor debate on Hawaiian sovereignty
    By Brian DeBose
    THE WASHINGTON TIMES
    June 9, 2006

    The Senate yesterday blocked the annual effort to grant Hawaiians the ability to form a sovereign government similar to those operated by American Indians and Alaskans.

    The so-called Akaka bill, named for Sen. Daniel K. Akaka, Hawaii Democrat, died on a 56-41 procedural vote, four shy of the 60 needed to allow a floor debate.

    Mr. Akaka, who has pushed the bill for seven years, said he was disappointed by the outcome but buoyed by growing support for the legislation.

    "Native Hawaiians have been recognized as an indigenous people deserving of justice, equality and the recognition according to the other indigenous peoples of the United States," said Mr. Akaka, who is backed by the Hawaiian congressional delegation and Hawaii's Republican governor.

    Opponents, including many Republican Senators, say the bill violates the Constitution by creating a race-based government.

    Thirteen Republicans -- including, Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona, one of the bill's chief opponents -- voted for a floor debate. Mr. Kyl would not elaborate on why he voted for cloture except to say, "I made a commitment, and I honor my commitments." Two Democrats, Sens. Charles E. Schumer of New York and John D. Rockefeller IV of West Virginia, did not vote.

    Mr. Akaka will have to wait another year to try for a floor debate, but the Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act will continue to be discussed in the Senate and in Hawaii, where divisions about the bill's constitutional legality remain sharp.

    "The only justification for this bill, to allow what no other group of people would be able to do, is that they are just another Indian tribe," said Sen. Lamar Alexander, Tennessee Republican.

    Under U.S. law, Indian tribes can be recognized only if they have operated as a sovereign entity in the past 100 years and lived in a distinct, separate area. Mr. Alexander said, "Native Hawaiians have not."

    "This would be the creation of a tribe. This bill would create a new competing government in Hawaii, and it is the wrong way to right the wrongs committed in Hawaii," Mr. Alexander said.

    Hawaii Attorney General Mark Bennett, a Republican, said the argument about a lack of sovereign government operation in the past 100 years is moot because the U.S. government acknowledged in a 1993 apology resolution that it illegally overthrew the last Hawaiian monarch.

    "The argument that this bill is illegal because it is race-based is a legal non sequitur," Mr. Bennett said. "Race-based programs are presumptively illegal, but those with respect to Native Americans and Alaskans are not; Congress' power to recognize or derecognize a native-indigenous group is exclusive and plenary."
    Hawaiians who oppose the legislation cite poor relations between Congress and nations run by American Indians and Alaskans.

    "If you look at these negotiations other Native American tribes have had, they are left with 2.2 percent of their land and the situation of poverty and poor education gets worse than they were before the negotiations began," said 'Ehu Kekahu Cardwell, director of the Kohani Foundation, a grass-roots group of Native Hawaiians who oppose the bill.
    "Liberty CANNOT be preserved without general knowledge among people" John Adams (August 1765)

  2. #2
    Senior Member xanadu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    958
    Just an addition to this article. Native American Indians have a major class action suit active against the United States government and it (unlike other numerous lawsuits) is progressing.
    "Liberty CANNOT be preserved without general knowledge among people" John Adams (August 1765)

  3. #3
    Senior Member Shapka's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Staten Island, New York
    Posts
    3,044
    What the heck is wrong with Kyl?!

    Now he's pulling a Jeff Sessions?

    Patting us on the back before he jabs the shiv into our spine...

    Reporting without fear or favor-American Rattlesnake

  4. #4
    Senior Member Virginiamama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    2,088
    How did Sessions stab us in the back?
    Equal rights for all, special privileges for none. Thomas Jefferson

  5. #5
    Politicalactivist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    185
    Senator Kyl voted against S-2611; he voted for cloture of S-2611.
    http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... ic&t=29492

  6. #6
    Senior Member xanadu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    958
    How did Sessions stab us in the back?
    Not that I heard.
    "Liberty CANNOT be preserved without general knowledge among people" John Adams (August 1765)

  7. #7
    Senior Member Shapka's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Staten Island, New York
    Posts
    3,044
    Quote Originally Posted by Virginiamama
    How did Sessions stab us in the back?
    http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... ic&t=29492
    Reporting without fear or favor-American Rattlesnake

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •