Thread: Speaker Boehner's Office: 'President's Unilateral Action Sets Stage for Another Surge

Speaker Boehner's Office: 'President's Unilateral Action Sets Stage for Another Surge of Illegal Immigration'

by Caroline May 25 Nov 2014, 12:35 PM PDT 7 post a comment

A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner is warning of more illegal immigration in the wake of President Obama’s executive amnesty.

In a Tuesday dispatch from the Speaker’s office, spokesman Matt Wolking detailed recent developments which offer insights as to how the “president’s unilateral action sets [the] stage for another surge of illegal immigration.”

Wolking highlighted the recent warning from, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson in which he said, “I’m concerned about the possibility of another rise in illegal migration.”

The next day, Wolking recounts, Obama moved forward with his executive amnesty.

“Just one day later, President Obama announced he was unilaterally granting amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants who are already in the country – a move that will almost certainly ‘encourage more people to come here illegally, putting their lives at risk,’ Speaker Boehner noted,” Wolking wrote.

The post concludes that President Obama’s executive action will make the problem of illegal immigration in the U.S. worse and make people more vulnerable to human smugglers — something the President Obama himself once acknowledged.

Read the full dispatch, titled "President’s Unilateral Action Sets Stage for Another Surge of Illegal Immigration":

On Wednesday last week, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson delivered a blunt warning. “I’m concerned about the possibility of another rise in illegal migration,” he said, referring to the flood of unaccompanied minors that overwhelmed Border Patrol agents and caused a humanitarian crisis over the summer.

Just one day later, President Obama announced he was unilaterally granting amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants who are already in the country – a move that will almost certainly “encourage more people to come here illegally, putting their lives at risk,” Speaker Boehner noted.

Indeed, according to The New York Times’ Ross Douthat, “Obama has implicitly strengthened the incentives to attempt to smuggle in minor children, to send those same children across the border on their own, and to bear children while in the United States illegally.”

Even President Obama once agreed. When illegal immigration activists urged him to unilaterally grant them legal status or “ignore the laws” and suspend deportations, he said in July 2010 that he did not have the legal authority to do so. He warned that “such an indiscriminate approach would be both unwise and unfair. It would suggest to those thinking about coming here illegally that there will be no repercussions for such a decision. And this could lead to a surge in more illegal immigration.”

What President Obama said then was correct. In June 2012, he unilaterally granted deferred action for childhood arrivals (DACA), and the number of apprehensions at our southern border in the Rio Grande Valley increased sharply. Democratic Rep. Luis Gutiérrez (IL-04) confirmed that many of the minors crossing the border were encouraged to make the journey because of DACA.

Sadly, many were taken advantage of, or worse. “We don't even know how many of these kids don't make it, and may have been waylaid into sex trafficking or killed because they fell off a train,” President Obama told ABC News in June this year, at the height of the influx.

Immigrants that did not lose their lives faced “horrific conditions” in overcrowded detention centers that were never intended or equipped to handle tens of thousands of people at once.

To address this humanitarian crisis, House Republicans passed a bill to speed up the process of safely returning unaccompanied children to their home countries – a solution supported by a majority of Americans. Senate Democrats failed to pass anything after President Obama reversed his initial position and opposed the measure.

Ultimately, the vast majority of the illegal immigrants who crossed the border this summer were released into communities across the United States. The Associated Press revealed in September that “about 70 percent of immigrant families the Obama administration had released into the U.S. never showed up weeks later for follow up appointments” with federal immigration agents. It previously reported that “children who make the dangerous trip can effectively remain in the U.S. for years before facing even a moderate risk of deportation.”

Indeed, with the backlog of court cases standing at roughly 400,000, some hearings are being scheduled four years from now, in 2018. After President Obama’s unilateral action last week, the stage is set for things to get even worse, just as he once predicted.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...al-Immigration

Just out of curiosity, how Obama's Amnesty Edict differ from a Congressional Amnesty Edict? Don't they both result in more illegal immigration? Don't they both grant privileges, immunities and welfare benefits to those approved by either Edict to be here? Don't they both steal jobs, money and educations from American citizens? Don't they BOTH result in more for illegal aliens and less for Americans?

No, Yes, Yes, Yes, and Yes.

Hey, if this were 5 card stud, that's 4 of a kind and I win!

Great ready to lose, you two-faced traitors. Americans will not tolerate this bull.