Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012

    They're Already Here: For Years, 1000s of High-Risk 'Refugees' Have Been Crossing Sou

    They're Already Here: For Years, 1000s of High-Risk 'Refugees' Have Been Crossing Southern Border

    BY TODD BENSMAN
    NOVEMBER 18, 2015



    In Paris on Friday, November 13, a mere national security theory -- one long dismissed as the largely unwanted property of far right-wing stalwarts, racist anti-immigration nativists, and a few sober national security professionals -- became proven reality. Some of the suicide terrorists who tore the city apart turned out to have infiltrated European borders as asylum-seeking immigrants fleeing Syria.
    At least one of them slipped over the Greek border some six weeks earlier, then joined the plot in France. Whether or not the immigration was a pre-ordained part of the plot or a willing terrorist immigrant was recruited after arrival, a switch is now flipped. The eyeroll-prompting theory that willing suicide terrorists might infiltrate borders is now a reality with which all civilized nations have to contend.

    The debate over American immigration reform and what to do about our own border security is now colored with a terrorist infiltration threat that is much more tangible than at any time before Paris.

    The timing for this opening column, and the series of pieces that PJ Media invited me to write about migration from Islamic nations to the American southwestern land border for this new Homeland Security page, could not be more auspicious. The Paris attacks had not occurred when PJM agreed that I should share with you my 10 years of accumulated research about this theoretical border security problem.

    I was going to argue, before Paris, that illegal immigration from Islamic nations to the U.S. land border could no longer be ignored in the debates over immigration or in any public policy under discussion. I was going to make the case that my research on the subject finally has to get onto the radar and be put to use right now, because millions of migrants from nations brimming with violent Islamic terrorists are coursing through the global bloodstream in numbers rarely seen in human history. I was going to put forth the proposition that these marching millions from Syria, Pakistan, Somalia, and Afghanistan -- including some 30,000 foreign terrorist fighters moving to and from ISIS territory -- warranted an escalated awareness should even a fraction of them turn toward our own borders.

    I was going to suggest that when Republican and Democrat presidential contenders talk about immigration, they should no longer crimp the discussion at only Spanish speakers, and should instead start addressing those who speak the languages of the Middle East, North Africa, and South Asia. (Only Ben Carson briefly referenced these illegal migrants. He stopped after he was criticized for doing so.)

    But tragically, Paris settled all of those arguments in blood just as I was sitting to write this first column. I suspect I will not have to work very hard at all to persuade anyone that the prospect of sleeper cell terrorists posing as asylum seekers and infiltrating our border is the real deal now.

    So let the conversation begin about what the threat actually is to America from this migrant population, what it is not, and what we must do about it from here, during a presidential campaign where only Mexican immigration is discussed. For the next five or six months, I will share, in installments, grist for that mill.

    I will let slip now something you should know, but probably do not because coverage of it is largely absent: asylum-seeking Syrian and Iraqi immigrants have been coming over the Mexico-U.S. border and petitioning for asylum, by the hundreds, for three years already.

    It is my intention to soberly lay down an empirical foundation of knowledge about such migration, which I hope is put to use by our security policymakers, our next president, and you, an interested and consequential polity. Our current leaders, candidates for leadership, and voters needed good information on this topic long before Paris. Migrants from the Islamic world have been using highly accessible intercontinental routes to cross our borders by the thousands for years; too many of them have arrived with terrorist associations, as I will show. Too little reliable information is out there to prep responsible discussion of this phenomenon at the public square.

    As the purveyor of the information, I know my bonafides matter. So here you go: I am a recovering print journalist and investigative reporter. I crossed the police tape in 2009 after 23 years, and entered the terrorism intelligence world, where I retooled and have remained.

    The reason I am writing about immigration from the Islamic world is part of an obligation dating to the morning of 9/11. On that morning, I was a staff writer covering the FBI for the Dallas Morning News, in the city where American Airlines was headquartered. I spent the next eight years covering terrorism issues for theDMN and other mainstream media organizations.

    In 2006, I learned that Iraqi refugees were coming across our border from Mexico, borne over extremely long distances by highly organized human smugglers through Latin America and Mexico. I investigated for six months, amazed by this discovery, its homeland security implications, and its absence from the 2007 debate in Congress over an immigration reform law that ultimately failed.

    My reporting about the Iraqi travelers took me to Syria, Jordan, Guatemala, Nicaragua, and Mexico.

    Fast forwarding to 2014, the Department of Homeland Security bestowed on me a rare opportunity to build on my earlier work in a major way. DHS and the American taxpayers sponsored me to obtain a master’s degree in homeland security studies from the Naval Postgraduate School’s Center for Homeland Defense and Security (CHDS). I graduated from CHDS in September 2015. In exchange for its sponsorship, the government asked of me only one deliverable: a potentially actionable policy thesis based on significant original scholarship.

    This series is part of my return on that DHS investment in me. I chose to document exactly how the human smuggling organizations I heard so much about back in '06 actually operated, where and how. I used thousands of pubic court records from the un-mined archives of every U.S. prosecution of human smugglers I could find -- 19 in all, plus thousands of other records and materials.
    The purpose was to provide a blueprint for how homeland security authorities might more effectively dismantle these networks on the day after an infiltrating migrant, posing as an authentic asylum seeker among crowds of Mexicans, attacked the homeland (although preferably before such a tragedy). Faculty granted my work the “Outstanding Thesis” distinction.

    As this series unfolds, you are going to learn what our homeland security enterprise has done to date to hunt these migrants and their smugglers in distant lands, and how and why the effort has fallen short. Next, you’ll learn all about these long-distance human smuggling networks, how they make terrorist infiltration and migration possible, who their leaders are, their motivations, how they evade us, and how we caught the ones we did. I am going to identify what I see as the fail points in these smuggling networks, soft spots where our law enforcement and intelligence communities will need to strike. Lastly, I will recommend specific strategies for them to do so, an interesting mix of conventional law enforcement operations abroad and intelligence operations.

    I thought I might have to convince you of the reasons to pay heed to my message. Paris did that. Now that Paris has your attention, I hope you’ll stay along for the ride along the U.S.-Mexico border; the two places are connected.
    https://pjmedia.com/homeland-securit...outhern-border

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012
    Actually, U.S. Has Had Program to Filter Muslim Migrants Since 9/11, But It Has Been Neglected


    BY TODD BENSMAN
    NOVEMBER 25, 2015


    (Click here for last week’s article: "They're Already Here: For Years, 1000s of High-Risk 'Refugees' Have Been Crossing Southern Border")
    ----------------------------
    Let’s get something out of the way before we move on to the more important discussion: yes, Syrians are crossing the U.S.-Mexico border. But in terms of the news cycle, this is moldy bread to those who have been around this topic for a long time.

    The whole world is suddenly aware of the issue since learning that at least two ISIS terrorists sent to attack Paris (and possibly others killed or arrested afterward) breached Europe’s borders camouflaged as illegal immigrants. Even traditional media like the New York Times is associating the France attack with the threat posed by Syrian migrants moving through Latin America toward our own border.

    But despite appearances based on the current attention, we've known Syrians have been coming for years. We've also known that they have been coming along with people from Somalia, Afghanistan, and from dozens of other countries that Islamic terrorists call home.

    There’s no need to keep sounding the alarm about this. Instead, we should all be trying to get up to speed quickly so we can address the following timely, relevant questions:
    -- What have our homeland security leaders been doing about this cross-border traffic since 9/11?-- What are the results of those efforts?
    -- What is the way forward now that Paris is officially on the books as a terrorist border infiltration case, and the human traffic from Islamic nations to the U.S. southwestern border can no longer be blissfully ignored?

    As I mentioned last week, for the next few weeks I will be addressing the real story about terrorists exploiting our border and our immigration policies. And part of the real story is that -- contrary to all you have read since the Paris attacks -- for all these years since 9/11 we were aware of this problem, and we did implement programs to monitor, retard, and disrupt migrant traffic that can camouflage terrorist travelers like those who hit France.

    The American public did not know much about this campaign partly because its law enforcement and intelligence operations occurred overseas, where they are -- by nature and necessity -- secretive affairs. But the American public also did not know much about this campaign because the American media and -- by extension -- congressional oversight committees never really wanted to know about it. And while no one was paying attention, this campaign to stop the flow of migrants from the Islamic world descended into flawed neglect over the past decade.

    The vast border security and immigration control apparatus we started building after 9/11, regardless of whether you think it adequate, initially had virtually nothing to do with Mexican and other Latin and South American migrants. It had everything to do with Muslim migrants from countries where Islamic terrorist groups operated. Only later did the political discourse entirely shift to the border buildup’s consequences regarding Hispanic migrants; to the domestic political competition for the “Latino vote” and the various related issues. And because of the shift, serious disrepair to the program has followed.

    A classic policy drift has occurred. Our border build-up was never about Hispanics; so much to the contrary that at one early point they created a term “Other Than Mexicans” to characterize what it was actually about.

    Earlier this year, I visited the George W. Bush Presidential Library in Dallas (I was conducting research for my Naval Postgraduate School MS in homeland security studies). There, via the White House domestic policy council papers the archivists kindly wheeled out to me on coffee carts, I found plenty of evidence defining the original post-9/11 motivation for our present border security machine. The catalyst for the programs was fear that this new and determined breed of Islamist terrorist would infiltrate U.S. borders to attack the homeland. They arrived at this finding via the following observation: if economic opportunists and war refugees were already able to find established human smugglers with routes for transporting them from distant Islamic countries all the way to the U.S. border, then certainly terrorists could exploit these operations as well. This made the human smuggling organizations transporting these migrants culpable American targets.

    Close inspection of the actual language of all the legislation pushed through Congress in those years reflects the same target.

    The legislation all started with a series of congressional legislative fiats after 9/11, the same ones that have famously doubled the number of Border Patrol agents to 21,000, funded the construction of the wall, and put Predator drones over the Rio Grande. The legislation is clear that Mexicans and other Hispanics were not the main target.

    The Homeland Security Act of 2002, for example, established one of its key objectives as “preventing the entry of terrorists and terrorist weapons” by threat actors described as “transnational terrorists, transnational criminals and unauthorized migrants.”

    The hallmark Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004mandated “a cohesive effort to intercept terrorists, find terrorist travel facilitators, and constrain terrorist mobility domestically and internationally.” That act created a Human Smuggling and Trafficking Center -- still operating far from any limelight -- to collect intelligence on human smuggling that could enable “clandestine terrorist travel,” far from the beefed-up American home border.

    The Secure Fence Act of 2006 states that its purpose is “the prevention of all unlawful entries to the U.S., including entries by terrorists.”

    There is much more, but you get the drift.

    Homeland security minds had to come up with a special way to categorize these targeted migrants so that they could be given the requisite national security treatment. So they were called “Other Than Mexican” if they were citizens of some 35 to 40 Islamic “countries of special interest” in the Middle East, South Asia, and North Africa.

    As the American effort developed around OTMs in later years after 9/11, the migrants would be further sub-categorized as “aliens from special interest countries,” “third country nationals,” or “special interest aliens (SIAs).” I prefer the latter.

    In typical fashion for government, the legislation spawned strategic plans by which our homeland security agencies could carry out the statutes. To this day, all of them cite prevention of terrorist border infiltration as a top priority.

    The first National Strategy for Combating Terrorism, for instance, described one of its top goals as “denying terrorists entry to the United States” by disrupting their travel “internationally and across and within our borders,” and undermining the “illicit networks” that facilitate the travel.

    The first of several Border Patrol strategic plans in 2005 marked that agency’s new priority mission as: “establishing substantial probability of apprehending terrorists and their weapons as they attempt to enter illegally between ports of entry.”

    Our immigration-control apparatus was thus put to work on Islamic counterterrorism, so you can almost understand how confusion could arise over time about which migrant set was their target.

    The formal SIA interdiction policy -- still essentially in place today -- is traceable to a November 2004 memorandum from U.S. Border Patrol Chief David Aguilar to all field agents. It listed 35 countries of interest, and instructed border agents to take eight actions when migratory citizens of the countries were apprehended. Most would be subject to national security database checks and interviews by intelligence agencies and FBI agents.

    The 35 countries identified in a November 1, 2004, memorandum by U.S. Customs and Border Protection Chief David Aguilar to all field agents.

    Tellingly, immigration-related federal agencies were assigned to chase SIAs and their smugglers, often in Latin America locations, while the U.S. Border Patrol was expanded to guard physical land borders to net them at home. Domestic law enforcement agencies such as ICE and the FBI were sent abroad to join American military and intelligence agencies, which had pivoted to the new mission of breaking the backs of SIA smugglers.

    Primary responsibility for interdicting SIAs and SIA smuggling networks fell to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
    To pave the way for the ICE counter-SIA campaign, the U.S. State Department expanded the number of cooperative counterterrorism agreements and attaché offices, particularly throughout Latin America where SIA smuggling routes ran. Not long ago, a top ICE official described the mission in congressional testimony as involving 240 agents in 48 foreign attaché offices, their mission being to “aggressively pursue, disrupt and dismantle foreign-based criminal travel networks -- particularly those involved in the movement of aliens from countries of national concern.”

    This was all cloak and daggers never intended for public consumption, hence the lack of government advertisement.

    But Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano did offer a rare public acknowledgment in 2012, when she told reporters at an impromptu Arizona press conference:
    There’s a whole category called SIAs -- special interest aliens is what it stands for. We watch that very carefully. We have been working -- not just with Mexico, but countries of Central America, in terms of following more closely people transiting the airports and the like. And so, again, our efforts there are to try to ... take as much pressure off the physical land border as we can.
    It simply is not the case that the U.S. has done nothing about this human traffic, and the question is whether the traffic has been seen and treated as a homeland security threat. We have, and it is.

    The real question we should all be asking after Paris: How has the American counter-SIA effort been performing? And the short answer is “not so well” because of neglect, as I will explain next time.
    https://pjmedia.com/homeland-securit...been-neglected

  3. #3
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    What we need is ..... A 20 Year Moratorium on All Immigration.

    And we need it ....... now.

    Wake UP People. What is happening worldwide is the overpopulation of a species. Study animals when this happens. Our homo sapien species is no different. We can't manage the world population, but we can manage our own, starting with no more immigration for at least 20 years so our country can sort out this disaster, fix the problems, and reset the system so what's happening to our country never happens again. This will in turn show the example to other countries to do likewise and fix their countries so there is a balance between people and resources to sustain their populations so the people are happy and comfortable and feel no need to flee somewhere else. Most of these immigrants today are not seeking freedom or liberty, they're seeking money and they don't have enough money because they have too many people.

    It's just math. It's just numbers. It's not personal.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  4. #4
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. Migrants Say Arizona is Worth the Risk of Crossing
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-31-2010, 07:19 PM
  2. Catalina High refugees offer look at U.S.
    By FedUpinFarmersBranch in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-15-2008, 11:32 AM
  3. Why More Vietamese Refugees-30 Years After The War?
    By CCUSA in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-10-2007, 12:46 AM
  4. 1st N.Korean refugees in 50 years approved as refugees to US
    By concernedmother in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-24-2006, 05:57 PM
  5. Guatemalans warned of border crossing risk
    By Brian503a in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-10-2005, 08:16 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •