Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree4Likes

Thread: Undocumented-Immigrant Housing Ban Allowed by High Court

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    67,683

    Undocumented-Immigrant Housing Ban Allowed by High Court

    Undocumented-Immigrant Housing Ban Allowed by High Court

    By Greg Stohr May 5, 2014 9:34 AM ET 6 Comments Email Print


    The U.S. Supreme Court refused to say whether states and cities can bar landlords from renting to undocumented aliens, leaving intact a lower court disagreement and steering clear of the national debate over illegal immigration.

    The justices today turned away a challenge to a Fremont, Nebraska, law that civil rights advocates said conflicts with federal immigration measures. A St. Louis-based federal appeals court upheld the law, putting it at odds with appellate courts that have considered similar measures elsewhere.

    The Supreme Court previously put limits on what states and local governments can do to crack down on illegal immigration. In 2012, the justices voided parts of an Arizona immigration law, including criminal provisions that would have barred people from being in the state without proper documentation.

    Since then, the Supreme Court has repeatedly sidestepped the issue of anti-harboring laws. In March the court rejected appeals raising almost identical issues, filed by towns in Pennsylvania and Texas, and in April the justices turned away an appeal by Arizona on its anti-harboring law.

    Fremont, a town of 26,000 outside Omaha, adopted the measure through a 2010 ballot initiative. Under the law, all prospective tenants must apply for an occupancy license, and non-citizens must include information about their immigration status.

    The Fremont Police Department then submits that information to federal immigration officials. If the federal government reports that the applicant isn’t lawfully present in the U.S., officials revoke the occupancy license. Violators can be fined $100.

    A landlord and two tenants represented by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund were challenging the measure.

    The case is Keller v. City of Fremont, 13-1043.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-0...igh-court.html
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    67,683
    Thanks Jean, sorry I forgot the link. I must be getting forgetful lol

    W
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443
    No problem, W, just trying to help.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •