Results 1 to 2 of 2
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
08-14-2009, 02:34 AM #1
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
- Posts
- 117,696
The ACCF/NAM Estimate of Waxman-Markey
Study of the economic impacts of the pending Waxman-Markey bill
The ACCF/NAM Estimate of Waxman-Markey
By Institute for Energy Research
Friday, August 14, 2009
On August 12 the American Council for Capital Formation (ACCF) and National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) released their study of the economic impacts of the pending Waxman-Markey bill. Proponents of Waxman-Markey hailed the study as showing the economic benefits of the bill. However, in actuality the ACCF/NAM study shows the opposite: Waxman-Markey will destroy American jobs and make the United States materially poorer.
Confusing Absolute With Relative Change
The self-described progressives at the “Wonk Roomâ€Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
08-14-2009, 05:32 PM #2
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 7,928
Global Warming Bill Would Cut U.S. Economic Growth, Study Says
Friday, August 14, 2009
By Edwin Mora
House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., during the committee's markup of H.R. 3200, America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009, on Thursday, July 30, 2009. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
(CNSNews.com) - The bill intended to combat global warming that passed the U.S. House of Representatives in June would decrease the Gross Domestic Product of the United States by $2 trillion to $3 trillion between 2012 and 2030, a study shows.
The study on the economic impact of the American Clean Energy and Security Act was commissioned by the American Council for Capital Formation (ACCF), a non-profit that examines tax and environmental policy, and the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), the nation’s largest manufacturing trade organization.
The analysis was conducted by the Science Applications International Corporation, a private research company.
The global warming legislation, sponsored by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.), passed the House in June by a 219-212 vote. The Senate may consider its own version of the bill this fall.
The legislation would impose caps on the amount of carbon that U.S. industry could emit and would allow manufacturers to trade emission allowances doled out by the government.
Waxman and Markey’s offices did not return calls seeking comment on the study.
“High energy prices, fewer jobs, and loss of industrial output are estimated to reduce [annual] U.S. Gross Domestic Product by between $419 billion and $571 billion by 2030,â€Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
1,300 Migrants swarm NYC’s City Hall over false rumor of green...
04-25-2024, 07:27 AM in General Discussion