The Blueprint for World War III

**AirborneSapper7** · 08-30-2014, 09:46 PM

Freedom Outpost

The Blueprint for World War III http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/08/bl...world-war-iii/

The Blueprint for World War III

Dave Hodges 6 hours ago
2 Comments

This article is the first of a two part series which details the coming war. This war will not be a simple war of occupation such as what we saw in Iran and presently in Afghanistan. This war will be utterly devastating and has the potential to escalate into a conflict befitting the over-used term, "Armageddon."

Part one of this series will present what boxing fans call, "the tale of tape." The "tale of the tape" entails identifying the combatants, their respective sides as well as the relative strengths of the participants and their military forces.

The Relative Strengths of Each Side

The coming war will largely feature what pundits call the BRIC nations and the USA and her allies. Each side of this coming conflict possesses widely divergent military strengths, weaknesses and strategies.

The US Is Dependent On a Devastating First Strike Attack

The United States and her allies have a decided advantage of quick strike, long range battlefield capabilities because of superior aircraft and carrier strike capabilities. The BRIC nations have an advantage with manpower, rocket propelled weapons and tanks. The USA and her allies cannot win a sustained battlefield campaign because of the attrition factor. The Chinese have demonstrated the ability to negate the United States Navy's technological advantage through the use of killer satellites. Therefore, the entire US strategy is predicated on a first strike before the Chinese can destroy the majority of the eyes and ears of the US military, namely, its superior satellite capabilities in which the US forces can quickly locate and destroy the enemy with its smart weapons before the enemy knows what hit them.

Nuclear Submarines Are the "X Factor"

Nuclear submarines are often looked at as the great equalizer. No matter who is winning on the ground, in the air and on the surface of the oceans, the submarine force has the capability to reign down unimaginable destruction upon their enemy. In the case of submarines, the USA and her allies are matched by their BRIC counterparts. Most subs carry eight nuclear missiles, each capable of destroying a major city. The USA presumably has superior evasive techniques and therefore, would presumably survive sub-killer strategies with greater frequency that their BRIC adversaries. Therefore, the BRIC nations might win every land battle, however, the victorious BRIC nations would not have many of its cities left to return to in the case of a nuclear war. The US submarines are, in effect, a formidable doomsday weapon.

The Trigger Event

For the United States and her allies to win a conventional war, a quick strike, surprise engagement is critical to the success of these forces. The BRICS would have an advantage in a longer prolonged conflict. This is particularly true when one considers that if time permitted, the Chinese have bragged that they could put 100 million men on a battlefield. Following the teachings of Sun Tsu in the famous book, The Art of War, it is critical that the BRIC nations be brought to the battlefield of choice by the USA for a quick and decisive engagement.
From a conventional warfare standpoint, the engagement is likely to be naval and involve aircraft. This plays to the advantage to the USA, whose superior long range strike capability is enhanced by their superior aircraft carriers. The USA forces would likely engage in a distracting land engagement first to hold and occupy the maximum number of the BRIC forces. The land strike, a first strike, will be directed at Syria. Given the present crisis, the Russians would have to decide on choosing between protecting its eastern border with the NATO forces poised to attack, or launching an offensive directed at protecting Syria. The Russians will choose self-defense. The timing of the American invasion of Syria will take place when a sufficient number of American naval vessels are present in the Black Sea to checkmate the Russia military buildup in Crimea which would serve as a staging area for military action in Syria. At the end of the day, once a large contingent of the American navy has moved into position off of the Baltic states, Russia will be powerless to prevent an US takeover of Syria. The path and progress of the CIA force, ISIS, as it creates more designed havoc in Syria, will provide the impetus for US forces to enter Syria, thus provoking a Russian and a BRIC nation unified response.
Conventional wisdom states that once the US occupies Syria, Russia will be powerless to intervene on behalf of America's next target, Iran because the US medium range missile batteries will prevent the Russian army from moving south into the region. With Russia out of the way, Iran will capitulate and stop selling oil for gold to the BRIC nations and the Petrodollar will be preserved. Iran will agree to the control of their oil fields by the US to avoid an invasion. They will capitulate because nobody will come to their rescue. At least that is what the US is hoping for. In part two, I will present a more likely scenario.
What about India and China? Won't they move to protect Iran and thus, erode the Petrodollar? Not exactly, as China and India will have their hands full. The naval strike that I speak of will be directed at China. Before the commencement of hostilities, China will be given a short time to stand down or face destruction by the US submarines and the long range capabilities of US carriers. It is only necessary to target China's major cities to force capitulation. This strategy would free the disenchanted Chinese, living in the rebellious outlying provinces to launch a revolution against Beijing. It is also rumored that the US does have space based nuclear weapons. If this is the case, this conflict could be over in the early morning hours of the first day. The Chinese submarine force could be capable of taking out several US cities, however, their submarines alone will not change the outcome. India will be held in check by Pakistan. Subsequently, India will never enter the fight. US forces in Afghanistan could block a Russian invasion of Pakistan from the north. It is clear that the USA and her allies will decisively defeat the BRIC nations in a conventional war, so long as it is a short conflict.
However, there is one game-changing strategy that the BRICS could employ. If the BRIC nations were to simultaneously launch a series of high altitude ICBM's over every theater of potential war, the high altitude nuclear blast could create an EMP attack on a global scale. Such an action would negate the technological advantage of the US military and reduce the conflict to brutal savagery which would be dominated by global famine. Certainly the super elite would experience their much-coveted population reduction on an unprecedented scale. This action would ultimately produce a military stalemate and the war would disintegrate into one brute force versus another for a very long time. The former popular TV show, Revolution, comes to mind. More on the trigger event along with a more detailed chronology will be presented in the next part of this series.

The Tale of the Tape: The BRICS vs. the USA and Her Allies

(NOTE: The forces of North Korea would be absorbed by China Ukraine and Belarus have a combined military strength of 200,000 men)

Source: Global Fire Power

NUCLEAR WEAPONS: BRIC NATIONS VS USA & ALLIES

The nuclear arsenals of the BRICS vs. the USA and her allies are equivalent on paper. However, the reliability factor, related to the weapons, clearly favors the USA. To the sane person, the topic of nuclear war is almost a moot point. If either side resorts to the use of nuclear weapons on anything more than a battlefield scale with tactical nuclear weapons, this would render the conflict meaningless as the planet would be a very undesirable place to inhabit. Then again, the psychopathic elite, safely tucked away in the tunnels beneath Denver International Airport, may feel they have the ability to wait out the devastation going on above. The following data demonstrates the ultimate futility of employing nuclear weapons on a regional and intercontinental basis. Of course, recognizing the futility of such utter destruction and hoping that this would serve as a deterrent to the psychopathic bankers from starting such a conflict, cannot be counted on. After all, if one's ultimate goal is the destruction and reduction of 90% of the human race, and a nuclear war would constitute the level of chaos needed in order to bring forth "the order of out chaos" which would be needed to usher in the New World Order. This makes nuclear war more, not less likely!

Conclusion

Your children picked a very bad time to be born. The only winners in what is coming will be the Satan-serving bankers who are bankrolling both sides of the coming conflict.
Certainly, the conditions are ripe for nuclear conflict and it is all so tragic and avoidable.
Jesus showed humanity over 2,000 years ago, who the real enemy of humanity is. It is unquestionably demonic but manifests itself in the human form of a banker. Man was not meant to engage in banker wars of profit. No wonder Jesus chased the money changers from the Temple with a whip. The world needs an "Occupy Basel" movement, where the Bank of International Settlements resides. Such a movement would be needed in order to save humanity. These psychopathic bankers need to be imprisoned in order to save humanity from complete destruction. Do not hold your breath, martial law, followed by World War III, is probably unavoidable.

Source

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/08/bl...world-war-iii/

**AirborneSapper7** · 08-30-2014, 10:03 PM

Glenn Beck Says World War III Is at the End of the Highway and We Have ‘Missed All the Exits’

Aug. 11, 2014 9:19pm
Erica Ritz

Video at the page link:

Glenn Beck on Monday warned that “we have missed all the exits,” and World War III is at the end of the highway.
Beck took his audience back 15 years to all of the predictions he has made, starting with his warning in 1999 that Osama bin Laden posed an enormous threat to the United States.
“I talked about a guy [Osama bin Laden] — I couldn’t even pronounce his name,” Beck recalled on his television program. “I got so frustrated at one point at a caller, I said, ‘Look, within the next ten years, this guy is going to rain blood and bodies and buildings in the streets of New York. Will you then wake up?’”
Beck said “we could have done something,” but after 9/11, it was “too late.”
He said the same thing about a number of other predictions. Before the housing market collapsed, Beck said he begged his audience not to take out loans they couldn’t afford. Before the banking crisis, he also begged his audience to safeguard their money.
“It was right around here that I started saying, ‘This is a highway; these are off-ramps,’” Beck said. “There are things on the horizon and if you don’t get off here, or here, or here … at some point we run out of road.”

Glenn Beck speaks on his television program August 11, 2014. (Photo: TheBlaze TV)

In 2011, Beck warned that Islamists were seeking to re-build the caliphate, and that radical leftists and radical Islamists would unite to collapse the western world.
“I believe we’re at the end of the highway. This is it,” Beck said. “The caliphate is here. We are headed towards World War III … [and] I don’t know how to tell you not to get there because we’ve missed all of the exits. We are headed for massive European anti-Semitism. … We’re headed for a collapse beyond our understanding because we got off the gold standard.”
Beck said that over the weekend, Russia and China took yet another step to cut the U.S. dollar out of their transactions.
“Which side do you think China has just picked? They’ve picked Russia,” Beck said. “Which side is Russia on when it comes to the caliphate? Oh, that’s right, Iran and Syria. What side are we on? Saudi Arabia. Gee, that puts America in the position of World War II.”
Beck said in World War II, America faced communism and fascism and, though we didn’t like either system of governing, we decided to “cozy up to the communists” because we liked them more than the Nazis.
“It’s almost like, who do you want to cozy up to? You’ve got Iran running a caliphate, or you have Saudi Arabia. Well, we really don’t like Iran, but we kinda like Saudi Arabia,” he remarked. “It’s World War II all over again.”
Beck said he thought all weekend about “how to get out of this,” but he’s “already said it all.” He said the only thing his audience can do is embody “gospel principles.”
“That’s it,” Beck said. “Live like Jesus. Live like Gandhi. I don’t care who your model is. Live like Buddha … What you have to be is the impact zone. You have to be the parachute. You have to be the one that helps society absorb what’s coming.”
“If we don’t stand, and stand together, across all political parties, all lines, all classes, and we just help each other, and we exercise the human heart … if we don’t do that, I don’t know if we survive,” he concluded. “I don’t know who does, but the world is about to change.”

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014...all-the-exits/