Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040

    CA. State policies work against good fiscal management

    State policies work against good fiscal management

    Five recommendations could help, including updating the tax structure, ending the two-thirds majority rule, reigning in initiatives, building a serious rainy day fund and getting real oversight.

    By Evan Halper
    May 24, 2009

    Reporting from Sacramento -- In this economy, every state is hurting. Unemployment is in double digits, tax receipts are taking a dive and deficits are piling up. But, once again, California seems to be in a class of its own when it comes to financial dysfunction. The problems here eclipse those elsewhere.

    California has the distinction of being the only state that is constantly running out of cash. California is the only one pleading with the federal government to backstop an emergency borrowing plan. California is the only state that never completely closed its deficit from the last economic downturn -- the one that began in the beginning of the decade -- with the hangover from that neglect hobbling efforts to solve the latest crisis.

    The state has become a laboratory for what not to do when it comes to managing finances. The online news journal Stateline.org, which state government wonks look to for news on the latest policy trends, recently published a guide of sorts for bureaucrats and analysts who want to keep their state from becoming another California. Rest assured, the piece advised, most states are not likely to find themselves as troubled as the Golden State any time soon.

    Size is a factor. "You are talking about the eighth-largest economy in the world, so the numbers involved are just so monumental," said Sujit CanagaRetna, a senior fiscal analyst with the Council of State Governments in Atlanta. "The largeness of the problem makes it more intense."

    But there is also so much more.

    The oft-cited waste and abuse is a problem, but the deficit is bigger than the entire state bureaucracy.

    California could fire every state employee -- including well-paid prison guards and university professors -- close every government office, stop all travel and even cease the purchase of paper clips without closing the budget gap. The government would be gone but the deficit wouldn't.

    "When you have a budget gap of $20 billion plus, cleaning up waste and abuse just isn't going to fix it," said Susan Urahn, managing director of the nonprofit Pew Center on the States.

    The runaway spending is caused largely by an ever growing group of Californians making use of basic state services as the cost of those services escalates. Since Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger took office, for example, the amount the state spends on Medi-Cal health insurance for the poor has grown more than 40%, from under $10 billion annually to more than $14.4 billion. Spending on community mental health services has nearly tripled, and the state's program that provides services for the disabled leapt from a $1.6-billion annual expense to nearly $2.4 billion.

    This has happened despite efforts by the state to contain costs. Primary care doctors, for example, are paid just $26 for an office visit with a Medi-Cal patient. There is no simple way to seriously limit these healthcare costs short of eliminating the benefits for hundreds of thousands of Californians.

    The same scenario holds true for prisons, where state spending jumped from $6.5 billion to nearly $10.5 billion under Schwarzenegger. The federal courts mandated much of that spending after ruling that the state's prisoners have been widely mistreated. The alternative to spending the money is releasing tens of thousands of inmates and parolees.

    Similar challenges confront other big states too. Yet few of them have plunged into the same condition of financial despair. They move quicker to spot and confront financial problems as they arise. Here, problems mount fast and then are left to fester as political leaders bicker.

    The backbone of this inertia is a patchwork of state policies that work against good fiscal management. That these underlying mechanical issues with state government are fueling the problem is no secret. Legions of blue ribbon commissions, nonpartisan think tanks and elder statesmen and stateswomen have provided blueprints for fixing them. A fresh round of such reports is being worked on now. Among the likely recommendations:

    Updating the tax structure

    California is extremely reliant on personal income taxes to fund government. It is a source of cash that is unpredictable and subject to huge swings. When the stock market is soaring, it is great for the state.

    California's millionaires and billionaires contribute wads of capital gains taxes in those good years, and the state has consistently used that money to grow programs.

    The richest 1% of residents end up contributing half of all the personal income tax the state collects.

    As soon as the economy takes a dip and the stock market stalls, the money stops flowing and the state plunges into a crisis.

    Ending the two-thirds rule

    Only two other states require two-thirds of its Legislature to approve a state budget. The rule was added to the California Constitution by voters in 1933.

    The idea was to make it exceedingly difficult for the Legislature to raise taxes. And it is. But it also has become exceedingly difficult for lawmakers to merely do their job and get any spending plan in place -- with or without new taxes.

    GOP lawmakers, a minority in the Legislature, tend to use the influence they have over the budget to renew policy demands that had been neglected for much the year.

    Democrats complain they are being extorted for budget votes. Gridlock follows.

    Nothing happens until the state stops paying its bills or comes close to it.

    Lawmakers rush a budget onto the governor's desk that uses borrowing and other gimmicks to paper over much of the problem. The cycle repeats itself.

    Reining in citizen initiatives

    Voters have created a complicated and conflicting web of spending requirements and tax limitations. They have told the state to borrow billions for new programs without any plan for repaying the loans.

    Last week's special election embodied the problem. Voters refused to reallocate money they had previously ordered spent on mental health and children's programs, but they also refused to raise revenues with tax increases and a plan to borrow against the lottery.

    Building a serious rainy day fund

    The one we have is full of escape hatches. It is regularly raided, leaving nothing to tap when the state finds itself in the kind of jam it is in now.

    Getting some real oversight

    Other states keep track of how well every program is functioning, requiring department heads to meet a strict list of "performance standards" or risk losing money. California has resisted this for years.

    evan.halper@latimes.com

    Times staff writer Michael Rothfeld contributed to this report.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me ... full.story
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member WorriedAmerican's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    4,498

    Re: CA. State policies work against good fiscal management

    But, once again, California seems to be in a class of its own when it comes to financial dysfunction. The problems here eclipse those elsewhere.

    California has the distinction of being the only state that is constantly running out of cash. California is the only one pleading with the federal government to backstop an emergency borrowing plan. California is the only state that never completely closed its deficit from the last economic downturn -- the one that began in the beginning of the decade -- with the hangover from that neglect hobbling efforts to solve the latest crisis.

    The state has become a laboratory for what not to do when it comes to managing finances.
    This is what I have been saying and you have been getting upset with me about!
    If Palestine puts down their guns, there will be peace.
    If Israel puts down their guns there will be no more Israel.
    Dick Morris

  3. #3
    Senior Member WorriedAmerican's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    4,498

    Re: CA. State policies work against good fiscal management

    "When you have a budget gap of $20 billion plus, cleaning up waste and abuse just isn't going to fix it,"

    The runaway spending is caused largely by an ever growing group of Californians making use of basic state services as the cost of those services escalates. Since Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger took office, for example, the amount the state spends on Medi-Cal health insurance for the poor has grown more than 40%, from under $10 billion annually to more than $14.4 billion. Spending on community mental health services has nearly tripled, and the state's program that provides services for the disabled leapt from a $1.6-billion annual expense to nearly $2.4 billion.


    Well there's 17 billion right there!


    There is no simple way to seriously limit these healthcare costs short of eliminating the benefits for hundreds of thousands of Californians.
    How about eliminating the benefits for hundreds of thouf=sands of ILLEGALS!


    The same scenario holds true for prisons, where state spending jumped from $6.5 billion to nearly $10.5 billion under Schwarzenegger. The federal courts mandated much of that spending after ruling that the state's prisoners have been widely mistreated. The alternative to spending the money is releasing tens of thousands of inmates and parolees.
    They could make room just deporting the illeglas that didn't murder or torture.


    Voters have created a complicated and conflicting web of spending requirements and tax limitations. They have told the state to borrow billions for new programs without any plan for repaying the loans.
    Same here in Maine. I know NO ONE that is voting for all those things on the ballots every year, YET every year they all pass??? What's up with that? I vote no on everything now. . . .


    Last week's special election embodied the problem. Voters refused to reallocate money they had previously ordered spent on mental health and children's programs, but they also refused to raise revenues with tax increases and a plan to borrow against the lottery.
    They are mad and have every right to be! Weed out people and programs from the state government. Go down to bare bones. I wish my governor would but the idiots chose to stop certain money to the elderly and KEEP their travel money. That's a bunch of nice people we have, huh?
    If Palestine puts down their guns, there will be peace.
    If Israel puts down their guns there will be no more Israel.
    Dick Morris

  4. #4
    Senior Member agrneydgrl's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,760
    If we could get rid of the millions of illegals in this state, we could have plenty of money and be able to help our poor. I think that it is wrong to take away all funding for the poor and disabled and elderly, but I think they should start asking for proof of citizenship before services are given out. It would also help our education system.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    11,242
    California's problems are not unique, but certainly more noticeable with the state's huge economy and the star-power of Schwartznegger. The sanctuary cities have made national news (probably international too) as do stories about the severe drought, while increasing populations of "immigrants" occasionally are mentioned. California has always been a sort of trend-setter, and I hope that this will not be a new trend where elderly citizens and children are totally deprived of any help.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6
    Senior Member WorriedAmerican's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    4,498
    Quote Originally Posted by agrneydgrl
    If we could get rid of the millions of illegals in this state, we could have plenty of money and be able to help our poor. I think that it is wrong to take away all funding for the poor and disabled and elderly, but I think they should start asking for proof of citizenship before services are given out. It would also help our education system.

    That's exactly how I feel too. Our poor need to be ahead of another countries poor. We have no money for our people now. AND he is still passing it out to other countries!

    Hell, Obama just gave some Carribean Island $900,000 because they were complaining of the repatriation effecting them. (I need to look up that article)

    He isn't just spreading the wealth within America or even on our Continent! He's giving it away to everyone but the people. He's spreading the wealth worldwide! Wonder how much Kenya has gotten or going to get?
    If Palestine puts down their guns, there will be peace.
    If Israel puts down their guns there will be no more Israel.
    Dick Morris

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •