Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Greta Van Susteren Presses Hillary Clinton on the Constitution: ‘We Have This Funny L

    Greta Van Susteren Presses Hillary Clinton on the Constitution: ‘We Have This Funny Little Thing Called the Fourth Amendment and It’s Actually Quite Plain’

    Jun. 17, 2014 8:49pm Oliver Darcy
    18.8K Shares

    Video at the page link:

    Hillary Clinton was repeatedly pressed Tuesday by Greta Van Susteren, with the Fox News host repeatedly telling the former Secretary of State that the U.S. Constitution mandates the federal government have a warrant to spy on Americans.
    “Madam Secretary, you’re a lawyer, President Obama is a lawyer, I’m a lawyer and NSA spying on Americans violates the Fourth Amendment. It couldn’t be plainer. If you want to spy on Americans you get a warrant,” Van Susteren said. “What do you think about that?”
    “Well, I think that we’re finally taking stock of the laws that we passed after 9/11. I voted for some and I voted against some,” Clinton, who has not determined whether she’ll run for president in 2016, answered. “And people are saying, ‘Wait a minute. We did all of this in an emergency, in a hurry because we were, you know, understandably worried and scared, and now we need to take a step back and figure out how we make sure that the balance between liberty and security is absolutely right for America.’”
    That answer did not appear to quell Van Susteren.
    “When you go out and seize Americans’ stuff, you have to have a warrant,” she told Clinton. “And the NSA was seizing Americans’ stuff — no warrant. And there are two options — either amend the Constitution or you get a warrant. That wasn’t done. So what should the American people think?”
    Clinton responded by noting that laws were passed post-9/11 that gave the government a “very broad authority” which was “endorsed by executives in two administrations.”
    “And I think what has happened is people have said, ‘Okay, the emergency is over and we want to get back to regular order. We want to make sure that we’re not being spied on, that our privacy is not being violated — so we want you to keep us safe, we want you to protect us, but we don’t want Americans to be in any way fearful of their own government’s actions,’” she said.
    “I don’t think any American wants to be unsafe,” Van Susteren countered. “And I think every American wants to give the authority to the government to seize things constitutionally.”
    “The problem is we have this funny little thing called the Fourth Amendment and it’s actually quite plain,” she continued. “And I know everyone on Capitol Hill is trying to scurry and say that we’ve got these laws and I hear you too. But the fact is that the Fourth Amendment is plain and says you need a warrant.”
    “The problem is we have this funny little thing called the Fourth Amendment and it’s actually quite plain.”
    Share:

    Clinton moved to cite work being conducted by Congress to reign in some of the federal government’s authority.
    “Well, I think what you’re going to find with the laws that are now being amended and passed — one was just passed in the House — that the Congress is trying to square Americans’ Constitutional right under the Fourth Amendment and the necessity for information that can be connected to terrorist activity here at home or abroad,” she said. “It’s a really difficult balancing act, but you’re a 100% right that we have to make some changes in order to secure that privacy, that Constitutional right to privacy, that Americans are due.”

    Follow Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy) on Twitter

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014...-quite-plain/#
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    WATCH: Greta van Susteren grills Hillary Clinton on the constitutionality of the NSA

    Wednesday, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:02 PM EST
    Video at the page link:

    Hillary Clinton continues to falter as she makes the rounds to promote her new memoir Hard Choices. During an appearance on Fox News’ On the Record, host Greta Van Susteren repeatedly pressed Clinton on the constitutionality of the National Security Agency and its surveillance techniques. Clinton did not respond well to the line of questioning.

    “Greta Van Susteren had Hillary Clinton on yesterday, and I thought she did a great job,” Glenn said on radio this morning. “Hillary Clinton on the other hand… I’m so tired of all of these politicians. They’re all exactly the same. Hillary Clinton is no different than John Boehner would be… We can’t be the only group of people that are sick of this. I mean, honestly, I don’t know who’s watching interviews like this anymore.”
    Van Susteren asked – point blank – if the NSA spying on Americans violates the Fourth Amendment, and Clinton dodged the question.
    “Madam Secretary, you’re a lawyer, President Obama is a lawyer, I’m a lawyer and NSA spying on Americans violates the Fourth Amendment. It couldn’t be plainer. If you want to spy on Americans you get a warrant,” Van Susteren said. “What do you think about that?”
    “Well, I think that we’re finally taking stock of the laws that we passed after 9/11. I voted for some and I voted against some,” Clinton said. “And people are saying, ‘Wait a minute. We did all of this in an emergency, in a hurry because we were, you know, understandably worried and scared, and now we need to take a step back and figure out how we make sure that the balance between liberty and security is absolutely right for America.’”
    Not pleased with her response, Van Susteren then followed up by questioning the potentially illegal search and seizure conducted by the NSA without a warrant, and Clinton once again spoke in circles – noting laws were passed post-9/11 that gave the government a “very broad authority” which was “endorsed by executives in two administrations.”
    “And I think what has happened is people have said, ‘Okay, the emergency is over and we want to get back to regular order. We want to make sure that we’re not being spied on, that our privacy is not being violated — so we want you to keep us safe, we want you to protect us, but we don’t want Americans to be in any way fearful of their own government’s actions,’” she said.
    Van Susteren continued to press the former Secretary of State on the NSA in relation to the Fourth Amendment. Watch the entire exchange below:

    Video at the page link:

    “She’s always duplicitous. And it is most politicians but this was in particular agonizing,” Pat said of Clinton. “What Greta was saying is so clearly true. What the NSA has done and is doing is completely unconstitutional.”
    Glenn was particularly struck by quickly Clinton distanced herself from the NSA even though her served as a Senator during President George W. Bush’s presidency and was Secretary of State in the Obama Administration.
    “Notice she has backed away from both… [But] she was in the Senate under Bush and she was in the Administration on this one,” Glenn said. “You know what’s amazing is she says the emergency is over. I don’t know anybody who thinks the emergency is over. That we are more safe today. We are just more awake today and going, ‘Wait a minute, wait a minute. Wait a minute. We made a huge mistake.’”

    http://www.glennbeck.com/2014/06/18/...ty-of-the-nsa/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Similar Threads

  1. What Will Bret & Greta Ask in Half-Hour Sit-Down With Hillary Clinton?
    By kathyet2 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-02-2014, 12:40 PM
  2. Gang of 8 vs. Greta Van Susteren's One Page Immigration Bill
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-27-2013, 10:00 AM
  3. Lindsey Graham with Greta Van Susteren on Immigration
    By Newmexican in forum Videos about Illegal Immigration, refugee programs, globalism, & socialism
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-10-2010, 05:08 PM
  4. Greta Van Susteren on illegals illegal heathcare coverage
    By StokeyBob in forum Videos about Illegal Immigration, refugee programs, globalism, & socialism
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-29-2009, 07:37 PM
  5. Hillary Clinton presses China to keep buying US debt
    By carolinamtnwoman in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-25-2009, 11:28 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •