Thread: Health Care Overhaul Racing Against the Clock (not so easy)

I think our leader thought his personality alone would get much accomplished the first year. This article mentioned that 1/3 of the senate is up for re-election next year. I did not know it was so high. So they better be listening to their constituents...


Health Care Overhaul Racing Against the Clock
Problems in Congress threaten to overshadow White House event designed to boost Obama's plan.

Wednesday, July 08, 2009


WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama is struggling to show progress in a race against the clock to revamp the U.S. health care system this year.

Problems in Congress threaten to overshadow a White House event Wednesday designed to boost Obama's health overhaul, his top domestic priority.

Leaders from hospital industry trade groups were expected to appear with Vice President Joe Biden to announce that hospitals are ready to give up about $155 billion over 10 years in government payments. The money could then be used to help pay for covering millions of uninsured Americans.

But Congress, not the health care industry, is the source of Obama's troubles.

Lawmakers returned Tuesday from their July 4th holiday break with lots of questions about the complex legislation and deep misgivings about key elements under discussion.

Democratic senators in particular are having second thoughts about a proposed new tax on generous health insurance benefits provided by some employers. Without the tax -- Republicans favor it as a brake on cost increases-- the prospects for a bipartisan deal in the Senate appear to be in jeopardy.

The stakes are extremely high for Obama. The fate of legislation to overhaul the U.S. health care system, with a major new role in it for the government, could become the defining issue of the Democratic president's first term.

Obama's ambitious timetable for passing a bill this year keeps slipping. Timing is critical because lawmakers might be reluctant to vote on such a charged issue as health care next year, when all House members and one-third of senators face elections.

"We're not there yet," said Democratic Sen. Max Baucus of Montana, who, as chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, has spent countless hours seeking a compromise with Republican colleagues. "I'm trying the best I can to get there soon."

Another senator deeply involved in the bipartisan negotiations said the proposed new tax on the costliest employer-paid insurance benefits is quickly losing favor with Democrats.

"It's clearly a very difficult issue," said Sen. Kent Conrad, a North Dakota Democrat, citing recent polls. "You go to the public to ask them what they think and they don't like it."

A compilation of surveys reviewed by senators showed at least 59 percent of the public opposed to taxing health care benefits to "pay for reform."

As a result, Conrad said, "we're looking at other options" to help finance a bill whose price tag is expected to reach $1 trillion or slightly more. Those other options may be hard to sell to Republicans whose support Baucus has been cultivating.

Baucus has long championed a tax on health benefits as the best way to pay for health care while simultaneously restraining the growth of the cost in coverage in the future. But the idea has drawn strong opposition from organized labor, a core Democratic constituency. House Democrats have been highly resistant, too, and up of Republicans who have been involved in the discussions.

While Democrats and the White House have said they would prefer a bipartisan bill, they also must be careful not to let the talks drag on so long that they fall hopelessly behind schedule.

Similar efforts were under way in the House.

It's still unclear whether the difficulties are enough to imperil Obama's objective of signing a health care bill this fall, or whether they were merely the type of obstacles that emerge any time Congress attempts to pass major legislation.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has set a target of month's end to enact health care legislation, while in the Senate, Reid hopes to complete legislation by the end of the first week in August.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07 ... ing-clock/

Why does the Obama regime feel the need to speed up the process of major legislation? Could it be that they know if anyone if their right mind had time to read and/or think about the legislation it would never pass?

Originally Posted by ELE

Why does the Obama regime feel the need to speed up the process of major legislation? Could it be that they know if anyone if their right mind had time to read and/or think about the legislation it would never pass?

My thoughts exactly ELE.

I was in Pa. for the holiday and couldn't believe how many people I spoke with that were unaware obamacare would benefit more IAs than Americans.