Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    High Court Gives Arizona Leeway to Teach English

    High Court Gives Arizona Leeway to Teach English

    Thursday, June 25, 2009 1:57 PM

    PHOENIX – The Supreme Court on Thursday handed a partial victory to Arizona officials who are challenging federal court supervision of a program to educate students who aren't proficient in English.

    By a 5-4 vote, the court reversed an appeals court ruling in a 17-year-old lawsuit intended to close the gap between students in Nogales, Ariz., who are learning to speak English and native English speakers.

    Justice Samuel Alito, in the majority opinion, said a federal judge in Arizona must take another look at the program to see whether Nogales now is "providing equal opportunities" to English language learners.

    Alito, joined by his conservative colleagues, was highly critical of rulings by both the judge and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco that have kept Nogales and, more recently, the entire state under federal court supervision with regard to teaching nonnative English speakers.

    In 2000, a federal judge found that the state had violated the Equal Educational Opportunities Act's requirements for appropriate instruction for English-language learners. A year later, he expanded his ruling statewide and placed the state's programs for non-English speaking students under court oversight.

    Since then, the two sides have fought over what constitutes compliance with the order. Arizona has more than doubled the amount of funding that schools receive per non-English speaking student and taken several other steps prescribed by the No Child Left Behind Act, a broader education accountability law passed by Congress in 2002.

    State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne, one of the state officials in Phoenix who defended the current system and asked for it to be freed from federal court oversight, expressed confidence that the state can demonstrate the program's compliance under current circumstances.

    "It's a major victory for the principle of self-government," Horne said of the ruling. "People rule themselves through their elected representatives and should not be ruled over by an aristocracy of lifetime federal judges."

    State House Speaker Kirk Adams, one of the Republican legislative leaders who sided with Horne, said the ruling was "a breath of fresh air" that respects both federalism and separation of powers between branches of government.

    "Now we need to roll up our sleeves and get on with it and teach these children English," Adams said in a statement.

    Tim Hogan, an attorney for the class-action plaintiffs, said that with the case going back to lower courts for further review, "we're going to have an expanded opportunity to put the efficacy of the state's current program at issue."

    "The message seems to be that we have to prove there's an ongoing violation of federal law. I welcome the opportunity to do that actually, to focus on the program that exists today, the four-hour models, and whether or not they're working," he added.

    Arizona's current program for English-learning students includes daily four-hour instruction periods in English. The state Department of Education said Arizona has approximately 143,000 such students.

    Alito said the courts need to be more flexible in evaluating the state's actions.

    Justice Stephen Breyer, in a dissent for himself and the other three liberal justices, said the lower courts were thorough and correct.

    Thursday's decision "risks denying schoolchildren the English-language instruction necessary to overcome language barriers that impede their equal participation," Breyer said in a dissent that was longer than Alito's majority opinion.

    Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and John Paul Stevens also dissented.

    Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas were in the majority.

    http://www.newsmax.com/us/court_arizona ... 29121.html
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member laughinglynx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Northern California (moved back to fight for our land and freedom)
    Posts
    666
    "Arizona has more than doubled the
    amount of funding that schools receive
    per non-English speaking student"

    This is why our schools are fighting to get illegal immigrants in their schools and fighting to keep them here. It's the easiest money-making scheme they can find. Then they get raises because there is more money/students in the system and then all these kids, legal - illegal - American, get the same poor education they had in the first place. The money just went to wages.

    When I first moved to Arizona I was shocked at the level of stupidity here. I couldn't understand how, what looked to be a reasonable adult, could show one speck of brains in the course of everyday life. Then I realized the kids were worse and that the adults were just grown-up versions of what was coming out of the school systems. This place is scary and if the rest of this country is not cautious, they will be next. This is like a disease of stupidity coming out of Arizona and I guarantee you, if we do not do something about all these illegals, we will be a third world country in about 10 years.

    If any of us immigrated to a country we would learn to speak their language before we got there. Just out of respect for the natives of the state. As far as I'm concerned this is just one more example of how these invaders don't have any respect for us or what we are all about. They don't care. They want what they want and they are going to take it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •