Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 57
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Horrible! Islamic Terrorism Not Mentioned in FBI Threat Assessment

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546

    Horrible! Islamic Terrorism Not Mentioned in FBI Threat Assessment

    Horrible! Islamic Terrorism Not Mentioned in FBI Threat Assessment

    by Sara Noble • August 30, 2014

    h/t Herb Richmond

    PC will destroy our country. It not only robs us of our freedom, it completely misleads. No better example can be made than the most recent national threat assessment for domestic terrorism. It makes absolutely no reference to Islamic terror threats.
    Despite the latest FBI warning that a threat is imminent on our southern border, despite the fact that the fact that multiple attacks on the homeland have been by Islamic terrorists, and despite the promises recently made by Islamic terrorists to destroy us, our government is using the PC manual to deceive, misdirect, and pander.
    King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia warned that the West is the next target of the jihadists unless there is “rapid” action.
    Lack of action would be “unacceptable” in the face of the phenomenon, King Abdullah said.
    “You see how they (jihadists) carry out beheadings and make children show the severed heads in the street,” he said, condemning the “cruelty” of such acts.
    “It is no secret to you, what they have done and what they have yet to do. I ask you to transmit this message to your leaders: ‘Fight terrorism with force, reason and (necessary) speed’.”
    While this is going on Obama fundraises and Eric Holder pretends radical Islam doesn’t exist.
    On Friday, Obama blithely dismissed the threat, blaming social media and the press.
    “The world’s always been messy … we’re just noticing now in part because of social media,” he said, according to a White House pool report.
    “If you watch the nightly news, it feels like the world is falling apart,” said Obama.
    It is!!! Someone wake this man up.
    The FBI intelligence report for 2013 listed eight types of threats to our U.S. internal security and none were motivated by radical Islam.
    There is no doubt that the greatest threat to the homeland are the homegrown terrorists who are now members of ISIS is many cases. These terrorists are often naturalized Muslims or first generation Muslims and yet we keep letting them in at a record-breaking pace as we continue to lie about what is going on.
    We have no handle on the situation and our administration won’t even recognize the problem for what it is. In fact, our president admitted he has no strategy while passing the blame to his defense department as if he were an objective observer.
    The assessment talks about domestic anti-government militias, animal rights and environmental extremists, black separatists, anti- and pro-abortion activists and Puerto Rican nationalists.
    The report also claims that the threat to domestic-origin extremism is moderate!
    We have captured domestic Islamic extremists at airports and two U.S. citizens were killed fighting with ISIS, but our FBI sees no need to mention Islamic extremism.
    SOURCE: WASHINGTON FREE BEACON

    This could be Barack Obama and Eric Holder only they’re not kidding.

    http://www.independentsentinel.com/h...at-assessment/

    http://www.independentsentinel.com/h...at-assessment/

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    ISIS Are True Muslims

    by Sara Noble • August 31, 2014

    Barack Obama, while eulogizing journalist James Foley who was recently beheaded by ISIS on TV, said, “Let’s be clear about ISIL…ISIL speaks for no religion…their ideology is bankrupt.”

    Cameron said “IS [ISIS/ISIL] are not Muslims.”

    Gateway Pundit published this cartoon from a tweet in which ISIS mocks them for saying they are not the true Islamists - the “Cross people” who think they know what Islam is, ISIS wrote.

    Underneath the tweet was the following which was translated by Gateway Pundit:
    Cross” leaders [meaning Christian] deny the Islamic State
    Cameron: the Islamic state are not Muslims
    Obama: State does not belong to any faith or religion
    We are being told by our leaders that ISIS are not Muslims, but does that show a lack of understanding of what ISIS really is?
    One of our writers, Harvey Miller sent this to me:
    Read the criminal code of Muhammad – the Quran: 9:29 – “fight the infidel until they pay the jizya and feel themselves subdued.”
    Now look at the actions of ISIS against Christians in Mosul who were given 3 options: convert, pay jizya or die.
    They are the true Muslims.
    The Quran: 9:29 - English Translation from the Quranic Arabic Corpus which shows seven parallel translations for the 29th verse of Chapter 9, sūrat l-tawbah (The Repentance).
    Sahih International: Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.
    Pickthall: Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low.
    Yusuf Ali: Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
    Shakir: Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.
    Muhammad Sarwar: Fight against those People of the Book who have no faith in God or the Day of Judgment, who do not consider unlawful what God and His Messenger have made unlawful, and who do not believe in the true religion, until they humbly pay tax with their own hands.
    Mohsin Khan: Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allah, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
    Arberry: Fight those who believe not in God and the Last Day and do not forbid what God and His Messenger have forbidden — such men as practise not the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book — until they pay the tribute out of hand and have been humbled.
    Jizya is the money, or tribute conquered non-Muslims historically pay to Islamic overlords with submission to safeguard their existence. It serves as a reminder of their inferior status. It is also meant to hasten conversion to Islam.
    It is not only ISIS demanding jizya.
    Last year, Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood ordered Coptic Christians to convert to Islam or pay ‘jizya’ tax. The Muslim Brotherhood and its supporters began forcing the roughly 15,000 Christian Copts of Dalga village in Egypt to pay a jizya tax as indicated in Koran 9:29. According to Washington Times, Fr. Yunis Shawqi, all Copts in the village, “without exception”, are being forced to pay the tax.
    One study shows that non-Muslims are not regarded as citizens by any Islamic state, even if they are original natives of the land.
    The State Department reports that the Pakistani government worked out a truce in 2009 with the Taliban that allowed them to collect the jizya against Sikhs. The government of the Philippines proposed giving taxing authority to the Moro Islamic Liberation Front, which would have legalized jizya against Christians in the southern Philippines. Even absent that proposal, Islamic militants in the Philippines have been levying the jizya against Christians for several years. Yemen still demands jizya from the small number of Jews left in that country. And so on.
    Muslim faith is built on two solid principles: The Koran is the literal transcript of the words of God and there are the Hadiths which are an account of the exact words and deeds of Muhammad.
    The Koran Verse 9:29 is explicit on this point. The Hadith of Ishaq 956 & 962 also says “He who withholds the Jizya is an enemy of Allah and His apostle”.
    Muslim organizations that believe in the Wahhabi concept of Islam believe in it.
    ISIS are following the Quran as they see it.
    They only differ from other Islamic terror groups such as The Muslim Brotherhood by matter of degree and in some cases, they don’t appear to differ at all. Our administration has not made that connection. They pander to the Brotherhood and Hamas as if they were legitimate.
    According to World Net Daily, a former, well-respected CIA agent, Clare Lopez, said the Obama administration switched sides in the war on terror and joined with the terrorists in The Muslim Brotherhood. She believes that it’s because the Brotherhood has infiltrated the administration.
    She is not the first agent to express these views to Congress, but she was willing to come out publicly.
    She said Obama has the basic same goals as the Brotherhood - “to remove American power and influence, including military forces, from Islamic lands.”
    A member of President Obama’s Homeland Security Advisory Council known for controversial Twitter posts that seem to support the Muslim Brotherhood sent out this tweet in June.
    @davereaboi #Silly. As I’ve said b4 inevitable that “Caliphate” returns. Choice only whether we support #EU like Muslim Union vision or not.
    We should treat the caliphate like the EU? Is that where we are headed?
    In the end, ISIS originated from the literal and radical translation of Islam. Cameron and Obama seem to say they are not in any way connected to Islam.
    Like it or not, they are Muslims and denying radical Islam exists demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of what we are dealing with. The Quran is the basis for the existence of organizations like ISIS. To suggest that ISIS originated from the ether and exists independently of Islam shows a lack of understanding.
    If we don’t wise up in time, we will be at their mercy.
    Daily Mail reported Saturday that a jihadi laptop seized in Syria contained a 19-page document with instructions for making weaponised bubonic plague, including the steps needed for testing it.
    ‘The advantage of biological weapons is that they do not cost a lot of money, while the human casualties can be huge,’ the document states, according to Foreignpolicy.com.
    The manual explores a variety of means to spread “chemical or biological agent” over a wide area – including rockets and missiles, suicide missions in cars, and contamination of air-conditioning systems.
    Mr. Obama, who does not have a strategy yet after four years, is playing golf today at Fort Belvoir, Maryland. The president is playing with junior White House aides Joe Paulsen, Luke Rosa, and Mike Brush. It’s his 37th time playing this year and the 194th time of his presidency, according to White House Dossier.

    http://www.independentsentinel.com/i...-true-muslims/





    You might also like

    Sharia Law!Sharia Law! by Joe David Those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger or who corrupt others will ...
    Yazidis Throw Children Off Mountaintop to Keep Them From ISISPresident Obama has finally taken some action on an issue not involving the fundamental transformation of the U.S. He ... The Rise Of The Caliphate, Russian Imperialists And Iran's AyatollahsAbu Bakr Al Baghdadi, the new caliph. All the pieces are moving into place and a new era of ...
    U.S. Aided And Abetted ISISISIS, also known as ISIL or Islamic State, has engaged in a murderous rampage throughout the Middle East. Mr. ...
    ISIS Won't Come Across Our Open Borders SillyFormer Senior Policy Advisor to Homeland Security Chair, Joshua Katz, says "it's very very true ISIS may have crossed ... Islamic Rules for RadicalsUnindicted Co-conspirators “Islam is a revolutionary faith that comes to destroy any government made by man. Islam doesn’t look ...

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Jimmy Carter Invokes Allah In His Speech to Terror-Tied Islamic Group’s Conference

    by Sara NobleAugust 31, 2014

    Former president Jimmy Carter decided to give an alleged Muslim Brotherhood front organization legitimacy by being the first president to address their annual conference.

    In his keynote speech this weekend, he told attendees to mobilize against violence targeting women and spoke passionately about abuses to women. If only he had stopped there.

    “Men and women are created equally from one soul,” Carter said. “If you were taught by your parents or you believe you’re superior to your wife just because you’re a man, Allah says your wrong.”

    He didn’t forget to address the Israel-Palestine peace initiative.

    As usual, he sided with Palestinians over Jews.

    “You can’t bring peace to the Middle East without justice and human rights for the Palestinians,” Carter told a packed hall at Cobo Center. “When my prayers are answered and we have peace in that Holy Land then the Israelis and all their neighbors will be blessed to live in peace and prosperity.”

    He wants a two-state solution which will undoubtedly lead to Israel’s demise if Gaza is any indication.

    He said the Carter Center meets with parties that the U.S. Government or the U.N. won’t negotiate with. He said the goal has always been for Israel to withdraw from all occupied territories.

    A one state solution “would be a very serious catastrophe,” he said.

    At an earlier luncheon on Saturday, he said this: “We are all Americans in a system that allows basic human rights: peace, justice and the ability to treat each other as equals,” Carter told a crowd of about 1,000. “I hope all of you will use the principals of Allah to bring peace and justice to all.”

    The principals of Allah are alarming to some of us watching the events in the Middle East with little pushback or condemnation by the moderate Muslims.

    After attacking the U.S. response to 9/11 – he would have preferred no response – he said, “We need to close Guantanamo and restore America to its previous status of respecting everyone,” he said.

    Even al Qaeda?

    The conference was held by The Islamic Society of North America, the largest Muslim organization in the United States. It has been accused of being a front organization for Wahhabism and has ties to Hamas and is considered by many to be an arm of The Muslim Brotherhood in the United States.

    Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ) has asserted that the Islamic Society of North America is “accused of ties to Islamic extremists”, and investigative journalist Steven Emerson accused ISNA of ties to terrorism.

    In testimony before the US Senate in October 2003, Professor J. Michael Waller, Annenberg Professor of International Communication, Institute of World Politics, told Senators, that “The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) refers Muslim clerics to the U.S. Bureau of Prisons. The Islamic Society of North America is an influential front for the promotion of the Wahhabi political, ideological and theological infrastructure in the United States and Canada.”

    Claiming that ISNA has connections to 50 to 79 percent of mosques on the North American continent, he accused the organization of “dominating Islam in North America.”

    • ISNA provides ideological material to about 1,100 of an estimated 1,500 to 2,500 mosques in North America. It vets and certifies Wahhabi-trained imams and is the main official endorsing agent for Muslim chaplains in the U.S. military.
    • An organ of ISNA, the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) has physical control of most mosques in the United States. NAIT finances, owns, and otherwise subsidizes the construction of mosques and is reported to own between 50 and 79 percent of the mosques on the North American continent.
    • Origin of military chaplain problem: Muslim Brotherhood penetration
    • One can trace part of the military chaplain problem directly to its origin: A penetration of American political and military institutions by a member of the Muslim Brotherhood who is a key figure in Wahhabi political warfare operations against the United States.


    This is what Dr. Waller and his colleagues found:


    • Foreign states and movements have been financing the promotion of radical, political Islam, which we call Islamism, within America’s armed forces and prisons.
    • That alien ideology, with heavy political overtones, preaches intolerance and hatred of American society, culture, government, and the principles enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.
    • Adherents to that ideology directly and indirectly spawn, train, finance, supply and mobilize terrorists who would destroy our system of government and our way of life.
    • They have created civil support networks for terrorists at home and abroad, providing material assistance, fundraising operations, logistics, propaganda, legal assistance in the event of arrest or imprisonment, and bringing political pressure to bear on policymakers grappling with counterterrorism issues.
    • The Islamists exploited the nation’s prison chaplancies and the created the Muslim chaplain cadre in the armed forces as one of several avenues of infiltration, recruitment, training and operation.


    Similarly, Stephen Schwartz described ISNA in Senate hearing testimony as one of the chief conduits through which the radical Saudi form of Islam passes through to the US.


    In 2007, the Justice Department implicated ISNA in a plot to funnel more than $12 million to Hamas terrorists. According to an unsealed court document, Justice labeled ISNA an unindicted co-conspirator in the successful trial of the Holy Land Foundation, which acted as Hamas’ fundraising arm in America. Much of Holy Land’s leadership is now behind bars.


    The former president recently said that Hamas should be recognized as a legitimate political group, though the U.S. has designated it as a terrorist organization.


    Jimmy Carter, friend to terror-linked organizations.


    That’s our Jimmy!

    SOURCE OF CONFERENCE QUOTES: DETROIT NEWS

    http://www.independentsentinel.com/jimmy-carter-invokes-allah-in-his-speech-to-terror-tied-islamic-conference/

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    The Covert Origins Of ISIS

    September 2, 2014



    Evidence exposing who put ISIS in power, and how it was done. The Islamic militant group ISIS, formerly known as Al-Qaeda in Iraq, and recently rebranded as the so called Islamic State, is the stuff of nightmares. They are ruthless, fanatical, killers, on a mission, and that mission is to wipe out anyone and everyone, from any religion or belief system and to impose Shari’ah law. The mass executions, beheadings and even crucifixions that they are committing as they work towards this goal are flaunted like badges of pride, video taped and uploaded for the whole world to see. This is the new face of evil.
    Would it interest you to know who helped these psychopaths rise to power? Would it interest you to know who armed them, funded them and trained them? Would it interest you to know why?


    This story makes more sense if we start in the middle, so we’ll begin with the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011.
    The Libyan revolution was Obama’s first major foreign intervention. It was portrayed as an extension of the Arab Spring, and NATO involvement was framed in humanitarian terms.
    The fact that the CIA was actively working to help the Libyan rebels topple Gaddafi was no secret, nor were the airstrikes that Obama ordered against the Libyan government. However, little was said about the identity or the ideological leanings of these Libyan rebels. Not surprising, considering the fact that the leader of the Libyan rebels later admitted that his fighters included Al-Qaeda linked jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq.
    These jihadist militants from Iraq were part of what national security analysts commonly referred to as Al-Qaeda in Iraq. Remember Al-Qaeda in Iraq was ISIS before it was rebranded.
    The Covert Origins Of ISIS [continued]





    Read more at http://libertycrier.com/covert-origi...736Zw1mLp4H.99


    Evidence exposing who put ISIS in power, and how it was done.


    The Islamic militant group ISIS, formerly known as Al-Qaeda in Iraq, and recently rebranded as the so called Islamic State, is the stuff of nightmares. They are ruthless, fanatical, killers, on a mission, and that mission is to wipe out anyone and everyone, from any religion or belief system and to impose Shari'ah law. The mass executions, beheadings and even crucifixions that they are committing as they work towards this goal are flaunted like badges of pride, video taped and uploaded for the whole world to see. This is the new face of evil.



    Would it interest you to know who helped these psychopaths rise to power? Would it interest you to know who armed them, funded them and trained them? Would it interest you to know why?
    This story makes more sense if we start in the middle, so we'll begin with the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011.
    The Libyan revolution was Obama's first major foreign intervention. It was portrayed as an extension of the Arab Spring, and NATO involvement was framed in humanitarian terms.
    The fact that the CIA was actively working to help the Libyan rebels topple Gaddafi was no secret, nor were the airstrikes that Obama ordered against the Libyan government. However, little was said about the identity or the ideological leanings of these Libyan rebels. Not surprising, considering the fact that the leader of the Libyan rebels later admitted that his fighters included Al-Qaeda linked jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq.
    These jihadist militants from Iraq were part of what national security analysts commonly referred to as Al-Qaeda in Iraq. Remember Al-Qaeda in Iraq was ISIS before it was rebranded.
    With the assistance of U.S. and NATO intelligence and air support, the Libyan rebels captured Gaddafi and summarily executed him in the street, all the while enthusiastically chanting "Allah Akbar". For many of those who had bought the official line about how these rebels were freedom fighters aiming to establish a liberal democracy in Libya, this was the beginning of the end of their illusions.

    Prior to the U.S. and NATO backed intervention, Libya had the highest standard of living of any country in Africa. This according to the U.N.'s Human Development Index rankings for 2010. However in the years following the coup, the country descended into chaos, with extremism and violence running rampant. Libya is now widely regarded as failed state (of course those who were naive enough to buy into the propaganda leading up to the war get defensive when this is said).
    Now after Gaddafi was overthrown, the Libyan armories were looted, and massive quantities of weapons were sent by the Libyan rebels to Syria. The weapons, which included anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles were smuggled into Syria through Turkey, a NATO ally. The times of London reported on the arrival of the shipment on September 14th, 2012. (Secondary confirmation in this NYT article) This was just three days after Ambassador Chris Stevens was killed by the attack on the U.S. embassy in Benghazi. Chris Stevens had served as the U.S. government's liaison to the Libyan rebels since April of 2011.
    While a great deal media attention has focused on the fact that the State Department did not provide adequate security at the consulate, and was slow to send assistance when the attack started, Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh released an article in April of 2014 which exposed a classified agreement between the CIA, Turkey and the Syrian rebels to create what was referred to as a "rat line". The "rat line" was covert network used to channel weapons and ammunition from Libya, through southern turkey and across the Syrian border. Funding was provided by Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
    With Stevens dead any direct U.S. involvement in that arms shipment was buried, and Washington would continue to claim that they had not sent heavy weaponry into Syria.
    It was at this time that jihadist fighters from Libya began flooding into Syria as well. And not just low level militants. Many were experienced commanders who had fought in multiple theaters.
    The U.S. and its allies were now fully focused on taking down Assad's government in Syria. As in Libya this regime change was to be framed in terms of human rights, and now overt support began to supplement the backdoor channels. The growing jihadist presence was swept under the rug and covered up.
    However as the rebels gained strength, the reports of war crimes and atrocities that they were committing began to create a bit of a public relations problem for Washington. It then became standard policy to insist that U.S. support was only being given to what they referred to as "moderate" rebel forces.
    This distinction, however, had no basis in reality.
    In an interview given in April of 2014, FSA commander Jamal Maarouf admitted that his fighters regularly conduct joint operations with Al-Nusra. Al-Nusra is the official Al-Qa’ida branch in Syria. This statement is further validated by an interview given in June of 2013 by Colonel Abdel Basset Al-Tawil, commander of the FSA's Northern Front. In this interview he openly discusses his ties with Al-Nusra, and expresses his desire to see Syria ruled by sharia law. (You can verify the identities of these two commanders here in this document from The Institute for the Study of War)

    Moderate rebels? Well it's complicated. Not that this should really come as any surprise. Reuters had reported in 2012 that the FSA's command was dominated by Islamic extremists, and the New York Times had reported that same year that the majority of the weapons that Washington were sending into Syria was ending up in the hands Jihadists. For two years the U.S. government knew that this was happening, but they kept doing it.
    And the FSA's ties to Al-Nusra are just the beginning. In June of 2014 Al-Nusra merged with ISIS at the border between Iraq and Syria.
    So to review, the FSA is working with Al-Nusra, Al-Nusra is working with ISIS, and the U.S. has been sending money and weapons to the FSA even though they've known since 2012 that most of these weapons were ending up in the hands of extremists. You do the math.
    In that context, the sarin gas attacks of 2013 which turned out to have been committed by the Syrian rebels, makes a lot more sense doesn't it? If it wasn't enough that U.N. investigators, Russian investigators, and Pulitzer prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh all pinned that crime on Washington's proxies, the rebels themselves threatened the West that they would expose what really happened if they were not given more advanced weaponry within one month.
    By the way, this also explains why Washington then decided to target Russia next.
    This threat was made on June 10th, 2013. In what can only be described as an amazing coincidence, just nine days later, the rebels received their first official shipment of heavy weapons in Aleppo.
    After the second sarin gas fiasco, which was also exposed and therefore failed to garner public support for airstrikes, the U.S. continued to increase its the training and support for the rebels.

    In February of 2014, Haaretz reported that the U.S. and its allies in the region, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Israel, were in the process of helping the Syrian rebels plan and prepare for a massive attack in the south. According to Haaretz Israel had also provided direct assistance in military operations against Assad four months prior (you can access a free cached version of the page here).
    Then in May of 2014 PBS ran a report in which they interviewed rebels who were trained by the U.S. in Qatar. According to those rebels they were being trained to finish off soldiers who survived attacks.
    "They trained us to ambush regime or enemy vehicles and cut off the road,” said the fighter, who is identified only as "Hussein." "They also trained us on how to attack a vehicle, raid it, retrieve information or weapons and munitions, and how to finish off soldiers still alive after an ambush."
    This is a blatant violation of the Geneva conventions. It also runs contrary to conventional military strategy. In conventional military strategy soldiers are better off left wounded, because this ends up costing the enemy more resources. Executing captured enemy soldiers is the kind of tactic used when you want to strike terror in the hearts of the enemy. It also just happens to be standard operating procedure for ISIS.
    One month after this report, in June of 2014, ISIS made its dramatic entry, crossing over the Syrian border into Iraq, capturing Mosul, Baiji and almost reaching Baghdad. The internet was suddenly flooded with footage of drive by shootings, large scale death marches, and mass graves. And of course any Iraqi soldier that was captured was executed.
    Massive quantities of American military equipment were seized during that operation. ISIS took entire truckloads of humvees, they took helicopters, tanks, and artillery. They photographed and video taped themselves and advertised what they were doing on social media, and yet for some reason Washington didn't even TRY to stop them.
    U.S. military doctrine clearly calls for the destruction of military equipment and supplies when friendly forces cannot prevent them from falling into enemy hands, but that didn't happen here. ISIS was allowed to carry this equipment out of Iraq and into Syria unimpeded. The U.S. military had the means to strike these convoys, but they didn't lift a finger, even though they had been launching drone strikes in Pakistan that same week.
    Why would they do that?
    Though Obama plays the role of a weak, indecisive, liberal president, and while pundits from the right have had a lot of fun with that image, this is just a facade. Some presidents, like George W. Bush, rely primarily on overt military aggression. Obama gets the same job done, but he prefers covert means. Not really surprising considering the fact that Zbigniew Brzezinski was his mentor.




    Those who know their history will remember that Zbigniew Brzezinski was directly involved in the funding and arming the Islamic extremists in Pakistan and Afghanistan in order to weaken the Soviets.



    By the way Osama bin Laden was one of these anti-Soviet "freedom fighters" the U.S. was funding and arming.
    This operation is no secret at this point, nor are the unintended side effects.



    Officially the U.S. government's arming and funding of the Mujahideen was a response to the Soviet invasion in December of 1979, however in his memoir entitled "From the Shadows" Robert Gates, director of the CIA under Ronald Reagan and George Bush Senior, and Secretary of Defense under both George W. Bush and Barack Obama, revealed that the U.S. actually began the covert operation 6 months prior, with the express intention of luring the Soviets into a quagmire. (You can preview the relevant text here on google books)
    The strategy worked. The Soviets invaded, and the ten years of war that followed are considered by many historians as being one of the primary causes of the fall of the USSR.
    This example doesn't just establish precedent, what we're seeing happen in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria right now is actually a continuation of a old story. Al-Nusra and ISIS are ideological and organizational decedents of these extremist elements that the U.S. government made use of thirty years ago.
    The U.S. the went on to create a breeding ground for these extremists by invading Iraq in 2003. Had it not been for the vacuum of power left by the removal and execution of Saddam, Al-Qaeda in Iraq, aka ISIS, would not exist. And had it not been for Washington's attempt at toppling Assad by arming, funding and training shadowy militant groups in Syria, there is no way that ISIS would have been capable of storming into Iraq in June of 2014.
    On every level, no matter how you cut it, ISIS is a product of U.S. government's twisted and decrepit foreign policy.
    Now all of this may seem contradictory to you as you watch the drums of war against ISIS begin to beat louder and the air strikes against them are gradually widened http://www.wjla.com/articles/2014/08/president-obama-considers-possible-...). Why would the U.S. help a terrorist organization get established, only to attack them later?
    Well why did the CIA put Saddam Hussein in power in 1963?, Why did the U.S. government back Saddam in 1980 when he launched a war of aggression against Iran, even though they knew that he was using chemical weapons? Why did the U.S. fund and arm Islamic extremists in Afghanistan against the Soviets?
    There's a pattern here if you look closely. This is a tried and true geopolitical strategy.
    Step 1: Build up a dictator or extremist group which can then be used to wage proxy wars against opponents. During this stage any crimes committed by these proxies are swept under the rug. [Problem]
    Step 2: When these nasty characters have outlived their usefulness, that's when it's time to pull out all that dirt from under the rug and start publicizing it 24/7. This obviously works best when the public has no idea how these bad guys came to power.[Reaction]
    Step 3: Finally, when the public practically begging for the government to do something, a solution is proposed. Usually the solution involves military intervention, the loss of certain liberties, or both. [Solution]
    ISIS is extremely useful. They have essentially done Washington dirty work by weakening Assad. In 2014, while the news cycle has focused almost exclusively on Ukraine and Russia, ISIS made major headway in Syria, and as of August they already controlled 35% of the country.
    Since ISIS largely based in Syria, this gives the U.S. a pretext to move into Syria. Sooner or later the U.S. will extend the airstrikes into Assad's backyard, and when they do U.S. officials are already making it clear that both ISIS and the Syrian government will be targeted. That, after all, is the whole point. Washington may allow ISIS to capture a bit more territory first, but the writing is on the wall, and has been for some time now.
    The Obama administration has repeatedly insisted that this will never lead to boots on the ground, however, the truth of the matter is that anyone who understands anything about military tactics knows full well that ISIS cannot be defeated by airstrikes alone. In response to airstrikes ISIS will merely disperse and conceal their forces. ISIS isn't an established state power which can be destroyed by knocking out key government buildings and infrastructure. These are guerrilla fighters who cut their teeth in urban warfare.
    To significantly weaken them, the war will have to involve ground troops, but even this is a lost cause. U.S. troops could certainly route ISIS in street to street battles for some time, and they might even succeed in fully occupying Syria and Iraq for a number of years, but eventually they will have to leave, and when they do, it should be obvious what will come next.
    The puppets that the U.S. government has installed in the various countries that they have brought down in recent years have without exception proven to be utterly incompetent and corrupt. No one that Washington places in power will be capable of maintaining stability in Syria. Period.
    Right now, Assad is the last bastion of stability in the region. He is the last chance they have for a moderate non-sectarian government and he is the only hope of anything even remotely resembling democracy for the foreseeable future. If Assad falls, Islamic extremist will take the helm, they will impose shari'ah law, and they will do everything in their power to continue spreading their ideology as far and wide as they can.
    If the world truly wants to stop ISIS, there is only one way to do it:

    1. First and foremost, the U.S. government and its allies must be heavily pressured to cut all support to the rebels who are attempting to topple Assad. Even if these rebels that the U.S. is arming and funding were moderate, and they're not, the fact that they are forcing Assad to fight a war on multiple fronts, only strengthens ISIS. This is lunacy.


    2. The Syrian government should be provided with financial support, equipment, training and intelligence to enable them to turn the tide against ISIS. This is their territory, they should be the ones to reclaim it.

    Now obviously this support isn't going to come from the U.S. or any NATO country, but there are a number of nations who have a strategic interest in preventing another regime change and chaotic aftermath. If these countries respond promptly, as in right now, they could preempt a U.S. intervention, and as long this support does not include the presence of foreign troops, doing so will greatly reduce the likelihood of a major confrontation down the road.

    3. The U.S. government and its allies should should be aggressively condemned for their failed regime change policies and the individuals behind these decisions should be charged for war crimes. This would have to be done on an nation by nation level since the U.N. has done nothing but enable NATO aggression. While this may not immediately result in these criminals being arrested, it would send a message. This can be done. Malaysia has already proven this by convicting the Bush administration of war crimes in abstentia.

    Now you might be thinking: "This all sounds fine and good, but what does this have to do with me? I can't influence this situation."
    That perspective is quite common, and for most people, it's paralyzing, but the truth of the matter is that we can influence this. We've done it before, and we can do it again.
    I'll be honest with you though, this isn't going to be easy. To succeed we have to start thinking strategically. Like it or not, this is a chess game. If we really want to rock the boat, we have to start reaching out to people in positions of influence. This can mean talking to broadcasters at your local radio station, news paper, or t.v. station, or it can mean contacting influential bloggers, celebrities, business figures or government officials. Reaching out to current serving military and young people who may be considering joining up is also important. But even if it's just your neighbor, or your coworker, every single person we can reach brings us closer to critical mass. The most important step is to start trying.

    video at link below

    If you are confused about why this is all happening, watch this video we put out on September 11th, 2012




    If this message resonates with you then spread it. If you want to see the BIG picture, and trust me we've got some very interesting reports coming, subscribe to StormCloudsGathering on Youtube, and follow us on Facebook, twitter and Google plus.

    BONUS ARTICLE (an interesting tangent): Were the Libyan rebels being led by a CIA plant?



    video's at the link below


    http://scgnews.com/the-covert-origins-of-isis


    Last edited by kathyet2; 09-02-2014 at 10:39 AM.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    #ISI not a threat according to feds. Patriot groups are the real terrorists. http://bit.ly/1Cmzhke


    Feds Ignore ISIS Border Terror Threat
    Infowars

    Focus instead on political groups in America.


    Feds Ignore ISIS Border Terror Threat

    Focus instead on political groups in America
    Image Credits: IS social media

    by Kurt Nimmo | Infowars.com | September 2, 2014

    On Sunday, Judicial Watch tweeted that it was good to see Tom Fitton and the El Paso Times taking the ISIS terror threat seriously:


    Judicial Watch @JudicialWatch Follow Good to see people are taking the terror warning uncovered by @JudicialWatch seriously. https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/506155805117521920 …
    12:11 PM - 31 Aug 2014

    However, when it comes to the rest of the media, there is nothing but silence.

    Beyond Fox News and a handful of alternative news websites, few are mentioning the Judicial Watch report. The organization cited sources within the government that said an ISIS attack on the United States emanating from Ciudad Juarez is “coming soon.”

    Government Focuses On Domestic Political Enemies, Not Islamic Terror


    The FBI, in addition to tracking down who posted nude photos of celebrities on the internet, is concentrating on non-Muslim would-be terrorists. Its National Threat Assessment for Domestic Extremism doesn’t mention Muslim terrorists or the possibility of an attack launched from the southern border.

    “The FBI’s most recent national threat assessment for domestic terrorism makes no reference to Islamist terror threats, despite last year’s Boston Marathon bombing and the 2009 Fort Hood shooting– both carried out by radical Muslim Americans,” writes Bill Gertz for the Washington Free Beacon.


    The most prominent threat to America, according to the FBI and the government, comes from “eight types of domestic extremist movements – none motivated by radical Islam.”


    “They include anti-government militia groups and white supremacy extremists, along with ‘sovereign citizen’ nationalists, and anarchists. Other domestic threat groups outlined by the FBI assessment include violent animal rights and environmentalist extremists, black separatists, anti- and pro-abortion activists, and Puerto Rican nationalists.”


    According to the report, “lone actors” and “small cells” inspired by “anarchist, anti-government militias, white supremacy, and sovereign citizen extremists… will engage in lethal violence, although it is most likely the majority of violent criminal acts will continue to be characterized as serious crimes, such as arson and assault, but which are not, ultimately lethal.”


    DHS, FBI, DOJ, State Police: Political Opposition in America Are the Real Terrorists


    The absence of Islamic terror in the FBI assessment is hardly surprising given previous reports produced by the agency and the Department of Homeland Security.

    In June Infowars.com reported on Attorney General Eric Holder’s “Domestic Terrorism Executive Committee,” a revamped version of Janet Reno’s post Oklahoma City bombing task force. It will include members from the FBI and Justice Department’s National Security Division.


    “We face an escalating danger from self-radicalized individuals within our own borders,” Holder said in a video posted on the Department of Justice website. “As the nature of the threat we face evolves to include the possibility of individual radicalization via the Internet, it is critical that we return our focus to potential extremists here at home.”


    “Holder pointed to a 2013 Congressional Research Service report that claims domestic terrorism has produced more than two dozen incidents since 9/11 as justification for the task force, specifically noting the Boston Marathon bombing and Fort Hood shooting,” writes Mikael Thalen.


    The Department of Homeland Security has produced a number of reports warning patriot groups and others pose a threat to national security.

    In 2012, the agency produced Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States, 1970-2008 (PDF), a document characterizing Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists.

    “While largely omitting Islamic terrorism – the report fails completely to mention the 1993 World Trade Center bombing – the study focuses on Americans who hold beliefs shared by the vast majority of conservatives and libertarians and puts them in the context of radical extremism,” writes Paul Joseph Watson.

    In 2011, the DHS produced several PSAs, or Public Service Announcements, depicting non-Muslim Americans as terrorists. “Far from representing some superficial nod to political correctness, this is in fact a deliberate effort by the feds to characterize predominantly white, middle class, politically engaged Americans as domestic extremists. It’s all part of the agenda to frame dissent against big government as dangerous radicalism,” Watson wrote in August, 2011.


    In 2009, Infowars.com reported on “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment,” a DHS produced document that characterized patriot groups as potential terrorists.


    Prior to the release of the DHS report, Alex Jones and Infowars.com reported on a Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) document on the “Modern Militia Movement” dated February 20, 2009, that “describes supporters of presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr as “militia” influenced terrorists and instructs the Missouri police to be on the lookout for supporters displaying bumper stickers and other paraphernalia associated with the Constitutional, Campaign for Liberty, and Libertarian parties,” we reported on March 11, 2009.


    The documents produced by the government demonstrate the establishment is more concerned about political opposition at home than Islamic terrorism abroad that has the potential of crossing over an unprotected border.


    The Judicial Watch report reveals the possibility of a terror attack by a group that has repeatedly demonstrated its desire to attack civilians and military forces alike. The establishment media is now ignoring this threat.



    http://www.infowars.com/feds-ignore-isis-border-terror-threat/
    Last edited by kathyet2; 09-02-2014 at 01:01 PM.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    22 Jihad Training Camps in the US – FBI Refuses to Take Action

    There are over 22 confirmed terrorist Jihad camps in the United States belonging to Jamaat ul-Fuqra, a Pakastan Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda related branch. Now a combined media effort, we find police officers working to double as the compound militia. To top it off, the FBI states that their hands are tied in monitoring their activities despite a training video that is years old, possible murders, and proof of illegal activities.

    These training camps are being operated by an extremely militant group of international terrorists, an organization called Jamaat ul-Fuqra. In order to live in these camps, you must pledge to support a Pakastani Cleric on the International Wanted list. As early as 2012, the media confirmed 19 Jihad camps on United States soil.

    http://www.clarionproject.org/analys...l-new-enclaves





    'Muslims of the Americas' Depositions Reveal New Enclaves


    The revelations came during depositions of three senior officials of the group after MOA unsuccessfully sued two of their critics.

    By Ryan Mauro
    Sun, May 4, 2014

    The entrance to Islamberg, NY
    Headlines




    A senior official of the Muslims of the Americas/Jamaat ul-Fuqra (MOA), a terror-linked group, said during a deposition that it has a “community” outside Anchorage, Alaska. Officials also confirmed the existence of three communes in New York, California and Michigan that have yet to be publicly pinpointed.
    The comments came during depositions of three senior MOA officials after the group sued two critics, Martin Mawyer and Patti Pierucci, for $30 million for their book about MOA titled Twilight in America. The judge dismissed the lawsuit last week. Astonishingly, MOA Deputy Director Hussein Adams, the son of terrorist Barry Adams, admitted he had no information to show that the defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their claims.
    The MOA officials repeatedly denied being a terrorist organization, but would not provide basic details about the group. Adams was especially secretive, claiming that the group had virtually no records and that he didn’t even know the names of those on Islamberg’s town council or who was paying the bills.
    MOA says it has 22 “Islamic villages” around the country, including the one named “Mahmoudberg” in Sweeny, Texas that was identified by the Clarion Project.
    Other pinpointed communes include Islamberg in Hancock, NY; Holy Islamville in York County, South Carolina; Islamville in Dover, Tennessee; Hasanville in Barry’s Bay, Ontario, Canada; Madinah Village near Commerce, Georgia; Aliville in Odum, Georgia; Ahmadabad West in Red House, Virginia and one with an unknown name in Meherrin, Virginia.
    Deputy Director Hussein Adams said that MOA has a “community” near Anchorage, Alaska. This is the first time that a MOA enclave has been reported in the state.
    He also spoke of “Mariaville” located “just down the street” of Islamberg, New York. There is documentation of a village in Deposit, New York. Adams mentioned another site outside Los Angeles, substantiating reports of a village at Oak Hill, California. Another MOA official, Muhammed Hasib Abdul-Haqq, confirmed the existence of a site in Coldwater, Michigan.
    There are likely more to be found. During his deposition, Adams claimed that only three villages (Islamberg, Mariaville and Holy Islamville) are “officially” part of his group. Another nine that he mentioned were “unofficial.” When confronted with how MOA says on its DVDs that it has 22 villages, he replied, “Well, maybe there were other locations included.”
    The officials maintained that the group never engages in jihad training and downplayed the significance of two videos showing that the MOA network in the U.S. is used for guerilla training. The first shows Gilani saying that Muslims interested in such training should contact his offices in the U.S. The second tape shows women training inside Islamberg.
    Adams said that he was not aware of any training like what’s seen in the Clarion tape since he arrived in Islamberg from Canada in 2000. He said there are no weapons storages in Islamberg, but “if there is, you’re referring to individuals’ personal firearms.” The interviewer then asked, “So there may be [weapons], but they would be individuals’ personal firearms?” He replied, “Correct.”
    Abdul-Haqq said he had seen parts of the Clarion tape but had not seen “any actual training like that.”
    “I know that they were doing things. They were going out there and marching and carrying on with some wooden sticks. Yeah, I know about that,” he said.
    The third official to be deposed, Khadijah Smith, said she saw the footage released by Clarion and was asked whether she saw training like that taking place. She responded, “Self—we have self-defense classes, yes.”
    The interviewer then commented that it looked more like military-type training. She answered:
    “That’s in reference—that’s basically personal opinion, but I know that I’ve actually taken self-defense classes, as well as all the other ladies did.”
    Smith compared the instruction to the type of self-defense classes that many women take. However, she then admitted she “briefly” got firearms instruction at Islamberg, but “I don’t know a whole lot about guns. I know how to shoot a rifle, not even a handgun.”
    The level of advancement of MOA training is not the point. The point is that MOA is a secretive organization that, in the words of declassified FBI report from 2007, “possesses an infrastructure capable of planning and mounting terrorist campaigns overseas and within the U.S.” and “extols membership to pursue a policy of jihad or holy war against individuals or groups it considers enemies of Islam, which includes the U.S. Government.”
    In a documentary titled Grand Deception, former FBI agent and Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Nathan Garrett explains, “We’re not talking about a gun. We’re talking about the man holding the gun. How do you build him?”
    Getting the gun is the easy part. Producing the extremist that uses the gun is the hard part. That’s what MOA and other Islamist indoctrinators are doing.



    Ryan Mauro is the ClarionProject.org’s National Security Analyst, a fellow with the Clarion Project and is frequently interviewed on top-tier TV stations as an expert on counterterrorism and Islamic extremism.

    Related Articles

    Last edited by kathyet2; 09-02-2014 at 03:04 PM.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Obama Sued For Funding Terrorist Group Hamas

    Posted on September 2, 2014





    This seems pretty open and shut.
    Check it out:

    Larry Klayman, the founder of Judicial Watch and now Freedom Watch, and a former U.S. Department of Justice prosecutor who helped break up AT&T, today announced that he and other plaintiffs have filed a civil lawsuit in federal court in D.C. (Case no. 14-1484) under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act “RICO” for criminal acts by President Barack Hussein Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and the U.N. Secretary General for laundering U.S. dollars to the terrorist organization HAMAS. This money has been been foreseeably used to buy rockets and construct tunnels to attack Israel and terrorize and kill American and dual American-Israeli citizens who reside or are located in Israel.
    As set forth in the complaint, which can be viewed at www.freedomwatchusa.org, the defendants have conspired to send money, that is hundreds of millions of U.S. Dollars to HAMAS, under the false pretext that this financial support will be used for humanitarian purposes. However, as recently reported by Voice of America and the New York Times, the recent killing of the chief HAMAS financial officer by the IDF confirmed that these U.S. dollars, only some of which was found in his bombed out car, has predictably fallen into the hands of HAMAS’s terrorist wing which controls and was elected by Gazans to govern over them.
    Larry Klayman, the lead plaintiff had this to say upon filing suit: “The nation and the world have increasingly come to see that Obama views himself primarily as a Muslim and acts accordingly in favoring Islamic interests over Judeo-Christian ones, and the complaint lays out Obama’s history in documented detail. This includes his actions calculated to harm the nation of Israel. His facilitating and ordering financial and other material aid to HAMAS, along with his equally anti-Israel Secretaries of State Kerry and Clinton, and the U.N. Secretary General, is just the latest deadly chapter in what amounts to criminal activity which has logically resulted in harm and death to Jews and Christians and threatens the continued existence of Israel. That is why he and the other defendants were sued under RICO and other relevant laws.”


    Published on Sep 1, 2014
    Larry Klayman, the founder of Judicial Watch and now Freedom Watch, and a former U.S. Department of Justice prosecutor who helped break up AT&T, today announced that he and other plaintiffs have filed a civil lawsuit in federal court in D.C. (Case no. 14-1484) under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act "RICO" for criminal acts by President Barack Hussein Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and the U.N. Secretary General for laundering U.S. dollars to the terrorist organization HAMAS. This money has been been foreseeably used to buy rockets and construct tunnels to attack Israel and terrorize and kill American and dual American-Israeli citizens who reside or are located in Israel. http://freedomwatchusa.org/obama-kerr...
    http://www.larryklayman.com/
    http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/obama-name...
    Follow Alex on TWITTER - https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones
    Infowars on G+ - https://plus.google.com/+infowars/
    Like Alex on FACEBOOK - https://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEme...

    :Web:
    http://www.infowars.com/
    http://www.prisonplanet.com/
    http://www.infowars.net/

    :Subscribe and share your login with 11 friends:
    http://www.prisonplanet.tv
    http://www.InfowarsNews.com


    Visit http://www.InfowarsLife.com to get the products Alex Jones and his family trust, while supporting the growth of our expanding media operation.

    [http://bit.ly/1s6cphV] Occu Power™
    [http://bit.ly/1rGOLsG] DNA Force™
    [http://bit.ly/1nIngBb] X2 Survival Shield™
    [http://bit.ly/1kaXxKL] Super Female Vitality™
    [http://bit.ly/1mhAKCO] Lung Cleanse™
    [http://bit.ly/1mGbikx] Silver-Bullet - Colloidal Silver™
    [http://bit.ly/1rUsgkl] Fluoride Shield™
    [http://bit.ly/1xcoUfo] Super Male Vitality™
    [http://bit.ly/1z5BCP9] Survival Shield - Nascent Iodine™
    [http://bit.ly/1o4sQtc] Patriot Blend 100% Organic Coffee™
    [http://bit.ly/1iVL6HB] Immune Support 100% Organic Coffee™

    All available at - http://www.infowarsshop.com/

    INFOWARS MAGAZINE - LATEST ISSUE
    http://www.infowarsshop.com/-Infowars...


    INFOWARS HEALTH - START GETTING HEALTHY BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE - http://www.infowarshealth.com/

    Newsletter Sign-up - Includes free monthly digital copy of Infowars Magazine - http://www.infowars.com/newsletter




    Continue Reading on freedomwatchusa.org ...

    http://conservativebyte.com/2014/09/...t-group-hamas/

    NATIONAL INSECURITY

    Sowing seeds of our own destruction

    Exclusive: Larry Klayman blows whistle on Obama plan to fund Hamas


    Published: 4 days ago Larry Klayman About | Email | Archive Larry Klayman is a former Justice Department prosecutor and the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch. His latest book is "Whores: Why and How I Came to Fight the Establishment."

    Subscribe to feed

    The American people had better wake up! Our so-called leaders, President Barack Hussein Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, with the end of the latest Israeli-Hamas war, are about to resume their slick, under-the-table scheme to fund Hamas with U.S. dollars, allegedly earmarked for humanitarian purposes.As explained in excruciating detail in a complaint I filed Thursday against these criminals (see FreedomWatchUSA.org), Obama and company – and let’s also throw the former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton into the mix as she is a defendant as well – have been using a State Department slush fund, authorized by Congress for legitimate purposes, to send U.S. dollars to Hamas, a “subsidiary” of the Muslim Brotherhood and a designated terrorist group.

    The bigger problem is that the people of Gaza, whose nation now lies mostly in ruins, voted Hamas into power to rule over them. And recently Hamas reached an agreement with the Palestinian Authority, which governs Palestinian-controlled areas of the West Bank, to rule over all Palestinians. Thus, your hard-earned taxpayer monies in the hundreds of millions have been, and will continue to be, sent to Hamas for “humanitarian purposes.” However, this financial support is in large part also being used to purchase rockets and to build tunnels to attack the land of Jesus and Moses, Israel. And, those who travel to Israel, as I did during this latest war that ended just a few days ago with a phony and compromised cease-fire before Hamas was finished off for good, are being either threatened with serious bodily injury or death or are being killed outright. During this latest war with Hamas, 64 Israelis were killed, some of whom were either American citizens or dual American-Israeli citizens who went to the Holy Land to fight for our God-given right of Jews and, by extension, Christians to the land of Zion.
    One might ask: How is it possible that Obama and his comrades could get away with this? Where is the opposition Republican political party, which prides itself on claimed honest dealings and patriotism? Indeed, now that the threat to our shores from ISIS, another and even worse Muslim terrorist group, is becoming increasingly known, how is it that, according to the Republicans, Obama is all to blame for allowing this radical Islamic cancer to grow? Why haven’t the leaders in the Republican Party loudly spoken up before now? Apparently, their primary interest is getting on Fox News to win the next election this fall and in 2016, not forcing Congress to serve as a real check to a president and his enablers who are bent on destroying the nation.
    Help Larry Klayman with his class-action suit against Obama’s use of the NSA to violate Americans’ rights
    This is a dilemma that We the People find ourselves in today. To remain silent and take no forceful decisive action would amount to sowing the seeds of our own destruction. I, for one, am trying to use the legal system, what is left of it given its march toward increased corruption in recent years, to try to check this tyranny. Recently, I have had some success, particularly in our lawsuits against the National Security Agency, or NSA, where a rare courageous judge found Dec. 16, 2013, that it had violated the constitutional rights of all Americans by accessing their most private telephone conversations and related data, known as metadata. This coercive spying is obviously intended to keep the people down so they do not even question the acts of our establishment leaders, who continue to line their own pockets at the expense of all of us. The case is headed for the Supreme Court. But while the NSA’s tyranny, at the direction of both Democrat and Republican leaders on congressional intelligence committees and in the Obama White House, may be technically checked, the hard reality is that this nation and the world are in the process of coming unglued at the seams.
    The events of the last week, and months in particular, have proven that the United States is in dire and critical condition, hanging by a thread, ruled over by a president who is more loyal to his Middle Eastern Muslim brothers and his racial heritage than all of the people. In this latter respect, just look at his biased conduct, and that of his equally racist attorney general, with regard to the sad events in Ferguson, Missouri – where a policeman was effectively condemned to prosecution for killing a black man before all the facts were known. Meanwhile, white cops killed by blacks (and there have been six in the last few years just in my native city of Philadelphia alone) get no attention from this president and his Al Sharpton-like allies. And, this is how it should be, as these tragic events should be left to law enforcement, and the president and his men should not intervene to create a lynching party to hang “whitey” for years of past invidious discrimination.
    Fellow Americans, remember the Declaration of Independence and the revolution that followed and take heed. Now, 238 years later, it’s time to again think things through and act against a tyrannical sovereign who is destroying the nation and our lives, as time is all but running out.
    Media wishing to interview Larry Klayman, please contact media@wnd.com.

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/sowing-se...7ofkHy6tIwt.99
    Last edited by kathyet2; 09-02-2014 at 03:26 PM.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Infowars

    Shared publicly - 12:02 PM
    #ISIS

    Border Gates in El Paso Wide Open As Feds Warn #ISIS Attack Imminent - http://www.infowars.com/border-gates...tack-imminent/

    Supposed terror threat belied by government's refusal to secure nation's porous southern #border.


    Last edited by kathyet2; 09-02-2014 at 03:17 PM.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546


    Published on Sep 4, 2014
    # ISIS: Decoding Obama's Bullshit: What does it mean when Obama and the Liberal Leftist Media use the term ISIL over and over again instead of ISIS? The Anonymous Patriot explains.
    ========================
    LINKS
    The Coded Message Obama Delivers When He Says ISIL Instead Of ISIS
    http://bit.ly/1qrojVN
    Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
    http://bit.ly/1ptxUpL
    Levant
    http://bit.ly/Wi2OuH
    GRAPHIC: A Second Message to America (FAKE ISIS beheading video)
    http://mil-com.me/1tuUeal
    ========================
    contact The Anonymous Patriot by calling
    480-420-8743
    (leave a message after the beep)
    ========================
    Follow The Anonymous Patriot on Twitter:
    http://bit.ly/1pwyjN1

    On Facebook:
    The Anonymous Patriot Facebook Page:
    http://on.fb.me/1t2u6Qd

    Visit The Anonymous Patriot Blog:
    http://theanonymouspatriot.wordpress.com

    The Anonymous Patriot Contact Email:
    murinarpanterac03@gmail

    Contact The Anonymous Patriot on ZELLO 2-way:
    user name Anonymous0407
    ===========================
    :::NOTICE TO TROLLS, SHILLS, AND THE MHC:::
    The Anonymous Patriot (0407) reserves the RIGHT to ban "trolls, shills, and general assholes" from The Anonymous Patriot Youtube Channel, if required. 0407 also reserves the right to block such individuals from his Facebook and Twitter social media accounts.
    Any voice mails left at Google Phone are recorded and downloadable, and 0407 reserves the right to use such voice recordings in videos.
    YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546

    "Moderate" Islam isn't what most Muslims Believe - It's what Liberals Believe that Muslims Believe - Freedom Outpost
    ow.ly




    "Moderate" Islam isn't what most Muslims Believe - It's what Liberals Believe that Muslims Believe

    Daniel Greenfield 2 hours ago

    I have been searching for moderate Islam since September 11, and just like a lost sock in the dryer, it was in the last place I expected it to be.
    There is no "moderate" Islam in the mosques or in Mecca. You won't find it in the Koran or the Hadiths. If you want to find moderate Islam, browse the newspaper editorials after a terrorist attack or take a course on Islamic religion taught by a Unitarian Sociologist wearing fake native jewelry.
    You can't find a moderate Islam in Saudi Arabia or Iran, but you can find it in countless network news specials, articles and books about the two homelands of their respective brands of Islam.
    You won't find the fabled land of moderate Muslims in the east. You won't even find it in the west. Like all myths, it exists in the imagination of those who tell the stories. You won't find a moderate Islam in the Koran, but you will find it in countless Western books about Islam.
    Moderate Islam isn't what most Muslims believe. It's what most liberals believe that Muslims believe.
    The new multicultural theology of the West is moderate Islam. Moderate Islam is the perfect religion for a secular age since it isn't a religion at all.
    Take Islam, turn it inside out and you have moderate Islam. Take a Muslim who hasn't been inside a mosque in a year, who can name the entire starting lineup of the San Diego Chargers, but can't name Mohammed's companions and you have a moderate Muslim. Or more accurately, a secular Muslim.
    An early generation of Western leaders sought the affirmation of their national destinies in the divine. This generation of Western leaders seeks the affirmation of their secular liberalism in a moderate Islam.
    Even if they have to make it up.
    Without a moderate Islam, the Socialist projects of Europe depend on heavy immigration collapse. America's War on Terror becomes the endless, inescapable slog that the rise of ISIS has once again revealed it to be. Multiculturalism, post-nationalism, and Third World Guiltism all implode.
    Without moderate Muslims, nationalism returns, borders close, and the right wins. That is what they fear.
    If there is no moderate Islam, no moderate Mohammed, no moderate Allah, then the Socialist Kingdom of Heaven on Earth has to go in the rubbish bin. The grand coalitions in which LGBT activists and Islamists scream at Jews over Gaza aren't the future; they're the Weimar Republic on wheels.
    Flash back to Obama in his tan suit wearily saying that he has no strategy for ISIS. The original plan was to capture Osama alive, give him a civilian trial, cut a deal with the moderate Taliban and announce the end of the War on Terror before the midterm elections.
    So much for that.
    Moderate Islam is a difficult faith. To believe in it, you have to disregard over a thousand years of recorded history, theology, demographics and just about everything that predates 1965. You have to ignore the bearded men chopping off heads because they don't represent the majority of Muslims.
    Neither does Mohammed, who did his own fair share of headchopping.
    The real Islam is a topic that non-Muslims of no faith, who hold sacred only the platitudes of a post-everything society, are eager to lecture on without knowing anything about it.

    Their Islam is not the religion of Mohammed, the Koran, the Hadiths, the Caliphs or its practitioners in such places as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq or Indonesia. Their Islam is a religion that does not exist, but that they fervently believe must exist, because without it, their way of life is as doomed as the dodo.
    They aren't Muslims. They have no faith in Allah or the Koran. Instead, they have faith in the goodness of an Islam that exists without resort to scriptures, theology or deity. This may seem strange to actual believers, but after all, their own poor tattered scraps of Christianity or Judaism don't bother paying too much attention to deities or scriptures except when it comes to cherry-picking quotes about tolerance.
    Is it any wonder that they treat Islam the same way?
    The true moderate Muslims are secular liberals of loosely Christian and Jewish persuasion who have invented and believe in a moderate Islam that doesn't exist outside of their own heads. This secular Islam, which values all life, is dedicated to social justice and universal tolerance, is a counterpart of their own bastardized religions. And they are too afraid to wake up and realize that it doesn't exist.
    When American and European leaders insist that Islam has nothing to do with the latest Islamic atrocity, they are not referencing a religion practiced by Muslims, but an imaginary religion that they imagine Muslims must practice because the alternative is the end of everything that they believe in.
    Their moderate Islam is light on the details, beyond standing for social justice, fighting Global Warming and supporting gay rights, because it is really multiculturalism wearing a fake beard. When a Western leader claims that the latest batch of Islamic terrorists don't speak for Islam, he isn't defending Muslims, he's defending multiculturalism. He assumes that Muslims believe in multiculturalism because he does.
    Moderate Islam is just multiculturalism misspelled. Its existence is a firm article of faith for those who believe in multiculturalism.
    Dissuading a believer in moderate Muslims from his invented faith by citing the long trail of corpses or the hateful Hadiths that call for mass murder is futile because these are not the roots of his religion. He doesn't know what a Hadith is, nor does he care. As a social justice man in good standing, he attributes the violent track record of Islam to European colonialism and oppression.
    He has never read the Koran. He has read a thousand articles about how Muslims are oppressed at the airport, in Gaza, in Burma and in Bugs Bunny cartoons. They are his new noble savages and he will not hear a word against them. Having colonized their identities in his imagination (despite the marked up copy of Edward Said's Orientalism that he keeps by his bedside) he treats them as reflections of his ego.
    When you say that moderate Muslims don't exist, you are calling him a bad person. When you challenge Islam, you are attacking multiculturalism and he will call you a racist, regardless of the fact that Islam is as much of a race as Communism, Nazism or the Mickey Mouse Fan Club were races.
    The moderate Muslim is an invention of the liberal academic, the secular theologian, the vapid politician and his shrill idiot cousin, the political activist. Like the money in the budgets that underpin their plans and the scientific evidence for Global Warming, he does not exist.
    And it is not necessary that he should exist. It is only necessary that we have faith in his existence.
    The degraded lefty descendants of Christians and Jews wait for a moderate Muslim messiah who will reconcile the impossibilities of their multicultural society by healing the conflicts between Islam and the West. Until they find him, they have to believe, not in a divinity, but in the moderate Muslim.
    Source
    Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

    Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/09/mo...qj4WhbAmH31.99
    Last edited by kathyet2; 09-05-2014 at 12:51 PM.

Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. FBI National Domestic Threat Assessment Omits Islamist Terrorism
    By Newmexican in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-29-2014, 09:45 AM
  2. Justice Department Releases MS-13 Threat Assessment
    By zeezil in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-16-2008, 12:01 AM
  3. THE MS-13 THREAT A National Assessment
    By GREGAGREATAMERICAN in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-14-2008, 10:47 PM
  4. Islamic terrorism in Kosovo
    By Sam-I-am in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-24-2007, 01:32 PM
  5. Islamic Terrorism and Sex Slavery are Imported Through......
    By Brian503a in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-14-2005, 11:20 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •