Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Mass Arrest and Gun Confiscation Has Begun: Video

    Mass Arrest and Gun Confiscation Has Begun: Video

    Infowars.com
    April 6, 2013



    Tyranny is rising. The examples we have seen from the 20th century by Hitler’s Nazi Germany, Stalin, Mao and other despots are surfacing in America today.

    The police state starts out by throwing the book at selected groups like liberty lovers and veterans, pot smokers and gun owners alike.

    Children are being abducted by the nanny state as the tyranny escalates.

    History demonstrates that the tyranny does not stop at these groups but soon every citizen falls victim to police state terror. The police state isn’t coming, it’s already here!

    This article was posted: Saturday, April 6, 2013 at 10:47 am

    Tags: police state

    http://www.infowars.com/mass-arrest-...s-begun-video/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,266
    Thomas Jefferson Carried Pocket Pistols Without a Permit

    Posted on April 5, 2013






    Thomas Jefferson was an admirer of the writings of Cesare Beccaria (1738–1794). Jefferson often wrote passages word for word from Beccaria in a Commonplace Book (a journal). One such passage was a denouncement of laws which forbid di portor le armi, in other words, “to forbid the bearing, carrying or wearing of arms.”
    At the end of this rather lengthy passage was the money quotation, as it were copied from Beccaria’s An Essay on Crimes & Punishments:


    “Does the execution of this law deprive the subject of that personal liberty, so dear to mankind and to the wise legislator; and does it not subject the innocent to all the disagreeable circumstances that should only fall on the guilty? It certainly makes the situation of the assaulted worse, and of the assailants better, and rather encourages than prevents murder, as it requires less courage to attack unarmed than armed.”


    Beccaria’s passage was the source in Jefferson’s proposed Virginia Constitution of 1776:

    “No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”


    By the way, Thomas Jefferson carried pockets pistols. Oh my, concealed carry without a permit?
    John Adams wrote of the right of “arms in the hands of citizens, to be used at individual discretion … in private self-defense.”[1]



    In 1789, mere days after James Madison proposed the Bill of Rights, Tench Coxe, a friend and correspondent of both Madison and Jefferson wrote that this would confirm to the people “their right to keep and bear their private arms.” Interestingly, neither man corrected Mr. Coxe that it was only within the militia, because it isn’t.


    So if the right to bear arms is unrestricted, does that mean you should be able to own a tank, artillery or other heavy weapons? Well, I believe the answer is clearly no. How can I say that? Simple. Words mean things. The Second Amendment gives one the right to “bear arms”; arms that an individual can carry or wear, to protect oneself.


    Okay then, what about grenades, bombs, bazookas, etc. Although they can be carried, they are not considered weapons of self-defense. They are more prone to cause collateral damage of the innocent as well as the guilty or an aggressor.


    Finally, there is the question of having to register your weapon or obtain a license to carry. Is this an infringement of the Second Amendment? Yes it is. Sen. Ted Cruz described well to the leftist dolts, Feinstein, Leahy, and the like. Would people need to register or obtain a license to exercise their religious or political beliefs or free association such as the First Amendment delineates? Wouldn’t you think it absurd to require a permit before objecting to unreasonable search and seizure?

    The bottom line is, an infringement is an infringement regardless of the amendment they infringe upon, and it is clear that most if not all of these gun control measures infringe upon an individual’s right to keep and bear arms.


    Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/04/...#ixzz2PnOD4xY8

  3. #3
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •