Results 1 to 2 of 2
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
03-25-2009, 02:14 AM #1
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
- Posts
- 117,696
Obamas National Service Corps / UK 60,000 Civilian Counter T
Whats the differance between the two... they were annouced roughly the same time... but 1 seems kinder and gentler that the other ... is any one else seeing this through rose colored glasses.. as it is we seem to follow England or them follow the US in a lot of things as far as security goes ...
I guess my point is - Is Obama's National Service Corps not what it appears to be? at least in the name
Obamas National Service Corps
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009 ... te-hurdle/
UK 60,000 Civilian Counter Terror Force
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009 ... m-al-qaidaJoin our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
03-25-2009, 02:37 AM #2
They just want people to work for free. Or they want to toss them a few peanuts. If they can give billions to a few bankers, they could pay the people for these services. And dont think I am anti-volunteer...I am not. I think volunteering is a good thing...a great thing to do. But to set up a "service corps"? I smell a rat. Right now people need jobs...pay them.
Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
Listen to William Gheen on Rense Apr 24, 2024 talking Invasion...
04-25-2024, 02:03 PM in ALIPAC In The News