Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    136

    Time Says No Win In Afghanistan Without Jobs

    One long year after activists at Jobs for Afghans began putting out their unique message, that creating cash-for-work jobs in Afghanistan would cut short the insurgency and be much cheaper than a prolonged war, Time Magazine has thrust this solution into the spotlight with this week's cover story "How Not to Lose in Afghanistan" (April 20, 2009.) The double-page spread leading into the story makes no bones about where it is headed: JOBS. This is not a nod in the direction of fighting smarter. This is a full embrace.

    Taking a page from Sun Tzu's Art of War, Time, if not the American people, seems to understand that the most preferable way to win a war is never to have to fight it.

    Reporter Aryn Baker quotes a Korengal Valley elder:
    "The Taliban say they are fighting because there are Americans here and it's a jihad. But the fact is, they aren't fighting for religion. They are fighting for money. If they had jobs, they would stop fighting."
    Thank you Time Magazine. I thought it would be a cold day in heck before I'd hear myself saying that.

    Baker muses:

    Is it really that simple? Afghans like Khan say only a small fraction of the insurgency consists of hardened jihadis willing to fight to the death; the rest are ordinary, poor villagers who simply haven't been given a better option. Khan estimates that the insurgents earn from $100 to $200 a month..."
    Most of that money comes from illegal trade like opium or clear-cut lumber. Baker notes that the U.S. policy of poppy eradication has only fueled the fighting by eliminating income without providing an alternative.

    Baker flips the emerging Pakistan-first analysis on its head, and notes the obvious:
    Stabilizing Afghanistan might well become crucial to preventing the far more terrifying prospect of an Islamist takeover in Pakistan.
    Buy this issue of Time. It's not every day that the flagship of the corporate media, bizarrely miscast by the far-right as "liberal," not only gets it right, but gets it exactly right. We may be forgiven if we think we hear in the distance the footfalls of a Velvet Revolution.

    A hawk-dove issue it is not. One of the first to go public with jobs-as-a-weapon-of-counterinsurgency was Karl Eikenberry. As in, General Karl Eikenberry, Former Commander of US Forces in Afghanistan:
    "Much of the enemy force is drawn from the ranks of unemployed men looking for wages to support their families"
    The far-right will attempt to squash this deviation in thinking from that preferred by the military-industrial complex, which Republican President Eisenhower warned us about. Eisenhower warned us that war is profitable, but sometimes there are solutions other than war. He urged us to recognize that business forces will tend to drive us towards war.

    Not that there isn't fighting ahead. There will be fighting. But perhaps not of the stupid sort, which brings to fruition bin Laden's dream of "bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy." He said:
    "All that we have to do is to send two mujahedeen to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al Qaeda, in order to make generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic and political losses without their achieving anything of note,"
    The surge in itself may not be fatal. It is not the number of soldiers in the mission, but what that mission consists of. Chase "Taliban" only as far as necessary to protect populations and work crews, and hand out jobs and money.

    Changes in tune like the Time article do not just happen. The credit goes to activists who quietly forward and fax articles and arguments to congressmen, to the White House, to newspapers, to the media. They may not talk about it or write diaries or make comments in blogs, but they do the work. You are succeeding. George Patton said the greatest endeavor of man is war. This is wrong. The greatest endeavor is to stop wars.

    Somewhere a wheel was turned, and the 20,000-ton ship-of-state is now showing that turn. Somewhere a soldier high over the Atlantic headed for ultimate destination Baghram is reading Time Magazine, and hoping his exalted elders are doing something more than cheerleading sending him into a meat grinder. Hoping his government has done its damned best to make men down there decide not to shoot at him, or plant one of those dreaded IEDs. The one that will kill me, or worse.

    There are already a number of cash-for-work pilot programs in Afghanistan, in Jawzjan Province, Uruzgan, and Balkh Province, run by Action Aid, Mercy Corps, and USAID, respectively. The USAID project involves the clearing of springs and removal of silt which clogs irrigation ditches.

    Afghanistan, the last place empires test their might. Perhaps hardest to believe is that Time Magazine's path is cheaper. The cost of military operations in Afghanistan? Going on $30 billion a year. The cost of 500,000 day-labor jobs there for a year? $4 billion. To not create jobs in Afghanistan is penny-wise and pound foolish. By short-circuiting this quagmire, we'll be saving billions that we're going to need to create our own jobs.

    "How Not to Lose in Afghanistan"


    Please circulate and forward this to your congressmember and the White House.
    LINK TO CONGRESS EMAILS.
    LINK TO EMAIL WHITE HOUSE.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Captainron's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,279
    I know a woman, a graduate of Bible Institute of Los Angeles who, as a certified nurse midwife, went over there and spent five months training the women in how to have healthier, medically safe deliveries. There are probably a number of similar efforts. Not sure what's happening on the jobs front, but we have done similar things with vanquished countries, within our recent past. Like the Marshall Plan.
    "Men of low degree are vanity, Men of high degree are a lie. " David
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member carolinamtnwoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Asheville, Carolina del Norte
    Posts
    4,396

    Re: Time Says No Win In Afghanistan Without Jobs

    we'll be saving billions that we're going to need to create our own jobs
    Most important would be the lives saved!!!

  4. #4
    Senior Member gofer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    3,728
    Local lore holds that the fight with the Americans began in earnest when the U.S., acting on a tip from a rival tribe, dropped a bomb on the lumber mill of a local chief, killing some of his relatives and leading to a campaign of vengeance.

    The bomb coincided with a decision by the Karzai government, concerned about the environmental impact of clear-cutting, to ban timber exports outright. The valley's population lost its only source of income.
    Another unintended consequence of enviromental wackos! I'm sure some Greepeace person had a hand in this somewhere or one of those nuttso groups. Apparently war is preferred to timber cutting.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •