Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546

    The Trigger Event for the UN Takeover of the US

    The Trigger Event for the UN Takeover of the US

    June 28, 2014 in Columnist by RBN

    By Dave Hodges
    Republic Broadcasting Network

    Parts One and Two of this series described how the United Nations is poised to take over the United States. The border crisis with tens, if not hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens is threatening to paralyze several federal agencies. When this number grows to millions, this country and its resources will be paralyzed in terms of responding the holocaust which is underway. Part Two, in particular, demonstrated how the United Nations is prepositioning resources in anticipation of being able to assume a policing duty with regard to the border crisis, which has totally been manufactured in order that the UN has a pretext to function as a force.
    Because the UN will be responding to a “humanitarian need” the American military will have a very difficult time objecting and opposing the takeover by the UN. The policing of the US by the UN is merely a move to gain a foothold for control over this country. When one looks at the wholesale movement of UN military vehicles, it is easy to conclude that their mission will not be humanitarian, in its totality, but this is lining up to be a military mission.
    As bad as the crisis on the border will be, this is just the opening act. What follows will allow the UN to assume complete policing powers in all 50 states and the assumption of jurisdictional control over all state and federal agencies.
    What Will Give the UN the Justification to Assume Control Over the Entire US?

    The one element that binds together all the local, state and federal agencies is the economy. The border crisis will provide the UN the opportunity to have a presence in the border states. However, there will be 46 states that will not be under UN control. Therefore, how does the UN overcome this challenge in order to assume complete control of the United States?

    When the American economy collapses, food riots will commence. The average American will have enough food and water for about three days, with the majority of Americans not possessing the means to protect their individual supplies from the hording bands of desperate people. Banks will collapse, business inventories will be looted and police will abandon their posts just like they did during Hurricane Katrina. From a law enforcement perspective, America will lose the ability to respond to the crisis within 3-5 days. Within 10 days, there will absolute and total anarchy. Nobody will be safe. However, the UN “Peacekeepers” will be present and will be willing and able to assume control. And if they assume control, as they did, in Bosnia, Serbia, the West Bank, Lebanon and Rwanda, Americans are in a lot of trouble.

    My military sources have told me that this has already been rehearsed, the UN takeover of America, as far back as the 1990′s version of NORTHCOM and in combination with the UN have engaged in urban warfare drills.
    Again, in Bosnia, urban occupation was coordinated between foreign troops and US soldiers, under UN command in this war torn country. The removal of 260+ American military senior grade military officers should make a lot more sense because our loyal military leaders would not approve of this loss of sovereignty. An economic collapse will be the second leg of the UN takeover of this country following an international response by the UN at the border.
    And what will that mean? It will mean gun confiscation and seizure of private assets.
    I WANT TO BE CRYSTAL CLEAR. WHEN THE UN ASSUMES CONTROL OF THE EMERGING AND PLANNED BORDER CRISIS, THIS WILL MARK THE BEGINNING OF THE END OF THE UNITED STATES. AND WHEN THE ECONOMY COLLAPSES, THIS WILL MARK THE END OF AMERICAN SOVEREIGNTY. THE UN MUST NEVER BE ALLOWED TO HAVE A POLICING AUTHORITY ON OUR SOIL FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER!

    For those who are indifferent to a planned UN intervention in this country, I would ask you to please tell me when has the United Nations ever intervened in a crisis without having its presence create genocide type conditions? Since class is in session, let me provide for you with the poster child answer to the previous question. Look at what the UN did not do in the Rwanda crisis. These yellow-bellied blue helmets watched as people were pulled from their cars, their wagons and their homes and were subsequently murdered.


    Twenty years after a million Rwandans were murdered in 90 days, the UN apologized for their inaction. The UN also has a similar track record in Bosnia, Serbia, the West Bank, et al., and soon to be in America.
    Mark my words, when the food riots commence following the collapse of the dollar, the UN will not be intervening to save American lives in the midst of the economic collapse that is presently underway. The sole purpose of the UN presence, during this crisis, will be to assume complete control of the government and the key infrastructure.
    Larry Grathwohl Was Correct


    I had the good fortune of interviewing the late Larry Grathwohl many times. Larry was well-known for exposing the fact that Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorne, formerly the leaders of the radical revolutionary group, the Weatherman Underground, launched the political career of Barack Hussein Obama. While Larry was serving as an undercover informant designed to penetrate the Weatherman on behalf of the FBI, he once asked Ayers what will happen if and when these radical communists were ever able to assume control over the US. Ayers responded that “50 million Americans would have to be placed in re-education camps” (i.e. FEMA Camps). And he added that about “25 million would have to be eliminated”.
    At that time in 1968, the United States only had 200 million people. Ayer’s incarceration numbers represented one in four Americans would have to incarcerated and one in eight would have to murdered. In today’s numbers, about 67 million Americans would be incarcerated and over 33 million Americans would have to murdered. The enormity of this statement by Ayers is staggering. Please keep in mind that this man that was the driving force behind the launching of Obama’s political career!

    The Catalyst

    Americans need to stop listening to Obama and the mainstream media, there is not going to be any economic recovery. No matter how many times they lie and bend the numbers to cushion America’s fall from financial grace, we have no hope economically because there is nothing left to salvage. America only has to look at three economic indicators to know that we are in a lot of trouble, The debt is $17 trillion dollars, unfunded (partially or otherwise) mandated social programs constitutes another $240 trillion dollars and the credit swap derivatives total between $1 quadrillion dollars to $1.5 quadrillion dollars, which is six times the GDP of the planet. Do you get it now? There will be no recovery, only a complete UN takeover when the economic collapse does come.
    Conclusion

    The UN will not have to round up 67 million Americans, most Americans will come to their imprisonment willingly, that is, if they want to eat and to be “temporarily” protected. It will be during this backdrop that we will see FEMA camps unveiled in manner described by Bill Ayers, who not only launched Obama’s political career but also still visits him at the Whitehouse. Time is short and the dots are beginning to connect.
    Perhaps this July 4th, we should be having a going away party instead of a celebration.

    http://republicbroadcasting.org/the-...ver-of-the-us/
    Last edited by kathyet2; 07-02-2014 at 01:39 PM.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    U.N. To Intervene In Detroit Water Shutoffs

    July 2, 2014

    UNITED NATIONS – Watch out, Detroit. Here comes the United Nations.
    WND has learned that after issuing a statement last week condemning Detroit’s decision to send water shut-off notices to tens of thousands of customers behind in their payments, the U.N now plans to conduct confidential policy discussions with the Obama administration to be followed by a formal public report to the U.N. Human Rights Council.
    On Monday, the U.N. Human Rights Council’s office in Geneva confirmed to WND that the U.N. plans to intervene directly in the Detroit water crisis, determined to apply international law to judge the U.S. in violation of human rights to safe water.

    Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, DWSD, announced in March it would send shut-off notices to customers with balances more than $150 overdue or who are more than two months behind in their payments. The department, which said nearly half of the 324,000 water and sewerage accounts are overdue, has put out 46,000 notices since March. About 4,500 accounts have had their water shut off.
    In response to a WND inquiry, Madoka Saji, a human rights officer in the Special Procedures Branch of the office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva, Switzerland, explained in an email Monday that the U.N. plans to intervene directly in the Detroit crisis, because the Human Rights Council has received formal allegations the Detroit water shut-off threatens to violate U.N.-established human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation mandates.
    Saji explained that the U.N. High Commission on Human Rights special rapporteur on safe water and sanitation, Catarina de Albuquerque , must intervene directly with the U.S. government, first in a confidential manner and then in a public manner.
    The Associated Press noted in a report June 25 that de Albuquerque can make recommendations and lend “moral weight,” but she has no enforcement power.



    The U.N. in Geneva further pointed out that de Albuquerque encountered similar water disconnection cases in her first official “country mission” to the United States from Feb. 22 to March 4, 2011. Her final report, Aug. 2, 2011, recommended the U.S. adopt a federal minimum standard on affordability for water and sanitation in conformity with the U.N.’s International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights .

    Although the United States signed the U.N.’s International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights on Oct. 5, 1977, during the administration of President Jimmy Carter, the U.S. Senate never ratified the treaty.
    Saji explained to WND that de Albuquerque has a mandate to communicate with any nation violating the U.N. covenant, whether or not the nation has ratified the document as a treaty obligation.
    In a U.N. news release June 25 , de Albuquerque stated water shut-offs due to non-payment are only justified “if it can be shown that the resident is able to pay but not paying,” further alleging that “when there is genuine inability to pay, human rights simply forbids disconnections.”
    U.N. To Intervene In Detroit Water Shutoffs [continued]


    THE NEW WORLD DISORDER

    U.N. to intervene in Detroit water shutoffs

    Talks on 'human-rights violations' planned with Obama administration

    Published: 3 days ago Jerome R. Corsi About | Email | Archive Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., is a WND senior staff reporter. He has authored many books, including No. 1 N.Y. Times best-sellers "The Obama Nation" and "Unfit for Command." Corsi's latest book is "Who Really Killed Kennedy?"

    Subscribe to feed




    UNITED NATIONS – Watch out, Detroit. Here comes the United Nations.


    WND has learned that after issuing a statement last week condemning Detroit’s decision to send water shut-off notices to tens of thousands of customers behind in their payments, the U.N now plans to conduct confidential policy discussions with the Obama administration to be followed by a formal public report to the U.N. Human Rights Council.
    On Monday, the U.N. Human Rights Council’s office in Geneva confirmed to WND that the U.N. plans to intervene directly in the Detroit water crisis, determined to apply international law to judge the U.S. in violation of human rights to safe water.
    Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, DWSD, announced in March it would send shut-off notices to customers with balances more than $150 overdue or who are more than two months behind in their payments. The department, which said nearly half of the 324,000 water and sewerage accounts are overdue, has put out 46,000 notices since March. About 4,500 accounts have had their water shut off.
    In response to a WND inquiry, Madoka Saji, a human rights officer in the Special Procedures Branch of the office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva, Switzerland, explained in an email Monday that the U.N. plans to intervene directly in the Detroit crisis, because the Human Rights Council has received formal allegations the Detroit water shut-off threatens to violate U.N.-established human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation mandates.
    Saji explained that the U.N. High Commission on Human Rights special rapporteur on safe water and sanitation, Catarina de Albuquerque, must intervene directly with the U.S. government, first in a confidential manner and then in a public manner.
    The Associated Press noted in a report June 25 that de Albuquerque can make recommendations and lend “moral weight,” but she has no enforcement power.
    The U.N. in Geneva further pointed out that de Albuquerque encountered similar water disconnection cases in her first official “country mission” to the United States from Feb. 22 to March 4, 2011. Her final report, Aug. 2, 2011, recommended the U.S. adopt a federal minimum standard on affordability for water and sanitation in conformity with the U.N.’s International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights.
    Although the United States signed the U.N.’s International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights on Oct. 5, 1977, during the administration of President Jimmy Carter, the U.S. Senate never ratified the treaty.
    Saji explained to WND that de Albuquerque has a mandate to communicate with any nation violating the U.N. covenant, whether or not the nation has ratified the document as a treaty obligation.
    In a U.N. news release June 25, de Albuquerque stated water shut-offs due to non-payment are only justified “if it can be shown that the resident is able to pay but not paying,” further alleging that “when there is genuine inability to pay, human rights simply forbids disconnections.”
    In the same press release, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, Leilana Farha, expressed concern that children are being removed from their families and homes because, without access to water, their housing is no longer considered adequate.
    “If these water disconnections disproportionately affect African Americans they may be discriminatory, in violation of treaties the United States has ratified,” Farha added, strongly suggesting standards established by the U.N.’s International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights may not be the only international law the U.N. seeks to apply to the water shut-off crisis in Detroit.
    DWSD serves approximately 700,000 Detroit residents and an additional 4 million people in southeastern Michigan, while selling water service to suburban communities that in turn bill their residents.
    Rush weighs in
    Talk radio host Rush Limbaugh poked fun Monday at the U.N., Detroit and its residents, who he said have racked up $90 million in overdue water bills.
    “By the way, folks, I checked. Apparently water bills in Detroit are the one thing not subsidized by government. That, I think, is probably why so many in Detroit are now up in arms. They get pretty much every social service free; they can’t understand why they’ve gotta pay for water. I think that’s largely true.”
    He said half the city’s population “has had their water cut off because they’re not paying for it, either because they refuse to or because they can’t.”
    “The U.N. is thinking about going in there and make sure the water is turned on for everybody, even though they can’t afford it,” he said. “They think this is just outrageous.”
    He noted the city’s efforts to emerge from bankruptcy then wondered if President Obama is aware of the problem.
    “Does Obama know that they’ve cut the water off to so many people in Detroit? Does Obama know that the U.N. says that Detroit’s violating international standards in his country? Does he know this? You’d think he would be mad about this and would go tell the U.N. to pound sand.
    ‘Habit’ of non-payment

    Last week, Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., leveraged the U.N. involvement for immediate federal emergency relief for Detroit’s residents.
    “Detroit’s water crisis did not happen in a vacuum,” Conyers said in a statement reported by the Detroit Free Press.
    “Over the past decade,” Conyers said. “Detroiters have seen their water rates increase by 119 percent. Over this same period, forces beyond city residents’ control –including a global financial crisis that left one in five local residences in foreclosure and sent local unemployment rates skyrocketing – severely undercut Detroiters’ ability to pay.”
    However, DWSD spokeswoman Curtrise Garner told CBS Detroit that the department has programs to help customers who are “totally in need.”
    She argued that not paying the water bill has simply become a habit among many of Detroit’s impoverished residents.
    “But we also know that there are people who can afford it, and we know this because once we shut the water off, the next day they are paying the bill in full.”
    Garner told CBS Detroit that with an estimated half of Detroit water customers unable or unwilling to pay their bills, activists have lobbied the United Nations to take action.
    The activists contend that the planned DWSD water shut-offs are not about recouping millions in unpaid bills but a campaign to remove people from their homes.
    “Water is the wedge,” said Detroit activist Shea Howel.” People are being targeted at the rate of 1500 to 3000 homes a week.”
    Howell pointed out DWSD is not threatening similar disconnections against corporate clients such as Detroit Public Safety, which owes $2.2 million in outstanding bills. Palmer Golf Club owes $2.2 million, the Joe Louis Arena/Red Wings Hockey $80,000 and Ford Field $55,000.
    United front
    Maude Barlow, founder of the Blue Planet Project, headquartered in Ottawa, Ontario, in Canada, filed last week a report to de Albuquerque protesting the Detroit water shut-offs with a united front that included the left-leaning Michigan Welfare Rights Organization, Food & Water Watch and the Detroit People’s Water Board.
    The Barlow report charged that Detroit’s water crisis has resulted from decades of public policy that have put corporate business and profit ahead of the public good and human rights.
    The report alleges:
    The case of water cut-offs in the City of Detroit speaks to the deep racial divides and intractable economic and social inequality in access to services within the United States. The burden of paying for city services has fallen onto the residents who have stayed within the economically depressed city, most of whom are African-American. These residents have seen water rates rise by 119 per cent within the last decade. With official, understated unemployment rates at a record high and the official, understated poverty rate at about 40 percent, Detroit water bills are unaffordable to a significant portion of the population.
    “What we see is a violation of the human right to water,” Meera Karunananthan, an international campaigner with the Blue Planet Project, explained to Al Jazeera America on the submission of the report to the U.N.
    “The U.S. has international obligations in terms of people’s right to water, and this is a blatant violation of that right. We’re hoping the U.N. will put pressure on the federal government and the state of Michigan to do something about it.”
    U.S. resists U.N. on water rights
    The U.S. has consistently opposed the U.N. push to define clean water as a fundamental human right.
    In 2007, the United States government submitted a detailed explanation of its views to the Office of the United Nations Commissioner for Human Rights.
    In it, the U.S. recognized the importance of providing water while rejecting the view that a “right to water” exists under current formulations of international human rights law.
    The 2007 U.S. rebuttal to the U.N. argued:
    Understanding how the United States addresses these issues [equitable access to safe drinking water and sanitation] requires an understanding of the U.S. system of federalism, under which, state and local authorities play the primary role in promoting access to safe drinking water and sanitation. Over time, the U.S. Congress and the courts have increased the involvement of the federal government in certain areas. Today here are a wide range of federal laws and regulations aimed at promoting safe drinking water and sanitation. However, state sovereignty over many water issues remains.
    On Nov. 21, 2013, the U.N. General Assembly Third Committee [Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural] approved 11 draft resolutions including a text on the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation that called on all U.N. members, including the United States, “to ensure the progressive realization of the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation for all in a non-discriminatory manner, while eliminating inequalities in access.”
    Delia M. Arias De Léon, a Wellesley College political science student currently serving as a WND intern at the U.N. in New York City, contributed to this article.


    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/06/u-n-to-in...Dub34XTjLR1.99

    Read more at http://libertycrier.com/u-n-interven...0GfJiFWyRLs.99


    This is how it starts!!!! Get the UN out of America and get America out of the UN!!!!

Similar Threads

  1. DHS Whistleblower: Obama Will Commit Reichstag Event To Trigger Martial Law
    By kathyet in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-16-2012, 08:33 AM
  2. Obama admin to stage ‘reichstag’ event as trigger for martial law, dhs source
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-11-2012, 09:06 PM
  3. ALERT: S-510 Food Takeover Act, S-787 Water Takeover Act
    By kathyet in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-16-2010, 10:48 AM
  4. 'Trigger' Warning by Tancredo
    By mrazmerized in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 07-15-2006, 01:53 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •