Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    594

    U.S. Corp. "Be Scared! We Will Protect You" (of what We Created)

    Panic Panic!!! The terms "Sleeper Cells", "Attack over the 4th", and ever "NUCLEAR DIRTY BOMBS" are being spit out all over the Corp. Teleprompter Media. THEY NEED MORE "SOLUTIONS" TO TAKE AWAY MORE OF OUR RIGHTS!!!

    LOOK UP THE TERM "Hegelian Dialectic"-(Problem/ Reaction/Solution) (add to your collection of Information)

    New York Times- Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I.

    DAVID K. SHIPLERAPRIL 28, 2012



    Continue reading the main story Share This Page
    • Email
    • Share
    • Tweet
    • Save
    • more



    THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years — or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts.
    But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. Suspects naïvely played their parts until they were arrested.
    When an Oregon college student, Mohamed Osman Mohamud, thought of using a car bomb to attack a festive Christmas-tree lighting ceremony in Portland, the F.B.I. provided a van loaded with six 55-gallon drums of “inert material,” harmless blasting caps, a detonator cord and a gallon of diesel fuel to make the van smell flammable. An undercover F.B.I. agent even did the driving, with Mr. Mohamud in the passenger seat. To trigger the bomb the student punched a number into a cellphone and got no boom, only a bust
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/op...-fbi.html?_r=0

    Daily Mail(LAPDOG TELEPROMPTER Corp. MEDIA) SPREADING FEAR



    The sick ambitions of a caliphate bent on carnage: Chilling map predicts where ISIS will seize new land, strike the West with 'lone wolf attacks' and awaken 'sleeper cells'... all before the end of Ramadan

    • ISIS announced it will target Western countries like UK, France, Spain and Italy, Institute for the Study of War says
    • It correctly predicted ISIS would execute 'mass casualty attack' on Tunisia and a Shia mosque in the Middle East
    • ISIS militant Seifeddine Rezgui killed 38 - including 18 Britons - when he opened fire on tourists on Tunisian beach
    • At almost the same time, an ISIS suicide bomber blew himself up in a Shia mosque in Kuwait - killing at least 27
    • Extremists will also unleash its dangerous 'terror cells' in south-east Asian countries like Malaysia, the Philippines
    • Combination of four surveys found that 42million Muslims in Arab states feel 'somewhat positively' towards ISIS

    By Jay Akbar For Mailonline
    Published: 09:16 EST, 30 June 2015 | Updated: 01:41 EST, 1 July 2015


    ISIS will mark the holy month of Ramadan and the first anniversary of its self-imposed caliphate by launching bloody terror attacks on the West and activating 'terror cells' in countries as far as the Philippines, respected terrorism analysts have predicted.

    It already controls large swathes of land across Iraq, Syria and Libya - where over eight million people live under the terror group's brutal regime - and has formed partnerships with other extremist groups across the Middle East and north Africa.

    Now the terror group will capitalise on religious tension and war to plunge as much of the world into chaos as it can by July 18, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) says.

    In its report, 'ISIS Military Operations during Ramadan' which was published on June 7, it correctly predicted ISIS would execute a 'mass casualty attack' in Tunisia, which has become a 'breeding ground' for the extremists in recent years.
    Scroll down for video

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...d-Ramadan.html

    ***DON'T FORGET***
    Hillary Clinton : We created Al-Qaeda


  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    594
    YOU are "69 times more likely to die taking a bath than from terrorism."

    Don't Be Terrorized By Your Government This Fourth of July


    Stay calm, carry on, and above all, defend the Constitution.

    Ronald Bailey | July 2, 2015




    CNNAs Americans prepare to celebrate Independence Day, officials in the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security are warning us that there's a heightened threat of Islamist terrorist attacks. CNN is reporting that law enforcement officials believe that the Islamist threat is "the highest in years." CIA deputy director turned CBS security analyst Michael Morrell declared, "I wouldn't be surprised if we're sitting here a week from today talking about an attack over the weekend in the United States. That's how serious this is."
    So just how "serious" is the risk? Well, the risks to American lives aren't very big. Things don't look good, though, for the constitutional freedoms we celebrate on the Fourth.
    The current spate of terrorism warnings certainly sounds scary in light of the recent terror attacks in Kuwait, Tunisia, and France. Islamic radicals linked with ISIS and Al Qaeda no doubt hope to carry out or inspire attacks in the United States. I was as horrified any other American by the September 11, 2001, atrocities. But we all need to keep in mind that terror only works if you let it.
    The plain fact is that terrorism does not remotely threaten the existence of the United States. Even more importantly, it does not materially threaten you or your family. According to the Global Terrorism Database at the University of Maryland, only 68 Americans have died in terror attacks since 9/11, and that includes the 13 who died in the Fort Hood rampage by military psychiatrist Nidal Malik Hasan.
    That's an average of just under 5 people per year. An additional 260 Americans were injured, including 132 in the Boston Marathon bombing, yielding an average of about 19 people wounded annually. So since 2001, your annual chances of dying or being injured in a terrorist attack have been 1 in 62 million and 1 in 16 million, respectively. For some context, note that an average of 335 people drown in their bathtubs annually, a rate of just over 1 in 900,000. Americans are 69 times more likely to die taking a bath than from terrorism.
    Of the years covered by the Global Terrorism Database, the one with the most terrorist incidents in the U.S. was 1970—which also happens to be the year the data start being collected. That year saw an astonishing 468 terrorist bombings, arsons, and shootings, which were mostly perpetrated by black nationalists, student radicals, and left-wing militants, with an occasional white extremist group thrown in. These attacks killed 30 people and injured 161 others. In contrast, there were 16 deaths and 6 injuries in the database for 2014. Of those, only two deaths appear to have resulted from attacks motivated by radical Islam. Lightning strikes killed 26 Americans last year, 10 more than died in terror attacks.
    GTD
    When it comes to attacks specifically occurring around the Fourth of July, since 2001 four have been perpetrated by Animal Liberation Front activists, two targeted abortion clinics in Florida, one was a knifing of a Hispanic man by white supremacists in California, and one other was an attempted arson of a mosque in Missouri. Fortunately, no one died in any of those incidents.
    So why do 49 percent of Americans say in a recent Gallup Poll that they are very to somewhat worried that they or a family member will become a victim of terrorism?
    Gallup
    One big reason is that our extensive and growing security bureaucracies and their enablers in Congress have an interest in promoting those fears. As John Mueller, a political scientist at the Ohio State University, explained back in 2007, there is "a terrorism industry—politicians, bureaucrats, journalists, and risk entrepreneurs who systematically exaggerate dangers and who often profit from their fear-mongering and alarmism." Ian Lustick, a political scientist at the University of Pennsylvania, argues that when public fears have been aroused by a spectacular attack, the standard processes of political power-grabbing can fuel a self-reinforcing cycle in which the government "can never make enough progress toward 'protecting America' to reassure Americans against the fears it is helping to stoke." Or as journalist H.L. Mencken put it, "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins."
    As a result of these processes, Americans have seen their rights and freedoms eroded in ways both big and small. We live now in a "your papers please" world where we all are subject to "random" searches in order to enter government buildings or take public transport. We have lost our Fourth Amendment rights to privacy. The national security surveillance state has metastasized.
    What is to be done? When the next terrorist attack occurs, we must forcefully remind ourselves that the perpetrators are seeking to destroy our open society and free institutions. By overreacting to the minimal risks they pose, we have been doing the terrorists' work for them. So if there is an attack this holiday weekend, stay calm, carry on, and above all, defend the Constitution.


    Ronald Bailey is a science correspondent at Reason magazine and author of Liberation Biology (Prometheus)
    http://reason.com/archives/2015/07/0...-government-th

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    594
    This woman is a good researcher. Follow her and the inks she posts, if you want to add to your Collection of Information.





    Politics | Mon Jun 22, 2015 5:33pm EDT Related: Politics
    U.S. military pays Syrian rebels up to $400 per month: Pentagon

    WASHINGTON | By David Alexander






    A rebel fighter aims his weapon as he takes a position during a military training in Aleppo's countryside against forces loyal to Syria's President Bashar al-Assad April 20, 2015.
    Reuters/Jalal Al-Mamo



    Syrian rebels receiving U.S. military training to battle Islamic State militants are being paid $250 to $400 per month, depending on their skills, performance and leadership position, the Pentagon said on Monday.
    It was not immediately clear how many Syrian rebels were currently being paid. Army Colonel Steve Warren, a Defense Department spokesman, said last week that up to 200 Syrian fighters were undergoing training. A further 1,500 have completed the necessary screening.
    Defense Secretary Ash Carter said in May that Syrian fighters participating in the U.S.-led mission would receive "some compensation," but he gave no figures.
    Navy Commander Elissa Smith, a Pentagon spokeswoman, said trainees were each receiving a stipend.
    Some 6,000 Syrians have volunteered to participate in the U.S. effort to train and equip a politically moderate Syrian military force. Warren said last week the effort had moved more slowly than expected due to complications vetting volunteers and bringing them out of Syria for the training.
    Navy Captain Scott Rye, a spokesman for the Combined Joint Interagency Task Force-Syria, said a number had quit or been excluded, including a group who left together about 10 days ago.
    Reasons for leaving included "everything from volunteers showing up without ID (identity) papers to being underage, to being unfit for training," Rye said.
    He declined to say how many fighters had left in total, but said: "The group that quit all quit at the same time after training for several weeks. This was unusual, and I would deem it a one-time event."
    He said it was not indicative of the overall program, adding that more than 1,000 new volunteers had signed up for the program since the group withdrew.
    Rye denied a news report that the group withdrew because its members did not want to sign a contract agreeing not to fight the Syrian government of President Bashar al-Assad.
    He said that, while U.S. officials had been clear the program was to train fighters to combat Islamic State, the only document participants had to sign was one committing them to promote respect for human rights and the rule of law, a mandate issued by the U.S. Congress.
    (Reporting by David Alexander. Editing by Andre Grenon)
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/...0P22BX20150622

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-04-2015, 01:53 PM
  2. ADP "Cancels" 365,000 Private Jobs Created In 2012
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-01-2012, 09:49 PM
  3. Google Trends Shows Why The Status Quo "Powers That Be" Should Be Scared. Very Scared
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-29-2012, 05:28 PM
  4. How Rick Perry created the "Texas JOBS Miracle"
    By HAPPY2BME in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-13-2011, 09:00 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •