Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    April
    Guest

    A VERY DANGEROUS STEALTH BILL HR 985

    Found the below post on WND and thought it is worth posting.




    A VERY DANGEROUS STEALTH BILL
    Posted by Horizon3 on May 23, 2009 22:02

    THESE IDIOTS ARE DOING IT AGAIN !!!! WHILE WE WERE DISTRACTED WITH PELOSI THEY ARE SNEAKING A VERY DANGEROUS BILL THROUGH

    Please tell your senators to vote NO on HR 985. This bill is "stealth legislation" and will protect the president from disclosing his ties to fraudulent real estate transactions, providing his birth certificate to prove he meets the citizenship requirements for office of the President as stated in the Constitution, and if passed, will protect others in his administration from disclosure of concealed transactions between government and businesses such as House Speaker Pelosi's dealings with her husbands interest in Dole Foods and off-shore labor activities. If this stealth legislation continues to be passed virtually unnoticed, it won't be long before any of the State courts would be rendered useless against getting information from agencies having records involving the president, his administration, Congress, or their staff.

    This is some serious stuff - please call, write, e-mail, fax to stop this!

    LINK TO THE BILL
    http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin ... fs.txt.pdf

    !!!GET THIS GOING VIRAL NOW!!!

    http://forums.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=235




    H.R.985
    Title: To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify which disclosures of information are protected from prohibited personnel practices; to require a statement in nondisclosure policies, forms, and agreements to the effect that such policies, forms, and agreements are consistent with certain disclosure protections, and for other purposes.
    Sponsor: Rep Waxman, Henry A. [CA-30] (introduced 2/12/2007) Cosponsors (29)
    Related Bills: H.RES.239
    Latest Major Action: 6/6/2007 Referred to Senate subcommittee. Status: Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs referred to Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia.
    House Reports: 110-42 Part 1, 110-42 Part 2SUMMARY AS OF:
    3/14/2007--Passed House amended. (There is 1 other summary)

    Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2007 - (Sec. 2) Expands the types of whistleblower disclosures protected from personnel reprisals to include disclosures without restriction as to time, place, form, motive, context, forum, or prior disclosures made to any person by an employee or applicant for employment, including a disclosure made in the ordinary course of an employee's duties, that the employee or applicant reasonably believes is a violation of any law.

    (Sec. 3) Defines "disclosure" as a formal or informal communication, not including a communication concerning policy decisions that lawfully exercise discretionary authority unless the employee providing the disclosure reasonably believes that it evidences: (1) any violation of law; or (2) gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.

    Defines "clear and convincing evidence" as evidence indicating that the matter to be proved is highly probable or reasonably certain, for purposes of Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) reviews of prohibited personnel practices.

    (Sec. 4) Provides that any presumption relating to the performance of a duty by an employee with personnel authority may be rebutted by substantial evidence.

    Codifies the legal standard (i.e., disinterested observer with knowledge of the essential facts) for determining whether an employee or applicant for employment has a reasonable belief of the validity of their whistleblower disclosures.

    (Sec. 5) Includes as a prohibited personnel practice the implementation or enforcement of any nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement.

    Prohibits any agency from: (1) implementing or enforcing any nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement if it does not contain a specified statement of employee rights and obligations; or (2) conducting an investigation (other than that necessary to the agency's mission) of an employee or applicant for employment because of any protected whistleblower activity.

    (Sec. 6) Includes as an agency exempt from whistleblower restrictions the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. Requires the removal of any agency or unit by the President from whistleblower protection coverage to be made before any personnel action is taken against a whistleblower at that agency.

    (Sec. 7) Expands the authority of the MSPB to discipline an employee who takes adverse personnel action against a whistleblower if it finds that the protected activity was the primary motivating factor in such employee's action.

    (Sec. Directs the Comptroller General to conduct a study on certain security clearance revocations and to report to Congress on such study.

    (Sec. 9) Allows an employee, former employee, or applicant for employment who seeks corrective action from the MSPB for an alleged prohibited personnel practice to bring legal action in federal district court for de novo review and seek a jury trial, if the MSPB fails to issue a timely final order or decision.

    Allows the MSPB to award interest and reasonable expert witness fees as compensatory damages.

    (Sec. 10) Prohibits adverse personnel actions against an employee of a covered national security agency (i.e., Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, the National Reconnaissance Office, and any other executive branch agency determined by the President to have as its principal function the conduct of foreign intelligence or counterintelligence activities) for making whistleblower disclosures to an authorized Member of Congress or executive branch official or to the Inspector General of the covered agency that employs the whistleblower.

    Requires: (1) the Inspector General to investigate any claim of adverse personnel actions against an employee of a covered agency; and (2) the head of such agency to make a determination of whether a prohibited personnel practice has taken place and take corrective action.

    Authorizes a whistleblower to seek judicial review of an adverse determination by an agency head.

    (Sec. 11) Requires the head of a civilian executive agency, within 180 days of an employee complaint, to determine whether a private contractor has subjected an employee whistleblower to a reprisal and to either issue an order denying relief or take corrective action. Allows such employee whistleblower to request a jury trial in a federal district court and seek compensatory damages if the agency head does not issue an order or take corrective action.

    (Sec. 12) Extends federal whistleblower protections to individuals holding or applying for a position in the Transportation Security Administration (TSA).

    (Sec. 13) Modifies the definition of "abuse of authority" with respect to prohibited personnel practices against a whistleblower relating to scientific and other research to include: (1) any action that compromises the validity or accuracy of federally funded research or analysis; (2) the dissemination of false or misleading scientific, medical, or technical information; (3) any action that restricts or prevents publication of scientific material; and (4) any action that discriminates for or against any employee or applicant on the basis of religion (as defined in this Act).

    (Sec. 14) Makes the provisions of this Act effective 30 days after enactment (except for TSA employee whistleblower provisions which are effective immediately upon enactment).

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z ... D&summ2=m&

  2. #2
    Super Moderator GeorgiaPeach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    21,832
    So, are they admitting that he is not a citizen legitimately entitled to be the President of the United States? If not, then why not produce proof to counter the claims that you are not legally entitled to be President.

    I did not look yet April, but I hope that you posted this on the thread talking about his failure to provide his birth certificate.

    Our government is so full of traitors.

    Galatians 6:9
    Matthew 19:26
    But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
    ____________________

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)


  3. #3
    Senior Member avenger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Royse City, Texas
    Posts
    1,517
    This may be an effort to undermine the efforts of Dr. Orly Taitz who is in the process of getting a hearing in the Supreme Court about Obama's eligibility.

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/
    Never give up! Never surrender! Never compromise your values!*
    __________________________________________________ __

    NO MORE ROTHSCHILD STOOGES IN PUBLIC OFFICE!!!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member Rockfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    From FLA to GA as of 04/01/07
    Posts
    6,640
    What eats me up is that they wouldn't try this unless they thought they could get away with this..which means the majority of the Senate and House would have to agree to this stealth BS, which would make them all traitors guilty of sedition and treason..if indeed the bill would do what April is claiming it will do. I'm not too great unwinding the fine print down to laymen's terms when it comes to reading proposed legislation, but an interpetation at that level would help a lot of us write our leaders about this treachery! It seems to me that parts of this bill are trying to put certain govenment officials above the law.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    April
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgiaPeach
    So, are they admitting that he is not a citizen legitimately entitled to be the President of the United States? If not, then why not produce proof to counter the claims that you are not legally entitled to be President.

    I did not look yet April, but I hope that you posted this on the thread talking about his failure to provide his birth certificate.

    Our government is so full of traitors.

    Galatians 6:9
    Thanks for the reminder Georgia, I just posted it on that thread.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •