Voter Fraud Information Thread

[April]

Limbaugh Suggests Voter Fraud May Be Only Reason Dems Stay in Power

Wow I have been saying that for awhile.....good to see Rush is catching up....

[April]

IMO The Dems know most people DO NOT want to be communists so they have to use the voter fraud to get the people in office to promote and put the communist agenda in place. We are so screwed if we do not get this turned around.

[kathyet2]

Democrat Cheating Begins – Rigged Voting Booths in Illinois

E Pluribus Unum — October 23, 2014

---

As Democrats try to deny the veracity of Republican worries about electoral cheating, it appears things in 2014 are off to an early start now that a rigged voting booth has been identified in early voting in Illinois.
You know it’s a bad day when you try to vote for yourself, and the machine records your vote for your opponent, but such was the lot of Jim Moynihan, Republican candidate for state representative in Cook County, Illinois.

The conservative website Illinois Review reported that “While using a touch screen voting machine in Schaumburg, Moynihan voted for several races on the ballot, only to find that whenever he voted for a Republican candidate, the machine registered the vote for a Democrat in the same race. He notified the election judge at his polling place and demonstrated that it continued to cast a vote for the opposing candidate’s party. Moynihan was eventually allowed to vote for Republican candidates, including his own race.

As faithful as “the dog ate my homework” came the chorus, it was a “calibration error”.

Cook County Clerk’s Office Deputy Communications Director Jim Scalzitti, told Illinois Watchdog, the machine was taken out of service and tested.
“This was a calibration error of the touch-screen on the machine,” Scalzitti said. “When Mr. Moynihan used the touch-screen, it improperly assigned his votes due to improper calibration.”

Yes. It’s always a calibration error.
Electronic voting machines – often faulty, easily hacked

After the 2000 Florida Fiasco, the world seemingly had its fill of hanging chads, pregnant chads, swin ging chads, or anybody named Chad.
Those voting machines were mechanical. The trend since then has been away from mechanical and in favor of computerized voting methods. The people in charge of elections wanted to eliminate mistakes, because, you know, computers never make mistakes. Perhaps these geniuses have never owned a Windows computer? Never heard of BSOD, or its younger brother YSOD? Never had to reboot after things began to run too slow, or because it quit detecting the printer?
Computerized voting machines introduce a whole array of new and wonderful ways to introduce errors and inaccuracies. Further, and much more interesting, the possibilities for fraud are multiplied exponentially. With mechanical voting machines, you can always go back and count the actual paper ballots. It is possible to rig mechanical machines, but if they’re rigged, it’s easy to demonstrate, because every wrong operation will be wrong every time it is tried. When computers malfunction, or when they are deliberately tampered with, the evidence can easily be hidden.
I am a computer programmer. I can tell you that it is laughably easy to design software that performs tasks hidden to the user, hidden to testing systems, hidden to everybody. They can be set to misbehave in thousands of ways, on any kind of schedule, in ways that cannot be detected or duplicated in test environments. You know of at least one variant of malware (viruses and trojans), but the possibilities are endless. And let me emphasize this: the number of people in the United States who can design voting programs that cheat is probably no less than 500,000 people. Probably 25,000 of those could design it in such a way that they could make the source code available to scrutiny, and it still would not be detected.
I could whip up such a voting system in my sleep. Polishing it up and prettying it up for commercial use, running load tests, putting it through a rigorous QA testing program, and designing it to pass QA and still cheat in any of 100 ways I desire, I could do it in 80 hours. Easily. Just imagine if I was contracted by an election board run by Republicans, who knew I was a strong conservative, and imagine if knowing winks and handshakes were traded. There wouldn’t even be a QA effort, any accountability at all. So easy it should be disturbing to you.
And… it’s already been done. Apparently by both sides in 2012.




Read more at http://joeforamerica.com/2014/10/dem...oths-illinois/


My husband and I voted in our early voting this week....My husband's ballot had a Democratic congress person already checked off on his ballot...He called over the poll person and showed him and of course they brushed it off with a "oh well just change it" he said....My husband did say it loud enough for all in the booths around us to hear it. This has happened to me as well in the past when Bush was running, I did the same at that time and stated it very loudly...The only thing we can do is bring it to all of the people around your voting booths attention, and change your ballot..It is important to go through everything well before you cast your ballot...This is all part of the voter fraud process I can''t imagine what will happen if they bring in on "line voting"..I will never vote on line, that needs to never happen..we have fraud now I can't imagine what fraud that will bring us..

[AirborneSapper7]

The Not So Silent Majority By Proliferocks.com via Conservative Tribune





URGENT: Leak Shows NAACP Is Planning Mass Fraud on Election Day [DETAILS]
Paging Eric Holder...
conservativetribune.com

URGENT: Leak Shows NAACP Is Planning Mass Fraud on Election Day [DETAILS]

The government watchdog group Judicial Watch is announcing that they have come across evidence of plans for massive voter fraud set to take place in the lead up to the 2014 midterm elections.
Judicial Watch has been involved in the fight against voter fraud across the country, specifically in North Carolina, which is where this voter fraud is planned to occur.

A lawyer for the state of North Carolina sent a letter to Judicial Watch, informing them of remarks made by a speaker at a recent NAACP conference in the state. The speaker was encouraging audience members to deliberately mislead voters by telling them they don’t have to register before voting or that they don’t have to vote at a specific polling place.
The plan is to use the resulting chaos, confusion, and animosity to further the NAACP’s joint fight with Attorney General Eric Holder against North Carolina’s voter ID law, which they charge is “racist.”
The letter states: “It is also our understanding that during the [NAACP conference], Rev. Barber urged those in attendance to take unregistered voters to vote during the Early Voting period and to engage in get-out-the vote activities that included transporting registered voters to vote in precincts in which they are not assigned to vote on Election Day, or words to that effect. The stated purpose for these activities, as I understand it, was to gather evidence for and thereby enhance plaintiffs prospects of success in the litigation involving [North Carolina’s Election Integrity Laws].”
Click here to get a FREE subscription to the Conservative Tribune.

If these comments prove true, they will show how baseless the left’s arguments against voter ID really are, that they must actively engage in deceiving their own community to manufacture outrage and “evidence” of voter suppression.
In truth, the only voter suppression would be their own actions.
Voter ID laws are not “racist.” In fact, the only thing racist about voter ID laws is the left’s argument against them, which assumes minorities are somehow less capable of obtaining a free ID card than white people are, which is nothing more than the soft bigotry of low expectations.
Voter fraud really is an issue, one that effects more than 1,000,000 votes nationwide and can certainly impact results in close elections. It would not be a surprise if this same plan from the NAACP in North Carolina is also being put in place in other swing states with close races.
However, the vast majority of American people recognize the problem of voter fraud and support voter ID laws designed only to protect the integrity of our electoral system by making sure that each registered voter is who he says that he is.
Please share this on Facebook and Twitter if you aren’t surprised that liberals will deliberately try to cause confusion on election day in order to advance their lies.

http://conservativetribune.com/naacp...-election-day/

[kathyet2]

Vote For Republicans In Chicago Automatically Changed To Democrats

Daily Caller






Rise Of The Machines: Vote For Republicans In Chicago Automatically Changed To Democrats





Jim Moynihan, Republican candidate for the Illinois State House, went in Wednesday to vote early, and to vote for himself. But when he touched the screen mark his name, it was his Democratic opponent’s name that registered the vote.
“While early voting at the Schaumburg Public Library today, I tried to cast a vote for myself and instead it cast the vote for my opponent,” Moynihan told Illinois Review. “You could imagine my surprise as the same thing happened with a number of races when I tried to vote for a Republican and the machine registered a vote for a Democrat.”
Every time he touched the screen for a Republican the machine registered it as a vote for the Democrat. “Clearly, I am concerned that citizens will be unable to vote for the candidate of their choice, especially if they are in a hurry and do not double check their ballot,” Moynihan said.
He notified the election officials and demonstrated the problem for them. He was eventually able to vote for himself and other Republicans.
Jim Scalzitti, Cook County Clerk’s Office Deputy Communications Director, told Watchdog Illinois, “This was a calibration error of the touch-screen on the machine. When Mr. Moynihan used the touch-screen, it improperly assigned his votes due to improper calibration.”

video at link below

http://dailycaller.com/2014/10/22/ri...-to-democrats/

[April]

October 24, 2014 9:53 AM
An Avalanche of Ballots in Colorado
Its mail-in ballots should be returned to sender.
By Deroy Murdock


Denver, Colo.
The autumn skies are bright blue this afternoon in the Mile High City. The vistas of the nearby Rockies are as sublime as the mild breezes that amble down the street. And yet Marilyn Marks could not be more worried. She fears that Republican representative Cory Gardner could lose a U.S. Senate seat in the mail — literally.
“Gardner got the Denver Post’s endorsement,” Marks tells me. “Amazing, and he has a real chance of winning. But this ‘100 percent absentee ballot’ disaster is likely to undermine every GOP candidate in a tight race,” adds Marks, a clean-vote advocate with the Rocky Mountain Foundation.

Mail-in ballots once were reserved, on request, for those absent on Election Day — because of vacations, business, study, or military service — or too infirm to reach the polls.Colorado has jumbo-sized this concept.
Coloradans now vote universally on mail-in ballots, whether they want to or not. Democrats passed and signed the 2013 Voter Access and Modernized Elections Act with zero Republican support — just like Obamacare. Some 3.6 million such ballots have reached active voters and even those who last voted in 2008. That’s right. People who have avoided the polls for the last six years — whether from ignorance, boredom, disillusionment, relocation, or even death — have had ballots mailed to their last known addresses.
“I’m going to people’s houses where they’re getting seven ballots to a household,” Republican state senator Ted Harvey told the Washington Times. “Their children when they were 18 registered to vote there. They’re now 30 years old and living somewhere else, but now that their inactive voting status is now active, the clerk and recorders are required to send them ballots. . . . If Mom and Dad wanted to, they could vote them.”
“We have a lot of the adult-children-not-living-at-home problem here,” Marks says. “I frequently have run into parents who vote the ballots and forge the signatures of their kids and think it is okay ‘because the government sends us the ballots.’” For her relentless efforts to cleanse Colorado’s elections of often-Democrat-inspired mischief, the Denver Post calls the former trucking-company executive “the Queen of Pain.”

Colorado’s mail-in ballots may be left in drop boxes, such as this one, which are totally unguarded and incapable of knowing if ballots are being deposited in illegal numbers.
In another potential headache, “harvesters” will collect ballots door-to-door. Citizens legally may gather up to ten ballots and mail them or deposit them in unsupervised, official drop boxes. This is admirable for, say, a granddaughter helping her elderly relatives. However, nothing prevents a political activist from gathering ten ballots on Monday, ten on Tuesday, and ten more on Wednesday.
“If it’s over ten, that’s a violation,” Colorado secretary of state Scott Gessler told KUSA-TV. “How you catch that? We don’t have those systems in place right now.”

Even worse, if harvested ballots favoring the “wrong” candidate vanish — well, stuff happens.


“The proliferation of ‘ballot harvesting’ ranges from perfectly legal campaigning to pressure tactics to undue influence to intimidation to forgery of ballots and everything in between,” Marks says.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...-deroy-murdock

[April]

It is important to go through everything well before you cast your ballot...This is all part of the voter fraud process I can''t imagine what will happen if they bring in on "line voting"..I will never vote on line, that needs to never happen..we have fraud now I can't imagine what fraud that will bring us..

What is sad the system is now set up so fraud is very easy to perpetrate, the future is not bright if one thinks deeply about it. Our kids and grand kids are very likely to live in a communist third world country ....if this is not turned around.

[AirborneSapper7]

The Not So Silent Majority By Proliferocks.com

The US Department of Justice must be informed immediately so that they can stop this in time...Oh wait...I almost forgot...ACTIVIST US Attorney General Eric Holder is still at the helm...



44,000 Can Vote In Virginia, Get on a Bus, Vote Again in Maryland
A group called The Virginia Voters Alliance has turned up some disturbing information as a result of their investigation into people who registered and vote in...
gopthedailydose.com

44,000 Can Vote In Virginia, Get on a Bus, Vote Again in Maryland
Posted on 23 April, 2014 by Rick Wells





A group called The Virginia Voters Alliance has turned up some disturbing information as a result of their investigation into people who registered and vote in Virginia but actually live in nearby states.
President of the group, Reagan George, told the Virginia State Board of Elections that their research indicates only 164 people voted in both states in the 2012 election.
That number could be significantly higher this time around with 44,000 registered in both Maryland and Virginia.
He says The Virginia Voters Alliance will be expanding their efforts to include the states of Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, North Carolina, Tennessee, West Virginia and Georgia as well as the District of Columbia.
They are also attempting to ascertain the most effective means by which to identify non-citizen voter fraud. George said, “We are also determining the best way to identify non-citizens who have registered to vote and may have voted in past elections.”
According to George, they worked in conjunction with the Privileges and Elections Committees of the state House and Senate and identified 31,000 dead voters through a search of the Social Security Administration’s Death Master File.
George said, “Dead voter registrations are prime targets for voter fraud which generate few complaints.”
George recommends that the state tighten Virginia’s voter ID law, which allows voters to submit unverified ballots by mail. He also urged a check of the more than 50,000 nursing home patient beds and rehab centers, a source of many complaints of irregularities.
He also recommends the obvious, a requirement of proof of citizenship to register to vote.
George said, “Virginia must control the registration process, as well as the form used to register voters. The current system is the perfect vehicle for identity theft and ‘lost’ registrations.”
A recent court decision regarding the legality of Arizona and Kansas utilizing their own forms which require voter citizenship verification was upheld as constitutional and similar forms could be required in the Virginia or elsewhere.
George added, “There needs to be a clearinghouse for all voter fraud referrals statewide,” he said. “The State Board of Elections would be the perfect place to assume that role and provide transparency for the public.”
Mr. George is obviously not a Democrat.

Rick Wells is a conservative author who believes an adherence the U.S. Constitution would solve many of today’s problems. “Like” him on Facebook and “Follow” him on Twitter.

http://gopthedailydose.com/2014/04/2...n-in-maryland/

[April]

Report: 10,000 Illegal Aliens are Registered to Vote In North Carolina

Dave Gibson 10/25/2014News

Will illegal aliens drag Democrat Kay Hagan over the finish line?

In 2013, the state of North Carolina began issuing driver’s licenses to illegal aliens who qualified for President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program (better known as ‘executive order amnesty’). Officials had originally planned to place an easily distinguishable pink stripe at the top of the license, along with the words “NO LAWFUL STATUS” in large, red letters, but under pressure from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), that plan was abandoned.
Now, the DACA license is indistinguishable from any other North Carolina license, save for the phrase “NO LAWFUL STATUS. LEGAL PRESENCE EXPS.: 00/00/0000,” which appears in very tiny print and could easily missed by a poll worker.
The citizens’ advocacy group known as NC FIRE recently announced that North Carolina driver’s licenses have been issued to 14,836 illegal aliens with DACA status. The number of recipients have been broken down by county:
WAKE…1,811
MECKLENBURG…1,292
FORSYTH…774
GUILFORD…697
RANDOLPH…594
DURHAM…582
JOHNSTON…537
UNION…428
CATAWBA…387
CABARRUS…361
DAVIDSON…354
ALAMANCE…340
ORANGE…292
NEW HANVOVER…280
WAYNE…282
SURRY…254
HENDERSON…246
LEE…241
ROBESON…239
SAMPSON…238
GASTON…223
IREDELL…219
WILSON…216
BUNCOMBE…211
CHATHAM…205
DUPLIN…198
ROWAN…196
YADKIN…166
ANSON…159
LENOIR…158
PITT…149
STANLY…146
MONTGOMERY…136
FRANKLIN…122
HARNETT…115
HOKE…106
GRANVILLE…103
VANCE…96
MOORE…89
ROCKINGHAM…85
BURKE…76
LINCOLN…77
CALDWELL…76
BEAUFORT…75
DAVIE…74
WILKES…66
MACON…61
CUMBERLAND…59
MCDOWELL…58
NASH…58
CLEVELAND…51
CRAVEN…50
DARE…50
RICHMOND…49
YANCEY…44
ALEXANDER…43
RUTHERFORD…41
PERSON…38
CARTERET…37
COLUMBUS…36
EDGECOMBE…33
WATAUBA…34
BLADEN…32
BRUNSWICK…32
TRANSYLVANIA…28
ONSLOW…27
MARTIN…25
HAYWOOD…24
JACKSON…24
MADISON…21
HALIFAX…15
ASHE…14
PENDER…13
PASQUATANK…11
AVERY…10
CHOWAN…9
SWAIN…8
ALLEGHENY…7
HERTFORD…7
MITCHELL…7
GREENE…3
POLK…2
CLAY…1
PAMLICO…1
SCOTLAND…1
WASHINGTON…1
Of those nearly 15,000 illegal aliens, about 10,000 of them have recently been discovered on state’s voter rolls.
When the North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles (NCDMV) submitted the list to the Department of Homeland Security, for cross checking, federal officials were, shall we say–less than accommodating…
NCFIRE reported:

Of that number, the often cited 145 DACA individuals who received a NC driver’s license and were registered to vote, was eventually pared down to 119. That still left a list of 9,984 individuals identified by the NC DMV as being “not citizens” by means other than DACA and registered to vote (i.e: green card holders, permanent resident status, etc…).
After an exhaustive search by the NC State Board of Elections, cross checking the names with the Department of Homeland Security, the original 10,000+/- names were eventually reduced to 2,890 whose citizenship status was “non-citizen” and who also appeared on the NC voter rolls.
Of that number, 1,250 of them are confirmed illegal aliens and 1,640 do not have enough information to even check if they are legal or illegal, through the DHS.

Real Clear Politics currently has Democrat incumbent Kay Hagan up by 1.6 points over Republican Thom Tillis, and lists the Senate race as a “toss up.” Hagan has supported amnesty legislation for illegal aliens since taking office, and would undoubtedly be the sole beneficiary of any votes cast by illegal aliens.
In such a tight race, thousands, or even just hundreds of illegal voters could easily make the difference.

http://universalfreepress.com/report...orth-carolina/

[AirborneSapper7]

The Not So Silent Majority By Proliferocks.com




Machines flip GOP votes to Democrats in Maryland
Voting machines that switch Republican votes to Democrats are being reported in Maryland.
examiner.com

Machines flip GOP votes to Democrats in Maryland

October 25, 2014 8:21 AM MST



Maryland uses a digital voting machines, and some voters report that the machines are flipping Republican votes to Democrats.
Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Voting machines that switch Republican votes to Democrats are being reported in Maryland.
“When I first selected my candidate on the electronic machine, it would not put the ‘x’ on the candidate I chose -- a Republican -- but it would put the ‘x’ on the Democrat candidate above it,” reported Donna Hamilton.
“This happened multiple times with multiple selections. Every time my choice flipped from Republican to Democrat. Sometimes it required four or five tries to get the ‘x’ to stay on my real selection,” the Frederick, Md., resident said Thursday.
Queen Anne County Sheriff Gary Hofmann said he encountered the problem, too.
"This is happening here as well. It occurred on two candidates on my machine. I am glad I checked. Many voters have reported this here as well," Hofmann wrote in an email Sunday evening.
Two other Maryland voters reported the same in Anne Arundel County on Friday.
A similar vote-switch turned up in Chicago earlier in the week.
Republican state representative candidate Jim Moynihan went to the Schaumburg Public Library on Monday to vote for himself. “Instead, it cast the vote for my opponent,” Moynihan told Watchdog.org.
“You could imagine my surprise as the same thing happened with a number of races when I tried to vote for a Republican and the machine registered a vote for a Democrat,” Moynihan said.
He notified the election judge at his polling place and demonstrated that it continued to cast a vote for the opposing candidate’s party. Moynihan was eventually allowed to vote for Republican candidates, including his own race.
Back in Maryland, two voters in Anne Arundel County experienced the same problem: A Diebold touchscreen voting machine switched their Republican votes to Democrats. The voters had to cancel theirs votes and start over.
Joe Torre, election director in Anne Arundel, called it a “calibration issue” involving a single machine.
Hamilton said she notified officials of the problem she encountered at the Frederick County Center, where she voted. “I’m not sure what was done about it. If someone is not paying close attention, they could end up voting for the wrong candidate,” she said.

http://www.examiner.com/article/mach...crats-maryland