Page 30 of 61 FirstFirst ... 2026272829303132333440 ... LastLast
Results 291 to 300 of 604
Like Tree88Likes

Thread: Voter Fraud Information Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #291
    April
    Guest
    Soros/ obama agenda is no borders no Voting Rules and no Restrictions, flood the country with illegals and turn it into a communist pit with chaos and killing at every corner. A country full of angry and fighting poor with a dictator who oppresses and rules.....pray that this country is saved while it still can be saved.


  2. #292
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #293
    April
    Guest
    judicial Watch, True the Vote Notch Another Victory for Election Integrity

    Put another check in the "win" column for Judicial Watch, True the Vote and election integrity. Because of our historic lawsuit, Indiana has now put into place significant protections to ensure free and fair elections in the state - protections so significant that JW and True the Vote declared victory and ended our legal fight there.

    After two years of hard-fought litigation, Judicial Watch and True the Vote announced on Thursday that on June 4, 2014, a District Court judge approved our Motion to Dismiss the election integrity lawsuit against the State of Indiana. This signals a major victory in our efforts to force the state to clean up its voter registration lists and overhaul its list-maintenance procedures.



    The Judicial Watch/True the Vote motion came within days after Indiana Secretary of State Connie Lawson conceded that, "at least one in eight voter registrations contains inaccurate information."

    To address the matter, on May 21, Ms. Lawson
    announced via a press release that her office would send out address confirmation postcards to 4.4 million registered Hoosier voters in order to "identify outdated and inaccurate voter registration information to improve the accuracy and integrity of Indiana's voter registration list." The mailing will cost an estimated $2.1 million and will be followed by a second mailing if necessary according to Ms. Lawson.

    In our Motion to Dismiss we applauded the state's actions and indicated the lawsuit was no longer necessary:

    Plaintiffs were pleased to learn that Defendants' most significant act of NVRA [National Voter Registration Act] Section 8 compliance in several years - the statewide address confirmation mailing to all voters - is now underway. In light of this, Plaintiffs now believe there are more productive uses of their time and Defendants' time than continuing to litigate the Count I claim over Indiana's Section 8 maintenance efforts.

    In addition to these new efforts by the Secretary of State, the Indiana Legislature has also taken action. After we filed our lawsuit in June 2012, the Indiana legislature passed an election reform law incorporating a number of measures the suit had sought. The July 2013 measure included:

    • A provision empowering the Indiana Secretary of State to break ties and decide matters whenever the Election Division Co-Directors "are unable to resolve a dispute between themselves regarding" the Indiana Election Division's budget, expenditures, or contracts.

    • A provision specifying that county officials could remove the names of deceased persons from the voter rolls "after receiving a copy of an obituary, notice of estate administration, or other notice of death" published in a newspaper.

    • A provision requiring the Indiana Department of Health to obtain out-of-state citizen death information monthly from the State and Territorial Exchange of Vital Events (STEVE) System and the Electronic Verification of Vital Events (EVVE) System, both administered by the National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems (NAPHSIS).

    • A provision requiring the state to obtain the Social Security Death Index (SSDI) on a monthly basis to remove voters who have died and to provide deceased registered voters to counties each month, tasks to be performed by the Secretary of State if the Co-Directors fail to do so.

    • A provision requiring the state to provide counties with the names of voters who move each month so they can be removed from the rolls or updated as appropriate.

    • A provision requiring the state to use the U.S. Post Office's National Change of Address (NCOA) Service to identify registered voters who have moved, and requiring the state to enter the Interstate Voter Registration Crosscheck (IVRC) Program to identify and remove registered voters who have moved from Indiana to other states.

    These actions by the legislature followed a precedent-setting December 2012
    decision by U.S. District Court Judge William T. Lawrence finding that Judicial Watch and True the Vote members had standing to challenge Indiana's alleged violations of the voter list maintenance requirements of the NVRA.

    Eventually Judge Lawrence ruled that the lawsuit had effectively been mooted out by Indiana's election integrity reforms that came after the lawsuit's filing. This decision, coupled with the Indiana Secretary of State's voter registration list clean-up moves prompted Judicial Watch and True the Vote to dismiss their lawsuit, concluding the litigation.

    JW's lawsuit may no longer be necessary. But it certainly was historic. Our lawsuit led to the first federal court decision granting citizens and non-government groups the ability to sue in federal court to enforce Section 8 of the NVRA.

    And why was all of this effort necessary? Why did Judicial Watch and True the Vote have to go to such extraordinary lengths, including filing lawsuits, in order to clean up voter registration rolls?

    First, because a Judicial Watch investigation had unearthed a massive problem with fraudulent registrations. Judicial Watch's
    examination of data published in 2013 capturing 2012 voter rolls and population data showed that at least 11 states plus DC had substantially out of date voter rolls, with multiple counties where the number of registered voters exceeded the total voting age population.

    Second, because the corrupt Obama Justice Department, in collaboration with its radical leftist allies, has ignored provisions of the NVRA requiring that lists be clean. And administration officials have been outright hostile to any attempt to protect election integrity.

    On that point, Robert D. Popper, Judicial Watch's senior attorney who served as deputy chief of the voting section at the Justice Department's civil rights division,
    said that during his tenure the George W. Bush administration in its final three years filed five lawsuits over improper maintenance of voter rolls. By comparison, Popper said, "There's been not a single lawsuit" from the Obama administration.

    You know what Obama has done in terms of nullifying and violating federal immigration law. So I trust you don't need any more convincing how the Obama administration has been damaging the rule of law on election integrity.

    Judicial Watch lawyers stepped into the gap and earned a significant victory in Indiana that can provide a model for the rest of the country.

    It took a federal lawsuit to spur the state legislature to reform Indiana's electoral process and force Secretary of State Lawson to finally clean the badly outdated Indiana voter rolls. Nonetheless, this is a major victory for Hoosier voters as well as voters nationwide.

    Obviously, from the public interest perspective, it would have been counter-productive to continue to battle after Indiana gave us what we wanted. We will, however, remain vigilant in case Indiana officials again violate the law and put Indiana's elections at risk.

    And it is shameful that President Obama's politicized Justice Department won't do its job and force states to clean up voting lists. Instead, Eric Holder and his allies are fanatically focused on attacking commonsense election integrity measures such as voter ID.

    What a disgrace it is that Judicial Watch and True the Vote are required to do basic law enforcement work to clean up elections that the Eric Holder's Justice Department won't do because of the administration's cynical racial politics and radical ideology.

    The Obama Justice Department is a clear and present danger to the integrity of our nation's elections.

    Here's what True the Vote founder Catherine Engelbrecht said in response to the court's ruling: "Despite the length of time this litigation took to come to an acceptable close, Indiana voters can now rest assured that common-sense voter roll maintenance procedures are in place and working in the interests of all. True the Vote hopes this episode serves as a strong example for the power that regular citizens have in demanding their rights as voters be protected."

    But there is still much to be done.

    According to the
    Pew Report published in 2012: "[N]early 2 million dead people are still registered to cast ballots, about 3 million eligible to vote in two or more states and millions more that are inaccurate, duplicate or out of date. The alarming figures were published this week in a report issued by the non-partisan Pew Center on States. It reveals that approximately 24 million active voter registrations in the United States are no longer valid or have significant inaccuracies. The problem, apparently, is an outdated registration system that can't properly maintain records."

    We are pleased that our lawsuit forced the State of Indiana to fix its broken system for protecting the integrity of the electoral process. Leading Judicial Watch's and True the Vote's representations in court were Judicial Watch attorneys Paul Orfanedes and Chris Fedeli, and Election Law Center attorney J. Christian Adams. David Langdon and Joshua Bolinger of Langdon Law, LLC served as local counsel. All of them should be congratulated for their fine work. You should know that we have dedicated staff, brave clients (like True the Vote), and other partners who enable us to fulfill our mission to hold the government to account. I am privileged to be able to report the results of their fine work to you.

    And, Judicial Watch wouldn't have a dime to do any of our work on election integrity, immigration, the IRS, Benghazi, were it not for the voluntary support of hundreds of thousands of patriotic Americans. So I am happy and excited to ask for your support! Want to help us keep these election integrity successes rolling? Please consider making a tax-deductible contribution. Liberals will not stop their assault on clean elections, an effort aided by the president's reckless disregard for immigration laws (more on that below). And we must man the legal ramparts for the rule of law.




    Tom Fitton
    President

  4. #294
    April
    Guest
    But there is still much to be done.

    According to the
    Pew Report published in 2012: "[N]early 2 million dead people are still registered to cast ballots, about 3 million eligible to vote in two or more states and millions more that are inaccurate, duplicate or out of date. The alarming figures were published this week in a report issued by the non-partisan Pew Center on States. It reveals that approximately 24 million active voter registrations in the United States are no longer valid or have significant inaccuracies. The problem, apparently, is an outdated registration system that can't properly maintain records."

    I just hope enough has been done so the communists do not totally steal the 2016 election.

  5. #295
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    http://www.alipac.us/f19/registrar-a...-rolls-309433/

    . . . The four voters identified separately by both the elections group and the U-T were:
    • Evan Dixon, a Republican from San Diego who died Jan. 26, 2001, at age 44, and records show a ballot was cast for him at the polls on Nov. 6, 2012.
    • Forrest Downie, a Republican from Chula Vista who died Nov. 10, 2005, at age 97, and is listed as casting an in-person ballot on Nov. 4, 2008.
    • John Neibert of Chula Vista, registered with no political party, who died Dec. 25, 1995, at age 71, and is on record as casting an absentee ballot Nov. 6, 2012.
    • Roy O. Stephens, a Republican from San Diego who died Feb. 20, 1998, at age 83, and then was listed as casting a mail-in ballot in the May 19, 2009, election. . .
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  6. #296
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Drudge Report

    Los Angeles considers paying people to vote...



    Panel wants L.A. to look at using prizes to boost voter turnout
    Alarmed that fewer than one-fourth of voters are showing up for municipal...
    latimes.com|By Los Angeles Times

    Panel wants L.A. to look at using prizes to boost voter turnout



    LA City Officials Consider Lottery Prizes To Boost Voter Turnout Watch: Los Angeles city officials consider lottery prizes to boost voter turnout
    Watch: Los Angeles city officials consider lottery prizes to boost voter turnout

    By David Zahniser contact the reporter

    Video at the page link:

    LA's Ethics Commission votes to urge the City Council to look at using cash prizes to get more people to vote / Council President Herb Wesson says the idea of using prizes to boost voter turnout piques his interest

    Alarmed that fewer than one-fourth of voters are showing up for municipal elections, the Los Angeles Ethics Commission voted Thursday to recommend that the City Council look at using cash prizes to lure a greater number of people to the polls.
    On a 3-0 vote, the panel said it wanted City Council President Herb Wesson's Rules, Elections and Intergovernmental Relations Committee to seriously consider the use of financial incentives and a random drawing during its elections, possibly as soon as next year.
    Maybe it's $25,000, maybe it's $50,000. That's where the pilot program comes in -- to figure out what ... number and amount of prizes would actually get people to the voting box.- Nathan Hochman, Los Angeles Ethics Commission president
    Depending on the source of city funds, the idea could require a ballot measure. Commissioners said they were unsure how big the prizes should be or how many should be offered, saying a pilot program should first be used to test the concept.
    "Maybe it's $25,000 maybe it's $50,000," said Commission President Nathan Hochman. "That's where the pilot program comes in -- to figure out what ... number and amount of prizes would actually get people to the voting box."

    Only 23% percent of registered voters cast ballots in last year's mayoral election, prompting suggested solutions from an array of civic leaders. On Tuesday, turnout in a special school board election fell below 10%, according to preliminary numbers.
    The idea of an election day lottery came up Thursday during an appearance by Wesson before the commission. During that discussion, Hochman suggested that surplus matching funds -- money provided to candidates who agree to certain spending restrictions -- could cover the cost of election day prizes.
    That dialogue with Wesson, Hochman said, spurred the commission to act a few hours later.

    Related story: Study finds record-low midterm turnout amid discontentMark Z. Barabak
    There may be no more self-abasing profession than politics.
    There may be no more self-abasing profession than politics. ( Mark Z. Barabak )

    "When I heard that he really wants to consider this, and was enthused and excited about this out-of-the-box idea, I thought, 'Let’s get an action item before his committee,'" Hochman said.
    Wesson said he was indeed intrigued by the idea of a drawing or lottery but would first want to hear what neighborhood councils, his colleagues and assorted "legal beagles" think about the idea.
    "I can’t wait to have this conversation," he said. "But don’t get me wrong. Don't think I’m going to run around being the poster child" for the proposal.
    The commission's vote comes as Los Angeles political leaders examine various proposals for getting more people to the polls. A citizen commission formed by Wesson and Mayor Eric Garcetti recommended two months ago that the city boost turnout by moving from odd- to even-numbered election years.
    The LA 2020 Commission, another panel convened by Wesson, offered a similar recommendation in April.
    Still, a move to even-numbered years could take several years, since it would likely require turning over the city's election operations to the Los Angeles County registrar-recorder/clerk. The changeover won't be possible until the county adopts a new voting system, city officials said.
    Ethics Commissioner Jessica Levinson, an attorney and professor at Loyola Law School, said the city should not have to wait until the end of the decade to take steps to improve voter participation. "We have turnout in citywide elections in the high teens and low 20s and I think that's pretty dismal," she said.
    Federal law prohibits people from accepting payment in exchange for voting. But Levinson, who voted to pursue the lottery concept, contends that statute would not apply in an election where there are no federal positions on the ballot.
    California law prohibits people from using money or gifts to ensure that voters cast ballots for any particular person or measure. Money also cannot be used to keep people from voting in a particular election, according to information provided by the secretary of state's office.
    Hochman said an election day lottery would simply require that people enter the voting booth -- not cast a particular vote.
    "If they truly think there are no good candidates, we're not going to force them" to choose one, he said. "What the studies have shown is, if you get people to the voting booths and they're being incentivized to be there ... over time they will vote for someone."

    Follow @DavidZahniser for what's happening at Los Angeles City Hall.

    Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times

    http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/l...814-story.html
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  7. #297
    April
    Guest
    YA know everything is reaching a NEW low......

  8. #298
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    After Stolen Election / Vote Buying Scandal, Chris McDaniel Finally Files Suit in Mississippi

    Dean Garrison 2 hours ago






    There has been a lot of talk about the TEA Party's lack of success in 2014, but as we have seen in Mississippi, there may be reasons for that subpar performance. In June, Thad Cochran narrowly defeated Chris McDaniel (7,667 votes) in a runoff election, but McDaniel refused to concede. Almost immediately there were serious concerns raised about unethical moves made by the Cochran camp.

    There were reports that Thad Cochran's campaign actually bought votes from crossover democrats for $15 each in the primary. His opponent and TEA Party favorite, Chris McDaniel, has tried to stick to the high ground in subsequent weeks and address other inconsistencies in the election process. As of late last week, however, Chris McDaniel has finally filed suit.
    Cameron Joseph reports for The Hill:
    After weeks of threats that he'd challenge the results — and an appeal to the state party to review the results that was rebuffed — McDaniel has filed a challenge in Jones County claiming that enough Democrats who'd voted in the earlier primary crossed over to invalidate the results.

    "Republicans did not elect the nominee on June 24, so we are excited for the opportunity for Republicans to reclaim their primary process," he said in a statement. "This challenge is not about the candidates. It is about the integrity of Mississippi's election process, and we are committed to ensuring that process is accurate and fair for future Republican candidates."

    McDaniel's campaign has submitted thousands of votes it claims were potentially cast illegally and should be thrown out. Those include McDaniels's own lawyer, Mitch Tyner, and his wife.

    Most believe he has little to no shot at overturning the primary results.
    No shot at overturning the results?
    Though the story did not receive the national attention it likely deserved, this appears to be one of the most blatant attempts to buy an election in recent memory. Matthew Boyle reported, on June 30, for Breitbart:
    A black Mississippi pastor has emerged to claim Sen. Thad Cochran's (R-MS) campaign paid "thousands" of Democrats $15 each to vote in the June 24 GOP runoff – and that he was part of the scheme.

    Rev. Stevie Fielder, an associate pastor at First Union Missionary Baptist Church in Meridian, Mississippi, says Cochran's campaign "told me to offer blacks $15 each and to vote for Thad."

    Fielder, who was paid by freelance journalist Charles C. Johnson for the story, provided a new outlet launched by Johnson—GotNews.com—with four text messages from a person purporting to be Cochran campaign staffer Saleem Baird.

    The messages cite an official Cochran campaign email address—Saleem@ThadForMs.com—and include detailed discussions of the campaign providing envelopes of money to distribute to people who vote.


    "Send me individual names and amounts along with home address tosaleem@thadforms.com and I'll have money separated in envelopes at the office waiting for you," one message, sent three days before the runoff, says.

    Fielder said he helped distribute the Cochran cash for votes on a promise of eventually getting paid $16,000—and because a key Cochran campaign staffer convinced him that Cochran's conservative challenger state Sen. Chris McDaniel was racist.

    Read the rest at Breitbart.com…
    The people of Mississippi deserve another election. This would be Cochran v. McDaniel III since the prior election was a runoff. And then the state must still go to the general election in November.
    But can such blatant (alleged) cheating be tolerated?
    This is not something that can be simply "blown off." The winner will likely be sitting in the U.S. Senate in 2015 (providing that Mississippi voters don't vote Democrat).
    For those who are cynical about the voting process, this is just another case to support their cause.

    This is America. Things like this are not supposed to happen here.


    Our vote is supposed to matter.


    Does it?

    Source
    Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.


    Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/08/st...occsXzpDmj4.99

  9. #299
    April
    Guest

  10. #300
    April
    Guest

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •