Page 7 of 38 FirstFirst ... 3456789101117 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 379
Like Tree13Likes

Thread: WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE???

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #61
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    The Toughest Question Chris Matthews Asked Obama in Exclusive Interview

    Dec. 5, 2013 7:02pm Eddie Scarry

    The toughest question President Barack Obama was asked during an interview Thursday with MSNBC’s Chris Matthews was, ironically, probably the easiest to answer.

    In 2016, Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden?

    “Not a chance am I going there,” Obama said while laughing. He proceeded to say that either Vice President Joe Biden or former State Secretary Hillary Clinton would make “outstanding” presidents. He also said Biden would “go down in history as one of the best vice presidents– ever.” Obama said the same for Clinton as state secretary.
    Both Clinton and Biden are widely believed to be at least considering a run for president.


    President Barack Obama talks with MSNBC’s Chris Matthews during a break in the taping of an interview for the “Hardball with Chris Matthews” show, Thursday, Dec. 5, 2013, at American University in Washington. The show will air Thursday. (AP Photo/ Evan Vucci)

    During the interview, which took place in front of students at American University and mostly dealt with Obamacare, the President was asked why young people should want to sign up under the new healthcare exchanges.

    “There was a time when I looked healthy like these folks and thought I was never gonna get sick,” Obama said. “But what you discover is that– some tough stuff happens. You– you have a run of bad luck. You suddenly need hospitalization. You have an accident. You get an illness. And for young people to recognize that it is in their financial interest and their health interest to be able to get ongoing preventive care, to be able to get — free contraception and — you know, benefits that — like mammograms that allow them to maintain their health throughout their lives, without fear of going bankrupt or making their family bankrupt if they get sick — that’s something that’s priceless.”

    Recent reports have said government systems facilitating the health care law are vulnerable to hackers who could potentially access private information of enrollees. Still, Obama assured Americans that information provided to the government is “protected.”
    “You know, there are a whole bunch of things where you’re providing information to the government. It’s protected. It’s governed by a whole series of laws,” Obama said.

    He continued, rejecting any comparison between Obamacare and the NSA: “I can’t confirm or get into the details of every aspect of what the NSA does. … I’ve said before and I will say it again, the NSA actually does a very good job about not engaging in domestic surveillance, not reading people’s emails, not listening to their– the contents of their phone calls. Outside of our borders, the NSA’s more aggressive.”
    Obama said he would soon be “proposing some self-restraint on the NSA.”

    Asked to respond to recent polls showing a decline in trust in both the federal government and Obama himself, Obama directed blame at the Republican Party.

    “The entire Republican Party brand over– since Ronald Reagan has been, ‘Government’s the problem,’” Obama said. “And if you, day after day, week after week, election after election are running on that platform and that permeates our culture. And it’s picked up by, you know, ordinary citizens who grow skeptical. Then it’s not surprising that over time, trust in government declines.”

    Here Obama answers why young people should sign up for health insurance using the Obamacare exchanges:

    And here Obama talks about public distrust in government:

    2 videos at link below

    Editor’s note: All quotes were provided by MSNBC’s “Hardball” in the form of a transcript.


    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/12/05/the-toughest-question-chris-matthews-asked-obama-in-exclusive-interview/



    Just what we need two more useless people who lie and embarrass us and our Country!!!!

    One Million Mothers for Gun Rights


    AMEN! SHARE THIS! ~D-DOG One Million Mothers for Gun Rights

    Last edited by kathyet2; 12-06-2013 at 11:53 AM.

  2. #62
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546

  3. #63
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546

  4. #64
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546



    SHARE IF YOU ARE NOT A HILLARY FAN! ~D-DOG



    The words of the Day ethical versus unethical answer : What Hillary is!!!!

  5. #65
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Last edited by kathyet2; 12-12-2013 at 02:15 PM.

  6. #66
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Extremely Pissed off RIGHT Wingers 2


    F ALL LIBERAL COMMIEBOT TROLLS. LIKE AND SHARE ~D DOG JR~ Extremely Pissed off RIGHT Wingers 2





    HELP!!!!!!!

  7. #67

  8. #68
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    SHARE IF YOU AGREE! ~D-DOG Extremely Pissed off RIGHT Wingers 2





  9. #69
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546

    Sudden threat endangers Hillary's 2016 run Mrs. Clinton named in criminal charges

    WND Exclusive

    Sudden threat endangers Hillary's 2016 run

    Mrs. Clinton named in criminal charges

    Published: 27 mins ago





    NEW YORK – A threat to Hillary Clinton’s much anticipated 2016 presidential campaign appears to be developing in Egypt where the government is taking steps to criminalize the Muslim Brotherhood.
    Specifically, a new criminal complaint has been filed with Egypt’s attorney general, Hisham Barakat, alleging U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton collaborated with Naglaa Mahmoud, the wife of ousted Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi in seeking to excite domestic insurrections to topple Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, the Egyptian general who has been commander in chief of the Egyptian armed forces, as well as minister of defense, since Aug. 12, 2012.
    Researcher Walid Shoebat, a native Arabic-speaker and a former Palestinian Liberation Organization operative, has reported on his blog credible news sources in Egypt have reported in Arabic that criminal charges brought against Hillary Clinton and Morsi’s wife.
    Shoebat translated the following from an Egyptian Mehwar TV channel news video in which television reporter Nasr Qaffas explains on camera details of an interview Turkey’s Anatolia news agency conducted with Naglaa Mahmoud.
    The following are excerpts from the transcript of the Mehwar TV news video, in which comments by Naglaa Mahmoud also implicate Huma Abedin, wife of former Democratic Congressman Anthony Weiner and the former Hillary Clinton chief of staff whom WND has identified as having close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood:
    Qaffas: According to Anatolia Press, Mahmoud said, “I have between my fingers, a treasure trove of secrets from the White House and Mrs. Clinton fears my wrath.” She said, “I will not speak about Huma Abedin.” When asked if she had a close relationship with Hillary Clinton, Mahmoud said, “When my husband returns from his kidnapping, the one who led the coup will pay a hefty price.” Of Mrs. Clinton, she said, “We have a long friendship of many years. We lived in the U.S. and my children learned there. This friendship increased further when my husband became the legitimate president of the country.”
    Mahmoud went on to say that they were recruited by the Clintons from the U.S. and began their friendship in the 1980s. This appears to be a conspiracy that is being hidden.
    When asked if they still have friendships with each other, Mahmoud said communications never ceased and that the conversations are all recorded. The wife of Morsi divulged that Mrs. Clinton seeks the assistance – both official and unofficial – of several members of the Muslim Sisterhood organization to help with problems in the Middle East. “We also have routine business dealings with the Clintons.”
    Continuing with the excerpts from the transcript of the Mehwar TV news video, Naglaa Mahmoud claimed Hillary Clinton is looking for the support of Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood in her anticipated 2016 run for the U.S. presidency:
    Mahmoud further stated that “Hillary depends on us tremendously to help her succeed in the coming presidential elections, just as we helped Barack Obama win twice.” She is quite the looney bin to believe she helped Obama win.
    When asked about her relationship with Michelle Obama, Mahmoud said it is very good but it never developed to the point of close friendship, like with Hillary.
    On the ability of women to take the lead in the revolution, Mahmoud said that could indeed happen with the Sisterhood. “I have many wives of Brotherhood leaders with me. Many of their husbands were kidnapped and jailed too. I tell them to be patient, for you will have a great reward in the future. I tell them that if their husbands are martyred, we will see to it that they are married off to other men as soon as their menstrual period is over,” she said.
    According to Mahmoud, the police will not touch the women, which is why the women are so effective.
    Finally, the excerpts from the transcript of the Mehwar TV news video suggest Naglaa Mahmoud was aware the current criminal charges her husband and other Muslim Brotherhood leaders face in Egypt could be a liability for Hillary Clinton in her anticipated presidential race:
    On her concerns that the Muslim Brotherhood could be identified as a terrorist organization, the wife of the former president said she was not and declared that she and her colleagues are in the process of organizing a “coup against the coup.”
    “We are under the condition of war and Jihad,” she said, “and we have a good command of the necessities of war, the ancient and the modern. I will keep the tactics of war secret because in Islam, war is trickery.”
    She said her conscience will not be eased until all of the traitors are hanged in the gallows.
    “A key revelation in these reports is Mahmoud’s claim that the Clintons befriended her family in the 1980s while living in the U.S. As one of 63 leaders in the Muslim Sisterhood, Mahmoud is a colleague of Saleha Abedin, another one of those 63 leaders,” Shoebat wrote. “Saleha is the mother of Huma Abedin, who is a close adviser to Hillary Clinton and wife of former Democratic Congressman, Anthony Weiner.”
    Muslim Brotherhood goes on trial in Egypt
    WND first reported in August that criminal charges have been filed against Malik Obama, half-brother to President Barack Obama, for his involvement allegedly managing funds for a terrorist organization based in neighboring Sudan as well as for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
    A criminal trial against former Egyptian president Mohamed Morsi is scheduled to begin in Egypt in January 2014, with Morsi facing charges that he supported the Muslim Brotherhood in acts of violence directed against the Egyptian people.
    President Obama is likely to be a subject in Morsi’s criminal trial given evidence the Obama administration used to U.S. Embassy in Cairo to provide direct financial support to key Muslim Brotherhood political operatives, with the full knowledge and complicity of the Morsi government, as WND first reported in August.
    In November, WND reported the Egyptian Air Force Officer currently residing in the U.S. and working as a physician, who has pressed terrorist charges in Egypt against President Obama’s elder brother Malik, has characterized the decision of the Egyptian government to prosecute the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt a conflict that involves “Moderate Muslims vs. the Obama brothers.”
    As Jan. 8, 2014, approaches and Egypt prepares for the next appearance in court of former president Mohammed Morsi and the 14 Muslim Brotherhood leaders facing charges of incitement to murder, Sadek Raouf Ebeid believes Barack Obama and his brother Malik Obama in Kenya will be implicated in the criminal proceedings because of the support President Obama and his brother have shown for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
    Ebeid was the man who filed last August what in Egypt is known as “Complaint No. 1761″ with the office of Egypt’s Attorney General Hisham Barakat, a complaint that accused Malik Obama of managing investment funds for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
    In a letter addressed to WND, translated and published as a “guest column” on the website of Walid Shoebat, Ebeid stressed that the promptness with which Hisham Barakat responded to the filing of his complaint requesting that Obama’s elder brother, Malik, be placed on the Egyptian terrorist watch list reflected not just the efficiency of Ebeid’s lawyer in Egypt, Dr. Ahmed el-Ganzory, but also demonstrated the degree to which this case “resonated with the feelings of the majority of moderate Muslims in the Arab world.”
    On Sept. 5, WND reported Ebeid’s attorney, Dr. Ahmed Nabil Ganzory, filed Complaint No. 1761, adding that the complaint asked the Egyptian High Court to consider placing Malik on the terrorist watch list both for his involvement managing funds for both the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and for the Islamic Dawa Organization, or IDO, in Sudan.
    On Nov. 11, WND reported Egyptian lawyers have filed criminal terrorism charges in the International Criminal Court against President Obama, in addition to the criminal terrorism charges previously filed in Egyptian courts against the president’s half-brother Malik.
    Specifically, the criminal charges filed in the ICC against President Obama charge Obama coordinated, incited, and assisted the armed elements of the Muslim Brotherhood in the commission of crimes against humanity including the torching, destruction and plundering of some 85 Christian churches, in the period March 7 through Aug. 18 in Egypt.
    Attacks in Egypt on Coptic Christians
    WND has previously reported on Muslim Brotherhood violence against Christian Copts in Egypt.
    According to a paper published Nov. 12, by Middle Eastern expert Raymond Ibrahim on the website of the Gatestone Institute titled “What Happened to Christians in the Middle East this August?” the attacks on Egypt’s Coptic Christians and their Christian churches began with the June 30 Revolution that “saw the ousting of President Morsi and prompted the Muslim Brotherhood to scapegoat and incite violence against the Copts.”
    Ibrahim reported the attacks became “even more brutal in mid-August after security forces cleared out Brotherhood ‘sit in’ camps, where people were being tortured, raped, and murdered.”
    He noted the attacks were especially devastating in Minya in Upper Egypt where the large Christian community was hit especially hard, with at least 20 attacks on churches, Christian schools and orphanages.
    According to Ibrahim, the goal of the radical Islamists in their attack on the Copts in Egypt was “to erase all the traces of a Christian presence,” such that even the orphanages were looted and destroyed.
    Earlier, in an article titled “Attacks on Christians Escalate in Egypt, Nigeria” published by the Gatestone Institute on Sept. 19, 2013, Ibrahim wrote:
    On July 4th, the day after the Egyptian military liberated its nation from Muslim Brotherhood rule, Christian Copts were immediately scapegoated and targeted. All Islamist leaders – from Brotherhood supreme leader Muhammad Badi, to Egyptian-born al-Qaida leader Ayman Zawahiri, to top Sunni cleric Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi – made a point to single out Egypt’s Copts as especially instrumental in the ousting of former Islamist president Morsi, a claim that ushered in a month of slaughter against the nation’s Christian minority.
    Although religious violence by Muslims against Christians remains largely unreported in the mainstream media in the U.S., Ibrahim warned that persecution of Christians in the Islamic world is on the way “to reaching pandemic proportions.”

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/sudden-th...RR5Kqq06KtM.99





  10. #70
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Hillary Clinton 2016? More Alinsky-Style ‘Hope & Change’?

    Posted By Leon Puissegur on Aug 25, 2013 in Articles, Communism, History, Politics, Socialism |

    Share279 Tweet57 Share440 6 Email4
    Who is Hillary Rodham Clinton? We have to ask because this woman is now set to run for the highest office in the land. Of course, there are many things to remind the American people about concerning Hillary Clinton, including her most notorious scandal concerning what she did or did not do when it came to the operations in Benghazi. We also have to explore just what was being done in Benghazi that the federal government thinks must be hidden from the people of the United States, especially the families of the 4 men killed.
    Benghazi is serious and is more recent history. However, let us take a trip down memory lane with Hillary Rodham Clinton, especially since she seems to wish to run for President in 2016. We have to question Hillary Rodham Clinton about her past since it seems that she came from a background that is foggy and questionable, to say the least. We have to go back as far as we can before all the sources dry up or get removed, similar to her 1969 College Senior Thesis which was a 92 page report on none other than a man named “Saul Alinsky.” Clinton had several meetings with him prior to writing her thesis. Her thesis was so strong on Alinsky that she was offered a job when she graduated from Wellesley College in 1969 with a “Saul Alinsky” foundation called, “Industrial Areas Foundation” (IAF). Hillary Rodham was not yet married to William Clinton, so she decided to go on to Yale Law School instead, and there she continued her allegiance to the “Alinsky” style of teachings.
    According to a March 2007 Washington Post report: “As first lady, Clinton occasionally lent her name to projects endorsed by the [IAF]…. She raised money and attended two events organized by the Washington Interfaith Network, an IAF affiliate.”
    Later on after the escapades of her husband in the office of President with Monica Lewinsky, Hillary became a senator for New York. Her actions in the senate, along with her statements, followed the Marxist Saul Alinsky ideology perfectly, since Hillary stated that she would, in essence, “take from the rich.”
    During her years in the Senate, Mrs. Clinton consistently voted against proposed income-tax cuts — most notably the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 and the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 — depicting them as fiscally irresponsible measures that were designed to help only the wealthy. At a fundraiser in 2004, she told a crowd of financial donors: “Many of you are well enough off that … the tax cuts may have helped you … We’re saying that for America to get back on track, we’re probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”

    Have we, as a nation, been lowered to this level of ignorance that we actually believe that those who have the will and work ethic to get up and work long, hard days to make millions from their ideas just to have to give it up because people like Hillary Clinton and others want them to? Our nation was never thought of in this way. Only in the past few decades has the influence of socialists, communists, and Marxists been seen as they have been elected to Congress. For the most part, they have been elected under the guise of being Democrats and have even become emboldened enough to call themselves “Progressives,” which is a term closely associated with all 3 of the aforementioned groups.
    Recently, people have seen the discussion about the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation and how it continues to operate in the red and be extravagant in spending. We should question this, because if Hillary, or any member of her family, cannot run this foundation, how in the world will she run our country? When the Clintons began the foundation, they employed Robert Congel’s assistance with their foundation, which is nearly in failure!

    In 2004, New York developer Robert Congel donated $100,000 to the then called “William J. Clinton Foundation”. It has since been changed to the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation. Soon thereafter, Senator Clinton reportedly helped Congel access millions of dollars in federal assistance for his mall project.
    As with all the Democrats and especially with the “progressives,” (better known as the Socialists, Communists, and Marxists) they continually make the statement that if you are against any of the ideas floated out by the Democrats, you are either a Homophobic, Racist, or some other general hate group. This is clearly shown by what Hillary Clinton stated about herself and others within the “Elite” group that know just how to “help’ the poor people, in the following brief paragraph which, by the way, shows just how the Democrats prey upon those who are under the wrong idea that they wish to help them!
    Depicting herself and fellow leftists as the champions of the downtrodden, Mrs. Clinton has often characterized Republicans and conservatives as being inclined toward racism and discrimination. At a Martin Luther King Day celebration in January 2006, for example, she told a black audience at Harlem’s Canaan Baptist Church: “When you look at the way the (Republican-controlled) House of Representatives has been run, it has been run like a plantation. And you know what I’m talking about. It has been run in a way so that nobody with a contrary view has had a chance to present legislation, to make an argument, to be heard.” She went on to condemn Republicans’ “constant exploitation of race.” Al Sharpton later praised her comments.
    Of course, we all should know that Al Sharpton, along with one Barack Obama and Jeremiah Right organized Louis Farrakhan’s October 16, 1995 Million Man March. Al Sharpton of course has come out mainly to stir things up between the races in what many call Race baiting by him so with a direct link to Hillary Clinton, it seems that maybe she is willing to do the same thing that Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and the rest of the others wish to do, and that is to divide the races rather than bring them together.
    As with other Democrats, Hillary was re-elected back to the Senate again in 2006, even though she could not keep any of her promises. During her 2000 campaign, she had pledged to bring 200,000 new jobs to New York State. By late 2006, however, New York had lost 112,000 jobs and its jobless rate had risen by 0.7 percent. Clinton won the 2006 election by a wide margin over Republican opponent John Spencer.
    It seems that Hillary Clinton is not afraid to gather support from the very people that wish to “change” the way our nation has been operated since 1776! In Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, Hillary did the following:
    “In January 2007, two months after her re-election to a six-year term in the Senate, Mrs. Clinton announced that she planned to run for U.S. President in 2008.

    On the campaign trail, candidate Clinton said that to restore “fiscal responsibility to government,” she would like to return “high-income tax rates to the 1990s levels.”

    In April 2007 Mrs. Clinton spoke at an event held by Al Sharpton‘s National Action Network, where she stated that her own presidential bid was possible only because of the dedicated work of longtime civil-rights leaders who had fought on behalf of those traditionally excluded from power positions in American life. She specifically cited Jesse Jackson and Children’s Defense Fund founder Marian Wright Edelman (both of whom were on the dais that day). “I have enjoyed a long and positive relationship with Reverend Al Sharpton and National Action Network,” said Mrs. Clinton, “and I don’t ever remember saying ‘no’ to them and I intend to remain their partner in civil rights as I clean the dirt from under the carpet in the Oval Office when I am elected President.”

    That same month, Senator Clinton appointed Raul Yzaguirre, who served as President and CEO of the National Council of La Raza from 1974 to 2004, to co-chair her 2008 presidential campaign and to direct her outreach efforts to Hispanic voters.

    Another notable co-chair of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign was Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, supporter of the radical Chicano student organization MEChA.”
    <

    However, Hillary Clinton also has ties to what some have seen as the worst person in the United States, George Soros! Many will ask just who this is, and all you have to do is click on the link and you will find out, but be aware, this man is the money bags for most if not all of the anti-United States groups one could ever think of.
    According to Discover the Networks:
    Mrs. Clinton has close ties to the billionaire financier George Soros and his so-called “Shadow Democratic Party,” or Shadow Party. This term refers to a nationwide network of unions, non-profit activist groups, and think tanks that actively campaign for the Democrats and leftist causes. The Shadow Party was conceived and organized principally by Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Harold McEwan Ickes – all identified with the Democratic Party left.

    A New York hedge fund manager with a personal fortune estimated at about $7.2 billion (aside from the billions of dollars in investor assets controlled by his management company), Soros is one of the world’s wealthiest and most powerful individuals. Since 1979, his foundation network – whose flagship is the Open Society Institute (OSI) — has given billions of dollars in grants to a multitude of organizations whose objectives are consistent with those of Soros. The major agendas of those organizations can be summarized as follows:



    • promoting the election of leftist political candidates throughout the United States
    • promoting open borders, mass immigration, and a watering down of current immigration laws
    • promoting a dramatic expansion of social welfare programs funded by ever-escalating taxes
    • promoting social welfare benefits and amnesty for illegal aliens
    • financing the recruitment and training of future activist leaders of the political Left
    • promoting socialized medicine in the United States
    • promoting the tenets of radical environmentalism

    • promoting racial and ethnic preferences in academia and the business world alike

    Hillary Clinton shares each of the foregoing Soros agendas.

    At a 2004 “Take Back America” conference in Washington, DC, Mrs. Clinton introduced Soros with these words:


    “Now, among the many people who have stood up and said, ‘I cannot sit by and let this happen to the country I love,’ is George Soros, and I have known George Soros for a long time now, and I first came across his work in the former Soviet Union, in Eastern Europe, when I was privileged to travel there, both on my own and with my husband on behalf of our country. … [W]e need people like George Soros, who is fearless, and willing to step up when it counts.”[18]“

    [18] Cited in David Horowitz and Richard Poe, The Shadow Party, p. 53.”

    Here, one sees for the first time the words “Shadow Party.” We can state, without a doubt that many will come up with all sorts of wild ideas, but if you follow the link, it will show you a part of the United States that is extremely scary, to say the least!
    Hillary Clinton made a statement early on about the ideas of Saul Alinsky, of whom she actually sat down and discussed his ideas with on several occasions. However, the most “radical’ words that she stated in 2003 have to be considered when we think of her running for President since this shows that her ideas are so closely aligned to Saul Alinsky, that it.
    “I agreed with some of Alinsky’s ideas,” she explained in “Living History,” her 2003 biography, “particularly the value of empowering people to help themselves. But we had a fundamental disagreement. He believed you could change the system only from the outside. I didn’t. Later he offered me the chance to work with him when I graduated from college, and he was disappointed that I decided instead to go to law school. Alinsky said I would be wasting my time, but my decision was an expression of my belief that the system could be changed from within.”

    Hillary Clinton shows without a doubt that she figures that the “change” that is needed to move the United States towards the goals of this Saul Alinsky character could better be done from “within.” Now that alone should cause some exceptionally strong concern if she thought that way just 8 short years ago, what would make her think any different now? The concern should not be that there needs to be change, but what kind of change. In the two terms of Barack Hussein Obama, we have seen what the Alinsky kind of change is, and it isn’t pretty.
    Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Google Plus.

    Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/hi...bLfmSMx8zwJ.99


Page 7 of 38 FirstFirst ... 3456789101117 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •