Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    White House: We Don’t Have to Explain Our Global Warming Claims to You

    White House: We Don’t Have to Explain Our Global Warming Claims to You

    November 2, 2014 By Greg Campbell



    For many Americans, there exists a faith in the cult of global warming alarmism. Beyond all rational explanations and beyond the tainted “science” behind this multi-billion-dollar myth that has fostered a whole industry dedicated to the advancement of “green” technology, there remains some serious holes in the claims surrounding the existence of global warming and, more specifically, man-made global warming.

    Now, even supporters of this fiction are wondering how the Obama Administration’s top “scientist” has come to the conclusion that global warming spawned severe storms seen in 2014 and, most curiously, why the Obama Administration is simply refusing to release the supposedly scientific data supporting this conclusion.

    In a video posted on WhiteHouse.gov titled, “The Polar Vortex: Explained in 2 Minutes,” John Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, pointed to supposed global warming as the catch-all cause for storms that in previous decades might have just merely been called “weather.”

    “If you’ve been hearing extremes cold spells likes the one we are having in the United States now disprove global warming, don’t believe it,” Holdren said.

    “A growing body of evidence suggests that the kind of extreme cold being experienced by much of the United States as we speak is a pattern that we can expect to see with increasing frequency as global warming continues,” Holdren also explained.

    Concluding the video, Holdren explained,“I believe the odds are that we can expect, as a result of global warming, to see more of this pattern of extreme cold in the mid-latitudes and some extreme warmth in the far north.”

    However, much of the scientific community as well as even the most-liberal of media outlets, such as The Washington Post, took issue with Holdren’s assertions as not only inherently erroneous, but startling in the fact that he has simply refused to identify the methods by which his department has reached these conclusions.

    The Blaze reports on the frustrations from the scientific community concerning the Obama Administrations refusal to explain their assertions:
    Numerous scientists, many believers in climate change, strongly disagreed with the conclusions by John Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.

    That’s not the issue that concerns Sam Kazman, general counsel for the Competitive Enterprise Institute, which is bringing the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the White House’s science office.

    “This is not about what side of the global warming debate you are on,” Kazman told TheBlaze. “It’s about transparency that this administration claims to represent.”

    While Kazman said this is far from the administration’s biggest breach of transparency, he still stressed it is a serious one.

    “It might be a minor example, but it is a particularly outrageous one because the erroneous nature of his claims are so obvious,” Kazman said of Holdren.
    Kazman is bringing forth a federal lawsuit to try and get the Obama Administration to reveal their data. Various agencies have stonewalled the efforts by attempting to claim that the information is privileged because the opinions offered in the video were personal opinions. This has prompted a FOIA request by Kazman to probe further.

    “If it’s opinion, it’s not labeled as such,” Kazman said. “He claims there is a growing body of evidence. There is a growing body of evidence in the opposite direction.”

    This is a classic example of two distinct phenomena on the left:

    1) It’s clear that for many, facts don’t matter when discussing global warming but that, instead, faith in its existence has replaced any rational discussion of the subject.

    2) The Obama Administration is not even remotely interested in being servants of the people but only interested in maintaining an autonomy that is most-often seen in 14th century European monarchies and dictatorships.


    http://www.tpnn.com/2014/11/02/white...claims-to-you/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    I can explain it in short: Money Laundering

    this is the biggest scam to rob Citizens World Wide ever conceived

    Trillions upon Trillions of Untraceable Dollars / Euro's etc.

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Similar Threads

  1. White House using global warming as a tool against capitalism? Global Warming Scam
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-20-2014, 12:12 AM
  2. Global Warming Alarmists Caught Doctoring '97-Percent Consensus' Claims
    By HAPPY2BME in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-14-2014, 02:18 PM
  3. Global Warming Alarmists Caught Doctoring '97-Percent Consensus' Claims
    By Newmexican in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-31-2013, 12:17 PM
  4. White House:Global Warming Out, Global Climate Disruption In
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-17-2010, 01:53 AM
  5. Disappearing world: Global warming claims tropical island
    By Kate in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-24-2006, 11:31 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •