Page 17 of 55 FirstFirst ... 713141516171819202127 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 541
Like Tree29Likes

Thread: WHY IS'NT MSM REPORTING ON THE escalating DANGERS of Radiation, UPDATED


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #161
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    You can never find the truth by presenting only one side of any issue.

    You find the truth by presenting all sides of an issue

    and having a discussion about it.
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #162
    April
    Guest
    Many of the articles I have posted on here have 2 sides in them but it is obvious this ongoing crisis is being buried and lied about by MSM and I for one am not going to allow it to go unanswered. This is a health issue that has and will affect millions and I for one am not going to bury my head in the sand or roll with the current propaganda spew from MSM...common sense should be on full alert for all of at this time IMO. 300 to 400 tons of radiation spewing daily into the ocean is nothing to ignore. Yeah my side of the issue is all for for alerting people to wake up, research and protect themselves and their families and the side you are promoting appears to be the exact opposite. You obviously stand with MSM and they have their side of the issue out there covering up truth as they go....it is the side to protect the people that I stand on and there VERY LITTLE of that out there being reported.

  3. #163
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    FROM THE MSM:


    1. Team to test west coast kelp for radiation from fukushima

      m.utsandiego.com/.../tp-team-to-test-west-coast...‎

      U‑T San Diego

      by Gary Robbins - in 96 Google+ circles

      1 day ago - Matt Edwards will soon dip a hand into the cool blue waters off Point Loma and grab strands of golden-brown kelp that might have a worrisome ...


    2. Kelp Off California Coast to Be Tested for Fukushima Radiation ...

      www.nbclosangeles.com › newslocal

      KNBC
      15 hours ago - Researchers are gathering kelp from along the West Coast to analyze it for traces of radioactive material that leaked into the Pacific Ocean from ...
    3. Kelp off San Diego coast to be tested for Fukushima radiation

      www.10news.com/.../kelp-off-san-diego-coast-to-be-tested-for-fu...‎
      KGTV

      14 hours ago - Kelp off San Diego coast to be tested forFukushima radiation. Kelp Project teams up with SDSU biologist... Researchers are now collecting samples of kelp off the West Coast to test its radiation levels to see if it is true.Missing: team
    4. Fukushima radiation: Scientists to test California Fish : The ...

      www.agoracosmopolitan.com/news/headline_news/2014/.../7705.html‎
      3 days ago - A research team led by UCLA ecologist Peggy Fong will take 15-pound ... Found up and down the coast, this canopy-forming kelp acts like a sponge and ... this year by scientists to monitor radiation levels on the West Coast.
    5. West Coast kelp to be tested for Fukushima radiation | Health ...

      www.kcby.com/.../West-Coast-kelp-to-be-tested-for-Fukushima-radiatio...‎
      14 hours ago - Researchers are gathering kelp from along theWest Coast to analyze it for traces of radioactive material that leaked into the Pacific Ocean from ...Missing: team
    6. News for team to test west coast kelp for radiation ...
      1. Scientists to Test Malibu Kelp for Radiation
        Malibu Times- 5 days ago
        In California, kelp is at once admired for its underwater beauty, grumbled ... to the March 2011 Japanese tsunami and resultingFukushima radiation leaks. ... next month to test local kelp as part of a West Coast-wide effort to determine the ... A researchteam led by UCLA ecologist Peggy Fong will take 15-lb.

    7. Kelp to be tested for Fukushima radiation - Worldnews.com

      article.wn.com/view/2014/.../Kelp_to_be_tested_for_Fukushima_radiatio...‎
      20 hours ago - TEAM TO TEST WEST COAST KELP FOR RADIATION FROM FUKUSHIMA ... FUKUSHIMA 2012 radiation buying Kelp Iodine + 150 Potassium ...
    8. Scientists to test Malibu kelp for Fukushima radiation | Citizens for ...

      www.legitgov.org/Scientists-test-Malibu-kelp-Fukushima-radiation
      5 days ago - Scientists to test Malibu kelp for Fukushima radiation --More than 20 labs and ... next month to test local kelpas part of a West Coast-wide effort to determine the ... A researchteam will take 15-pound samples at locations off ...
    9. Kelp off California coast to be tested for Fukushima radiation News ...

      www.news.nom.co/kelp-off-california-coast-to-be-tested-7933429-news/‎
      9 hours ago - Researchers are gathering kelp from along the West Coast to analyze it for traces of radioactive material that leaked into the Pacific Ocean, ...



    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  4. #164
    April
    Guest
    The only reason MSM is reporting ANYTHING on it now is because of people ranting and raving about it and doing their own testing and video taping it, so MSM could no longer ignore it....and now along with sheeple help they will try to minimize and cover it up.....no surprise there.

  5. #165
    April
    Guest
    TV: Scientists have found nuclear waste off San Diego coast — Fukushima’s problems now being felt in our local ecosystem — Professor most worried about finding ‘pools’ of cesium — “Time will tell how this plays out” (VIDEO)

    Published: February 4th, 2014 at 5:02 am ET
    By ENENews




    ABC San Diego, Feb. 3, 2014 –Steve Atkinson, 10 News: There continues to be serious concerns about whether radiation from the Fukushima nuclear disaster has reached our shores.
    Fox 5 San Diego, Feb. 3, 2014 (Emphasis Added):

    Watch the Fox 5 broadcast here

    http://enenews.com/fox-san-diego-fuk...ld-time-will-t

  6. #166
    April
    Guest
    Report: Fukushima nuclear waste will merge with radiation from U.S. reactors when washing up on West Coast — “Startling amounts” released from operating plants — Diablo Canyon officials admit to recently discharging more tritium than Fukushima (VIDEO)


    Published: February 4th, 2014 at 10:00 am ET
    By ENENews
    Bloomberg News, Feb. 3, 2014: Fukushima-US radiation runoff will merge on West Coast — The runoff from the Japanese plant will mingle with radiation released by other atomic stations such as Diablo Canyon in California. Under normal operations, Diablo Canyon discharges more radiation into the sea, albeit of a less dangerous isotope, than the Fukushima station [...] [There's] startling amounts that are released into the environment by the 435 nuclear power plants operating worldwide [...] Diablo Canyon plant in San Luis Obispo discharged 323 million liters of water into the Pacific in 2012, or about 870 tons a day, according to data from [its operator PG&E] [...] That water contained 3,670 curies of tritium, or 136 trillion becquerels, according to the company, almost three-and-a-half times the amount released from the Fukushima plant into the ocean in the period starting May 2011. The plant also discharged cesium-137 and strontium-90 [...]
    Colin Hill, associate professor of radiation oncology at USC, Feb. 3, 2014: [Tritium can] contaminate sea creatures that encounter the isotope in high levels.
    PG&E spokesman Blair Jones, Feb. 3, 2014: Total liquid discharges from Diablo Canyon in 2012 were 0.0165 percent of what the NRC allows. “Tritium is produced when a reactor is operating [...] Fukushima is not operating so naturally the tritium levels are lower.”
    Arjun Makhijani, President of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, Oct. 19, 2013 (at 26:15 in): [The releases are] not continuously monitored. In my opinion, the NRC is not looking very closely over the shoulder of the companies. For instance, tritium is released periodically, but I’m not sure when the measurements are made, and that’s not documented in the environmental reports. Are the water measurements made during the release? How are the averages reported? How are the totals calculated?
    Dr. Donald Moiser, professor at The Scripps Research Institute (Department of Immunology) and member of Del Mar city council in California, Oct. 19, 2013 (at 27:15 in): The problem with the data is tritium releases are episodic, so they’ll have a release of tritium one day a month when they report that to the NRC they’ll say this is the amount of tritium we released over the year. You have 5 days of release but you divide that by 365 days it doesn’t look like so much tritium, but if you’re sitting right next to the plant on the day of release, it’s quite a bit. There’s some data from Europe that says the spikes are dangerous. There’s no data in the U.S. that you can interpret.
    Watch the Symposium featuring Makhijani and Mosier here

    http://enenews.com/report-fukushima-...comment-466578

  7. #167
    April
    Guest
    Scientists Confirm Fukushima Radiation in California Kelp


    by Mikael Thalen
    February 6th, 2014
    Updated 02/06/2014 at 7:01 pm


    Scientists analyzing kelp off the coast of San Diego confirmed the presence of cesium this week, a radioactive isotope directly linked to the Fukushima Daiichi power plant.

    Part of the ongoing “Kelp Watch 2014″ project, government and academic institutions have begun receiving results from samples of Bull Kelp and Giant Kelp collected along the California coast. Despite attempts by the media to downplay the ongoing disaster, the discovery has only confirmed the continued build up of radiation in West Coast waters.
    “We’re trying to figure out how much is there and how much is getting into the ecosystem,” said Dr. Matthew Edwards, a professor from San Diego State University. “Things are linked a little more closely than sometimes we’d like to think. Just because it is on the other side of the world doesn’t mean that it doesn’t effect us.”
    The discovery coincides with statements made by researchers at the Institute for Cross-Disciplinary Physics and Complex Systems in Spain, who predicted the early 2014 arrival of Fukushima radiation along the North American West Coast.
    Although scientists claim the levels of cesium are safe, the public’s distrust has only grown given the government’s continued denial of other issues related to radiation.
    Currently, more than 70 U.S. sailors involved in the USS Ronald Reagan’s 2011 Fukushima rescue efforts have been stricken with ailments such as brain tumors, thyroid cancer and leukemia. Despite the clear connection to Fukushima, the federal government has continued to deny any link.
    Following the recent discovery of radiation levels over 1,400% above normal on a California beach, thought to be from naturally occurring thorium in the sand, government officials rushed to call the levels completely safe. Independent experts quickly refuted the claim, even warning that children playing in the sand were at risk.
    Given radiation’s ability to bio-accumulate in sea life, many fear that the massive animal die-off along the west coast is related to the continued consumption of radioactive isotopes. Sea stars and sardines have been especially effected, with other strange anomalies, such as the discovery of “never before seen” conjoined gray whale calves off the coast of Southern Mexico, sparking increased worry as well.
    While the government attempts to reassure the public that there is absolutely no risk whatsoever, tens of millions of doses of Potassium Iodide have been quietly purchased by the Department of Health and Human Services as well as the Pentagon.
    With experts predicting a 40 plus year cleanup at Fukushima, the likelihood of increased cesium in the Pacific Ocean seems inevitable.






    http://www.storyleak.com/scientists-...fornia-kelp-2/

  8. #168
    April
    Guest
    According to Andrey Dyomin, president of the Russian Association for Public Health, the same is to be expected in Japan."We cannot say that the problem would disappear in five years. The rise of morbidity will continue as the general gene pool has been damaged. Next generations will carry the burden of that catastrophe".
    The peculiarities of the Japanese national cuisine focused on fish and seafood are one of the risk factors. Of course, it is not necessarily true that all of the food will be poisoned by the radiation coming from the Fukushima spills, but the risk of getting radiation poisoning through food is rising. At the end of last year 40 km from the power plant a fish was caught, in which the level of dangerous elements exceeded the norm by a hundred times. Scientists assume that the poisoned water from the power plant was carried by the sea streams to California. How else would one explain that every blue tuna fish caught near the coast of the state has signs of radioactive poisoning, while brown kelp containing the radioactive iodine level that exceeds the norm by 200 times has been detected on the shore? According to the Bloomberg web site, this year a "squad" of radioactive jellyfish is to be expected at the US West Coast. Californians are worried. It is unclear how the situation will develop in the future, says Prof. Alexey Yablokov, an advisor at the Russian Academy of Sciences and ecologist.

    http://voiceofrussia.com/2014_02_06/...-to-rise-5545/

  9. #169
    April
    Guest
    Fukushima radiation levels underestimated by five times - TEPCO

    Published time: February 08, 2014 07:03

    AFP Photo / IAEA


    TEPCO has revised the readings on the radioactivity levels at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant well to 5 million becquerels of strontium per liter – both a record, and nearly five times higher than the original reading of 900,000 becquerels per liter.
    Strontium-90 is a radioactive isotope of strontium produced by nuclear fission with a half-life of 28.8 years. The legal standard for strontium emissions is 30 becquerels per liter. Exposure to strontium-90 can cause bone cancer, cancer of nearby tissues, and leukemia.
    Tokyo Electric Power Co. originally said that the said 900,000 becquerels of beta-ray sources per liter, including strontium - were measured in the water sampled on July 5 last year.
    However, the company noted on Friday that the previous radioactivity levels had been wrong, meaning that it was also likely reading taken from the other wells at the disaster-struck plant prior to September were also likely to have been inaccurate, the Asahi Shimbum newspaper reported.
    The Japanese company has already apologized for the failures, which they said were a result of the malfunctioning of measuring equipment.
    TEPCO did not mention the radioactivity levels of other samples of both groundwater and seawater taken from between June and November last year – which totaled some 140.
    However, the erroneous readings only pertain to the radiation levels measured in water – readings taken to measure the radiation levels in air or soil are likely to have been accurate.
    In the basement of the station, the drainage system and special tanks have accumulated more than 360,000 tons of radioactive water. The leakage of radioactive water has been an ongoing problem in the wake of the accident at the Fukushima-1 nuclear power plant.
    TEPCO also said on Thursday that 600 liters of contaminated water – which had 2,800 becquerels of beta-ray sources per liter in it, leaked from piping leading to a tank at the Fukushima nuclear plant.
    A record high level of beta rays released from radioactive strontium-90 was detected at the crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant beneath the No. 2 reactor's well facing the ocean, according to the facility’s operator who released news of the measurements mid-January.
    TEPCO measured the amount of beta ray-emitting radioactivity at more than 2.7 million becquerels per liter, Fukushima’s operator said as reported in the Japanese media.
    In March 2011, an earthquake triggered a tsunami that hit Japan’s coast, damaging the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. The catastrophe caused the meltdown of three nuclear reactors at the facility, leading to the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl.
    The water used to cool the reactors has been leaking into the soil and contaminating the ground water ever since. Some of the radioactive water has been escaping into the Pacific Ocean.

    http://rt.com/news/fukushima-radiati...estimated-143/

  10. #170
    April
    Guest
    Leaders on West Coast: Gov’t is “highly irresponsible… very negligent” for not testing in Pacific as Fukushima radiation arrives — Contamination of seafood is going to happen — “We don’t want to get cancer… We have a right to know if our fish is safe” — Gov’t: Testing ‘not required’


    Published: February 8th, 2014 at 10:26 am ET
    By ENENews

    Coast Reporter, Feb. 6, 2014: [...] Radiation from the March 2011 nuclear accident arrived off the B.C. coast [in June of] last year, Robin Brown [at the Department of Fisheries and Oceans] said Tuesday. [...] a report by five DFO scientists concluded that [...] “the inventory of Fukushima radioactivity will almost entirely shift from the western to the eastern North Pacific during the next five years.” [...] [It featured one model that] suggested ocean contamination would exceed levels of maximum fallout from nuclear tests and previous accidents such as Chernobyl, while the other model said levels would equal the amount of contamination that existed in 1990. [...] the report cited “many reasons for study,” including human health and marine biota. Brown, one of the co-authors of the report, acknowledged that neither study factored in ongoing discharges from Fukushima after the March 2011 release.
    Message from Annita McPhee, Tahlton Central Council president, to national Chief Shawn A-in-chut Atleo: “We cannot sit by and watch and wait to see what the full impacts of the Fukushima disaster will be on our salmon and our way of life [...] To date, we have not seen or heard of Canada taking this issue seriously and working in a real way to address it.”
    The Coast Reporter interviewed McPhee: “Some people are not eating their fish because they’re scared. Some people don’t want to feed it to their kids. We don’t want to get cancer. We already have lots of cancer up in our area. I mean, lots [...] The Tahltan people have been very concerned about what’s going on. We get our fish from the Stikine River, but it comes from the Pacific Ocean [...] As First Nations, we’ve got to come together and address this, force the government’s hand. We have a right to know if our fish is safe to eat.”

    B.C. Grand Chief Stewart Phillip
    : “[The federal government’s inaction is] highly irresponsible. [...] I think it’s certainly a legitimate concern [...] Other jurisdictions — other countries — realize there is a very real potential for contamination. Unfortunately, Canada doesn’t seem to be taking any steps whatsoever to acknowledge this as a potential threat. [...] It’s not only unacceptable, but it’s very negligent of the government of Canada.”
    Sliammon Chief Clint Williams: “Our people really cherish salmon, it’s always been part of our culture, so we absolutely encourage [testing and full disclosure]. We want to make sure our food is safe. And it’s not just salmon either – it’s clams, geoducks, sea urchins [...] I’m sure those concerns are shared all up and down the coast here.”
    Former shíshálh (Sechelt) Nation chief Calvin Craigan: “If [contamination of natural foods from the sea is] going to happen in the long term, and it is, all First Nations have to get together and call for testing.”

    Canadian Food Inspection Agency
    : “Based on our test results, as well as our ongoing assessment of information from a variety of expert resources, further testing of imported or domestic food products for the presence of radioactive material is not required”

    http://enenews.com/leaders-on-west-c...-to-get-cancer

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •