Page 528 of 574 FirstFirst ... 28428478518524525526527528529530531532538 ... LastLast
Results 5,271 to 5,280 of 5732
Like Tree97Likes

Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)

  1. #5271
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    [ED.: Widows may have survivor's benefits, and orphans, inheritances.]

    Woe to those who enact evil statutes
    And to those who constantly record unjust decisions,
    So as to deprive the needy of justice
    And rob the poor of My people of their rights,
    So that widows may be their spoil
    And that they may plunder the orphans.

    Now what will you do in the day of punishment,
    And in the devastation which will come from afar?
    To whom will you flee for help?
    And where will you leave your wealth?
    Nothing remains but to crouch among the captives
    Or fall among the slain.

    In spite of all this, His anger does not turn away
    And His hand is still stretched out.
    - Isaiah 10:1-4


    Quote Originally Posted by Devvy Kidd
    Think most of those justices don't know at this point [in] time [that] Soetoro is the biggest fraud (next to the "Federal" Reserve Banking Act of 1913) in the history of this country?
    Next biggest fraud? I have to take issue with Devvy there.

    Yes, the Federal Reserve Act FRAudulently ceded control of the U.S. financial system, and through it the U.S. economy, to the Central National Bank of
    Rothschild & Rockefeller, Astor, Carnegie, Flagler, Gould, Mellon, Morgan, Schwab, Stanford, Vanderbilt, & Sons, et al.

    But electing Mr. Obama, fraudulent impostor, UN-native son, constitutionally ineligible usurper of the Presidency, surrendered control of all physical assets of the United States, "the full faith and credit" of the American serfs, the U.S. armed forces, and abroad, the reputation, respect/fear, and "beholdings" (accumulated political capital or "U-O-Mes") of Uncle Sam, to:

    1. godless Communists/Globalists (UN, Agenda 21, EU, SPP/NAU);
      Communist China's cheap labor capitalists, who hold about $2 Trillion of U.S. federal debt, which they are trading for U.S. assets, including oil deposits, that "watermelon" environmentalists have preserved for America's enemies;
      the European elites (the G8, the Fed and the IMF,
      the Bilderbergs, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Davos Conference);
      the pseudo-Christian or anti-Christian entities which infest the Vatican and
      the Hague like termites; and

    2. the worldwide death cult (you raiders and slavers know who you are).

    God-fearing Americans used to know better - many still do.
    But tell The Big Lie long enough and pervasively enough...

    However,
    these counterfeit conquerors shooting blanks -
    riding a white horse but bearing a bow with no arrows
    (
    "the first seal" in Rev. 6:2) - need to understand:
    Mr. Obama cannot surrender what is not his to render.


    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 01-31-2013 at 05:00 PM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  2. #5272
    working4change
    Guest
    URGENT-PLEASE TAKE ACTION HERE-NO TO CLOTURE VOTE RULE CHANGES
    http://www.alipac.us/f8/help-stop-go...mnesty-271140/

  3. #5273
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Quote Originally Posted by working4change View Post
    URGENT-PLEASE TAKE ACTION HERE-NO TO CLOTURE VOTE RULE CHANGES
    http://www.alipac.us/f8/help-stop-go...mnesty-271140/
    Done and Done with my 1.1 Senators. The 0.1 Senator is 90% U.S. Chamber of Commerce's Senator, so I don't know why I bother. But for ALIPAC, I did (waste my breath). We know that he will vote against his constituents; he doesn't represent us.

    Is there any way to block a person from entering a state, so that he becomes a non-resident and eventually loses his citizenship of that state? Or even better, confine him to Washington, D.C.? Just brainstorming.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 01-24-2013 at 03:31 PM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  4. #5274
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Any fool's fatal flaw is likely his unwillingness to admit that he was wrong (or hooked on sin), and to change his mind (or his ways). But for that one flaw, he would accept correction, and he would not remain a fool. A saving grace of liturgical churches (Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Lutheran, Episcopal) is the unceasing congregational prayer, which even children learn by rote as soon as they can sit quietly in big church. "I have sinned through my own fault, my own grievous fault." "Lord, have mercy on me, a sinner."

    Until that prayer is part of one's soul, one's being, it is very difficult for one to admit, "I was wrong. I was mistaken. I was duped. I knowingly chose to disobey God, the Truth, and what I knew was right."

    Stay with me here... I'm going someplace with this that you may not have been before.

    How then can we expect anything else of those who believe The Big Lie? They sooo want The Big Lie to metamorphose into the honest-to-God truth that they will cling to it, in the face of indisputable evidence to the contrary, in the hope that their FAITH (in The Big Lie) will cause it to manifest itself as FACT. They must come to the bitter realization that the veracity of the object of their faith is more important than their faith alone. They must finally understand that they are not infallible, that only God and His word are ultimately infallible, and that all men are liars - persons who have told a lie in the past and will lie again in the future, unless they die first.

    Only when that spiritual and philosophical crevasse or chasm has been passed, over the bridge of Jesus' cross and crucifixion, His death and resurrection, can one begin to freely admit, "Somebody pulleda wool over my eyes and made a fool outta me."

    In 2009, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Columbus, Ga.,
    Judge Clay Land sanctioned Atty. Orly Taitz $20,000 for bringing a second military case claiming that the constitutionally ineligible Counterfeit Commander-in-Chief (CCinC) invalidated the chain of command for issuing deployment orders. Judge Land had previously warned her that, since he had made his decision on this matter known to her in Cook v. Goode et al (2009), she would be sanctioned if she brought any more of such cases. His decision effectively sealed off any civil recourse or relief for Army personnel at nearby Ft. Benning.

    Faint not. Atty. Orly Taitz has persevered to get Noonan, MacLeran, Judd, and Taitz v. Bowen to full conference at the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 15, 2013. Assume nothing, but a court date should be announced on the following Monday, Feb. 18th, if Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito agree to bring the case for trial. G
    iven the importance of the content of the case, hopefully oral arguments will be scheduled before the summer break.

    Mr. Obama is not on trial in Noonan et al v. Bowen. California Sec. of State Deborah Bowen is being sued for failing to vet Mr. Obama and verify his eligibility for the office before placing his name on the ballot. But in the course of presenting evidence against Sec. of State Bowen to demonstrate her malfeasance, evidence that Mr. Obama was never eligible must necessarily be presented.

    Of course, Sec. of State Bowen could just fold, plead "guilty", and accept her punishment. That would make Noonan et al v. Bowen moot, and the evidence of Mr. Obama's ineligibility to the Office of President would still not be entered as evidence by the U.S. Supreme Court. Immense pressure will be applied to Sec. of State Bowen to take the fall for the Kenyan Conman-in-Chief before the case comes before the Supreme Court for oral arguments. But she doesn't have to do so one day earlier, which gives Mr. Obama a few extra months of government protection.

    This is indeed a big "if", but IF the evidence of Mr. Obama's ineligibility were to be admitted into evidence and validated, proven as fact, by the U.S. Supreme Court, it would be much harder for Congress to hide behind (known fraudulent) statements by the Congressional Research Service, FactCheck/Politifact/Daily Kos, DNC Chairwoman Rep. Nancy Pelosi and DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond, etc..

    Many fools would be disabused of their folly and have scales removed from their eyes, delivered from a strong delusion, so as to know the truth.
    Of course, some will want to remain ignorant, because ignorance is bliss, and with knowledge comes responsibility to act accordingly. Likewise, some people still believe the earth is flat, and an absurdly enormous multitude still believes money grows from ATMs. "I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren. - 1 Th 4:13a

    Mr. Obama's lawyers do not have truth to use to their client's advantage, so their M.O. is:

    1. Lie and obfuscate, edit and redact, create doubt
      where there is none, and challenge everything;

    2. Get cases dismissed on the technicality of lack of standing;
    3. Bankrupt the plaintiff with repeated continuances,and
    4. stall, Stall, STALL!!!.


    Search - Supreme Court of the United States

    Breaking news, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts to rule on Noonan, MacLeran, Judd, Taitz v Bowen | Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire

    http://www.alipac.us/f31/barack-obam...ml#post1320167
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 01-29-2013 at 12:56 PM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  5. #5275
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    The article below was posted at libertycaucus.net by Trip, one of the most rigorous legal analysts at Hannity Forums of Mr. Obama's constitutional ineligibility to the Office of President, not being a natural born Citizen, that is, one born in the country of parents who are citizens. It appears that Chief Justice Roberts and Jane, his wife, adopted two Irish children unlawfully, in violation of Irish law. Even if they do not lose the children, the stink in the MSM and in Congress could render him devoid of moral authority. If C.J. Roberts was coerced to vote for ObamaCare by a threat of losing the two children, after raising them for twelve years, then he will not be able to vote for oral arguments for Noonan et al v. Bowen either. If C.J. Roberts is compromised and coerced, then the Mafia, the Mob, the NOI Mus|ims, the globalist banksters, and the Democrats own him, and the U.S. Supreme Court is not going to hear Noonan et al v. Bowen.

    Mrs. Roberts should flee the country with the children, or at least go into deep cover until the usurpation is past. Recall that Jesus' mother and stepfather fled with Him into Egypt, escaping the murderous wrath of King Herod the Great, until Herod died, no more than a few months later (Matthew 2:13-23)..
    .

    Quote Originally Posted by Trip at Liberty Caucus
    How Roberts Was Blackmailed To Support ObamaCare

    Many of us have questioned what caused Roberts to switch his vote on ObamaCare at the last minute, as reported by CBS, and doing so, so late that the Conservative Justices were forced to rewrite their majority opinion to be minority dissent. These facts may answer that question.

    In 2000 Justice Roberts and his wife Jane adopted two children. Initially it was apparent that the adoptions were "from a Latin American country", but over time it has become apparent that the adopted children were not Latin American, but were Irish. Why this matters will become evident.

    In 2005 the NY Times began investigating Roberts life as a matter of his nomination to the Supreme Court by George Bush. The Times was shortly accused of trying to unseal the adoption papers and intending to violate the anonymity of the adoption process... however there is more to the story.

    Drudge did an article in 2005
    Patterico's Pontifications » Drudge Says New York Times is Investigating Roberts’s Adoption Records

    • The NEW YORK TIMES is looking into the adoption records of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

      The TIMES has investigative reporter Glen Justice hot on the case to investigate the status of adoption records of Judge Roberts’ two young children, Josie age 5 and Jack age 4, a top source reveals.

      Judge Roberts and his wife Jane adopted the children when they each were infants.

      Both children were adopted from Latin America.

      A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoption papers are part of the paper’s “standard background check.”

      Bill Borders, NYT senior editor, explains: “Our reporters made initial inquiries about the adoptions, as they did about many other aspects of his background. They did so with great care, understanding the sensitivity of the issue.”


    Were the Children Adopted from Ireland?

    This is not clear ... -- the Associated Press reports that they were "adopted from Latin America." This seems a bit puzzling, in light of the Time magazine report indicating that the children were born in Ireland. Also, their blonde hair and fair skin do not seem conventionally Latin American 1

    TIME had a “web exclusive” on the Roberts's (7/24/05) and quoted a family friend as stating the kids were “born in Ireland 4 1/2 months apart.”

    How were the Children Adopted?

    According to The New York Times, based on information from Mrs. Roberts's sister, Mary Torre, the children were adopted through a private adoption.

    As explained by Families for Private Adoption, "[p]rivate (or independent) adoption is a legal method of building a family through adoption without using an adoption agency for placement. In private adoption, the birth parents relinquish their parental rights directly to the adoptive parents, instead of to an agency
    ."2

    But was Robert's adoption utilizing "a legal method"?

    Apparently the process of adopting Jack involved some stress for John Roberts. According to Dan Klaidman of Newsweek, during the contested 2000 election, Roberts "spent a few days in Florida advising lawyers [for George W. Bush] on their legal strategy," but "he did not play a central role," because " at the time, Roberts was preoccupied with the adoption of his son."

    It is now quite evident that the two Children were from Ireland. Even wikipedia references these adoptions at the time of Roberts' confirmation, and indicates that the children were of Irish birth.


    However Irish law 1) prohibits the adoption of Children to non-residents, and 2) also does not permit private adoptions, but rather has all adoptions go through a public agency.

    This would explain the children's origin from a "Latin American country", so as to circumvent Irish law.

    Evidently Roberts arranged for this adoption through some sort of trafficking agency, that got the children out of Ireland and into that Latin American country, from which they were adopted, thereby circumventing two Irish laws -- entirely illegal, but perhaps quasi-legitimized by the birth mothers (two) transporting the children out of Ireland.

    Undoubtedly Roberts and his wife spent a great deal of money for this illegal process, circumventing Irish laws and arranging for the transit of two Irish children from separate birth-mothers to a foreign nation. Come 2012, those two children have been with the Roberts' for roughly 10 years, since they were adopted as "infants".

    Some might feel an impulse dismiss this information, mistakenly believing Roberts and his wife were doing a good thing for a children needing a home.

    That would be an inaccurate belief. As recognized, such an inter-country adoption would only come about at great cost, and those who utilize this method are creating a for-profit black market in adoptive children, trafficking across international borders, and doing so from mothers who have not yet given up their children except for that profit. Such actions are creating a very unsavory profit-for-children human trafficking market that even necessitates immediate contact with new birth mothers in dire circumstances to offer financial gain. The entire arrangement is thoroughly predatory, turning children into only financial commodity, and even providing motivation for their birth mothers to give them up! That's an important ethical recognition.

    Roberts is not deserving of any sort of respect here, and is only the latest example of people in position believing themselves above the law, beyond scrutiny and exempt from repercussion.


    It all now makes sense.

    The circumstances of these two adoptions explain not only why this would be overlooked by an overall sympathetic media, but also why a sitting Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court would not want this information to become public fodder well into his tenure. Its release and public discussion would discredit Roberts as an impartial judge of the law, and undoubtedly lead to his impeachment.

    This also explains why Roberts would have a means to be blackmailed, and why that leverage would still exist even after the institution of ObamaCare.

    ... And it has led to flipping the swing-vote on ObamaCare, which fundamentally changed the relationship between citizen and government, making us de facto property of the state, with our relative worth in care and maintenance able to be determined by the government. Essentially it was a coup without firing a shot, much less needing even an Amendment to the Constitution.

    And it is consistent with Obama's Chicago-style politics, that has previously involved opening other sealed <divorce> records in order to win election.


    How Roberts Was Blackmailed To Support ObamaCare
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 02-03-2013 at 01:01 AM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  6. #5276
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Linda Jordan Fined For Challenging Obama’s Identity Fraud After He Failed E-Verify




    Obama Failed E-Verify: Linda Jordan Fined For Challenging Obama's Identity Fraud - YouTube

    Here is the story of how a mother and homemaker in Washington State stood up to challenge the identity fraud of Barack Obama. Learn how she paid a price for her courage to run the president through E-Verify.

    This should be Front page stuff………

    This is very frightening big time. I will never have any respect for Obama at all. It is a shame about how corrupt our government has become.

    America is done. Our leaders are crony scum. The military leaders are wimp-less hacks and unstudied. The citizens are arming up like no other country in history.

    We know the press/media is complicit in this fraud’s illegal holding of the office of POTUS..so tell me. How does a person get this info out??

    WHY cant they march right down with an arrest order and put his lying chump in jail??

    People with the money and power to expose this fraud have tried and look where it has gotten us to. I AM willing to lay my life on the line to get this pervert out of office..but that's not going to be enough. All these congress critters talk tough but someone has put the tape over their mouths for a reason wouldn't you think? Its absolutely ludicrous that these people REFUSE to indict this criminal in our White House. Our values and the Rule of Law only apply to those trying to expose him? We need millions of us to march on the WHITE HOUSE and arrest him ourselves.

    “Someone that has a lot to say about this subject these Days are taking their Lives in their Own Hands!!

    Obama has the money and power backing him so all he has to do is what he is told. I believe he will remain in charge. Due to voter fraud placing Obama in office 2 times I am sure the Democrats will take control of Congress after the 2014 elections. Then Obama will appoint his Supreme Court Justices and that will be the last nail in America’s coffin. I do not think anything or anyone can stop the Obama machine. I also believe the only reason he is sending planes and tanks to the Middle East is to help wipe Israel off the map. The US will be next.

    Linda Jordan Fined For Challenging Obama&rsquo;s Identity Fraud After He Failed E-Verify - Patriot Action Network
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  7. #5277
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    posted as a comment to "Busted: 1940 Census Confirms Obama Alias; Born in 1890"
    N.B. The U.S. Census does not include SSNs, so the above title is incorrect.

    @douglasdauntless, I'm not aware of the adult gin joints being
    High School Barry's motive for securing fake ID, as "gin" was reportedly not one of his preferred mood adjusters. But he did need a SSN to get a job at Baskin-Robbins in 1977. Social Security Administration verification of his personal identifying information on an SSN application in 1977 would have possibly raised questions about his post-birth registration in Hawaii in 1961.

    On Aug. 7, 1961, his grandmother, Madelyn (or Madlyn) "Toot" Dunham, registered his birth in absentia as a non-hospital birth, and she fraudulently claimed that he was born at Kapi'olani M&G Hospital in Honolulu, even though he was actually born in the Lady Grigg Maternity Unit of Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya, with James O.W. Ang'awa as attending physician.

    She also falsely claimed that his mother and father of record lived at 6085 K Hwy. just off Waikiki Beach, when Barack Sr. could hardly afford tuition and a student apartment. Establishing non-cohabitation for separation, Anna and young Barack never set foot in Hawaii before Barack Sr. left for Harvard in June of 1962, so even the newspaper birth announcements made by the Honolulu DOH were a sham; they were automatically triggered by the fictionalized Hawaii birth registration which Madelyn Dunham filed at the Honolulu DOH on Aug. 7, 1961.

    I cannot prove the following in court, but it is the simplest, non-contrived explanation which corresponds to the known facts, motive, and opportunity. There is no known evidence to disprove it, except the proven-fabricated documents which back the Barack Obama II birth myth.

    In 1977, Madelyn Dunham had to provide young Barry with a fake SSN to avoid any Social Security Administration cross-checking of the non-hospital birth registration of a birth at Kapi'olani Hospital against the birth records at Kapi'olani Hospital, which has denied having any record of Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama ever being a patient there. With the ready advice of Communist Frank Marshall Davis on how to create a fake identity, Mrs. Dunham used her volunteer position at the Honolulu Probate Judge's office to lift from the records of the deceased a SSN which had not yet been filed as deceased with the SSA. That deceased person was Harrison J. Bounel of Connecticut and New York, who had just recently died in Hawaii.

    Years later, after Mr. Obama acquired from Tony Rezko the 5046 S. Greenwood property in southside Chicago, that address was recorded along with Mr. Obama's assumed SSN beginning with "042". Thus Harrison J. Bounel (deceased), the true owner of that SSN beginning with "042", posthumously acquired an address of 5046 S. Greenwood in Chicago.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 02-07-2013 at 10:07 AM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  8. #5278
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    How they stole the 2012 elections

    (Hat Tip to bobmann101, who compiled most of the following links.)




    WND Poll: What role, if any, did vote fraud play in the 2012 election? [1295 Votes]


    • We may never have a free and fair election again in America if we don't start exposing abuses and prosecuting them (53%, 681 Votes)
    • The election was stolen – pure and simple (25%, 322 Votes)
    • It played a decisive role in the presidential election, robbing the real winner of victory (8%, 98 Votes)
    • It is abundantly clear now that presidential elections in the U.S. are rigged in favor of Democrats (7%, 89 Votes)
    • There's enough doubt about the fairness of the election that is causing Americans to lose confidence in the vote (3%, 42 Votes)
    • Democrats are fine with cheating and law-breaking, as James O'Keefe demonstrated in his videos (3%, 34 Votes)
    • Other (2¼%, 29 Votes)

    Read more at Did Obama steal the 2012 election? | WorldNetDaily

    Colorado Counties Have More Voters Than People | RedState

    Forensic profiler: Obama is subconsciously confessing election fraud | WorldNetDaily

    THE BIG LIST of vote fraud reports | WorldNetDaily

    Cuccinelli seems to agree voter fraud helped Obama - Virginia Politics | The Washington Post

    22 Signs That Voter Fraud Is Wildly Out Of Control And The Election Was A Sham | The American Dream

    Discrepancies Found in Election Results from Several Swing States | Breitbart

    Governor Romney would have won in the electoral college, 270-268, if he had received 333,912 more votes in four swing states: 103,482 in Ohio, 73,859 in Florida, 115,911 in Virginia, and 40,660 in New Hampshire. | Breitbart

    Election Fraud? Barack Obama Won More Than 99 Percent Of The Vote In More Than 100 Ohio Precincts | Market Daily News

    Claims increase of machines switching votes in Ohio and other battleground states | Fox News

    The Hamilton Co., Ohio, Director of Elections removed two precinct election judges for allowing several dozen unrregistered voters to cast regular ballots (not provisional ballots).

    Woodbridge, Virgiania, poll watcher Dara Fox reports massive voter fraud at her polling place. | WMAL-AM 630.





    Why the Republicans don't/won't/can't challenge the Democrats about voter fraud or election fraud. | Fellowship of the Minds

    ...
    during the weekly True the Vote webcast, Catherine Engelbrecht (see her photo below) related a meeting she had with Reince Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee (RNC), asking what the GOP would do about voter integrity. The answer?

    Nothing. They aren’t legally able to.



    True the Vote’s Catherine Engelbrecht (read more about her, here)


    This all goes back to a lawsuit 31 years ago, in 1981. The following is compiled from an account on The Judicial View, a legal website specializing in court decision research and alerts, and from Democratic National Committee v Republican National Committee,” Case No. 09-4615.

    In 1981, during the gubernatorial election in New Jersey (NJ), a lawsuit was brought against the RNC, the NJ Republican State Committee (RSC), and three individuals (John A. Kelly, Ronald Kaufman, and Alex Hurtado), accusing them of violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, 1973, and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

    The lawsuit was brought by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the NJ Democratic State Committee (DSC), and two individuals (Virginia L. Peggins and Lynette Monroe).

    The lawsuit alleged that:

    • The RNC and RSC targeted minority voters in New Jersey in an effort to intimidate them.

    • The RNC created a voter challenge list by mailing sample ballots to individuals in precincts with a high percentage of racial or ethnic minority registered voters. Then the RNC put the names of individuals whose postcards were returned as undeliverable on a list of voters to challenge at the polls.

    • The RNC enlisted the help of off-duty sheriffs and police officers with “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands, to intimidate voters by standing at polling places in minority precincts during voting. Some of the officers allegedly wore firearms in a visible manner.

    To settle the lawsuit, in 1982 — while Ronald Reagan was President (1981-1989) — the RNC and RSC entered into an agreement or Consent Decree, which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance. The following is what the RNC and RSC, in the Consent Decree, agreed they would do:

    [I]n the future, in all states and territories of the United States:

    (a) comply with all applicable state and federal laws protecting the rights of duly qualified citizens to vote for the candidate(s) of their choice;

    (b) in the event that they produce or place any signs which are part of ballot security activities, cause said signs to disclose that they are authorized or sponsored by the party committees and any other committees participating with the party committees;

    (c) refrain from giving any directions to or permitting their agents or employees to remove or deface any lawfully printed and placed campaign materials or signs;

    (d) refrain from giving any directions to or permitting their employees to campaign within restricted polling areas or to interrogate prospective voters as to their qualifications to vote prior to their entry to a polling place;

    (e) refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial or ethnic composition of such districts is a factor in the decision to conduct, or the actual conduct of, such activities there and where a purpose or significant effect of such activities is to deter qualified voters from voting; and the conduct of such activities disproportionately in or directed toward districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations shall be considered relevant evidence of the existence of such a factor and purpose;

    (f) refrain from having private personnel deputized as law enforcement personnel in connection with ballot security activities.

    The RNC also agreed that the RNC, its agents, servants, and employees would be bound by the Decree, “whether acting directly or indirectly through other party committees.”

    As modified in 1987, the Consent Decree defined “ballot security activities” to mean “ballot integrity, ballot security or other efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud.”

    Since 1982, that Consent Decree has been renewed every year by the original judge, Carter appointee District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise, now 88 years old. Long retired, Debevoise comes back yearly for the sole purpose of renewing his 1982 order for another year.



    In 2010, the RNC unsuccessfully appealed “to vacate or modify” the Consent Decree in “Democratic National Committee v Republican National Committee,” Case No. 09-4615 (C.A. 3, Mar. 8, 2012). [Case No. 09-4615 was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court but apparently was not accepted for oral arguments.]

    This is a summary of the appeals judge’s ruling, filed on March 8, 2012:

    In 1982, the Republican National Committee (“RNC”) and the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) entered into a consent decree (the “Decree” or “Consent Decree”), which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance. The RNC appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denying, in part, the RNC’s Motion to Vacate or Modify the Consent Decree. Although the District Court declined to vacate the Decree, it did make modifications to the Decree. The RNC argues that the District Court abused its discretion by modifying the Decree as it did and by declining to vacate the Decree. For the following reasons, we will affirm the District Court’s judgment.

    Surprise! The judge who denied the RNC’s appeal to “vacate” the 1982 Consent Decree is an Obama appointee, Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr., of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

    [Atty. Orly Taitz writes that Obama appointee Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr., is the same judge who cast the deciding vote against her 2011 case, Liberi v. Taitz, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Philadelphia, Penn..]




    Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr.,
    U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit

    (Continued. . .)

    Fellowship of the Minds has several more links - those in green - to accounts of voter fraud in 2012 by Democrats.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 02-08-2013 at 02:13 AM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  9. #5279
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    BREAKING: Supreme Court Opens Door To Challenge To Obama Forged IDs And Eligibility NEXT WEEK...




    Chief Justice John Roberts Schedules A Case Regarding Obamas Forged IDs to be Heard in Conference Before the Full Supreme Court. Date: FEBRUARY 15, 2013.

    The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.

    More from Huffington Post: Taitz's case argues that Obama is using false identification, a fake last name, a false Social Security number and forged birth certificates, and Selective Service applications to run for president. She originally filed the lawsuit against California Secretary of State Debra Bowen (D) in her attempt to prevent California's electoral votes from being counted and to prevent Vice President Joe Biden from counting the electoral votes earlier this month.

    A federal judge in California dismissed this case last week. Taitz likened her current case to Watergate.

    "Please, keep in mind, Richard Nixon was reelected and sworn in, but later was forced to resign as a result of Watergate. over 30 high ranking officials of Nixon administration including Attorney General of the United States and White House Counsel were indicted, convicted and went to prison," Taitz wrote on her website.

    "ObamaForgery gate is a hundred times bigger then Watergate. More corrupt high ranking officials, US Attorneys, AGs and judges were complicit, committed high treason by allowing a citizen of Indonesia and possibly still a citizen of Kenya Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soebarkah, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro to usurp the U.S. Presidency by use of forged IDs and a stolen Social security number."

    SCOTUS printout is below.






    No. 12A606
    Title:
    .
    .
    Docketed:
    Lower Ct:
    Case Nos.:




    .
    Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants
    v.
    Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
    December 13, 2012
    Supreme Court of California
    (S207078)




    Date
    Dec 11 2012
    Dec 13 2012
    Dec 26 2012
    Jan 9 2013
    Jan 9 2013



    Proceedings and Orders
    Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
    Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
    Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
    Application (12A606) referred to the Court.









    Follow us: @redflagnews on Twitter














    Last edited by AirborneSapper7; 02-09-2013 at 01:32 AM.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  10. #5280
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012
    FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2013

    2012 Presidential Election Results are a joke!



    Why did not a single newspaper reporter or TV journalist take five minutes to examine the 2008 Federal Election Commission election results report which Obama arrogantly posted on the White Housewebsite prior to my finding it there on Nov. 28, 2009 as a slap in the face to California attorney Orly Taitz?

    Taitz
    filed a Quo Warrantolawsuit against Obama, demanding to know by what authority he sat in the Oval Office (believing that would somehow make Obama produce his birth certificate
    ? By posting the FEC document, Obama was telling her, "...by winning the election." Had Obama, or anyone on the White House IT staff looked at the document they had posted, they would have noticed one glaring mistake. There were more votes than voters. Well, wait a minute—someone did. They simply "cut out" the mistake before posting the document. It was the blank box that should not have been blank that caught my attention and made me examine the document—and then go to the FEC website where I found the same document. Completely filled out. Line one on the White House websitesaid: "Number of registered voters: 169 million. Number of registered voters who voted: BLANK. Percentage of registered voters who voted: 56.8%" If you know how manyregistered voters there are, and you know what percentage of those voters voted, you have to know how many registered voters voted since the percentage comes from the other two numbers. You can't have two of them without the third. Line one on the FEC document said: "Number of registered voters: 169 million. Number of registered voters who voted: 96.992 million. Percentage of registered voters who voted: 56.8% The bottom line on both the FEC document and the White House document told the whole story: "Number of votes counted: 132,618,580." There were 35,626,580 more votes than voters.

    Although the government is constitutionally required to post those numbers, the FEC document did not end up in the public domain anywhere where I could find it. It took me about 12 hours to find most of the information. The only stat I did not find was the number of registere dvoters. That aside, various leftwing ]websites, bragging about Obama's second "win," provided me with the rest of it. Percentage of registered voters who voted: 57.7%. Number of registered voters who voted: 90,682,968. Number of votes counted: 126,985,809.

    In 2012, there were 36,302,651 too many votes. Don't forget, this time around, the Obama-ites stole about 6 million votes from registered Republicans by early-voting them, that needs to be added to the vote spread, so the vote theft in 2012 was somewhere around 42,500,000. Obama was credited with winning
    61,173,739 votes to Romney's 58,167,260 votes. Ignoring the stolen "GOP election day voter" votes by someone early voting their names, the totals tell us that Barack Obama didn't really win 61,173,739 votes in 2012, he only won 24,871,088 votes—or 8,959,229 votes less than he actually won in 2008 (which totaled 33,830,317 votes).

    If you could correct the totals by giving the stolen votes back to the registered GOP voters in the battleground states who complained someone early voted them, Romney's total in 2012 would not be 58,167,260 votes—it would have been closer to 64,167,260 votes. Even without deducting the voting machine theft which was rampant throughout the United States, Mitt Romney would have been the 45th President of the United States. Or rather, he should have been. If I could catch the theft in 12 hours, the FEC with the power to subpoena, could have had that information by the time their office opened on Wednesday morning. But sadly for America, Obama was controlling the head of the FEC..

    Once again, if a simple blogger without a research staff or access to the Democratic or ]Republican Parties, or access to this data without a FOIA request, can uncover this information within 12 hours following each election, why didn't the leftwing mainstream media do its job and kick over a few moldy, social progressive rocks? The answer? Because a cabal of globalist, one-world, New World Order politicians, princes of industry and barons of banking and business with membership in the Trilateral Commission (which was formed in 1973 as an adjunct arm of the Council on Foreign Relations [founded in 1921]) to disarm the world and create world government had a Manchurian Candidate in the race, and to accomplish their objective, they needed him to win.

    Since the 25 largest newspapers in the United States, Reuters and the Associated Press are controlled by them, it's a safe bet the only rocks they would ever kick over would have been those the Trilateralists wanted kicked over—which was none of them.
    [/COLOR]

    by JonChristian Ryter

    http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2013/02/2012-presidential-election-results-are.html



Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •