Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Don't count on those who are "just doing their jobs" in the military to quell this usurpation as it turns inward against the American people.

[One active duty military person wrote,] "Our best efforts will only be when they place us on orders against you. That is when we will know what soldiers will bleed for you and which are loyal to this regime."

[Gabor Zoina responded,] "They're gonna wait until this administration orders them to fight us, the American citizens."

Eric Rush explains targeted Internet shutdown of Birtherreport.com and other apparent aka Obama First Amendment interference (6m 16s).

• Confirmed Hack: BR/ORYR Blog Safe And Back Up;
  Will Still Be Moving ASAP - birtherreport.com
• Google shut down birther website - fellowshipoftheminds.com
• Google shut down birther website - gunnyg.wordpress.com

Boyles: Obama Has Social Security Number That Ain't His; Investigator Explains Peter Boyles: Obama Has Social Security Number That Ain't His; Private Investigator Susan Daniels Explains AUDIO HERE: ( Audio via 710-KNUS. ) Peter Boyles Website: http://www.710knus.com/peterboyles Susan Daniels Reports: http://www.birtherreport.com/search?q=Susan+Daniels OBAMA SSN FRAUD EVIDENCE: Private Investigator: Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number & Selective Service Registration by ObamaRelease YourRecords 12 Feb 2014

http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/02...our+Records%29

Originally Posted by Peter Boyles

Obama Has Social Security Number That Ain't His;
Private Investigator Susan Daniels Explains

AUDIO HERE:

( Audio via 710-KNUS. )

Peter Boyles Website: http://www.710knus.com/peterboyles

Susan Daniels Reports:
http://www.birtherreport.com/search?q=Susan+Daniels

WRONG! Well, partially right, but so very incomplete.

"Social Security number" (singular)?!?!?

Susan Daniels, Neil Sankey, and another incredibly diligent investigator who remains pseudonymous (but whose name you could probably discover if you tried) found not one SSN, not two or three or four SSNs, not a dozen SSNs, but something between a dozen and a half and three dozen plus fraudulently used SSNs. Their professional search tools found such a plethora of "previously-owned" SSNs associated with the Kenyan Konman, Barack H. Obama (II), a.k.a. Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barry Obama, a.k.a. Barry Dunham, etc., that the list has to be abridged before presenting it, just to make it believable.

The Obots' most amusing feint at obfuscation is their suggestion (to the unwary and the gullible) that Barack H. Obama, Sr., applied for the SSN issued to a Connecticut resident in 1977, since he was a grad student at Harvard: just a hundred minutes' drive from Hartford. Except that in 1962, Harvard had Immigration deport Obama Sr. back to Kenya for adultery or bigamy. Just a fifteen year hiccup in a presidential timeline; not so much, at least in the 30-second soundbite, mass media mindset. You have to watch those Obots - they do things like that... a fake State of Hawaii Certification here, a counterfeit State of Hawaii Certificate there, a fabulously fictitious timeline, and that's just until he entered kindergarten.

Mr. Obama's trail of SSN bread crumbs began in 1977, and almost all of the records found preceded his term in the Illinois state Senate, which began in 1997. The notorious exception is the infamous SSN beginning with "042", which belonged to Harrison (Harry) J. Bounel (b. 1890, d. 1977). Mr. Obama used that "042" SSN on his 2009 federal tax return - and presumably to the present day, because if he had a genuine SSN of his own, he surely wouldn't be "borrowing" Harrison J. Bounel's SSN to file with the IRS. The pertinent Form 709 is shown below, with the SSN beginning with "042" redacted to avoid prosecution, although you could doubtless discover the remaining six digits if you tried. No secret, that.
Heard even before it is spoken, the next Obot excuse/rant: "Nothing more than a simple case of maybe identity theft - probably just a misdemeanor, if it even happened. But some people make such a big deal about the LEAST little thing! Get over it! What difference does it make, already?"
____________________________________________

"If anyone believes that Barack Obama is gonna make an identity theft commercial any time soon, forget it. It's not gonna happen." - Chief Steve Davis, on "The Talk to Solomon Show LIVE" at CPNLive.com .

[ED.: continued from the previous post...]

In 2012, Atty. Orly Taitz sent the Social Security Administration an FOIA request for the numident (SSA numerical identifier) for Harry Bounel. SSN 042-nn-nnnn was known from other research to represent Harrison J. Bounel; this FOIA request should have made the connection official. Because Bounel was born more than 120 years earlier, Mrs. Taitz requested an exception to the privacy rules, based upon the 120 year rule. (The 120 year rule declares that a person is assumed to be dead 120 years after his or her birth, even in the absence of a Certificate of Death or other proof.) The privacy rules do not apply to deceased persons, including any person who, under the 120 year rule, is assumed to be deceased.

The Social Security Administration responded:
1. {a) as if the 120 year rule did not exist; OR
b) as if a man born in 1961 and now living in Washington, D.C., were now associated with the aforesaid SSN beginning with "042", using it, even, and therefore shielded by the privacy rules, even though he was a fraud and a criminal in the act of committing identity theft}; AND

2. as if "Harrison J. Bounel" were nothing more than a typographical error on some hypothetical Social Security registration form SS-5, long, long ago, in the days of typewriters and hard copy documents and clerical secretaries who knew where the files were and which document in the file had the requisite record . . .

The following is the response to Atty. Orly Taitz from the Social Security Administration, which stonewalls, plays dumb, obfuscates, and buries embarrassing facts and truth whenever one of those inquirers from outside the SSA turns over a rock that was never supposed to be turned over.


theobamahustle.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/foia-11-2012.png
(cropped here to allow maximum enlargement, for legibility)

Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC

[ED.: continued from the previous post...]

In 2012, Atty. Orly Taitz sent the Social Security Administration an FOIA request for the numident (identifier) for SSN 042-nn-nnnn, known from other research to represent Harrison J. Bounel. Because Bounel was born more than 120 years earlier, she requested an exception to the privacy rules, based upon the 120 year rule. (The 120 year rule declares that a person is assumed to be dead 120 years after his or her birth, even in the absence of a Certificate of Death or other proof.) The privacy rules cease to apply for all deceased persons, including any person who, under the 120 year rule, is assumed to be deceased.

The Social Security Administration responded,,,
as if the 120 year rule did not exist...
or as if a man born in 1961 and now living in Washington, D.C., were now associated with the aforesaid SSN beginning with "042", using it, even, and therefore shielded by the privacy rules, even though he was in the act of committing identity theft;
and as if "Harrison J. Bounel" were nothing more than a typographical error on some hypothetical Social Security registration form SS-5, long, long ago, in the days of typewriters and hard copy documents and clerical secretaries who knew where the files were and which document in the file had the requisite record . . .

This is the response to Atty. Orly Taitz from the Social Security Administration, which stonewalls, plays dumb, obfuscates, and buries embarrassing facts and truth whenever one of those inquirers from outside the SSA turns over a rock that was never supposed to be turned over.


theobamahustle.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/foia-11-2012.png
(cropped here to allow maximum enlargement, for legibility)

The plan now is to change how you get your social security number instead of like before from your birth region, they are going to be randomly issued , out of hmmm must be thin air I guess!!!!.....

More Power: Obama In His Own Words: How Can Obots Keep Defending Obama?

More Power: Obama In His Own Words;

How Can Obots Keep Defending Obama?

WE: A look at how times have changed: In 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama held a town hall event in Lancaster, Pa., where he criticized President George W. Bush's use of executive power.

"You know I taught constitutional law for 10 years, I take the Constitution very seriously. The biggest problems that we're facing right now had to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all, and that's what I intend to reverse when I'm president of the United States of America," he said. [.] Washington Examiner.


Video here:

( Flashback Video via American Commitment @ Washington Examiner )


BONUS VIDEO:

( Video via The Young Turks @ Liberty Unyielding. )

Samuel L. Jackson admits he voted
for Obama based on skin color
By Howard Portnoy | Liberty Unyielding

When will actor Samuel L. Jackson learn to keep his yap shut unless he’s reciting lines prepared for him by a Hollywood script writer? When he shares his own heartfelt opinion, he creates uncomfortable situations for his fellow liberals, who are then forced to explain why what he said wasn’t so bad. For example, When he weighed in on not-guilty verdict in the George Zimmerman murder trial last August by announcing that it’s “open season” on young black men, the liberal media spent days mopping up after him.

Recently, he was at it again. In an interview appearing in February’s Ebony Magazine:
[...] More @ Liberty Unyielding.

Who's racist?
They are!

http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/02...our+Records%29

Impeachment: The Obvious Answer to Obama Dictatorship

Posted on February 15, 2014

There are lots of problems with this. Most important being that we don’t have enough conservatives in DC at the moment.
Check it out:
The case for impeaching and removing President Obama grows stronger each week, as the president continues to violate the constitutional limits on his executive powers. His latest move in delaying the enforcement of yet another part of Obamacare should be article 20 in a bill of indictable offenses against the Constitution.
Citizens of all persuasions and parties should take encouragement in the fact that impeachment is fast becoming a respectable topic of debate even in the mainstream media. Of course, it is usually discussed with the disclaimer that it is a practical impossibility with Democrats in control of the Senate.
That Beltway conventional wisdom will soon change as Republican control of the Senate in 2015 becomes increasingly likely. But what Republicans do not yet understand is that the call for impeachment can be a winning issue in gaining control of the Senate in the November elections.
The rising tide of public opposition to Obamacare may soon be reinforced by a rising tide of demand for Obama’s removal before he can do any more damage to our liberties and our national security. In fact, the steady decline in Obama’s approval rating – now at about 39 percent – is due as much to the growing public awareness of his arrogant disregard for the Constitution as it is to disillusionment with Obamacare.

Continue Reading on www.wnd.com ...


Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/02/...7qI8zwOWDKh.99

Today's Politically Incorrect Laugh:
(Click to Enlarge)

www.wnd.com/2014/02/impeachment-the-obvious-answer-to-obama-dictatorship/

While a trial of impeachment is a non-starter in the Democratically-controlled Senate, impeachment by the House can be effective, if it involves a no-holds-barred, official House Investigation, which would make official much or most of what has already been uncovered and laid bare.

Even without a vote to impeach in the House or a trial of impeachment in the Senate, the official findings of a House Investigation would make Mr. Obama's Constitutional ineligibility to the Presidency a matter of both public record and judicial record, officially recognized by a competent governing authority with legal jurisdiction.

Even without a vote in the House or a trial in the Senate, a House Investigation publicly exposing Mr. Obama as a fraudulent, ineligible usurper would so cripple his power to rule and delegitimize his authority to govern that he would have to step down, just as public exposure by reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein forced then-Pres. Richard M. Nixon to resign, on Aug. 9, 1974. Reporters could do that then because Nixon was a Republican. Yet Mr. Obama's fraudulent usurpation of the Presidency is a far, far greater crime than Watergate.

About that "Impeach Obama!" bumper sticker...

Just the one word "Impeach!" is quite sufficient, yet discrete enough to park the car in WDC or Chicago's South Side. Would you expect anyone who is able to read "Impeach!" to think, "Impeach WHOM?" - or even, "Impeach WHO?"

Originally Posted by kathyet2

The plan now is to change how you get your social security number instead of like before from your birth region, they are going to be randomly issued , out of hmmm must be thin air I guess!!!!.....

If and when the Ministry of Truth is unable to erase, revise, or rewrite history - such as how SSNs used to be coded (by state) - to fit the One-World-Government Agenda, the MofT changes the LSM account of the present to suit, in the hope and sure expectation that the Big Lie will quickly become the new normal, and the old truth will not be long remembered.

The media-mesmerized masses, the unwary and the gullible sheeple, the sleeping majority and the useful idiots, apathetic even when awakened and spinelessly passive even when the FEMA boxcars are pulling up to the passenger gates - for the likes of these, old-time America will soon enough be forgotten. "God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change," they pray, even as the unacceptable is forced down their throats.

Hold Obama Accountable for the 4 Benghazi deaths