Thread: Ron Paul on the Issues

I said it before and I will say it again... NO MORE RINO's

No More Voting for the Lesser of 2 Evil's

No More Drunk's "Bush"

No More CRACK HEAD's "Obama"

It's Ron Paul or NOBODY

I DEMAND COMPETANT LEADERSHIP

If the Republican Party keeps pulling this BULL CRAP.. sticking "Looney Toon" McCain's, Jeb Bush and Romney's as the best that we got

Expect and I mean Expect a MAJOR FRACTURE in the Party.. "WE HAVE HAD IT"

Obama is SOOOOO SCREWED UP: ANYONE BUT OBAMA Ain't Cutting it; NOT EVEN CLOSE

You Will Lose the Military Vote - They will vote 3rd Party or Stay Home

You Will LOSE the Massive Youth Vote - They will vote 3rd Party or Stay Home

You Will LOSE the Under 30 vote and by a wide Margin - They will vote 3rd Party or Stay Home

The Republican Party will be 1/3 the size that it is right now ... you can think I am kidding and I hope you do

I would vote for a TURD ... a cold TURD on the sidewalk before I would vote for Obama or Romney the "Obama Lite"

it needs to happen ... the Republican party just does not get it

The Democrats shifted left to the Socialists and the Communist's

and guess what ... the Republican's shifted left into the Progressive Democratic Party as NEO-Conservative's

The HELL With That

If either of these 2 Mafia Figures win I will NOT Support Either as POTUS ... they have lost the will of the governed

Ron Paul IS BEATING Romney/ The media LIES! Watch This!

Submitted by GBAmerica on Mon, 04/16/2012 - 21:21

Ron Paul IS BEATING Romney/ The media LIES! Watch This!



Do Not Let The Media pick your President!

Donate! Donate! Get the word out and repost this video everywhere!

Any little bit helps! Does not matter what amount every single donation helps!

We all want our country back. Lets unite and show the establishment they have awaken this sleeping giant!

PRESIDENT RON PAUL ONLY!!!!!

https://secure.ronpaul2012.com/

Ron Paul is "In It To Win It" - MONEYBOMB Through April 17th

2nd Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6D36NnFBXY&feature=related

WINNING!!!!

Ron Paul IS BEATING Romney/ The media LIES! Watch This! | Peace . Gold . Liberty | Ron Paul 2012

NO ONE BUT PAUL!!!!!!!

Ann Barnhardt summarily dismisses Marxist elitist RINO Willard "Mitt" Romney from the 2012 Presidential race.

For the love of all that is right and good, don't give this jerk Romney any money

Romney: My Only Connection To The Republican Party Is That I'm Registered Republican



Does the Term RINO mean anything to the GOP anymore

Ron Paul Gains Huge Evangelical Endorsement!



Apr 13, 2012

**HELP SPREAD THIS VIDEO AND MESSAGE!**

Donate at https://secure.ronpaul2012.com/

Drockton Report:

New Romney Scandal a Major Campaign Threat

The problem with Mitt Romney is he appears to only do those things that will enhance his public image or personal fortunes. A guy like that will never let ethics stand in the way of a good payday. No matter who gets hurt. Take this latest scandal, which started on the Daily Beast and then was quickly removed.

"SALT LAKE CITY — A new report raises questions about one of Mitt Romney's sources of campaign money, who was also a key figure in the Olympic bribery scandal and the subsequent trial.

The Daily Beast reports the donor, New Jersey travel-company executive Sead Dizdarevic, became an immunized witness during the 2003 trial stemming from the Olympic bribery scandal.

He testified at the corruption trial of Salt Lake Olympic directors Tom Welch and David Johnson that he and his sister-in-law had delivered $131,000 in cash contributions to the defendants in hopes of securing an exclusive Olympic hospitality contract.

The report says after Romney took over running the Olympics, Dizdarevic was awarded an exclusive, elite travel package contract anyway. The Daily Beast says now Dizdarevic, his family, his company and his business associates have donated more than $1 million to Romney's campaign." (Source)

Romney controlled over 2 billion dollars in contracts as the "Savior of the Salt Lake Olympics". The money came from the U.S. taxpayer, and was assailed by such notables as John McCain for being an outrageous example of taxpayer abuse. Romney also had his eye on becoming POTUS long before the Olympics.

After the Olympic scandal became public, it appears that Romney cut his own little deal with Dizdarevic and still awarded him the monopoly on travel packages and event tickets. Undoubtedly, Dizdarevic, who was at the center of the scandal, should have been excluded based on that which Romney holds nearest and dearest, the appearance of gross impropriety.

The real question, of course, is when is Romney working for U.S. taxpayers and when is he working for his own self-enrichment? The POTUS has trillions of dollars in contracts he can influence through the use of Executive Orders and the bureaucracy. Why be a billionaire at other's expense when you can be a trillionaire?

Greed is just as big a part of Romney's persona as any other attribute, and greed leads to ethics scandals. Some view Dizdarevic as nothing more than a monopolistic Olympic ticket scalper, who looks at bribes as just the cost of doing business.

"Dizdarevic's base of operations is in Far Hills, N.J., and his companies have seven other offices around the world. Business has more than tripled since the Athens Olympics of 2004, Jet Set President Mark Lewis said.

The key to that success is simple: Dizdarevic knows tickets are the currency of Olympic travel. Olympic organizations sell tickets to the public for as much as $1,100 a seat at premier events. For those that he controls, Dizdarevic adds at least a 20 percent markup on top of face-value prices.

But the same tickets can generate a much higher profit margin when combined with hotels, transportation and meals to form expensive packages.

These packages are, for the most part, unregulated by Olympic officials, who allow Dizdarevic's companies to charge whatever he wants to sponsors, corporate VIPs and the general public.

Exercising his rights as an official Olympic "sponsor" for the host city's organizing committee and many other Olympic organizations around the globe, Dizdarevic buys a secret pot of tens of thousands of tickets that he controls and resells. He also sews up large numbers of the best hotel rooms in every host city — often years in advance.

His companies amassed 125,000 tickets for Vancouver and Whistler — about 8 percent of the 1.6 million total.

"We are the largest buyer of tickets to the Olympics," Lewis said, adding that the companies also control as many as 2,000 hotel rooms. Dizdarevic's dual roles as a ticket broker and travel-package provider give him convenient options: He can transfer tickets from one market to the other — in some cases, his critics say, artificially creating supply and demand according to his own whim.

"In effect, CoSport and Jet Set have a monopoly on legally valid tickets," says Moriarty, the Houston lawyer, who researched Olympic ticketing after getting scammed by another agency for Beijing tickets. "And what they seek to do is screw the consumers by bundling housing and tickets together to get more than what the housing is worth, and what the tickets are worth, because without them, you don't go." (Source)

Artificial demand drives prices up that much further, and thanks to Mitt Romney, the man who was at the center of the Salt Lake Olympic's scandal, was still permitted to make a significant profit from it. By accepting 1 million dollars from the man who some blame for the Salt Lake Scandal. Mitt Romney shows that he was never as interested in cleaning things up as he was in profitting from the mess.

Ron Paul will benefit as more scandals come to light. After all, he doesn't have any reported ethical lapses like the slick Mittster. If somehow Romney did win, we could expect more Congressional investigations into his other business dealings. After all, his greed has made him an easy target.

Sign the Petition to Investigate Romney and the financial dealings of the Mormon Church HERE.

More in the Next Article

Paul Drockton: New Romney Scandal a Major Campaign Threat

Whoop em Whoop em Ron! Whoop em ALL Ron Paul!

The Upcoming Bloody Civil War

Armed Chinese Troops in Texas!



NOTE: It is important to separate hunting down terrorists who attack our country and deserve justice (which Ron Paul is 100% for), and not confuse justice with occupying entire countries for a decade under the guise of the "War on Terror" or "Spreading Democracy". Terrorists are individuals and small groups, so why are we picking fights with entire nations? BILLIONS for Defense, NOT A PENNY for Empire.

This speech is called "Imagine" and it was given by Ron Paul on March 11, 2009. The original text of the talk is below:

Imagine for a moment that somewhere in the middle of Texas there was a large foreign military base, say Chinese or Russian. Imagine that thousands of armed foreign troops were constantly patrolling American streets in military vehicles. Imagine they were here under the auspices of "keeping us safe" or "promoting democracy" or "protecting their strategic interests."

Imagine that they operated outside of US law, and that the Constitution did not apply to them. Imagine that every now and then they made mistakes or acted on bad information and accidentally killed or terrorized innocent Americans, including women and children, most of the time with little to no repercussions or consequences. Imagine that they set up checkpoints on our soil and routinely searched and ransacked entire neighborhoods of homes. Imagine if Americans were fearful of these foreign troops, and overwhelmingly thought America would be better off without their presence.

Imagine if some Americans were so angry about them being in Texas that they actually joined together to fight them off, in defense of our soil and sovereignty, because leadership in government refused or were unable to do so. Imagine that those Americans were labeled terrorists or insurgents for their defensive actions, and routinely killed, or captured and tortured by the foreign troops on our land. Imagine that the occupiers' attitude was that if they just killed enough Americans, the resistance would stop, but instead, for every American killed, ten more would take up arms against them, resulting in perpetual bloodshed. Imagine if most of the citizens of the foreign land also wanted these troops to return home. Imagine if they elected a leader who promised to bring them home and put an end to this horror.

Imagine if that leader changed his mind once he took office.

The reality is that our military presence on foreign soil is as offensive to the people that live there as armed Chinese troops would be if they were stationed in Texas. We would not stand for it here, but we have had a globe-straddling empire and a very intrusive foreign policy for decades that incites a lot of hatred and resentment towards us.

According to our own CIA, our meddling in the Middle East was the prime motivation for the horrific attacks on 9/11. But instead of re-evaluating our foreign policy, we have simply escalated it. We had a right to go after those responsible for 9/11, to be sure, but why do so many Americans feel as if we have a right to a military presence in some 160 countries when we wouldn't stand for even one foreign base on our soil, for any reason? These are not embassies, mind you, these are military installations. The new administration is not materially changing anything about this. Shuffling troops around and playing with semantics does not accomplish the goals of the American people, who simply want our men and women to come home. 50,000 troops left behind in Iraq is not conducive to peace any more than 50,000 Russian soldiers would be in the United States.

Shutting down military bases and ceasing to deal with other nations with threats and violence is not isolationism. It is the opposite. Opening ourselves up to friendship, honest trade and diplomacy is the foreign policy of peace and prosperity. It is the only foreign policy that will not bankrupt us in short order, as our current actions most definitely will. I share the disappointment of the American people in the foreign policy rhetoric coming from the administration. The sad thing is, our foreign policy WILL change eventually, as Rome's did, when all budgetary and monetary tricks to fund it are exhausted.