Page 25 of 61 FirstFirst ... 1521222324252627282935 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 250 of 604
Like Tree88Likes

Thread: Voter Fraud Information Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #241
    April
    Guest
    More Florida voter fraud? 3000 registrations list UPS stores as residence

    Written by Allen West on April 26, 2014

    If there is one thing I learned in the 2012 election cycle, it was about voter fraud. My conservative warrior associate, Katherine Engelbrecht, and her organization, True the Vote, took up the mantle against the St. Lucie County Supervisor of Elections, Gertrude Walker, who admitted to sending “questionable” results to the Florida Secretary of State. It was somewhat disheartening that the Florida Secretary of State and Attorney General sat back, watched the news reports, and did nothing.

    With that background, I’d like to share a story written by Gregg Prentice: “Voter Fraud? If they’re not catching the easy stuff, what else are they missing?”

    Prentice asks, are some of Florida’s Supervisors of Elections skirting the law? Supervisors are tasked with maintaining an accurate voter roll. One of the requirements of the Supervisors is to ensure voters provide a legal residence address. Yet a December 2013 analysis shows more than 3,000 voter registrations statewide listing their residence address at a UPS store, potentially illegally.
    Florida Law is clear and, with minor exception, requires that voter registrations listing other than an address of legal residence should not be accepted, because they are “ineligible” (F.S. 98.045 (1)(h)). In fact, it’s actually a felony to willfully submit any false voter registration information (F.S.104.011(2)). Accordingly, if these “ineligible” registrations are found to exist, Florida statutes also provide for their prompt correction or removal (F.S. 98.075(6) & (7)).
    So there you go. It’s a felony for this to have happened, but how can it be that a citizen watchdog had to uncover this Florida voter fraud while the people paid with our taxpayer dollars have not a clue? Is it not a mandated responsibility of the Florida State Supervisors of Elections to maintain these voter address rolls? I’d say so.

    A review of the state-mandated voter registration list reveals that of the 3,000 UPS store registrations:
    - 1,200 match addresses already known as commercial that were ignored
    - 500 match addresses erroneously marked as residential
    - 1,100 have no match at all.

    The question is, when stories like this surface, how can the voting electorate believe there is integrity in their electoral process? We’ve reported here on the Hamilton County (Cincinnati) Ohio poll worker, Melowese Richardson, who voted nearly seven times. She was supposed to have a five-year sentence but thanks to Al Sharpton’s National Action Network, she served just about 18 months.
    Oh and by the way, she wasn’t charged by the federal government with any type of voter fraud allegations — so much for Eric Holder’s concern about voter suppression.

    You see, the real voter suppression comes when fraud exists, as it negates an individual’s lawful and proper vote. The fraudulent shenanigans in the 2012 Congressional District 18 election in St. Lucie County — and to some extent Palm Beach County — amounted to voter suppression. But as we reported previously, it’s not voter suppression Democrats are worried about, it’s fraud suppression.

    In the case of the UPS store registrations, it’s not a recent phenomenon. More than 2,300 of the more than 3,000 recently discovered UPS store registrations had the exact same UPS store listed as their residence at least 15 months prior. Approximately 800 of those 2,300 likely “ineligible” registrations voted in Florida’s during the 2012 General Election.

    Worse however, since Federal Elections occur in even years, the Supervisors are required by law to perform their primary “list maintenance” during the odd years. Yet these 3,000 UPS store registrations were identified in December of 2013 as the Supervisors’ odd year voter roll efforts came to a close.

    So it’s pretty clear too many of our Supervisors aren’t nearly as effective in their jobs as one might hope – and they’re not complying with Florida statute.

    So in which counties did this occur?

    According to the report, of the 67 counties in Florida, 38 were clean. The majority of the “unclean” counties have said they’re working on it. But three counties have not responded at all or weakly: Broward, Orange and Hillsborough. Prentice says Broward county receives the “here’s your sign” award with fully 40 percent of the 3,000 potentially ineligible records, and simply responding “they’re in process.”
    Note: Broward represents only about 10 percent of the total state population.

    Hat tip to Gregg Prentice for doing this research. He truly deserves recognition as a “Guardian of the Republic.” And in order to preserve this Republic, we will need many more Guardians. I challenge others to do the same in their state as Gregg has done here for us in Florida. “In a universe of deceit, truth becomes a revolutionary act” — and this is just the tip of the iceberg.

    Read more at http://allenbwest.com/2014/04/florid...uif7SttA84t.99

  2. #242
    April
    Guest
    If there is one thing I learned in the 2012 election cycle, it was about voter fraud. My conservative warrior associate, Katherine Engelbrecht, and her organization, True the Vote, took up the mantle against the St. Lucie County Supervisor of Elections, Gertrude Walker, who admitted to sending “questionable” results to the Florida Secretary of State. It was somewhat disheartening that the Florida Secretary of State and Attorney General sat back, watched the news reports, and did nothing.
    IMO when they sell out and sit back and let fraud take place and are accepting of it , they should be removed from office immediately. Complicity is A HUGE problem and is why there is so much corruption IMO.

  3. #243
    April
    Guest
    New federal ruling on voter ID resonates in North Carolina

    April 29

    By Franco Ordoñez

    McClatchy Washington Bureau

    WASHINGTON — Voter ID laws in North Carolina, Texas and other states appear more vulnerable to legal challenges after a federal judge struck down a Wisconsin law that required voters show a state issued photo ID at the polls.



    U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman ruled the Wisconsin law places an unfair burden on poor and minority voters. The ruling could encourge opponents in North Carolina and other states to make similar challenges.
    North Carolina and dozens more states require voters to show some form of identification when voting, according to The Associated Press. Legislation is being proposed in many others. The laws’ opponents, including many Democrats, argue the Republican-supported laws are an effort to suppress minority voters. Republicans who support the laws argue requiring a photo ID protects against voter fraud.
    The North Carolina ID law was signed in August, two months after the Supreme Court struck down parts of the Voting Rights Act that required jurisdictions with a history of discrimination, many of them in the South, to seek federal approval before changing voter laws.
    The U.S. Justice Department filed a lawsuit against the Tarheel state the following month claiming North Carolina legislators “intentionally” discriminated against minorities. McCrory, who said the law protects against fraud, has said the lawsuit is “without merit.” He cited a video showing the president presenting an ID card to vote in Chicago.

    http://www.kansascity.com/2014/04/29...-voter-id.html



  4. #244
    April
    Guest
    April 30, 2014, 06:00 am Opponents of voter ID laws see time to fight running out

    By Mike Lillis





    Critics of tough voter ID laws are running out of time and options in their efforts to knock down those barriers ahead of this year’s midterm elections.
    Opponents got good news last week, when a state judge struck down Arkansas’s law, and another jolt Tuesday, when a federal judge ruled Wisconsin’s law, which wasn’t yet in effect, was unconstitutional.


    But their enthusiasm could be short-lived. At least eight states are still slated to have strict photo ID requirements in place in November, leading voting rights advocates to send dire warnings about potential disenfranchisement at the polls this year.Yet on Capitol Hill, the voter ID issue remains as partisan as ever, forcing even the sponsors of bills softening those rules to concede that their legislation has no chance of moving through a divided Congress in 2014.
    “My bill probably doesn’t have a lot of hope to it right now,” said Rep. Rick Larsen (D-Wash.), who’s pushing a proposal essentially nullifying many of the state-based ID requirements enacted in recent years, mostly by GOP legislatures, in the name of tackling election fraud.
    Instead, Democrats, advocates and other voter ID critics see their best hope in passing an update to the Voting Rights Act (VRA), the 1965 civil rights law that the Supreme Court gutted last summer.
    Sponsored by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Rep. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wis.), the 2014 Voting Rights Act Amendment (VRAA) explicitly empowers states to adopt tougher voter ID requirements — an inclusion designed to attract conservative support — but it could also force some of those states to scale back those ID laws, a possibility being cheered by liberal voting rights advocates.
    The Leahy-Sensenbrenner bill remains a long shot, but on the issue of voting rights, voices on all sides of the debate say it’s the only game in town.
    The debate over voter ID laws took off in the immediate aftermath of the Supreme Court’s VRA decision in June, when several states were empowered to implement previously passed photo ID mandates that would have required federal “preclearance” approval under the VRA provisions rejected by the court.
    Prior to the ruling, Texas, Alabama and Mississippi had all passed such laws, which had not received preclearance, while North Carolina enacted a similarly tough version a month after the decision.
    Under the original Voting Rights Act, the federal government would have had the power to scrutinize all of those laws in an effort to ensure they didn’t discriminate against certain voters. In the wake of the Supreme Court ruling, the states were free to install the changes immediately. All are expected to be in place in November, triggering warnings from advocates that some voters will be denied their right to vote.
    “There’s a material concern that there will be a sizable portion of the population that will not have the kind of ID needed to cast a vote that will count,” said Myrna Perez, deputy director of the New York University Law School’s Brennan Center for Justice.
    The issue has long been a partisan one. Most Republicans support tougher ID requirements, saying they’re a necessary precaution for fighting voter fraud.
    Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s (R-Va.) office reiterated his support for those laws this month. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), who has jurisdiction over the issue, also has a long record of backing voter ID provisions.
    Most Democrats, meanwhile, maintain that the fraud concerns are largely manufactured. They contend the tougher ID rules are a GOP tool — alongside proof-of-citizenship requirements, registration restrictions and limits on early voting — aimed to discourage voting by minorities, students and other disproportionately low-income populations, which tend to vote Democratic.
    The Texas law, for instance, treats concealed gun licenses but not public university ID cards as legitimate forms of voter ID. Both are state-issued and feature photographs.
    Perez said such discrepancies create “the strong appearance that politicians are trying to manipulate the rules to target certain populations.”
    Some Democrats are coalescing behind a push to put photos on Social Security cards as a solution. The idea came earlier this month from Andrew Young, chairman of the nonpartisan voting rights group Why Tuesday. And the former U.N. ambassador has won the backing of former Presidents Clinton and Carter for his idea.
    Of the 12 states that have passed strict photo ID laws, eight of which will apply those rules in November, 10 enacted the changes at times when Republicans had single-party control over both the legislature and the governorship, according to the Brennan Center.
    The partisan nature of the voter ID push has not been lost on President Obama, who earlier this month said Republican efforts to apply tougher rules represent the greatest threat to voting rights in 50 years.
    “Across the country, Republicans have led efforts to pass laws making it harder, not easier, for people to vote. … Senior citizens who have been voting for decades may suddenly be told they can no longer vote until they can come up with the right ID,” Obama said April 11 at the National Action Network’s annual convention in New York.
    “I am not against reasonable attempts to secure the ballot. We understand that there [have] to be rules in place,” the president added. “But I am against requiring an ID that millions of Americans don’t have. That shouldn’t suddenly prevent you from exercising your right to vote.”
    The concerns have led Obama’s Justice Department to step in with a series of lawsuits challenging some tougher state ID laws, including those in Texas and North Carolina. But, it’s unclear how many of those other cases will be decided ahead of November’s elections.
    Rep. Marc Veasey (D-Texas), who has filed a separate lawsuit against his state over its ID law, said he’s fighting to secure a ruling in time to influence the elections.
    “We had some issues during the primary, and I believe there will be even more issues when a larger number of people turn out [in November],” he said. “That’s what’s worrisome, you know, that people start hearing on the news that they’re trying to make it harder to vote, and then people decide that they’re not even going to show up and exercise their right.”
    The potential interactions between the state ID laws, the lingering lawsuits and the possibility that Congress could still pass the Leahy-Sensenbrenner bill have created something of an uncertain landscape heading into the elections.
    In the case of Texas, for instance, passage of the VRAA would return the state to preclearance status, likely leading the DOJ to amend its lawsuit against the voter ID law. If the Texas law were upheld by the court, however, it would take effect regardless what Congress does with the VRAA. In a third scenario, if the court ruled against the Texas ID law and then the VRAA were enacted, the state would require the DOJ’s approval if lawmakers tried again with another voter ID proposal in the future.
    Three other states — Mississippi, Georgia and Louisiana — would also be subject to the extra election scrutiny under the Leahy-Sensenbrenner bill. Of those, Mississippi and Georgia have strict ID laws requiring people without a photo ID to vote on a provisional ballot and return within three to six days to show such identification.
    Two states previously subject to preclearance under the VRA, Virginia and Alabama, also have strict photo ID laws but would not be subject to the extra scrutiny under the VRAA.
    Larsen, the Washington Democrat, predicted the landscape wouldn’t be quite so complicated but not for reasons he supports. Rather, he said House Republican leaders simply have little appetite for moving the Leahy-Sensenbrenner bill.
    “Right now, I don’t see it happening,” Larsen said. “There’s not the energy [among House Republicans] to do much of anything.”

    http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...ht-running-out

  5. #245
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012

  6. #246
    April
    Guest

  7. #247
    April
    Guest
    How Widespread is Voter Fraud? | 2012 Facts & Figures

    Here are the facts:




    How popular is Voter ID?





    How did our voting records get so bad?
    Various groups threaten local election authorities to not maintain their rolls according to federal law:

    http://www.truethevote.org/news/how-...-facts-figures

  8. #248
    April
    Guest
    ACORN VOTER FRAUD

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LG0FRX4p ... r_embedded

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xd72fYWY ... re=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmn4ptXu ... r_embedded

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BngyucCC ... re=related
    http://youtu.be/zuEHljjhjyk

    http://youtu.be/7NmaZIdz6Vo

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8Ep1tkN ... re=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=625jUE78 ... re=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbDY3qPM ... re=related

    ACORN REBRANDING TABLE

    ACORN Housing Corp. changed its name to Affordable Housing Centers ofAmerica Inc.

    State-level chapters that have incorporated as new nonprofi t corporations:Arkansas: Arkansas Community Organizations

    California: Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE)

    Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island: New England United for JusticeDistrict of Columbia, Maryland: Communities United, Communities UnitedTraining and Education Fund

    Louisiana: A Community Voice

    Minnesota: Minnesota Neighborhoods Organizing for Change

    Missouri:Missourians Organizing for Reform & Empowerment (MORE)

    New York: New York Communities for Change


    Pennsylvania Neighborhoods for Social Justice (PNSJ) andPennsylvania Communities Organizing for Change (PCOC)

    Texas: Texas Organizing Project and Texas Organizing Project EducationFund

    Washington: Organization United for Reform (OUR) Washington

    http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1304376160.pdf

  9. #249
    April
    Guest
    WOW! Al Sharpton & Democrats Honor Convicted Voter Fraud Felon Melowese Richardson at “Welcome Home” Party


    Al Sharpton gave the convicted Democratic voter a big hug.



    WOW!
    Ohio Democrats held a “Welcome Home” party for convicted voter fraud felon Melowese Richardson this week.
    Al Sharpton gave the convicted Democratic voter a big hug.

    Cincinnati.com reported:
    A Hamilton County poll worker who has been held up nationally as an example of voter fraud took the stage at a local voting rights rally – outraging Republicans and dismaying even top local Democrats.
    The Rev. Al Sharpton, keynote speaker at Thursday’s rally to kick-off the campaign for an Ohio Voters’ Bill of Rights Ohio Constitutional amendment, even hugged Melowese Richardson.
    Richardson, a Democrat, was convicted of voter fraud after using her position as poll worker to vote more than once in the 2012 presidential election. She got a five year prison term, but was released earlier this month after local Democratic activists pressed for a fairer term.
    A judge sentenced her to probation instead.
    Richardson was among the more than 400 at Word of Deliverance Church in Forest Park when Cincinnati National Action Network President Bobby Hilton called her on stage for a “welcome home.”
    A tweet from an Enquirer reporter about the moment sparked immediate outrage from Republicans on Twitter.
    Even Democrat leaders questioned the idea of applauding Richardson.
    “I am very glad the county prosecutor and judge reconsidered and got her out of jail, but she is not a hero,” Hamilton County Democratic Party Chairman Tim Burke, who was at the rally, told the Enquirer. “What she did was criminal conduct and was particularly problematic because of her role as a precinct executive.”
    Hamilton County Democratic Party Executive Director Caleb Faux, who was also at the rally, saw it as an attempt to portray Richardson as a martyr because of the lengthy sentence.
    Democrat Melowese Richardson candidly admitted to Cincinnati’s Channel 9 in February 2013 that she voted twice in the 2012 election. “I’ll fight it for Mr. Obama and Mr. Obama’s right to sit as president of the United States,” she proclaimed in the interview.
    She was convicted of voter fraud in May 2013.

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014...me-home-party/

  10. #250
    April
    Guest
    Democrat Melowese Richardson candidly admitted to Cincinnati’s Channel 9 in February 2013 that she voted twice in the 2012 election. “I’ll fight it for Mr. Obama and Mr. Obama’s right to sit as president of the United States,” she proclaimed in the interview.
    She was convicted of voter fraud in May 2013.
    Fight means fraud to these criminals......unfortunately there are many like her and they will be doing the same thing in November.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •