Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member tiredofapathy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Central North Carolina
    Posts
    1,048

    Anybody Familiar with the Broadcaster Freedom Act?

    Here's the antidote for the poison pill "Fairness Doctrine" !

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c ... 110HZXfOJ::

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c ... 110HZXfOJ::

    Time to man the phones!!!

  2. #2
    MLWilson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    31

    S.1742

    S 1742 IS

    110th CONGRESS

    1st Session

    S. 1742

    To prevent the Federal Communications Commission from repromulgating the fairness doctrine.

    IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

    June 28, 2007

    Mr. THUNE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

    A BILL

    To prevent the Federal Communications Commission from repromulgating the fairness doctrine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the `Broadcaster Freedom Act of 2007'.

    SEC. 2. FAIRNESS DOCTRINE PROHIBITED.

    Title III of the Communications Act of 1934 is amended by inserting after section 303 (47 U.S.C. 303) the following new section:

    `SEC. 303A. LIMITATION ON GENERAL POWERS: FAIRNESS DOCTRINE.

    `Notwithstanding section 303 or any other provision of this Act or any other Act authorizing the Commission to prescribe rules, regulations, policies, doctrines, standards, or other requirements, the Commission shall not have the authority to prescribe any rule, regulation, policy, doctrine, standard, or other requirement that has the purpose or effect of reinstating or repromulgating (in whole or in part) the requirement that broadcasters present opposing viewpoints on controversial issues of public importance, commonly referred to as the `Fairness Doctrine', as repealed in General Fairness Doctrine Obligations of Broadcast Licenses, 50 Fed. Reg. 35418 (1985).'.
    Mark

    Aut Pax, Aut Bellum

  3. #3
    MLWilson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    31

    S.1748

    S 1748 IS

    110th CONGRESS

    1st Session

    S. 1748

    To prevent the Federal Communications Commission from repromulgating the fairness doctrine.

    IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

    June 29, 2007

    Mr. COLEMAN (for himself, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. SESSIONS, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. BOND, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. THUNE, Mr. COBURN, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. ROBERTS, and Mr. KYL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

    A BILL

    To prevent the Federal Communications Commission from repromulgating the fairness doctrine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the `Broadcaster Freedom Act of 2007'.

    SEC. 2. FAIRNESS DOCTRINE PROHIBITED.

    Title III of the Communications Act of 1934 is amended by inserting after section 303 (47 U.S.C. 303) the following new section:

    `SEC. 303A. LIMITATION ON GENERAL POWERS: FAIRNESS DOCTRINE.

    `Notwithstanding section 303 or any other provision of this Act or any other Act authorizing the Commission to prescribe rules, regulations, policies, doctrines, standards, or other requirements, the Commission shall not have the authority to prescribe any rule, regulation, policy, doctrine, standard, or other requirement that has the purpose or effect of reinstating or repromulgating (in whole or in part) the requirement that broadcasters present opposing viewpoints on controversial issues of public importance, commonly referred to as the `Fairness Doctrine', as repealed in General Fairness Doctrine Obligations of Broadcast Licensees, 50 Fed. Reg. 35418 (1985).'.
    Mark

    Aut Pax, Aut Bellum

  4. #4
    MLWilson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    31

    H.R. 2905

    Broadcaster Freedom Act of 2007 (Introduced in House)

    HR 2905 IH

    110th CONGRESS

    1st Session

    H. R. 2905

    To prevent the Federal Communications Commission from repromulgating the fairness doctrine.

    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

    June 28, 2007

    Mr. PENCE (for himself, Mr. WALDEN of Oregon, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. PUTNAM, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. AKIN, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mrs. BONO, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. BUYER, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. CAMP of Michigan, Mr. CAMPBELL of California, Mr. CANNON, Mr. CARTER, Mr. COLE of Oklahoma, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky, Mr. DAVID DAVIS of Tennessee, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mrs. DRAKE, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr. EVERETT, Ms. FALLIN, Mr. FEENEY, Mr. FORTUN.AE6O, Ms. FOXX, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Mr. GINGREY, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. GOODE, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. HERGER, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. ISSA, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. JORDAN of Ohio, Mr. KELLER of Florida, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. KIRK, Mr. KLINE of Minnesota, Mr. KUHL of New York, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. LATHAM, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California, Mr. MACK, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. MCCARTHY of California, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. PAUL, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. PITTS, Mr. POE, Mr. PRICE of Georgia, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, Mrs. SCHMIDT, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. TERRY, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. WICKER, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. WOLF, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, and Mr. UPTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

    A BILL

    To prevent the Federal Communications Commission from repromulgating the fairness doctrine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the `Broadcaster Freedom Act of 2007'.

    SEC. 2. FAIRNESS DOCTRINE PROHIBITED.

    Title III of the Communications Act of 1934 is amended by inserting after section 303 (47 U.S.C. 303) the following new section:

    `SEC. 303A. LIMITATION ON GENERAL POWERS: FAIRNESS DOCTRINE.

    `Notwithstanding section 303 or any other provision of this Act or any other Act authorizing the Commission to prescribe rules, regulations, policies, doctrines, standards, or other requirements, the Commission shall not have the authority to prescribe any rule, regulation, policy, doctrine, standard, or other requirement that has the purpose or effect of reinstating or repromulgating (in whole or in part) the requirement that broadcasters present opposing viewpoints on controversial issues of public importance, commonly referred to as the `Fairness Doctrine', as repealed in General Fairness Doctrine Obligations of Broadcast Licensees, 50 Fed. Reg. 35418 (1985).'.
    Mark

    Aut Pax, Aut Bellum

  5. #5
    MLWilson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    31
    TiredofApathy,

    I posted the 3 bills so people could read them. The links expire in short order, so they become dead. This way the bills are up for reading.
    Mark

    Aut Pax, Aut Bellum

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •