Thread: BENGHAZI – BIGGEST COVER-UP SCANDAL IN U.S. HISTORY? – BENGHAZI CIA GUN-RUNNING

NBC's Lisa Myers: Benghazi Is Starting to Worry Democrats

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=NzXuWDR2mTQ

BETWEEN THE LINES

'What difference does it make?'

Exclusive: Joseph Farah explains why Benghazi matters

Published: 2 hours ago
Joseph Farah

Video at the Page Link: http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/what-diff...QxbpxwTYR3B.99

Why did the Obama administration not prepare for a likely attack on the Libyan mission in Benghazi on 9-11-12 in light of the direct, video threat from al-Qaida leader Ayman al-Zawahiri released 24 hours earlier?

Why did the Obama administration not respond in any way to the attacks on the Benghazi mission as they were unfolding?

Why was no rescue effort initiated?

Why were no contingencies in place to deal with such attacks?

Why did the Obama administration’s talking points on the Benghazi massacre change 12 times?

And why did former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in her sworn testimony to congressional investigators show such contempt for accountability, such indifference to human suffering and such arrogance of leadership by asking the reprehensible and insulting question “What difference does it make?”

It’s been eight months since those terror attacks in Benghazi – and the Obama administration is still stonewalling the truth.

But, as Rep. Trey Gowdy noted this week, “There’s no statute of limitations on the truth.”

Neither is there any statute of limitations on coldblooded murder.

Nor is there any statute of limitations on accessory to coldblooded murder.

Nor is there any statute of limitations to negligence that leads to coldblooded murder.

That’s why Benghazi matters.

That’s before we even get to the question of what the Obama administration has done or is doing to ensure there is not a repeat of Benghazi next Sept. 11 or even tomorrow.

There is no doubt among the sane, rational, objective, informed American public that a monumental and systematic cover-up of the Benghazi scandal has been conducted by the Obama administration.

That’s why this congressional investigation must continue and must be expanded. Perhaps an independent counsel needs to be appointed, because culpability now points directly to the top – not just to Hillary Clinton but to Barack Obama, who literally slept through the slaughter of a U.S. ambassador, other civilian personnel and U.S. military personnel.

Americans need to hear the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth about Benghazi. No more lies and half-truths can be acceptable. No more spin can be acceptable. No more stalling can be acceptable.

Americans don’t want to hear members of Congress tell them that people just die, that those involved understood the risks they were taking. That kind of suggestion is as insulting to our intelligence and demeaning to the memory of the victims of the terrorist attack as anything I’ve ever heard.

It’s obvious the Obama administration was thinking about one thing as the Benghazi attack took place and in its aftermath – the November election results.

To paraphrase a refrain familiar during the previous administration, when it was inappropriately used by those who supported Obama: “Obama lied, people died.”

In this case, it’s the absolute, unvarnished truth.

The American people need to turn up the pressure on their elected officials for closure on this scandal.

Too often, in Washington, members of Congress get distracted by other matters.

Too often, in Washington, members of Congress get cold feet and timid in pursuing the truth – even on the gravest matters of national security and matters of life and death.

Too often, in Washington, elected officials put election cycles and personal political interests ahead of ensuring that government doesn’t make the same mistakes over and over again.

It’s time to demand the truth – and let the chips fall where they may.

What was the Obama administration up to in Benghazi?

What possessed the Obama administration to make such bad choices?

What secrets was the Obama administration keeping that cost the lives of those brave Americans?

It now appears that Benghazi was another “Fast and Furious” scandal on the international stage.

Somebody or somebodies – and not some sacrificial lamb – need to be held to account for the human carnage and the damage inflicted on America’s honor.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/what-diff...QxbpxwTYR3B.99

LibertyNEWS TV - "Benghazi - Terror Attack or Military Strike?"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SrI0...layer_embedded

THE BENGHAZI ASSAULT – TERROR ATTACK OR MILITARY STRIKE? LIBERTYNEWS.COM PURSUES THE TRUTH

By News Staff
Published: May 10, 2013 | 4 Comments



On Thursday, Liberty News published an in-depth 3,700 word report on the Benghazi attack and what we believe to be a full-blown disinformation/distraction campaign being aggressively waged by elements of the U.S. government. We didn’t hold back. We posed the tough questions, with background and context for the questions, exactly as we’ve been asking them around the office.
Among the many lines of questioning we’re pursuing, there is a single, simple one that brings the Obama Administration’s entire Benghazi narrative crashing down. This critical question hasn’t been answered by those in positions of leadership, which leads to many more serious issues of trust and accountability.

This key question is:

Now that we know we could have gotten help to the Benghazi compound in time to defend against the military-style attack and possibly save the lives of four Americans, why did our forces stand down?

Think about that for a moment. Depending on the answer(s), the implications are profound and far-reaching. The media is still fumbling around about the lack of timely response.

Additionally, most in the media still refer to the Benghazi compound as a “consulate”, implying it was a diplomatic facility instead of what it really was – a CIA outpost given camouflage and cover by the State Department. The media is infatuated with the what, but doesn’t seem to care about the why of this situation. You might say they’re all worked up about small brushfires (that the CIA or other government entities may have intentionally set) and don’t see that the barn is burning down.

If our guys on the ground in the region knew we could, in a timely manner, move military assets into Benghazi and counter the attackers’ punch, why were they told not to? What could possibly be the justification for that decision – to essentially let the Americans die? And did President Obama really issue a “stand down” order?

Because this question persists, the following questions must also be asked…and answered:

• Why do media outlets continue to buy into and report the convenient (mis-)labeling and refer to the “Special Mission Benghazi Compound” as a “consulate”?
• Where are the so-called “terrorist” attackers/armed militants/murderers? Have we stopped looking for them? Did we let them slip away into anonymity?
• Who and where are the rest of the survivors of the attack and those evacuated after?
• Why did the attackers know they should target the Special Mission Benghazi Compound, and what was their true intention, their true target – what or who did they really want?
• Why is there now so little mainstream discussion of the role the CIA played in the facilities that were attacked?
• Why were 23 of the 30 American officials evacuated from Benghazi active within the CIA? Only 7 of the 30 worked for the State Department? Yet the media continue to characterize the Benghazi facility as a State Department installation?
• Was the CIA Annex a facility used in a secret gun-running operation – a covert weapons transfer – and was Ambassador Chris Stevens involved?
• Was the CIA Annex used to facilitate the flow of arms to (Muslim Brotherhood) insurgents fighting in Syria and quite possibly elsewhere in the Middle East?
• Why are there two versions of the ARB (Accountability Review Board) Report? One is unclassified for public view, the other is highly classified; and while Congress can view it, they are legally forbidden to discuss it in public hearings or in news interviews.

Additionally, most in the media continue to refer to the attack as an “act of terror” (and in some few cases, still a protest gone awry). This accepted “terror” assessment comes from the CIA’s original talking points as well as recent testimony before Congress.

However, the Benghazi attack bears few, if any, signs of being perpetrated by terrorists, per se. An act of terror usually occurs in a crowded hotel or a cafe. A train station or a sporting event. Acts of terror are attacks performed with the purpose of inspiring terror, almost always among a non-military, defenseless civilian population.

What happened in Benghazi was no simple, random act of terror or spontaneous street protest. It was a coordinated, planned, well armed militaristic assault by an organized group with a specific target. It was a military attack on a U.S. facility defended, at least in part, by trained, armed ex-military CIA operatives.

So why in the world do so many in the media – conservative media included – continue to call the Benghazi attack “terrorism”?

On Breitbart.com, John Nolte, generally a crack investigative reporter, in a piece written on 5.10.13, concludes: “…this was a terror attack”.

On Townhall.com, Katie Pavlich, also usually a relentless reporter of truth, writes in a 5.10.13 article: “The CIA gave the White House and the State Department accurate and factual information about al Qaeda and terrorist threats in Benghazi.”

Given all the evidence, we believe otherwise. We believe the Special Mission Benghazi Compound – a CIA outpost manned by ex-military operatives for the spy agency, was the predetermined target of a military strike, possibly one disguised as a terrorist attack.
And if that “terrorist attack” assumption is false, what else is also a distraction, a diversion, or an outright lie?

As the great nation that we still are, America must not accept a compliant/complicit/corrupt media’s off-target, force-fed narrative. We must not accept a false premise based on a web of lies intended to cover possibly illicit government actions. We must not be lulled into complacency by distracting, irrelevant questions with no answers or answers that divert us from essential truth about this Administration. We’re better than to fall for this manipulative and dangerous game. We need to take a stand and insist on hard-nosed investigation and reporting until we get to the truth – THE REAL TRUTH.

LibertyNEWS.com joined a handful of other media outlets yesterday in asking unpopular questions most Obama-supporting media won’t touch or ridicule us for. Yes, we took a few jabs. Overall, though, the support for our move was positive, encouraging and informed. Our Network will not back down and will not quit asking probing questions that challenge the conventional wisdom and the convenient narratives.

In the coming days and weeks we’re going to roll out a series of investigative stories on Benghazi that revolve around the real demanding questions that exist today, not those concocted or regurgitated by the “shamestream” media and their allies in government. Please be sure you’re subscribed to LibertyNEWS Report and watch for updates.

Ask questions. Challenge and investigate the answers you’re given. Seek the truth and reject the lies.

http://www.libertynews.com/2013/05/t...ues-the-truth/

http://www.alipac.us/f9/lawyer-claim...lowers-277379/

BENGHAZI – THE BIGGEST COVER-UP SCANDAL IN U.S. HISTORY? – WAS BENGHAZI A CIA GUN-RUNNING OPERATION FOR MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD & OTHER INSURGENTS FIGHTING IN SYRIA?

Posted by Darla Dawald, National Director on May 10, 2013 at 10:39pm in Patriot Action Alerts

From PAN's sister site LibertyNEWS.com
– Editorial Team Special Report

http://api.ning.com/files/gj9J14QXQp...2012_09_12.jpg

It’s never fun to admit you’ve been lied to and duped. There is no comfort in realizing a high-level group in government has conned you. The wound created from such a realization would be deep and painful when paired with extraordinary insult when you realize the cons are people you not only trusted, but people who are tasked with protecting your rights, your liberty, your life.

When these people betray you, you’re in trouble – big trouble. Unfortunately, we believe America is being betrayed by powerful individuals tasked with our protection. These people are found in the White House, the Congress, the CIA and other government entities – and they’re lying to you. Then they’re covering it up on an epic scale, in a never-before-seen manner.

Here are the basics of what the schemers in government and the complicit media would like for us all to focus on and buy into:

• Why wasn’t there better security at the consulate (keep this misleading word in mind) in Benghazi?
• Why didn’t authorization come to move special forces in for protection and rescue?
• Why was an obscure video blamed when everyone knew the video had nothing to do with it?
• Did Obama’s administration cover-up the true nature of the attacks to win an election?

Truth is, as we’re starting to believe, the above questions are convenient, tactical distractions. And truth is, answers to these questions, if they ever come, will never lead to revelations of the REAL TRUTH and meaningful punishment of anyone found responsible.

Rep. Darrell Issa knows this, members of the House Committee investigating the Benghazi attacks know this, the White House knows this, and much of the big corporate media infrastructure knows it, too. How do they know it? Because they know the truth. They know the truth, but cannot and/or will not discuss it in public.
Here are the basics that we (America, in general) should be focusing on, but aren’t:

• Why do media outlets continue to refer to the “Special Mission Benghazi Compound” as a consulate?
• Where are the so-called “terrorist” attackers/murderers? Have we stopped looking for them?
• Who and where are the rest of the survivors and those evacuated after the attack?
• Why did the attackers know they should target the Special Mission Benghazi Compound, and what was their true intention – what did they really want?
• Why is there now so little discussion of the role the CIA played in the facilities that were attacked?
• Why were 23 of the 30 American officials evacuated from Benghazi active within the CIA? Only 7 of the 30 worked for the State Department? Yet the media continue to characterize the Benghazi facility as a State Department installation?
• Was the CIA Annex a facility used in a secret gun-running operation, and was Ambassador Chris Stevens involved?
• Was the CIA Annex used to facilitate the flow of arms to (Muslim Brotherhood) insurgents fighting in Syria and possibly beyond?
• Why are there two versions of the ARB (Accountability Review Board) Report? One is unclassified for public view, the other is highly classified, and while Congress can view it, they are legally forbidden to discuss it in public hearings or in news interviews.

We obviously don’t have answers to all of these questions, but we will provide you with an overview, some context and our reasoning for each of them.

http://api.ning.com/files/gj9J14QXQp...aziCoverup.jpg

THE “SPECIAL MISSION BENGHAZI COMPOUND”

According to public documents the State Department made available to Congress, Ambassador Stevens arrived in Benghazi on September 10th, 2012. The first order of business for Stevens was an urgent meeting at the CIA annex (We’ll discuss possibilities for this meeting later). Stevens was then escorted to the Special Mission Benghazi Compound, which had a villa that would be utilized for Stevens and his staff during their stay. The Special Mission Benghazi Compound did house a handful of State Department officials, but was also host to CIA operatives and officials. The Special Mission Benghazi Compound was not an actual embassy or consulate office and was not actually used as such.

The constant reference to the Special Mission Benghazi Compound as a “consulate” leads the casual news reader to believe the Ambassador may have worked out of this office as a facility made available for traditional, more public type of diplomatic operations. This was likely not the case in Benghazi. Stevens was not “stationed” at this facility. If you believe this to be an actual embassy type consulate office, you can also easily accept that the attack on September 11th was an attack meant simply for the purpose of projecting terror.

If you accept the premise this is an act of terror on the anniversary of 9/11, you’ll likely also accept the premise this is not the fault of the U.S. government. Questions will become fewer, those responsible will quietly slip away.

THE WELL ARMED MURDERERS – WHERE ARE THEY?

This question has no answers. Only a maze of peculiar dead ends. As a reminder, a United States Ambassador was brutally murdered. Where are the calls for those who killed him? Where are the hearings demanding that intelligence agencies give us an idea of where the investigation stands? Have we walked away from an aggressive pursuit of the killers? Have we concluded it was an “angry mob” who committed an act of terror and thus closed the books?

http://api.ning.com/files/gj9J14QXQp...A_2340247b.jpg

THE SURVIVORS AND OFFICIALS EVACUATED

Here we are eight months down the road from the 9/11/12 attack in Benghazi. We still have yet to discover the true identities of the many people evacuated. We keep saying they should be called up for hearings and questioned, yet they all seem to have vanished. Perhaps – and this is just something to consider, the government is not hiding them so they won’t speak… these people do not wish to speak because they know full well what was happening and what the consequences of disclosure could be. In fact, it’s very likely they were an integral part of what was being orchestrated from the Benghazi facilities, whatever that might be.
The calls for these individuals to be brought forward assume we accept the premise of an active, traditional consulate. In that, we think of it as an office where interns and passport staff may be working. Of course, interns and standard office staff would indeed be of great value in gathering intelligence to figure out what happened. But the Benghazi facilities were staffed by a few State Department personnel and many CIA operatives – not interns and standard consulate administration staffers.

These individuals didn’t want to go public with classified information before the attack, so why would they after the attack?

With regards to the whistleblowers who just testified to Congress, these guys were, for the most part, involved in security and/or related assignments. We see no reason to think the whistleblowers would have detailed knowledge of the CIA operations we believe were underway in Benghazi. Perhaps they were aware of CIA presence in Benghazi, but there is no doubt a strong CIA presence all over the Middle East.

WHAT WAS THE REAL REASON FOR THE CHOSEN TARGET OF ATTACK?

A Wall Street Journal article published before the classified government report/gag order was issued (one of only a few such articles in existence about the facilities) claims the Special Mission Benghazi Compound was set up for no purpose other than to function as a diplomatic front for the CIA. It’s possible the Special Mission Benghazi Compound was not only a front, but was actually a CIA facility operating under the cover of a State Department facility. This is not certain, however, but we do believe the information and activities at this facility were far less sensitive than that of the CIA annex. We believe this to be the case based on the actions taken by the CIA in the days following the attack on the compound.

The CIA immediately jumped into action, scrubbing the annex facility of any trace of CIA operations. All documents, files, traces of a clandestine presence in general, were completely removed and/or destroyed. Yet, the Special Mission Benghazi Compound was left unguarded and wide open for “looters”. And remember how long it took (weeks) for FBI investigators to be allowed in? Investigators who stayed a surprisingly short time and apparently came away with little or nothing?

There are other questions surrounding what then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton knew. You may recall that in the days following the attack, Hillary Clinton was oddly silent. Clinton was essentially hidden from the media, from Congress and/or anyone else with questions about the State Department’s role (or knowledge) in/of the attacks. The WSJ said “at 5:41 PM Eastern time, Mrs. Clinton called Mr. Petraeus. She wanted to make sure the two agencies were on the same page.” It’s entirely possible the State Department was fuzzy on what had actually happened and why. This lends even more credibility to the idea the Special Mission Benghazi Compound was simply a front for the broader CIA operations.

We do not assert the attackers went after the wrong facility, but certainly propose it be considered a possibility. Or, at the very least, might have assumed the facility had more significance. (It’s also possible they were searching for Stevens himself.)

Which brings us to the dirtiest of all possibilities. What we’re about to discuss could certainly be all coincidence, but the algorithm required for it to all be coincidence seems outside the realm of reality. Let’s get back to the arrival of Stevens in Benghazi.



WHY DID STEVENS ARRIVE IN BENGHAZI ON SEPTEMBER 10TH, 2012?

We mentioned Stevens arrived in Benghazi, Libya on September 10th, 2012, one day before the attack. Stevens immediately attended a classified meeting at the CIA annex before checking in at the Special Mission Benghazi Compound, where he would be staying while in Benghazi. According to the documents obtained by Congress, Stevens later met with an official from an outfit called Al Marfa Shipping and Maritime Services as well as an individual from the Arabian Gulf Oil Co. The final meeting of the evening took place with Ali Sait Akin, Turkey’s Consulate General to Benghazi.

Please keep this sequence of meetings at the front of your mind: CIA, Al Marfa Shipping and Maritime, Arabian Gulf Oil and Turkey.

The visit by Stevens came just 8 days after General David Petraeus, who was then head of the CIA, made a surprise visit to Ankara on September 2nd, 2012. The time of the General’s arrival in Ankara jives with the timeline mentioned in an article published by the Times of London. The article, published on September 14th, 2012, discusses the arrival of a certain ship at the Turkish Port of Iskenderun. Fox News had more (But, strangely, Fox News dropped the investigation and no longer mentions the discovery).

Through shipping records, Fox News has confirmed that the Libyan-flagged vessel Al Entisar, which means “The Victory,” was received in the Turkish port of Iskenderun — 35 miles from the Syrian border — on Sept. 6, just five days before Ambassador Chris Stevens, information management officer Sean Smith and former Navy Seals Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were killed during an extended assault by more than 100 Islamist militants.

The ship, which was coming from Libya, had curious cargo on board. From the same Fox News story.

According to an initial Sept. 14 report by the Times of London, Al Entisar was carrying 400 tons of cargo. Some of it was humanitarian, but also reportedly weapons, described by the report as the largest consignment of weapons headed for Syria’s rebels on the frontlines.

“This is the Libyan ship … which is basically carrying weapons that are found in Libya,” said Walid Phares, a Fox News Middle East and terrorism analyst. “So the ship came all the way up to Iskenderun in Turkey. Now from the information that is available, there was aid material, but there were also weapons, a lot of weapons.”

The cargo reportedly included surface-to-air anti-aircraft missiles, RPG’s and Russian-designed shoulder-launched missiles known as MANPADS.

The following part is extremely important and is what may connect the Petraeus visit to that of Stevens.

The ship’s Libyan captain told the Times of London that “I can only talk about the medicine and humanitarian aid” for the Syrian rebels. It was reported there was a fight about the weapons and who got what “between the free Syrian Army and the Muslim Brotherhood.”

This wasn’t just any fight. The Times of London said “the scale of the shipment and how it should be disbursed, has sparked a row between the FSA and the Muslim Brotherhood, who took control of the shipment when it arrived in Turkey.” Reports suggest a large portion of the shipment was indeed smuggled across the Syrian border, but much of the weapons were caught up in infighting amongst the Syrian insurgents. The Muslim Brotherhood had significant ties with Turkey and, from what we see in reports, were able to secure the ship and its cargo.



THE TIMELINE THE WHITE HOUSE DOESN’T WANT YOU TO FOCUS ON

So we’ve established a solid timeline here.

• SEPT 2, 2012 – General Petraeus, head of CIA, arrives in Turkey on September 2nd and meets with Turkey’s President and top Turkish government officials.
• SEPT 6, 2012 – On September 6th, a ship carrying 400 tons of cargo (much of it being arms), arrives from Libya. The ship is secured by Muslim Brotherhood operatives, due to connections with Turkish government. Other Syrian insurgent groups are furious and want control of the weapons.
• SEPT 10, 2012 – Ambassador Stevens arrives in Benghazi, has meetings with CIA, the shipping company and a government official from Turkey.

From what we can tell, the attacks on the compound where Stevens was located began around an hour after the meeting with a Turkish official ended. On September 11th, 2012, Stevens was killed (very early morning hours).

THE POSSIBLE CHRISTOPHER STEVENS CIA/GUN-RUNNING CONNECTION

The unclassified version of the ARB report provides some fascinating and under-reported details about Christopher Stevens. The September situation was in no way his first experience with Benghazi. In fact, Stevens had a presence at the CIA annex before the Special Mission Benghazi Compound was created. Stevens was at the CIA annex in the summer of 2011, shortly before the CIA created the Special Mission Benghazi Compound, the facility that eventually became the diplomatic front for the CIA’s operations in Benghazi. Stevens was not, at the time, Ambassador to Libya. At the time Stevens was the Special Representative to the Libyan Rebel-Alliance.

According to the New York Times, Stevens had even dealt with applications coming from U.S. weapons dealers requesting licenses to sell arms to Libyan insurgents.

There is a history of Stevens’ involvement in weapons used by Libyan fighters. There is also history of Stevens’ involvement in CIA operations. There appears to be massive movement of Libya-based arms, through Turkish territory, into the hands of Muslim Brotherhood fighters opposing the Assad government in Syria. There was controversy over a shipment of arms involving the Muslim Brotherhood and other Syrian insurgent groups, and an hour after a day of meetings ended, the compound in Libya came under attack.
Meanwhile, virtually all of the narratives circulating here in America surround the failed response to the attacks, the lack of security and the fact it was all blamed on a YouTube video.

WHY IS CONGRESS REFUSING TO ASK THESE QUESTIONS?

The most likely answer here is that members of Congress know the answers and they understand how extremely risky their disclosure would be. That said, because of the level of classification involved, Congress cannot legally answer the questions, or even ask the questions of someone who may know the answers. Especially in a public hearing or in a media interview.

This would explain why current Congressional hearings focus on the response, or lack thereof, not the true reason the attacks happened in the first place.

http://api.ning.com/files/gj9J14QXQp...benghazi_0.jpg

THE LIES AND THE COVER-UP

We don’t like having to say this, but we’re all very likely being lied to, repeatedly and recklessly. Very little, if anything, we’re being told about why Benghazi happened is true or relevant. Are we alleging the above is 100 percent accurate? Not at all. We do believe it all plays a part, either directly or indirectly, in the attack, in the murders that took place in Benghazi on September 11th, 2012, and in the deceitful cover-up orchestrated by the government and thrust on the American people. Yet, not a single person who is elected to protect our lives and our rights is, so far, willing to say it.

Not one.

This story does not provide all the answers, but hopefully it provokes the correct kind of questions.
We ALL need to be asking them.

Liberty News

First ACTION:
Start By Signing Our Petition:

http://api.ning.com/files/gj9J14QXQp...yc9/demand.jpg

Second ACTION:

Schedule your FAXES or we provide you with the link to FAX targets and you can FAX yourself.

Fax Congress Today and Demand Answers and Accountability in the Benghazi Cover-up!

Grassfire has set up a special FaxFire, giving team members a platform to call for an FULL INVESTIGATION into the Benghazi cover-up. Fax your members of Congress and other key members of the House and Senate to demand the truth before Wednesday's congressional hearing!

Click Here to schedule your FAX now
Third ACTION:
Join the social media
"Benghazi Blitz Campaign"

http://api.ning.com/files/gj9J14QXQp....jpg?width=750

A. Look up your Senators and Reps on Facebook and hit their pages hard with We/I Demand the Truth on Benghazi!
http://api.ning.com/files/gj9J14QXQp...witterbird.jpg

B. Tweet/Twitter Campaign:

Click Here for the House and Senate Twitter Handles

Are you new to Twitter? Click Here for great instructions and how to advice on using Twitter: Patriot Action Network Twitter Attack

Tweet them with various messages:

Copy and paste, change the senators and reps to yours or create your own message!
Examples:

I demand truth on Benghazi @senjohnmccain @jeffflake #BenghaziTruth #benghazi #tcot #teaparty #gop #pan @senate_gops
I Demand Truth on Benghazi @RepGosar #BenghaziTruth #benghazi #tcot #teaparty @hrclinton @barackobama #whitehouse #pan
We Demand that you report Truth on Benghazi @msnbc @cnn @abcnews @nbcnews @cbsnews @usatoday #pan
Stand 4 Benghazi Truth @jeffflake @senjohnmccain @repgosar @DarrellIssa @gopwhip @speakerboehner @gopoversight #tcot #tlot #gop #pan

Hashtags for Twitter:
#icon = Independent Conservatives
#xcot = Christian Conservatives on Twitter
#tpot = Top Patriots on Twitter
#tcot = Top Conservatives on Twitter
#tlot = Top Libertarians on Twitter
#ocra = Organized Conservative Resistance Alliance
#gop = Republican Party
#republicans
#teaparty
#right
#dnc = Democrat Party
#left
#liberals
#obama
#hillaryclinton
#BenghaziTruth
#benghazi
#obama
Other Accounts:
@patriotactionnw
@libertynews
@whitehouse
@barackObama
@HRClinton
@abcnews
@cbsnews
@cnn
@nbcnews
@msnbc
@usatoday
@DarrellIssa
@gopwhip
@speakerboehner
@gopoversight

http://api.ning.com/files/gj9J14QXQp.../PhoneIcon.jpg

Fourth ACTION:
Call your Rep and Senators!
Click Here for Contact Info

Follow us!
http://api.ning.com/files/X*t4t7cupR....png?width=173

http://api.ning.com/files/X*t4t7cupR....png?width=173

Start By Signing Our Petition:

http://api.ning.com/files/gj9J14QXQp...yc9/demand.jpg

Let us not give up or give in.

Keep the pressure on Congress with Facebook Messages, Tweets, Petitions, Faxes, and Phone Calls!

We Demand to Know the Truth!



Tags: action, administration, benghazi, benghazi-blitz, clinton, congress, coverup, grassfire, hearing, hearings, More…hillary, issa, obama, petitions, victims, wed, whistleblowers


http://patriotaction.net/forum/topic...sg_share_topic