Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member MadInChicago's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,552

    Buenos Notches, America

    THE CONSERVATIVE REVIEW September 7, 2007

    Buenos Notches, America
    By Patrick J. Buchanan

    "Mexico does not end at its borders. ... Where there is a Mexican, there is Mexico."

    That astonishing claim, by Mexican President Felipe Calderon, in his state of the nation address at the
    National Palace Sunday brought his audience wildly cheering to its feet.

    Were the United States a serious nation, Calderon's claim that Mexico extends into the United States would have produced an instant demand from the U.S. ambassador for clarification. Failing to receive it, he would have packed his bags, and the United States would be on the verge of severing diplomatic relations.

    In an earlier time, U.S. troops would be rolling to the border.

    For this is not the first time an arrogant Mexican ruler has made a claim to extra-territorial rights inside the United States and, indeed, to U.S. territory. Mexico's presidents have gotten into a habit of suborning treason against the United States.

    In 1995, President Ernesto Zedillo told a Dallas audience of U.S. citizens of Mexican descent, "You are Mexicans, Mexicans who live north of the border." I.e., you owe loyalty to Mexico, not Uncle Sam.

    In 1997, Zedillo brought a Chicago gathering of La Raza to its feet by exclaiming, "I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders."

    In 1998, Mexico changed its constitution to restore citizenship to Mexican-Americans who have taken an oath of allegiance to the United States and renounced loyalty to any other country.

    Purpose: loosen their ties of loyalty to the United States, re-knit their ties of loyalty to Mexico, and persuade Mexican-Americans to vote Mexico's interests in the U.S.A. Put Mexico first, even if you have taken an oath of allegiance to the United States.

    In June 2004, President Vicente Fox took the Zedillo road to the Mexican-American community in Chicago. There, he, too, declared: "We are Mexicans that live in our territories, and we are Mexicans that live in other territories. In reality, there are 120 million that live together and are working together to construct a nation."

    President Fox was saying that the construction of his nation is taking place -- inside our nation. Is that not
    sedition?

    In 2005, the head of the Institute of Mexicans Abroad, Carlos Gutierrez, asserted, "The Mexican nation goes beyond the borders that contain Mexico."

    What these Mexicans politicians are saying is that Mexico extends into the United States, and the first loyalty of all men and women of Mexican ancestry is, no matter where they live, to Mexico.

    Mexico's rulers believe in a nation of history, blood and soil that pre-existed, and supersedes, any pledge of allegiance any Mexican may make to another country, especially to the United States.

    Is George W. Bush vaguely aware of any of this?

    At the Quebec summit, Bush mocked the idea of a merger of a North American Union as a fantasy of conspiracy theorists. "It's quite comical actually, to realize the difference between reality and what some
    people on TV are talking about."

    Calderon laughed it off, too. "I'd be happy with one foot in Mexicali and one in Tijuana." But in his state of the nation, Felipe is talking about one foot in Mexico and one in Los Angeles.

    Is Bush oblivious to what his friend Vicente Fox laid down in Madrid in 2002 as the long-term strategy of Mexico?

    "Eventually, our long-range objective is to establish with the United States ... an ensemble of connections and institutions similar to those created by the European Union, with the goal of attending to future themes as important as ... the freedom of movement of capital, goods, services and persons. The new framework we wish to construct is inspired in the example of the European Union."

    Fox is talking about the erasure of borders.

    Whether Bush is aware of this really makes no difference. For the real issue is not what the Mexican regime has in mind, but whether we can stop it, or whether we have passed a point of no return.

    Today, already, there are 45 million Hispanics in the United States, perhaps half from Mexico, and 37 million immigrants.

    Now, Steve Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies projects -- using official Census Bureau figures of 1.25 million legal and illegal immigrants entering and staying in the United States every year -- a U.S. population of 468 million by 2060.

    We will add as many people -- 167 million -- in the next half-century as the entire population of the United States when JFK was elected. Some 105 million of these folks will be immigrants and their children. That 105 million is equal to the entire population of Mexico, whence most of these
    folks will be coming.

    No wonder Mexican presidents are coming out of the closet about what is up. They know the gringos can't stop it, for they have the American establishment on their side.

    Buenas noches, America.

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    End of CONSERVATIVE REVIEW
    Copyright 2007 by NextEra Media. All rights reserved.
    Feel free to forward this, in its entirety, to others.
    <div>&ldquo;There is no longer any Left or Right, there is only Tyranny or Liberty &rdquo;</div>

  2. #2
    Senior Member IndianaJones's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,235
    Purpose: loosen their ties of loyalty to the United States, re-knit their ties of loyalty to Mexico, and persuade Mexican-Americans to vote Mexico's interests in the U.S.A. Put Mexico first, even if you have taken an oath of allegiance to the United States.
    And we are taking this lying down???
    We are NOT a nation of immigrants!

  3. #3
    Senior Member posylady's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,553
    Could someone tell me why we aern't at war with Mexico instead of Iraq?

  4. #4
    Senior Member MadInChicago's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,552
    Quote Originally Posted by IndianaJones
    Purpose: loosen their ties of loyalty to the United States, re-knit their ties of loyalty to Mexico, and persuade Mexican-Americans to vote Mexico's interests in the U.S.A. Put Mexico first, even if you have taken an oath of allegiance to the United States.
    And we are taking this lying down???
    And the Democrats are kissing their butts. Look at the Democratic debate last night, “On Telmudo, in Spanishâ€
    <div>&ldquo;There is no longer any Left or Right, there is only Tyranny or Liberty &rdquo;</div>

  5. #5
    Senior Member MadInChicago's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,552

    Re: Buenos Notches, America

    Quote Originally Posted by MadInChicago
    THE CONSERVATIVE REVIEW September 7, 2007

    Were the United States a serious nation, Calderon's claim that Mexico extends into the United States would have produced an instant demand from the U.S. ambassador for clarification. Failing to receive it, he would have packed his bags, and the United States would be on the verge of severing diplomatic relations.

    And yet the U.S. State Department condemns an attacked within Mexico.
    " The U.S. State Department did condemn the attacks by saying: "There can be no justification for violence in pursuit of political ends in Mexico. However, it is important to underscore that the United States does not consider these actions threatening to Mexican political or economic stability."

    For the full story: TROUBLE IN MEXICO
    http://www.emergency.com/epr-mex.htm
    <div>&ldquo;There is no longer any Left or Right, there is only Tyranny or Liberty &rdquo;</div>

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    reno, nev
    Posts
    1,902
    Quote Originally Posted by posylady
    Could someone tell me why we aern't at war with Mexico instead of Iraq?
    Our representatives have not got the message yet that we are being invaded. We will be taken over and it will be done solely by their entering and setting up house. They have declared war without even letting us know.

  7. #7
    Super Moderator GeorgiaPeach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    21,832
    Thank you for posting. This is a duplicate post however. Please use the Search feature for title and author to help reduce duplicates.

    Continue to post on the original thread.

    This thread is locked.
    Matthew 19:26
    But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
    ____________________

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •