Thread: California Reconquista Alert NO ON PROPS 91, 92, 93

Fabian Nunez was interviewed on ABC this morning. He is very excited about the initiatives below and feels voters will support them on Feb.5. None of these will be a benefit to U.S. citizens. The first two will result in higher taxes. The initiatives are ridiculous. They are designed for the illegals here and those to come. Let's not forget that California has the largest illegal population in the U.S., and L.A. is a sanctuary city with an illegal population that is second only to Mexico City, Mexico. The third one will allow them more time in office. Sorry about the second one, it would not line up.


California Voter Guide
http://www.voterguide.sos.ca.gov/title_ ... e_sum.html

PROP 91
TRANSPORTATION FUNDS.
INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

Prohibits certain motor vehicle fuel sales and use taxes, that are earmarked for the Transportation Investment Fund, from being retained in the General Fund. Currently such taxes may be retained if Governor issues a proclamation, a special statute is enacted by a 2/3 vote of the Legislature, repayment occurs within three years, and certain other conditions are met.
Requires repayment by 6/30/17 of such vehicle fuel taxes retained in General Fund from 7/1/03 to 6/30/08. Currently repayment is generally required by 6/30/16.
Changes how and when General Fund borrowing of certain transportation funds is allowed.
SUMMARY OF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST'S ESTIMATE OF NET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT FISCAL IMPACT:
Increases stability of state funding for highways, streets, and roads and may decrease stability of state funding for public transit. May reduce stability of certain local funds for public transit.


PROP 92
COMMUNITY COLLEGES. FUNDING. GOVERNANCE. FEES.
INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE.


STATUTE.
Establishes in state constitution a system of independent public community college districts and Board of Governors.
· Generally, requires minimum levels of state funding for school districts and community college districts to be calculated separately, using different criteria and separately appropriated.
· Allocates 10.46 percent of current Proposition 98 school funding maintenance factor to community colleges.
· Sets community college fees at $15/unit per semester; limits future fee increases.
· Provides formula for allocation by Legislature to community college districts that would not otherwise receive general fund revenues through community college apportionment.
SUMMARY OF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST'S ESTIMATE OF NET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT FISCAL IMPACT:
· Increase in state spending on K–14 education from 2007–08 through 2009–10—averaging about $300 million per year, with unknown impacts annually thereafter.
· Loss of student fee revenues to community colleges—potentially about $70 million annually.


PROP 93
LIMITS ON LEGISLATORS’ TERMS IN OFFICE.
INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
Reduces the total amount of time a person may serve in the state legislature from 14 years to 12 years.

Allows a person to serve a total of 12 years either in the Assembly, the Senate, or a combination of both.
Provides a transition period to allow current members to serve a total of 12 consecutive years in the house in which they are currently serving, regardless of any prior service in another house.

SUMMARY OF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST'S ESTIMATE OF NET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT FISCAL IMPACT:
This measure would have no direct fiscal effect on state or local governments.

If Nunez is for it, I'm definitely against it.

Three great big fat NOS!!

NO NO NO specially fr prop 93

A very deceiving ad has been run
on tv telling voters to vote yes on 93.

I read somewhere that the only reason
California got to move its primary to February
was to accomodate those propositions to
be on the ballot.

How people like Nunes and his band of
traitors get elected is beyond me.

Californians.. wake up and do it now

I already voted by absentie. Of course of voted NO on all those measures!

odiesback wrote:

How people like Nunes and his band of
traitors get elected is beyond me.

Me too, and I don't even live in California!

Unfortunately most of the problem is predicated by the ethnical makeup of the district.

Originally Posted by MW

odiesback wrote:

How people like Nunes and his band of
traitors get elected is beyond me.

Me too, and I don't even live in California!

Unfortunately most of the problem is predicated by the ethnical makeup of the district.

And that is why it will be very hard to change it

Originally Posted by odiesback

How people like Nunes and his band of
traitors get elected is beyond me.

you know perfectly well how Nunez and the other mexican socialists get "elected" here in CA. massive voter fraud by illegals and their open-borders enablers. think about it. why do you think they always scream and wail whenever any voter photo ID laws are put forth?

it's amazing - we have allowed so many enemies into our midst, that we now are collectively unable to require legal photo ID to take part in our most sacred honor of our citizenship. while the same proof is required to buy beer and get on a plane.

America and Americans are incredibly weak. how did we get so weak? what are we going to do get strong again?