I put up a NYT article a few weeks ago, but cant find it, on Latino underachievment from Mexican (illegal) Anchor babies. Here is that link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/21/us/21 ... ers&st=cse

This is again, from a MAINSTREAM source, and they are WORRIED! Basicly, "its Genetic" is going to be rearing its rational but ugly head this year. It is BAD from a left wing 'blank slate' multi-cult perspective that is. Amazing read, click on the link, its worth your time to understand the issue.

http://www.economist.com/displaystory.c ... d=14742737


NOTE: The FIRST NYT article is a bold, blatent statement against illegal immigration from Mexico, as Mexicans will not CATCH UP or Replace White middle Americans, in a socio-economic respect. Just warm bodies, just numbers, not productivity.

The second article seems to be reflecting the inevitable flood of information comming out on race and genetics. Alipac wants to stay out of such frays, for good reasons, but maybe NOT. These are MSM articles, not stormfront postings.

That is correct, the NYT is posting what you read on Stormfront, and VDARE by Steve Sailer, who's articles are banned on Alipac.

Is the Economist to be banned also?

The cat is out of the bag, this has political and socioeconomic implicatins and underline the true, large ugly unspoken realities of illegal immigration.

The ECONOMIST AND NEW YORK TIMES ARE WORRIED FOLKS!

That is a GOOD THING, maybe we might, for gods sake, have a fighting chance at this. These idiots dont want to live in a third world toilet, and neither do you!


HEY LOU DOBBS, READ THIS POST!!