Thread: Flashback: Glenn Beck Attacks Melania Trump as ‘Lesbian Porno’ Model

by REBECCA MANSOUR 23 Mar 2016

Last August, Glenn Beck attacked Melania Trump, the wife of GOP frontrunner Donald Trump, by accusing the former fashion model of “posing nude in lesbian porno shots.”

The accusation came as part of a lengthy Facebook post Beck wrote last summer criticizing the Trump candidacy. The talk radio host prefaced his comments by stating, “This is not an attack, this is an honest question.”

He then proceeded to list his issues with the New York billionaire, which included a swipe at the candidate’s wife. Beck claimed that in a Trump presidency “the First Lady would be the first to have posed nude in lesbian porno shots.”

Beck’s accusation, which as of yet is unverified by any credible source, was blasted by fellow radio talker Sean Hannity, who wrote in response: “I thought you were libertarian? Also I go back to the fact that you have changed. Trump’s wife is a mother and what she did in the past doesn’t make my top 10,000 list of problems we face as a country.”

Some would also argue that dredging up past indiscretions is a dangerous tactic for a former “morning zoo” shock jock whose on-air antics were famous for being excessively cruel even for that medium.

Beck was the first, but not the last Cruz surrogate to attack Trump’s wife. This week an online attack ad featured an image of the Slovenian-born fashion model from a GQ magazine photo shoot in 2000 before she was married to Trump. The ad reads: “Meet Melania Trump. Your next First Lady. Or, you could support Ted Cruz on Tuesday.”

Republican strategist Liz Mair, who runs the Super PAC responsible for the ad, claimed it was directed specifically at Mormon women in Utah. After facing blowback on Twitter for “slut-shaming” the GOP frontrunner’s wife, Mair tweeted, “I’m fine w Melania’s prior work. But I’m not a Mormon woman. I also want to defeat her husband.”

Trump, for his part, took to Twitter to defend his wife and blast Cruz. He tweeted, “Lyin’ Ted Cruz just used a picture of Melania from a G.Q. shoot in his ad. Be careful, Lyin’ Ted, or I will spill the beans on your wife!”

Cruz responded to him on Twitter with: “Pic of your wife not from us. Donald, if you try to attack Heidi, you’re more of a coward than I thought. #classless”

Flashback: Glenn Beck Attacks Melania Trump as ?Lesbian Porno? Model

Cruz, Beck, Heidi, Carly ... the entire Cruz campaign that failed to tell Liz Mair not to run that ad and pull it, was silent consent and approval, if they weren't in fact all involved in it, the latter of course is my belief. I may be wrong, but I don't think so. I don't think Liz Mair is stupid enough to do such a thing without the consent and approval of the Cruz campaign because of the enormous risk of blow-back which is exactly what's happening to Cruz. This was a Wiley Coyote stunt that by the time it's all over will burn this wolf pack to the ground into dust.

I mean just think about it. They start a fight they think to win Utah, and maybe it made a difference, who knows, they win the Mormons, and while Ted is busy practicing his speech in the mirror to be a Big Cowboy and speak for and defend his little "strong woman" who apparently can't speak for herself pointing his finger at his own supporters pretending they're Donald Trump and calls his a "sniveling coward" who has a problem with "strong women", the National Inquirer is going to press about his own alleged affairs with not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, but FIVE "strong women", i. e. a $1000 a hit hooker, a teacher and 3 co-workers.

So, while we're all wondering why in the world Carly Fiorina doesn't go home and enjoy her life with her nice husband, there she is not just endorsing Ted Cruz (who in her own words will say anything to get elected) but on the road with Ted Cruz, whose Cruz Super PAC dumped $500,000 into her Carly campaign account while one of the 3 co-workers in the Cruz sex scandal is Carly's CAMPAIGN MANAGER, Sarah Isgur Flores.

Then, before we can all pick ourselves up off the floor from that, we hear Ted Cruz blaming Donald Trump for the Cruz Sex Scandal. Trump didn't have anything to do with the sex scandal. That was all Ted. Trump didn't have anything to do with the National Inquirer story, the rumors were all over the place initiated into some channels by the Rubio campaign.

And I learned today on one of the programs that the deal with the networks is they don't follow National Inquirer reports on sex scandals with candidates UNLESS they start talking about it, and what did Ted Cruz do? He talked about it, talked about it, talked about it, and talked about it. Now it's a legitimate story for the MSM to pursue. And he did so without ever being asked a question about it, because no one asked him a question about it, because no one wanted to pursue it. But TED TALKED so now it is. He's denied it, called everyone a liar, and now the MSM has to pursue whether or not WHEN HE TALKED ABOUT IT, was he telling the truth when he denied it, was he telling the truth about Trump doing a smear job on him, was he telling the truth calling everyone at the National Inquirer liars, etc., etc., etc. An anchor on CNN raised the question today, "why didn't Cruz call the National Inquirer and tell them it's all lies and to print a retraction?"

It's the ole "thou doth protest too much".

Wiley Coyote. BOOM!

A Trump Supporter in return puts together the side by sides of Heidi and Melania with the caption, images worth 1000 words, which was funny, it made me laugh. Just desserts which Cruz characterized as an "attack on my wife and family". I swear, for a Texan, he has no sense of humor leading me to think he's all hat and no cattle.

Cruz can dish it out, but he can't take it. Typical elitist establishment insider.

Yeah, a whining bark with no bite, a guy that's all hat and no cattle. It's just so hard to believe Texas sent someone like this to the United States Senate. They say it was an off election year and no one paid much attention to it. Very small number of voters. No majority, requiring a run-off, and of course Cruz lied his way into the winner's circle. Shame, because there are so many wonderful Texans who would make such fabulous US Senators.

So apparently a Cruz surrogate can accuse Trump's wife of homosexuality (which would imply infidelity as well BTW), and Cruz doesn't have to "disavow" it fifty times on national TV, but if one of Trump's surrogates accuses Cruz of infidelity, Trump must "disavow" it on every source of media in existence, 24 hours a day, for the next two weeks. Yeah, that's fair. Yet more of the unfair treatment Trump has received from the GOP establishment.

And that's Cruz and his supporters for you. He's just another establishment guy like "W" and a Cruz presidency would be Bush 3.0.

WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!

Cruz is dishonest at his core with no purpose other than to win. His ambition overwhelms his mental capacity. Back home, we'd call him a Rabid Dog. Trump made a big mistake listening to Limbaugh and these Cruz for Number 2 people and should have knocked this piece of crap out of the race in December when he wanted to.

Back to the CruzSexScandal, who do you think will talk first? The hooker or the teacher? I'm betting on the teacher.

Here in the Central Valley of California people do not follow the news like everyone here on this forum. Most don't even know who Glenn Beck is and don't follow Fox News. But they do have their Smart Phones and their Twitter Accounts. This became evident to me when I went to get my hair done the other day. In a usually PC zone, someone started talking about Trump and Cruz's tweets. That is all it took for everyone to start expressing their opinions. I now understand why Trump constantly uses his twitter account to get his message out there.

Unfortunately for Trump I think, from what I heard, this latest rant might not have been wise. Nobody knocked his wife for her picture. They felt it was out there it was her choice and she should own it. They felt Trump was the only person that seemed to have a problem with it. Then they started on at his attack against Heidi and that is when it started getting ugly. I have to tell you I thought I had heard it all but I hadn't. Bad move Trump.

Trump didn't have a problem with the picture, Melania had no problem with it, the problem was the words on it "This will be your next First Lady. Or you could vote for Ted Cruz on Tuesday."

What if Trump or some surrogate PAC prepared an ad on Heidi Cruz with a picture of her own face, which of course she should own, it's her face, her expression, right? And put the words on it "This will be your next First Lady. Or you could vote for Donald Trump on Tuesday."

What would everyone in Central Valley have thought about that?

Spouses and family are not supposed to be used in negative ads by opponents in political campaigns.

The very thing that Cruz is whining about is the very thing that he did.

By the way, Katrina Pierson "spilled the beans" today on Heidi, on the news this morning and it was her professional activities. They listed them all, Goldman-Sachs, LLoans from her Goldman-Sachs that weren't reported on the FEC filing by Cruz, Council on Foreign Relations, Task Force on North American Union (she called it NAFTA, but it's NAU), and a Bush operative in DC under GW Bush, and summed it up as "she's spent her entire professional career working for everything Ted Cruz claims he's against". Well done. So it's all out there now in MSM. We've posted that for months now, but MSM had never picked up on it or was just hiding it on purpose, but Katrina was asked by the reporters this morning what the "beans" were, and she was ready and spewed it all out.

Judy you win. There are always two sides to every story. I noticed that certain people have been picking and choosing which articles to post, so I decided to try and be fair and balanced and present both sides. But I can now understand MW's frustration when he tried to do the same thing. You can have your passive aggressive attitude. I am not going to waste anymore of my time. As long as this forum is mainly a Trump Site I am signing off.

This isn't a Trump site. This is a site that as you know and have been a part of is here to stop illegal immigration and end this free trade treason madness. If Trump had voted for TPA in 2015 and written an OP-ED for the Wall Street Journal promoting TPP in 2015 and gone on tour with Paul Ryan advocating the TPP in 2015, like Ted Cruz did, I wouldn't be a Trump Supporter. If Trump had testified in a Senate Hearing in 2013 in support of LPR (Legal Permanent Residence) Green Cards for 11 million illegal aliens like Ted Cruz did, I wouldn't be a Trump Supporter. If Trump had testified in a Senate Hearing in 2013 requesting approval to double green card immigration on an annual basis from 675,000 to 1.3 million a year like Ted Cruz did, I wouldn't be a Trump Supporter. If Trump had testified in a Senate Hearing in 2013 requesting a 5 fold increase to the H1B visa program like Ted Cruz did, I wouldn't be a Trump Supporter. If Trump had stated that "you can't deport 11 million illegal aliens using Jackboots going door to door to pull people out of their homes in the middle of the night", like Ted Cruz did in 2016, I wouldn't be a Trump Supporter. If Trump had said "you can't deport 11 million illegal aliens because the law won't allow it", like Ted Cruz did in 2016, I wouldn't be a Trump Supporter. If Trump had said "you can't ban Muslim immigrants from entering the US because it's unconstitutional" like Ted Cruz did in 2016, I wouldn't be a Trump Supporter.

I'm a Trump Supporter because of his positions on immigration and trade. Donald Trump has made our issues the Number One Issues of this campaign, they're why everyone who supports him, supports him. If he wanted to give illegal aliens amnesty like John Kasich or legalization like Ted Cruz and supported TPP like they do, none of us would be supporting him, because he wouldn't even be running. He'd be living his nice life with all of his money in his pocket, all of his business deals still intact, still selling products at Macy's, still running his Miss USA Pageant, still operating his Apprentice Show and having the time of his life without living in a bullet proof vest and being called nasty names he doesn't deserve. But because no one else in the race was going to stop illegal immigration or end this free trade disaster, and Cruz was already well-announced with his platforms all out there in support of legalization and promoting the TPP, Trump decided to run to fix our country and stop this madness.

So there is nothing "passive aggressive" about my stance. The frustration you and MW feel is self-inflicted with your support of Ted Cruz. And Cruz may win. Trump may lose. I hope not, but there's months of elections left and the whole world save Trump Supporters are against him. I know it feels safe to be against Trump while you have Trump. You need to remember what it was like before Trump was in the race, because as soon as he's out of it, no one will be talking about immigration and no one will be working to stop this free trade disaster, everyone will be right back in their comfy seats of status quo and same o, same o, whether Republican or Democrat, passing every free trade agreement this wicked government comes up with, handing out benefits to every illegal alien that can drive, walk or crawl in, increasing every immigration level we have, and amnesty will be passed in the first 100 days.

If that's what the majority of Americans want, then so be it.

Will of the people and all of that.