By Frosty Wooldridge
November 12, 2012
NewsWithViews.com
Thinker Sam Francis said, "You cannot separate a culture and its attendant civilization from the genetic endowments of its founding people, nor can you expect to transfer it to another people."Today in America, African-Americans, Mexican-Americans, Muslim-Americans and European-Americans share an uneasy if not cautious tolerance for each other across the land. The news reports didn’t talk about the American vote.
They discussed the Hispanic vote, the black vote, the white vote and with the addition of another 20 to 30 million Muslims in a few decades—the Islamic vote.As the American people allow themselves to be transformed into another kind of culture, i.e., a multicultural society, neither democrats who pander to the new cultural paradigm or the republicans who are trying to extend the old successful one—understand the destructive forces facing future generations of an “incompatible mixed bag” of American non-culture.About half the American electorate feels freaked out by Obama’s re-election.
They pray for the next four years to go as fast as possible so they can replace Obama with a republican.
But they fail to understand the direction of America. Within the next four years, somewhere between 12 and 20 million illegal alien migrants will gain full citizenship by Obama’s executive orders or Congress’ lay-down. Another 8 to 10 million immigrants will be imported through legal immigration—in the next four years.
Millions of them will tap into Social Security, food stamps and assisted housing.
Millions of them will be able to chain migrate their families into America.
Millions will legally displace Americans from their jobs.
Millions of them will become voters and millions of them will elect another person just like Obama.
In the land of milk and honey, the minority voter will become the new power in the White House—until, of course, the Fractured States of America collapse via socialism.
Great Britain’s Winston Churchill said, “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”
As it stands today, 47 million people in America feed themselves off the backs of American workers. Millions more accept unemployment checks. The United States sinks like the Titanic from $16 trillion in debt on its way to $20 trillion within four years—under Obama.
Barack Obama has become the “great emancipator” of those who avoid work on a daily basis.The ones that won’t work or can’t work or suffer illiteracy and can’t hold a job, will ride this U.S. Titanic down into the depths. Intractable poverty and cultural poverty create the perfect storm for AmericaI interviewed Canadian population expert Tim Murray.
He said much the same occurs in Canada as to poverty, immigration and cultural fracturing.
Mr. Murray, give my readers a close-up understanding as to what the United States and Canada are doing to themselves as cultures:“More distressing than the Presidential results were the lessons that both Republican and Democratic pundits drew from it,” said Murray.
“The common thread that ran through most commentaries was that the demographic foundation of the Republican Party was no longer broad enough to capture a majority of votes. “The numbers just aren’t there anymore, and never will be” was a common refrain.
“The remedy offered by friend and foe alike was for Republicans to “modernize” their party.
Translation--they must jettison some their traditional baggage and appeal to those voters who might be prepared to accept the party’s core economic message. Lower taxes, limited government, fiscal prudence and encouragement to small business. “The problem is, however, some of the policy positions thought expendable to some conservative voters are regarded as vital to others. “Imagine the Republican coalition as a zeppelin that is losing altitude in the mid-Atlantic.
It has become apparent to the crew that the air ship will not make it to shore unless some baggage is tossed out.
Not much.
A mere 5% would probably do. Some luggage is labeled “right-to-life”, some “opposition to gay marriage”, some “no corporate tax hikes”, some “no amnesty”.
Obviously something has to go. But what?“I think it was most telling that the favored scapegoat for the party’s demise was its failure to relate to “Hispanic” voters, which is code language for the failure to surrender to illegal immigration and to open the doors even wider.
After all, we’re told, Hispanics are a “growing demographic” soon to form 25% of the population, and the GOP cannot afford to concede 73% of Hispanic voters to the Democrats and expect to win elections.
Most commentators made a particular point of saying that the Republican Party should be the natural home of Hispanics, for Hispanics tend to be quite conservative people.
They are hard working, believe in traditional family values and are anxious to “get ahead”.
“If only the Republicans would ditch these old fashioned ideas about a nation having the right to control its borders, or that cheaters should never prosper, or that illegals should not be able to vote or drive a car or hold a job or make a claim on health care and educational services---Hispanics would run to them with open arms.
If Republicans pushed for the kind of immigration reform the open borders lobby wants, and made Marco Rubio their next Presidential nominee, victory in 2016 should be in the bag.
Or so goes the reasoning.
“Canadian conservatives have joined this chorus with some unsolicited advice of their own. What Republicans need to do is what Canada’s Conservative Party did. They need to “outreach” to ethnic communities.
Encourage them to join, to nominate, and to run.
They need to include them as an integral part of a new conservative multi-ethnic, multicultural coalition. Nonsense!“
The Republicans don’t have to open the floodgates.
They don’t have to accelerate the displacement of more American-born workers and the suppression of their wages. T
hey don’t have to cave in to bilingualism and threaten the cohesion of the nation.
They don’t have to add to the net fiscal burden that unskilled, poorly educated migrants impose on American taxpayers.
They don’t have to lead America further along the road to ecological and economic ruin by contributing to the addition of another 100 million immigrant people to the country’s population by mid-century.
“All they have to do is accept the fact that the culture war should not be fought in Congress.
All they have to do is not use the law to prevent women from choosing abortion and homosexuals from choosing marriage. That’s it.
“Does that mean that conservatives should not attempt to persuade people that abortion and same sex marriage is wrong?
No. It only means that they should wage their arguments outside the offices of government, if only for pragmatic reasons. As Prohibition should have taught us, moral conduct cannot be legislated if there is not a broad and strong societal support for it.
Laws against theft work because theft is universally regarded as wrong across all religious, cultural and racial lines. Laws against marijuana use are unworkable because they do not enjoy such universal support.
I think recreational use of cannabis is ill-advised and dangerous for a great many people. But I don’t think it is a matter for the law.
“There is no moral consensus in favor of restricting abortion rights, or for the denial of gay marriage rights. But there is, however, substantial support for an end to illegal immigration, and a reduction of legal immigration.
Even among Hispanics.
Or do we forget that 46% of Hispanics voted for Arizona’s Proposition 200, and that a majority of Hispanics polled in Colorado favored an immigration law modeled on Arizona’s?
And it should be remembered, after all, that Caesar Chavez stood on the Mexican border to protest the traffic of illegal immigrants from Mexico.
