Gun Control Amendment in NEW INTERNET CENSORSHIP BILL S.3414
I have been warning people on this forum for a while that NOT ONLY CAN SENATOR LIEBERMAN'S S.3414 Cyber Security bill shut down forums and sites like ALIPAC under Hate Sites which is in this S.3414, NOW WE FIND OUT SENATORS ARE SNEAKING IN A GUN CONTROL PROVISION:
Cyber bill has gun control amendment - The Hill's Video
Where is Michael Savage and Lou Dobbs and Bill OReilly from Fox News who have been ignoring this S.3414 and what it will do to Free Speech online. Anyway today was the vote as to whether to move the bill forward. It passed 82-11. 6 Republicans and 2 Democrats. However this Cyber Security Bill is going to create a NEW DEPARTMENT for DHS who as you know is no fan of ALIPAC. The National Cyber Security Agency will be created under this S.3414 which might I add has already passed the House under the name CISPA. However this National Cyber Security Agency will be able to SPY ON AMERICA'S web page views, e-mails, online purchases with your credit card numbers and online banking including passwords and make copies of them and send them over to DHS with your Internet Service Provider Number. Your Internet Service Provider or ISP will be able to not only give your information to DHS but to unknown third parties and should your ISP lose your information which could include Credit Card Numbers and passwords as well as the Third Party: UNDER S.3414 YOU CANNOT SUE YOUR ISP.
E-mails: FORGET IT, Not only can your ISP and third party take a long peek at your e-mails it could stop ALIPAC from sending out e-mail action alerts to tell you about an Amnesty Bill or some Senator sneaking an Amnesty clause in the bill and it can even stop ALIPAC Petitions. Not just from ALIPAC but from any Conservative or Lib Group. It can change e-mails you send and receive. Plus under Web Hate which is in the Senate S.3414 SITES LIKE ALIPAC can be banned. Free Speech cannot include Hate Speech which this Cyber Security bill makes sure your right to be against illegals is hate speech and can ban forums and webpages like ALIPAC if LA RAZA makes the claim YOU ARE A CYBER SECURITY THREAT BECAUSE OF YOUR FEELING ABOUT ILLEGAL ALIENS. Remember many news papers want to make illegal a hate word. This bill S.3414 can block you out of sites like ALIPAC because some groups who are for amnesty want to call us a hate webpage. Lets face it FOX NEWS AND LOU DOBBS are not exactly are friends anymore and the only way to get out the message against illegal immigration is through the world wide web.
Also remember this bill can have your ISP block out e-mails and web page views of ALIPAC.
This is why I stressed so much to get the message about S.3414 THE CISPA Cyber Security bill in the Senate. Now we find out Senator Schumer has included Gun Control in this bill.
Please call your Senators at 2022243121 and urge them to VOTE NO to S.3414 and remind them that sneaky Senator Schumer has included a Gun Control Provision in this Cyber Security Bill.
E-mail Congress as well: Congress.org
Let the Talk shows know about what Senator Schumer is going to include in this Cyber Security bill:
LET THE NRA KNOW AS WELL:
THANK YOU
Sneaky Dems Attempt Gun Control In CyberSecurity Bill
July 27, 2012 by Tim Brown
Sneaky Dems Attempt Gun Control In CyberSecurity Bill
http://freedomoutpost.com/wp-content...er-220x220.jpg
Democrat Senators have offered an amendment to the cybersecurity bill that would limit the purchase of high capacity gun magazines. May I ask what in the world high capacity gun magazines have to do with cybersecurity? I already know. They have nothing to do with it, but this is how our Congress works.
However, with this particular amendment, S.A.2575, was sponsored by Democrats Frank Lautenberg (N.J.), Barbara Boxer (Calif.), Jack Reed (R.I.), Bob Menendez (N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Schumer and Dianne Feinstein (Calif.). These liberal Senators are looking to make it illegal to transfer or posses large capacity devices that feed guns more than 10 rounds with the exception of .22 caliber rim fire ammunition. Apparently you can have a thousand round drum of those on your weapon and you’re ok.
The amendment is identical to a different bill that was sponsored by Frank Lautenberg.
In the first place, the stupid thing about the law is that it would only affect these devices that were sold or transferred after the law took effect. So people they are afraid of can still legally own these, just as long as they got them before the law was in effect. That makes absolutely no sense.
Chuck Shumer, the New York Democrat, and yes this is the same New York that gave the country the likes of Mayor Michael Bloomberg, was pushing for passage of this amendment.
“Maybe we could come together on guns if each side gave some,” Schumer said.
Mr. Schumer seems oblivious that the only people that have compromised are Republicans and frankly they need to stop compromising. That’s what gets us into this mess in the first place. The gun control laws on the books are the result of Democrats calling for more gun control and Republicans caving to that demand. The more we compromise, the further left we drift.
I think we can find common ground. Stop making new gun control laws Mr. Schumer. The government has tens of thousands of gun laws on the books now and they don’t stop all the things you claim they will stop.
“The basic complaint is that the Chuck Schumers of the world want to take away your guns,” Schumer said of the argument made by gun lobbies. “I think it would be smart for those of us who want rational gun control to make it know that that’s not true at all.”
It is true. Liberals like Chuck Schumer think that by disarming the population they can get a better handle on crime and control the people. What they fail to see is that the very people they are out to stop do not adhere to their laws, which is why they are called criminals. That’s C-R-I-M-I-N-A-L-S. As Rush says, “For those in Rio Linda” that means they are guilty of a crime, which means they violate the law. They disregard it. They oppose the law. The law simply defines who the criminals are and in this case, with this amendment, people, such as myself, who would seek to purchase a magazine for their Glock, or 1911 or AR-15 that would have more than 10 rounds, would become a criminal. See how that works?
“We can debate where to draw the line of reasonableness, but we might be able to come to an agreement in the middle,” Schumer said. “Maybe, maybe, maybe we can pass some laws that might, might, might stop some of the unnecessary casualties … maybe there’s a way we can come together and try to break through the log jam and make sure the country is a better place.”
OK, there are a lot of ‘maybes’ and ‘mights’ in Schumer’s statements here. “Mights” and “Maybes” are what the left always use to try and push their agenda. There is never a definitive “this will work and here’s how.”This kind of argument is emotional, not logical. The only way this will “make the country a better place” is for people like Charles Schumer to stay out of the gun marketplace and allow Americans the ability to purchase a weapon of choice for whatever they intend to use it for, whether it is hunting or sport shooting or self defense.
While Schumer also decried assault weapons and said that average Americans didn’t need such a weapon to go hunting or protect themselves, he is not to determine such things. Tell that to the victims of the tyrannical government under Bill Clinton and Janet Reno that brought bloodshed in both Waco, TX and Ruby Ridge for no real reason or threat. Americans should be able to purchase whatever weapons are on the market. Laws are in place to make sure that legal transactions are checked thoroughly. Those criminals that are intent on getting high capacity magazines are going to do it despite Schumer and the Democrats passing a million laws and the law-abiding citizens are the ones that will pay for their stupidity.
This bill is set to be voted on next week.
Here’s a montage of what Capitol Hill has to say about gun control. I think you’ll find Sen. Schumer’s call for limiting the Second Amendment in contradiction to his above claims.
Sneaky Dems Attempt Gun Control In CyberSecurity Bill : Freedom Outpost
