Thread: Hillary 2016: Old, Fat, Sick…still good enough for government work.

Obama PLANNED The Whole Benghazi Operation From The Start, INCLUDING Their LIE/Cover!!

Posted by Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer Admin II on April 30, 2014 at 7:25pm in Patriot Action Alerts
View Discussions




"It was all about a protest to an anti-Islam video that no one has seen or heard of til now..."

The Lie That Lands Them ALL In Gitmo?

Remember that for 2 weeks Obama and his administration ALL said it was

"innocent Muslims who were infuriated over a video and that it was a protest"?
Remember that even after that was proven FALSE they still fall back on that LIE hoping to get away with it? I remember that too.
Remember how MSM did their due diligence to uncover the truth?

ME NEITHER!

Well, after almost 2 years we're FINALLY getting the news we should have received BEFORE BHO was re-elected!!!

And it does not merely show that Obama and his entire Administration, past and present, LIED. But that Obama PLANNED the "so-called video protest" himself from the get-go!

BENGHAZI BOMBSHELL: EMAILS PROVE THE ‘VIDEO PROTEST’ DECEPTION WAS DIRECTLY ORDERED BY THE WHITE HOUSE



By: John Hayward

4/29/2014 01:27 PM
[Excerpt.]

All that spin from Obama apologists, gone in an instant. All those questions about the original of the false “video protest” narrative pushed by the White House to save Barack Obama’s re-election campaign, answered at a stroke. Yes, it was all a lie, and the White House knew it. They ordered it, for blatantly political purposes, and kept the proof secret until Judicial Watch finally managed to uncover some long-suppressed correspondence with a Freedom of Information Act request. Remember when our gigantic, well-funded mainstream media organizations used to conduct that kind of investigation, instead of just obediently passing along the President’s talking points?

None of these documents are exactly “shocking,” because they buttress exactly what critics of the Administration have been saying all along. It’s another great example of Obama’s strategy for political survival by “winning,” or at least enduring, one news cycle at a time. Bombshell revelations lose their explosive force over time. Emails that would have ended the 2012 presidential campaign are now a historical footnote. The Obama-friendly mainstream press is unlikely to bring the story they’ve been trying to bury for the past two years back to the front pages, just to inform their readers that all of spin they previously delivered was invalid. Critics of President Obama and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were 100 percent right all along… but as the latter so memorably put it, “what difference, at this point, does it make?”

Source- Human Events.

=========================



Patriots, we MUST keep hammering away with The Truth!

NEVER RELENT.
NEVER LET UP.
NEVER COMPROMISE.
NEVER QUIT.
NEVER.
We MUST get rid of ALL THESE LIBERAL, MARXIST, R.I.N.O.
VERMIN!!
===================
See Also-
Obama:"I'm good at KILLING People."

Economics Guide so Simple Even a"Porkulus Taxen Spendus"Can Understand.

Liberal Thwarts Murder With Words.
Nothing To See Here.
America's Founding Fathers on Sodomy.
The Tyranny of Depravity.
The American Stonehenge.
==================================

ACTION and Resources:




Click Here: Impeach

=============
[IMG]http://api.ning.com/files/eM6kNE1cbFzSC4cEZf99g6ZECKAXsliCvezB3qzlo4OPCz1t*x va7qPISsh7bwcX4nK0S-DP-U1ivc*zePzm3RxP5JIv6fJg/senatecroppedYS.gif?width=173[/IMG]

BE CONSERVATIVE.
WIN! PERIOD!
-

-Rev. Larry Wallenmeyer- P.A.N. Admin II.
"Disobedience to tyrants is Obedience to God." -Benjamin Franklin.

http://patriotaction.net/forum/topic...sg_share_topic

Published on April 30th, 2014 | by Allen West Republic

Jay Carney to America: (VIDEO) Obama Admin thinks you’re this stupid.

Published on Apr 30, 2014 by Rising Response



During the April 30, 2014 White House press briefing, ABC’s Jon Karl repeatedly presses White House Press Secretary Jay Carney over a newly released email from a White House senior aide discussing preparing then-UN Ambassador Susan Rice to blame the Benghazi attack on a YouTube video.

Tags: Benghazi, Benghazi emails, Benghazi White House emails, Jay Carney, Obama, President Obama, Susan Rice

http://allenwestrepublic.com/2014/04/30/jay-carney-to-america-video-obama-admin-thinks-youre-this-stupid/

Mark Levin discusses new Benghazi emails showing AP reporter colluding with State Dept. against Fox News reporting

Video at the Page Link:

Posted on Apr 30, 2014 at 8:09 PM in Politics | 1 Comment
By The Right Scoop

Tonight on his radio show, Mark Levin discussed a new Benghazi email that shows AP reporter Matt Lee emailing then State Dept. spokeswoman Victoria Nuland on September 13, 2012 for her comment on what they agreed was “bullshit” reporting on Fox News regarding the State Dept. having credible information 48 hours before the Benghazi attack.
Matt Lee suggested he had been watching Fox News on that night and agreed with Nuland that their reporting was “bullshit”, telling Nuland explicitly “but this is killing you guys.” He said the amount of mis-and-disinformation was “shocking”, even for an election year.
Nuland responded that they were on it, blasting out their counter to the story. She had already indicated that the DNI was “going on the record all over town” to bat the story down.
Lee responded, repeating his belief that the reporting on Fox News was “utter bullshit” and “really unbelievable”, once again calling it “shocking”.
In her last response, Nuland said “Mike Allen piece on drudge rebutting.” You can see that Politico article here.

See the emails below (click to enlarge):



http://therightscoop.com/mark-levin-...ews-reporting/

BREAKING: Benghazi emails show White House effort to protect Obama…

Posted by: Joshua Riddle April 29, 2014 41 Comments

Bombshell from Washington Free Beacon:

Previously unreleased internal Obama administration emails show that a coordinated effort was made in the days following the Benghazi terror attacks to portray the incident as “rooted in [an] Internet video, and not [in] a broader failure or policy.”
Emails sent by senior White House adviser Ben Rhodes to other top administration officials reveal an effort to insulate President Barack Obama from the attacks that killed four Americans.
Rhodes sent this email to top White House officials such as David Plouffe and Jay Carney just a day before National Security Adviser Susan Rice made her infamous Sunday news show appearances to discuss the attack.
The “goal,” according to these emails, was “to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure or policy.”
Rice came under fierce criticism following her appearances on television after she adhered to these talking points and blamed the attack on a little-watched Internet video.
The newly released internal White House e-mails show that Rice’s orders came from top Obama administration communications officials.

This is a huge deal. This is basically stealing the election. Obama couldn’t have won the election if he was held accountable for what happened in Benghazi. If he didn’t have Candy Crowley saving him in the debate, and if didn’t have a YouTube video as a scapegoat, it’s very easy to imagine 2012 going a different way.

“[W]e’ve made our views on this video crystal clear. The United States government had nothing to do with it,” Rhodes wrote in the email, which was released on Tuesday by the advocacy group Judicial Watch.
“We reject its message and its contents,” he wrote. “We find it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence. And we are working to make sure that people around the globe hear that message.”
Rhodes also suggested that Rice tout Obama’s reputation as “steady and statesmanlike.”
“I think that people have come to trust that President Obama provides leadership that is steady and statesmanlike,” he wrote. “There are always going to be challenges that emerge around the world, and time and again, he has shown that we can meet them.”
Also contained in the 41 pages of documents obtained by Judicial Watch is a Sep. 12, 2012 email from Payton Knopf, the former deputy spokesman at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations.
In this communication, Knopf informs Rice that senior officials had already dubbed the Benghazi attack as “complex” and planned in advance. Despite this information, Rice still insisted that attacks were “spontaneous.”
The newly released cache of emails also appear to confirm that the CIA altered its original talking points on the attacks in the following days.
Then-CIA Deputy Director Mike Morell is identified as the person who heavily edited the critical fact sheet.
“The first draft apparently seemed unsuitable … because they seemed to encourage the reader to infer incorrectly that the CIA had warned about a specific attack on our embassy,” states one email. “Morell noted that these points were not good and he had taken a heavy hand to editing them. He noted that he would be happy to work with [then deputy chief of staff to Hillary Clinton] Jake Sullivan and Rhodes to develop appropriate talking points.”
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said that the emails show the White House was most concerned with insulating Obama.
“Now we know the Obama White House’s chief concern about the Benghazi attack was making sure that President Obama looked good,” Fitton said in a statement. “And these documents undermine the Obama administration’s narrative that it thought the Benghazi attack had something to do with protests or an Internet video.”
“Given the explosive material in these documents, it is no surprise that we had to go to federal court to pry them loose from the Obama State Department,” Fitton said.

http://youngcons.com/breaking-bengha...protect-obama/

Breaking: White House Benghazi Cover-up

Posted by Joe For America on Apr 29, 2014 in Benghazi, Breaking Stories, Email, Politics



Bombshell from Washington Free Beacon:

Previously unreleased internal Obama administration emails show that a coordinated effort was made in the days following the Benghazi terror attacks to portray the incident as “rooted in [an] Internet video, and not [in] a broader failure or policy.”
Emails sent by senior White House adviser Ben Rhodes to other top administration officials reveal an effort to insulate President Barack Obama from the attacks that killed four Americans.
Rhodes sent this email to top White House officials such as David Plouffe and Jay Carney just a day before National Security Adviser Susan Rice made her infamous Sunday news show appearances to discuss the attack.
The “goal,” according to these emails, was “to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure or policy.”
Rice came under fierce criticism following her appearances on television after she adhered to these talking points and blamed the attack on a little-watched Internet video.
The newly released internal White House e-mails show that Rice’s orders came from top Obama administration communications officials.

This is a huge deal. This is basically stealing the election. Obama couldn’t have won the election if he was held accountable for what happened in Benghazi. If he didn’t have Candy Crowley saving him in the debate, and if didn’t have a YouTube video as a scapegoat, it’s very easy to imagine 2012 going a different way.

“[W]e’ve made our views on this video crystal clear. The United States government had nothing to do with it,” Rhodes wrote in the email, which was released on Tuesday by the advocacy group Judicial Watch.
“We reject its message and its contents,” he wrote. “We find it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence. And we are working to make sure that people around the globe hear that message.”
Rhodes also suggested that Rice tout Obama’s reputation as “steady and statesmanlike.”
“I think that people have come to trust that President Obama provides leadership that is steady and statesmanlike,” he wrote. “There are always going to be challenges that emerge around the world, and time and again, he has shown that we can meet them.”
Also contained in the 41 pages of documents obtained by Judicial Watch is a Sep. 12, 2012 email from Payton Knopf, the former deputy spokesman at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations.
In this communication, Knopf informs Rice that senior officials had already dubbed the Benghazi attack as “complex” and planned in advance. Despite this information, Rice still insisted that attacks were “spontaneous.”
The newly released cache of emails also appear to confirm that the CIA altered its original talking points on the attacks in the following days.
Then-CIA Deputy Director Mike Morell is identified as the person who heavily edited the critical fact sheet.

Continue reading…


Read more at http://joeforamerica.com/2014/04/bre...A5L0xCdm8SZ.99

TREASON: BREAKING News :Obama gave $500 MILLION For Weapons To Al-Qaeda Terrorist Used On Our Four Dead Americans In Benghazi.

Posted on 23 April, 2014 by AmyElizabeth



Benghazi attack could have been prevented if US hadn’t ‘switched sides in the War on Terror’ and allowed $500 MILLION of weapons to reach al-Qaeda militants, reveals damning report.
Citizens Committee on Benghazi claims the US government allowed arms to flow to al-Qaeda-linked militants who opposed Muammar Gaddafi
Their rise to power, the group says, led to the Benghazi attack in 2012
The group claims the strongman Gaddafi offered to abdicate his presidency, but the US refused to broker his peaceful exit
The commission, part of the center-right Accuracy In Media group, concluded that the Benghazi attack was a failed kidnapping plot
US Ambassador Chris Stevens was to be captured and traded for ‘blind sheikh’ Omar Abdel-Rahman, who hatched the 1993 WTC bombing plot

The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn’t been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier.
‘The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,’ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline.
She blamed the Obama administration for failing to stop half of a $1 billion United Arab Emirates arms shipment from reaching al-Qaeda-linked militants.
‘Remember, these weapons that came into Benghazi were permitted to enter by our armed forces who were blockading the approaches from air and sea,’ Lopez claimed. ‘They were permitted to come in. … [They] knew these weapons were coming in, and that was allowed..
‘The intelligence community was part of that, the Department of State was part of that, and certainly that means that the top leadership of the United States, our national security leadership, and potentially Congress – if they were briefed on this – also knew about this.’
The weapons were intended for Gaddafi but allowed by the U.S. to flow to his Islamist opposition.

The White House and senior Congressional members,’ the group wrote in an interim report released Tuesday, ‘deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler [Muammar Gaddafi] who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress al-Qaeda.’
‘Some look at it as treason,’ said Wayne Simmons, a former CIA officer who participated in the commission’s research.
Retired Rear Admiral Chuck Kubic, another commission member, told reporters Tuesday that those weapons are now ‘all in Syria.’
‘Gaddafi wasn’t a good guy, but he was being marginalized,’ Kubic recalled. ‘Gaddafi actually offered to abdicate’ shortly after the beginning of a 2011 rebellion.
‘But the U.S. ignored his calls for a truce,’ the commission wrote, ultimately backing the horse that would later help kill a U.S. ambassador.
Kubic said that the effort at truce talks fell apart when the White House declined to let the Pentagon pursue it seriously.
‘We had a leader who had won the Nobel Peace Prize,’ Kubic said, ‘but who was unwilling to give peace a chance for 72 hours.’
In March 2011, Kubic said, U.S. Army Africa Commander General Carter told NBC News that the U.S. military was not actively targeting Muammar Gaddafi. That, Kubic revealed, was a signal to the Libyan dictator that there was a chance for a deal.
Gaddafi responded by ‘verifiably … pull[ing] his forces back from key rebel-held cities such as Benghazi and Misrata.’

Gaddafi wanted only two conditions to step down: permission to keeo fighting al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), and the lifting of sactions against him, his family, and those loyal to him.
The Obama administration’s unwillingness to help broker a peaceful exit for the Libyan strongman, ‘led to extensive loss of life (including four Americans)’ when al-Qaeda-linked militants attacked U.S. diplomatic facilities in the city of Benghazi,’ the commission told reporters.
The White House and the National Security Staff did not immediately respond to questions about the group’s findings.
‘We don’t claim to have all the answers here,’ said Roger Aronoff, whose center-right group Accuracy in Media sponsored the group and its work.
‘We hope you will, please, pursue this,’ he told reporters. ‘Check it out. Challenge us.’


Video at the Page Link:

h/t daily mail


http://gopthedailydose.com/2014/04/2...s-in-benghazi/

Rush Limbaugh

So their next nominee would be a woman, and the same thing! "First female president! No criticism permitted. Any criticism that's offered is sexist and part of the War on Women." Then after the first woman serves, then the Democrats will nominate the first Hispanic and repeat the whole thing.



Democrats Prepare to Run Another
RUSH: My friends, I have another See, I Told You So. Three See, I Told You Sos in one day, all three big ones, all three major ones.
rushlimbaugh.com

Democrats Prepare to Run Another "First" for President to Shield Candidate from Criticism

September 30, 2014


Windows Media

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: My friends, I have another See, I Told You So. Three See, I Told You Sos in one day, all three big ones, all three major ones. I was the first... I think I was the first. There might have been somebody that came up with it before I did. Not sure. In explaining the value of Obama as "the first African-American president," I said it insulated him from any criticism. Remember the early days when so many people who vote for Obama thought doing so would show how non-racist the country finally had become?
And we were once again good people and that so many people had vote for Obama simply because he was African-American would demonstrate that this country is no longer a bunch of racist pigs. Instead what happened was that Obama's race was used as a giant insulation. He was immune to criticism. Any criticism of Obama as the president or his policies was immediately chalked up to racism, and therefore it was rejected -- and it was said to be illegitimate, unwise, unimportant because it was unserious.



It was all rooted in race, and this had one really practical impact. It shut up the Republican Party. The Republican Party just went mute. They didn't want to be called racist. They didn't want that out there during reelection campaigns. So they shut up. It worked. So no criticism of Obama was permitted because none of it was considered valid. It was all said to be rooted in racism. You know this as well as I do. Now, I do know that I was first in forecasting this, because during the salad days...
Remember, right after Obama had been elected but before he was inaugurated everybody was thinking that this was one of the most wonderful things that had ever happened, 'cause now the American people had finally proven they no longer were racist and we had shed the original sin of slavery. This one act had done all that, and here I came pouring cold water on everything, telling everybody, "If you think that, you couldn't be more wrong. It's going to be just the opposite.
"This country -- it's not gonna take very long -- is going to be said to be more racist than ever, because here we've got the first African-American president, and what's happening? People are criticizing him. And what does that mean? 'It proves that the country's still racist! They can't tolerate a black man as president. They criticize him left and right,'" and that's exactly what happened. It was then that I warned everybody that the Democrats maybe had planned this.
But if not, certainly had learned from it, so their next nominee would be a woman, and the same thing! "First female president! No criticism permitted. Any criticism that's offered is sexist and part of the War on Women." Then after the first woman serves, then the Democrats will nominate the first Hispanic and repeat the whole thing. "First Hispanic president! No criticism permitted. If you criticize, you're a bigot." From the Tea Party News Network: "Last week, Scottie Hughes made an appearance on Fox News' the O'[Baxter] Factor where she warned that the..." (laughing) Ahem.



Take two in three, two, one. "Last week, Scottie Hughes made an appearance on Fox News' the O’Reilly Factor where she warned that the progressive mafia, in preparation for Hillary 2016, are starting to establish a narrative that asserts women are under attack and that the sexism danger must confronted." Scottie is a commentator on Fox, by the way. Scottie Hughes a commentator, and Scottie Hughes out there saying sexism is gonna be the new black, and Hillary is the next protected victim.
Now, congratulations to Scottie Hughes. She's called it exactly right, and that's why I'm doing the piece. This is a See, I Told You So, because other people are now beginning to see what's in store. "The narrative inevitably continues with any legitimate critique of Hillary, when she inevitably runs, is not legitimate because it’s sexist-based. This game was played before or as Mrs. Hughes eloquently put it, 'This came right out of the election 2008 playbook.'"
So the Tea Party News Network is praising one of its own, but you have heard about this for the past two, maybe four years. This was easily spotted. And as I say, when they get around, if they do succeed nominating Hillary or electing her, then the next -- after her whatever number of years, eight, 16, 24, whatever. The next nominee will be Hispanic, and just repeat the same thing. This is how they're planning on doing it.
It's the Tea Party News Network is running the story warning everybody, but you, my friends, See, I Told You So, on the cutting edge.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: This is Vickie in Shawano, Wisconsin. Hello, and welcome to the program.
CALLER: Hey, hi, Rush. It is such a pleasure to talk to you, such an honor.
RUSH: Thank you.
CALLER: Just a quick comment. My husband and I used to live in Honolulu, and we would stay up in the early morning just to watch your TV show 'cause we love Koko the gorilla, and we loved when he did sign language.
RUSH: Was that not funny?
CALLER: Is he still in the West Maui mountains?

RUSH: I just couldn't contain myself laughing myself silly when we had Koko the gorilla on.
CALLER: It was great. We loved it. Thank you so much for the laughs.
RUSH: Thank you. Koko is now running RushLimbaugh.com, by the way.
CALLER: Oh, great, great! You took him out of the forest preserve to give him a real job. Thank you.
RUSH: (laughing) That's true.
CALLER: But my question and comment, you were talking earlier about the Democrats wanting to run someone who was gonna be the first woman president, and later on the first Hispanic. Well, what I think the Republicans should do in 2016 is to run Susana Martinez. Contrast to Hillary, it would be a contrast in character, competency, and charisma. And you need to win Ohio, so you run Rob Portman as her vice president. It would be a winning thing. I mean, that would squash the Democrats.



RUSH: Well, you know what would happen. I appreciate your thinking on this, and I know why you're thinking it. Let me tell you what would happen. Let's say it's Julian Castro who the Democrats nominate. Ah, let's stick with Hillary. Let's just stick with her. Hillary is gonna be the Democrat nominee in 2016 and they got this grandiose plan that she's gonna be elected and therefore the first female president can't be criticized. Republicans decide, okay, we'll fight fire with fire. Here's Susana Martinez, governor of New Mexico. We'll put her up there. She's not only Hispanic. She's female as well.
What the media would say is she's not legitimate Hispanic just like Clarence Thomas is not a legitimate African-American. She's not legitimate Hispanic and they would question how she could possibly be a real woman being in a Republican Party since they're conducting a War on Women, and they would attack her, they would attack her as unreal and illegitimate and not down for the struggle for women and traitorous and all that. That's how they would do it. I'm not saying they would succeed, but that's what their reaction -- it would not quiet the critics, is my point.
CALLER: But she's a tough cookie. I think she's got more you-know-what than a lot of the men.
RUSH: I know she is. My point is, it doesn't matter who she is or what she is. If she's a Republican female Hispanic, she's the enemy. They're not gonna reward her toughness. They're gonna say it's phony. They're gonna call her a traitor. They're gonna do everything they can to discredit her with the people they're trying to convince to vote for Hillary, because she's the real woman, if you can believe that.
END TRANSCRIPT

Related Links

• Tea Party News Network: Scottie Hughes is Right: Sexism is the New Black and Hillary is the Protected “Victim”
• RushLimbaugh.com: Susana Martinez Defends Success - 08.30.12

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/20...from_criticism

http://www.alipac.us/f19/hillary-cli...k-race-311820/

http://www.alipac.us/f19/black-genoc...vement-311611/

http://www.alipac.us/f19/hillary-cli...sanger-311610/