Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Mexifornia
    Posts
    9,455

    Immigration not dominate issue in Texas primary

    According to MSM, illegal immigration is a dead issue in Texas Primary even though 96% were for the state enforcing immigration law!!!! 1,267,411 voted for it and only 48,113 were against.



    WASHINGTON With the nation's second largest population of illegal immigrants behind California, and 1,200-mile long border with Mexico, Texas seemed tailor-made for a bruising confrontation on immigration in advance of the state's March 4 presidential primaries.

    But after more than 40 earlier primaries and caucuses, the issue that once threatened to roil the 2008 presidential race has seemingly lost much of its intensity. The three candidates now dominating the race share similar ideas on how to fix the nation's tattered immigration system.

    As colleagues in the Senate, Democrats Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama and Republican John McCain supported bipartisan efforts to legalize millions of illegal immigrants, the most controversial ingredient in failed immigration legislation.

    Their past record on immigration, coupled with their campaign pledges, point to a continuation of President Bush's efforts to overhaul the nation's immigration laws, regardless of which candidate ultimately wins.

    At a debate Thursday at the University of Texas, Clinton and Obama both recommitted themselves to comprehensive legislation that would put illegal immigrants on a path to U.S. citizenship after they paid fines and back taxes and learn English. Clinton promised to introduce a legalization measure in her first 100 days as president.

    McCain, who is closing in on the Republican nomination, worked with Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., to push legalization proposals in broad-ranging legislation that served as the basis for major Senate bills over the past two years.

    After his alliance with Kennedy chased away support among Republican conservatives, McCain has since retooled his immigration policies to put first priority on toughening border security before dealing with legalization and other elements of an immigration bill.

    But he has acknowledged continued support for legalization and an immigrant guest worker program. At a Jan. 6 debate in New Hampshire, when asked if he still has a plan for a path to citizenship, McCain responded: "Sure. But the fact is that the American people have lost trust and confidence in government, and we have to secure the borders first."

    One of McCain's remaining challengers, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, is pushing what pro-immigration groups consider a get-tough policy that would require illegal immigrants to leave the country before being eligible to apply for permanent residency. Those who failed to leave would be barred from returning to the United States for 10 years.

    The other Republican still in the race, Texas Congressman Ron Paul of Surfside, also takes a hard-line against what he calls amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants, saying "that's a lot of people to reward for breaking our laws."

    In Texas, the most volatile issue related to immigration is the Bush administration's construction of a border fence that is widely opposed by land owners and border-area political leaders.

    Although all three senators voted for the fence, Clinton and Obama, the only two Democrats still in the race, have largely sided with fence opponents. While some fencing may be necessary, they say, the Democratic candidates contend that added personal and high-tech hardware is the preferable solution to protecting the border.

    "This is an area where Senator Clinton and I almost entirely agree," Obama said during the UT debate.

    Similarly, McCain has advocated physical barriers around urban areas, but says vehicle barriers and high-tech gadgetry – such as unmanned drones and sensors – would be more effective in isolated desert areas.

    At the outset of the presidential race, immigration emerged as a hot-button issue among Republicans, fueled by deep political divisions that were evident in Bush's unsuccessful efforts to get an immigration bill through Congress.

    But the issue was later eclipsed by voter concerns over the economy and health care. Republican candidates pushing restrictive policies – Tom Tancredo, Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani and Fred Thompson – all dropped from the race.

    "Immigration is a dud issue," Houston-area Republican pollster David Hill wrote in an op-ed article. "Immigration baiters like Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani went to the showers early. Someone should ask: if the immigration issue is such a 'killer' issue, why are its staunchest advocates such losers."

    Rep. Charles Gonzalez, D-Texas, an Obama supporter, calls immigration an "issue of interest" among Texas Hispanics but adds, "it's not a controlling issue." In Edinburg in deep South Texas, residents are upset over the border fence but, overall, don't regard immigration as a pressing issue, says Jerry Polinard, a professor at the University of Texas-Pan American.

    "When you start talking about what the major issues are," he says, it's the economy, health care and education. Immigration is way down the ladder."

    Pro-immigration groups are heartened by the softening tone over immigration while groups pressing for limits on immigration are braced for another administration that will likely continue Bush's efforts.

    "It's has been a good election season for us," said Frank Sharry, director of America's Voice and a leader in the coalition that pushed comprehensive immigration legislation in Congress. "Most pundits thought that immigration was an issue that worked for hard-line Republicans and hurt pro-immigration Democrats.

    "And, in fact, just the opposite seems to be true," he said. "It's been an issue that Democrats are aggressively using to court Latino and immigrant voters. I think that's a big story."

    Jack Martin, a spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, which wants to restrict immigration, said that any of the three dominant candidates who enters the White House "is likely to be sympathetic to the argument s in favor of an amnesty."

    "It looks like, regardless of who wins the election, we are going to have to continue to count on the Congress to avoid the unwise policies that are being pushed by business, ethnic advocacy organizations and elites," he said.

    http://www.ocregister.com/news/immig...99-border-race
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member miguelina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    9,253
    Woe to the candidate who ignores the 96% who voted to ENFORCE the laws. The news media is no longer believable to the majority of Americans.

    The American people will prevail. Never doubt that.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
    "

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central Texas
    Posts
    233
    The news media here in central Texas did not cover this at all. I found out about it on this site and sorry it is not a 'dead' issue. It is just the MSM chooses to bury it just like the bus accident in MN. Texas is on a fast track to caous if they don't do something about the IA's.
    "We are being destroyed from within"

  4. #4
    Senior Member Bowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    North Mexico aka Aztlan
    Posts
    7,055
    The Orange County Register like all big newspapers, is owned and run by a rich white guy, Scott Flanders. He calls his company Freedom Communications. You can send him your thoughts here: info@link.freedom.com
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Senior Member joazinha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,576
    The news media is FOR the ILLEGALS, and THAT'S why THIS story WASN'T covered like it SHOULD have been!

  6. #6
    Senior Member bigtex's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    3,362
    These three items were on the Republican Texas Primary ballot and all three overwhelming passed.

    Immigration
    Federal, state, and local officials should be required to enforce U.S. immigration laws in order to secure our borders.
    Photo ID
    The Texas legislature should make it a priority to protect the integrity of our election process by enacting legislation that requires voters to provide valid photo identification in order to cast a ballot in any and all elections conducted in the State of Texas.
    Controlling Government
    Every governmental body in Texas should be required to limit any annual increase in its budget and spending to the combined increase of population and inflation unless it first gets voter approval to exceed the allowed annual growth or in the case of an official state of emergency.
    Certified Member
    The Sons of the Republic of Texas

  7. #7
    Senior Member miguelina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    9,253
    I heard Ron Paul was reelected by over 70% too. Guess not all latinos voted against him, hmm?
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
    "

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •