Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Oak Island, North Mexolina
    Posts
    6,231

    The Law Against Hiring or Harboring Illegal Aliens

    The Law Against Hiring or Harboring Illegal Aliens


    The following is an overview of federal law on hiring and harboring illegal aliens. It is not a substitute for professional legal counsel in specific situations.

    Summary
    A person (including a group of persons, business, organization or local government) commits a federal felony when he:

    assists an alien whom he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him to obtain employment,
    encourages that alien to remain in the U.S., by referring him to an employer, by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or
    knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions.
    Penalties upon conviction include criminal fines, imprisonment, and forfeiture of vehicles and real property used to commit the crime.

    Anyone employing or contracting with an illegal alien without verifying his work authorization status is guilty of a misdemeanor. Aliens and employers violating immigration laws are subject to arrest, detention, and seizure of their vehicles or property. In addition, individuals or entities who engage in racketeering enterprises that commit (or conspire to commit) immigration-related felonies are subject to private civil suits for treble damages and injunctive relief.

    Recruitment and Employment of Illegal Aliens
    It is unlawful to hire an alien, to recruit an alien, or to refer an alien for a fee, knowing the alien is unauthorized to work in the United States.1 It is equally unlawful to continue to employ an alien knowing that the alien is unauthorized to work.2 Employers may give preference in recruitment and hiring to a U.S. citizen over an alien with work authorization only where the U.S. citizen is equally or better qualified.3

    It is unlawful to hire an individual for employment in the United States without complying with employment eligibility verification requirements.4 Requirements include examination of identity documents and completion of Form I-9 for every employee hired. Employers must retain all I-9s, and, with 3 days advance notice, they must be made available for inspection.

    Employment includes any service or labor performed for any type of remuneration within the United States, with the exception of sporadic domestic service by an individual in a private home.5 Day laborers or other casual workers engaged in any compensated activity (with the above exception) are employees for purposes of immigration law.6

    An employer includes an agent or anyone acting directly or indirectly in the interest of the employer. For purposes of verification of authorization to work, employer also means an independent contractor, or a contractor other than the person using the alien labor.7 The use of temporary or short-term contracts cannot be used to circumvent the employment authorization verification requirements.8

    If employment is to be for less than the usual three days allowed for completing the I-9 Form requirement, the form must be completed immediately at the time of hire.9

    An employer has constructive knowledge that an employee is an illegal unauthorized worker if a reasonable person would infer it from the facts.10 Constructive knowledge constituting a violation of federal law has been found where (1) the I-9 employment eligibility form has not been properly completed, including supporting documentation, (2) the employer has learned from other individuals, media reports, or any source of information available to the employer, that the alien is unauthorized to work, or (3) the employer acts with reckless disregard for the legal consequences of permitting a third party to provide or introduce an illegal alien into the employer’s work force.11 Knowledge cannot be inferred solely on the basis of an individual’s accent or foreign appearance. Actual specific knowledge is not required. For example, a newspaper article stating that ballrooms depend on an illegal alien workforce of dance hostesses was held by the courts to be a reasonable ground for suspicion that unlawful conduct had occurred.12

    It is illegal for non-profit and religious organizations to knowingly assist an employer to violate employment sanctions, regardless of claims that their convictions require them to assist aliens.13 Harboring or aiding illegal aliens is not protected by the First Amendment.14

    It is a felony to establish a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading any provision of federal immigration law. Violators may be fined or imprisoned for up to 5 years.15

    Encouraging and Harboring Illegal Aliens
    It is a violation of law for any person to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection in any place, including any building or means of transportation, any alien who is in the United States in violation of law.16 Harboring means any conduct that tends to substantially facilitate an alien to remain in the U.S. illegally.17 The sheltering need not be clandestine, and harboring covers aliens arrested outdoors, as well as in a building. This provision includes harboring an alien who entered the U.S. legally, but has since lost his legal status.

    An employer can be convicted of the felony of harboring illegal aliens who are his employees if he takes actions in reckless disregard of their illegal status, such as ordering them to obtain false documents, altering records, obstructing INS inspections, or taking other actions that facilitate the alien’s illegal employment.18 Any person who within any 12-month period hires ten or more individuals with actual knowledge that they illegal aliens or unauthorized workers is guilty of felony harboring. 19

    It is also a felony to encourage or induce an alien to come to or reside in the U.S. knowing or recklessly disregarding the fact that the alien’s entry or residence is in violation of the law.20 This crime applies to any person, rather than just employers of illegal aliens. Courts have ruled that “encouraging� includes counseling illegal aliens to continue working in the U.S. or assisting them to complete applications with false statements or obvious “errors�.21 The fact that the alien is a refugee fleeing persecution is not a defense to this felony, since U.S. law and the UN Protocol on Refugees both require that a refugee must report to immigration authorities “without delay� upon entry to the U.S.

    The penalty for felony harboring is a fine and imprisonment for up to five years. The penalty for felony alien smuggling is a fine and up to ten years imprisonment. Where the crime causes serious bodily injury or places the life of any person in jeopardy, the penalty is a fine and up to 20 years imprisonment. If the criminal smuggling or harboring results in the death “of any person,� the penalty can include life imprisonment. Convictions for aiding, abetting, or conspiracy to commit alien smuggling or harboring, carry the same penalties. 22 Courts can impose consecutive prison sentences for each alien smuggled or harbored.23 A court may order a convicted smuggler to pay restitution if the alien smuggled qualifies as a “victim� under the Victim and Witness Protection Act.24

    Conspiracy to commit the crimes of sheltering, harboring, or employing illegal aliens is a separate federal offense punishable by a fine of up to $10,000 or five years imprisonment.25

    Enforcement
    A person or entity having knowledge of a violation or potential violation of employer sanctions provisions may submit a signed written complaint to the INS office with jurisdiction over the business or residence of the potential violator, whether an employer, employee, or agent. The complaint must include the names and addresses of both the complainant and the violator, and detailed factual allegations, including date, time and place of the potential violation, and the specific conduct alleged to be a violation of employer sanctions. By regulation, the INS will only investigate third party complaints that have “a reasonable probability of validity.�26

    Designated INS officers and employees, and all other officers whose duty it is to enforce criminal laws, may make an arrest for violation of smuggling or harboring illegal aliens.27

    State and local law enforcement officials have the general power to investigate and arrest violators of federal immigration statutes without prior INS knowledge or approval, as long as they are authorized to do so by state law. There is “no extant federal limitation� on this authority. The 1996 immigration control legislation passed by Congress was intended to encourage states and local agencies to participate in the process of enforcing federal immigration laws.28

    Immigration officers and local law enforcement officers may detain an individual for a brief warrantless interrogation where circumstances create a reasonable suspicion that the individual is illegally present in the U.S. Specific facts constituting a reasonable suspicion include evasive, nervous or erratic behavior, dress or speech indicating foreign citizenship, and presence in an area known to contain a concentration of illegal aliens. Hispanic appearance alone is not sufficient.29 Immigration officers and police must have a valid warrant or valid employer’s consent to enter work places or residences.30

    Any vehicle used to transport or harbor illegal aliens, or as a substantial part of an activity that encourages illegal aliens to come to or reside in the U.S. may be seized by an immigration officer and is subject to forfeiture. The forfeiture power covers any conveyances used within the U.S.31

    Private persons and entities may initiate civil suits to obtain injunctions and treble damages against enterprises that conspire or actually violate federal alien smuggling, harboring, or document fraud statutes under the Racketeer-Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).32 The “pattern of racketeering� activity is defined as commission of two or more of the listed crimes. A RICO “enterprise� can be any individual legal entity, or a group of individuals who are not a legal entity but are associated in fact, and can include non-profit associations.

    Employers who aid or abet the preparation of false tax returns by failing to pay income or social security taxes for illegal alien employees, or who knowingly make payments using false names or social security numbers, are subject to IRS criminal and civil sanctions.33

    U.S. nationals who have suffered intentional discrimination because of citizenship or national origin by an employer with more than 3 employees may file a complaint within 180 days of the discriminatory act with the Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices, U.S. Department of Justice.34

    In addition to the federal statutes summarized above, state laws and local ordinances controlling fair labor practices, workers compensation, zoning, safe housing and rental property, nuisance, licensing, street vending, and solicitations by contractors may also apply to activities that involve illegal aliens.

    INA 274A(a)(1)(A).
    INA 274A (a)(2).
    INA 274B(a)(4).
    INA 274A(a)(1)(B)(i).
    46 USC 8704, 8 CFR 274a.1(f), (h).
    Jenkins v. INS, 108 F.3d 195, (9th Cir.1997).
    8 CFR 274a.1(g).
    52 Fed. Reg. 16219 (May 1, 1987).
    8 CFR 274a.2(b)(1)(iii).
    8 CFR 274a.1(l).
    8 CFR 274a.1(l)(1).
    Seven Star Inc. v. U.S., 933 F. 2d 791 (9th Cir., 1991).
    AFSC v. Thornburgh 961 F.2d 1405 (9th Cir. 1992), Intercommunity Center for Peace and Justice v. INS, 910 F.2d 42 (2nd Cir. 1990).
    U.S. v. Merkt 794 F.2d 950 (5th Cir. 1986), cert. denied 480 US 946.
    INA 275(d).
    INA 274(a)(1)(A)(iii).
    U.S. v. Lopez, 521 F.2d 437 (2nd Cir 1975), cert. denied 423 US 995.
    U.S. v. Kim, F.3d ---, 1999 WL 803256 (2nd Cir. Oct. 8, 1999).
    INA 274(a)(3).
    INA 274(a)(1)(A)(iv).
    U.S. v. Oloyede, 982 F.2d 133 (4th Cir. 1992).
    274(a)(1)(B).
    Vega-Murillo v. U.S., 247 F.2d 735 (9th Cir. 1957), cert. denied 357 U.S. 910.
    U.S. v. Sanga, 967 F.2d 1332 (9th Cir. 1992).
    18 USCS 371.
    8 CFR 274a.9(b).
    INA 274(c).
    U.S. v. Ontoniel Vasquez-Alvarez, 176 F.3d 1294 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, SC 99-5643 (Oct. 4, 1999).
    U.S. v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873, 884-887 (1975).
    63 ALR Fed.180.
    INA 274(a), (b)(1).
    18 USC 1961-1968.
    26 USCS 7206.
    INA 274B(d).
    Updated 12/99
    http://www.fairus.org/ImmigrationIssueC ... =1195&c=13


    It is time for us to press our state representatives to pass a state version of the federal law on hiring and harboring illegal aliens.
    Lets face it to get a federal law enforced you have to get a federal enforcement officer to get involved......good luck. Now if you have a state law it makes thing a lot easier to enforce. If for example you are building a house or office building. There will be county/city building inspectors on the location numerous times. Think about how often that happens every day and how many illegals they see on these sites. But they have no power or local/state law/ordinance to use. But if you did have a state law the inspector could contact county/city enforcement and the company owner/foreman could be charged. It would not take many months before those hiring the illegals would get tired of the big fines or being totted off the site to the magistrates office.
    This would no only cover construction sites but meat plants and farms any where you have inspectors. I believe, looking at the federal version that it could cover those who rent to illegals.
    Chop off the head the body dies. No jobs= less illegals coming into the area. Having you name or comany name show up in the Police Blotter section of the local paper is not real good for business.
    I feel we do have more control how our state representatives vote and can move fast than those on a federal level.
    Just my 2 cent worth.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,032
    Wouldn't renting come under the general tems of harboring or sheltering?

    In the latino community word gets around pretty fast and if we could underline our unwelcome sign with some arrests and fines, etc. then the flow would at least slow down.

    RR
    The men who try to do something and fail are infinitely better than those who try to do nothing and succeed. " - Lloyd Jones

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Oak Island, North Mexolina
    Posts
    6,231
    Quote Originally Posted by RoadRunner
    Wouldn't renting come under the general tems of harboring or sheltering?

    In the latino community word gets around pretty fast and if we could underline our unwelcome sign with some arrests and fines, etc. then the flow would at least slow down.

    RR

    That is what I was thinking also.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    12,855
    Hope you don't mind if I bring this up again but it's eating at me.....

    Remember the huge fire in NYC where the 5 Firefighters were forced to jump out of the 6th floor and 2 died while the other 3 are permanently injured?

    That jump was caused by ILLEGAL WALLS BUILT in a building housing many more "families & people" than allowed by law. Many of the people, I'm certain, were ILLEGAL.

    Not a word has been said about the investigation concerning these illegal walls and who built them.

    My question is confusing but Can't the city be held responsible for either not making an effort to find ILLEGALS or possibly for the building inspectors no having done their jobs........knowing that this happens all the time. How about the City Health Dept. not taking care of business. Surely with all the kids going to school they KNOW where they live.

    I hope you can understand my babbling. These firefighters died and had their lives drastically impacted because of one simple thing........
    THE CITY GOVERNMENT ALLOWS ILLEGALS TO WALK & LIVE FREELY IN THE CITY WITHOUT RETRIBUTION.

    {thanx for listening}
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Oak Island, North Mexolina
    Posts
    6,231
    If the person(s) who built the wall did not get a permit then the building department would not know of the walls hence would not have had no call to enter the building for inspection .
    On the other hand if there was a permit and inspection had been conducted and no action taken then yes they are prpbable liable for wrong doing.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    30
    You know sometimes I do not see what all the fuss is about.

    I have a business that employs 23 individuals. Yeah, I know that 4 may be illegal. So what, they do the work I hired them for and they do it well.

    Besides, if I had people such as yourselves start meddling in my business, or the way I do business.. and report me.. I would close up shop and move my business outside of the USA.

    19 families would lose health and dental benefits as well and a job that pays better then the average pay scale.

    Actually with all the anti-immigration springing up, I am considering doing this anyway, as I am considering expanding and hiring more personnel.

    The US government is under contract anyhow with my company and will have to purchase my software, regardless...

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Oak Island, North Mexolina
    Posts
    6,231
    well, gee you know where they say don't let the door hit you.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,032
    I second the motion...don't look back...

    RR
    The men who try to do something and fail are infinitely better than those who try to do nothing and succeed. " - Lloyd Jones

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    30
    yeah, maybe.. just those 19 families are U.S. born citizens. Would you like to tell them they are now unemployed and have to collect Unemployment Insurance or Welfare?? Then I guess they can join the Minuteman Project too..

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,032
    No, we'll leave that for you...compassionate patriotic that you are.

    RR
    The men who try to do something and fail are infinitely better than those who try to do nothing and succeed. " - Lloyd Jones

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •