Thread: Mass deportation can be done

What did Hoover, Truman, and Eisenhower have in common?
Here is something that should be of great interest for you to pass around.
I didn't know of this until it was pointed out to me.


Back during The Great Depression, President Herbert Hoover ordered the
deportation of ALL illegal aliens in order to make jobs available to American
citizens that desperately needed work...


Harry Truman deported over two million Illegal's after WWII to create jobs
for returning veterans.


And then again in 1954, President Dwight Eisenhower deported 1 . 3 million
Mexican Nationals! The program was called 'Operation Wetback'. It was
done so WWII and Korean Veterans would have a better chance at jobs.
It took 2 Years, but they deported them!


Now...if they could deport the illegal's back then - they could sure do it today?

Just imagine 11 million deported by Trump being added to this list!!

-Stop the invasion with mass deportation!

Absolutely it can be done. State and local law enforcement alone can deport 20 million illegal aliens in less than a year. They can deport 11 million illegal aliens in 6 months. That's why the federal government sued the state of Arizona on AZ SB 1070 to prevent the deportation of illegal aliens because DHS has absolutely no intention of deporting illegal aliens to create jobs for Americans. DHS is owned lock, stock and barrel by the funders of illegal immigration.

Illegal immigration is a tool to give power to foreign interests, primarily foreign drug cartels and criminal enterprises and every politician and government official that is part of this travesty through their support of illegal immigration or refusal to take action to stop it is on the take with these cartels and criminal enterprises. There is just no absolutely no other explanation for what they're doing.

Great post, Goldendaze. Great information for the people to know. Most of us know about Eisenhower's deportations, but I sure didn't know about Hoover's and Truman's. Thank you!

You might go back and find the link or state the source. People will ask for it.

Also beware, Factcheck.org, is already challenging the email.

A writer's opinion - informative but should have made mention that it is unfair to select muslims only, asians only, africans only - the trend has been to ignore and refuse European bloodlines which is a mistake. Would like to see people with money allowed to emigrate here too instead of pushing the "global poor" to come here for lifelong welfare or take a job an American citizen should have. Same for the IT & STEM workers - build your country and get a job there.

Our citizens' families probably served in wars and are more deserved of jobs than those that RAN from their countries' problems. Some countries like Ecuador, you have to have a certain amount of income aside from anything you might earn there to receive residency.

History Repeats Itself: What Trump and others can learn from the 1924 Immigration Act

December 9, 2015 By Ashley Hall 21 Comments
The evolution of terrorism and spread of the Islamic state is forcing the United States to reexamine our immigration practices. Donald Trump called for a ban on Muslim immigration while others consider less draconian approaches.

This is not the first time our nation has reevaluated immigration intake in response to international factors. The 1924 Immigration Act was the first bill to meaningfully limit immigration in our nation’s history. Two factors—both foreign and domestic—coalesced for Congress to pass this Act.

First, the country was experiencing unprecedented waves of immigration following WWI, doubling previous annual immigration admissions. Labor organizations worried that they would lose the important wage gains and improved labor conditions they had achieved as a result of increased competition.

Second, the Communist Revolution successfully (and violently) gained control of the Soviet Union and communism was spreading to other European countries. The American public feared the spread of communism at home and the government needed to act to prevent a revolution on U.S. soil.

Influenced by both of these issues, Congress passed the 1924 Immigration Act, which restricted immigration from nearly 900,000 immigrants a year to closer to 300,000. This level allowed immigrants to more quickly assimilate American values, including both commitment to democracy and equitable work place wages/standards.

However the 1924 Immigration Act was not entirely positive. It set a quota system that heavily favored certain European countries and discriminated against immigrants based on national origin—completely barring admissions from Asian countries.

The combination of today’s labor issues and national security threats are similar to what our nation faced almost a century ago. The United States admits over a million legal immigrants every year, though the middle class has not seen income growth for almost two decades. Now ISIS is spreading through Europe and has threatened to infiltrate the United States.

We can look to the 1924 Immigration Act as model for both what to emulate and avoid. History reflects that reducing the numbers was positive for both jobs and diminishing the spread of radicalism at home. As we look at the purpose of our immigration system and how it affects both labor market dynamics and national security, reducing admissions makes sense. What we need to consider is how to fairly set criteria for admissions and limits. In doing so, we should be careful not to repeat the same mistakes of discriminating against individuals based solely on their country of origin or religion.

http://immigrationreform.com/2015/12...n=Top512112015

I believe when the religious doctrine is a threat, then the foreign immigrants that follow this religious doctrine should be banned until there is a vetting process that can distinguish who follows it, who believes it and who is a threat. Muslims can solve this problem, they should solve this problem, they should renounce the Shariah Law and Jihadist portions of their doctrine. Instead, they are the highest laws of their lands.

And there is no ethnic discrimination in Trump's plan. It crosses all nationalities, races and ethnicities. It applies to Africans the same as it applies to Indonesians, the same as it applies to Syrians. So it's not racist at all. It's about security and the risk Muslims pose because of a doctrine they subscribe to. It's an easy problem for them to solve.

Judy wrote (excerpt):

Absolutely it can be done. State and local law enforcement alone can deport 20 million illegal aliens in less than a year. They can deport 11 million illegal aliens in 6 months.

Your timeline is extremely unrealistic. The reality of the situation is, those 20-30 million illegals didn't just appear here in a years time and they aren't going to vanish in a year or less. Honestly, I wish it could be so, but to even suggest such is just not reality based. Even the remote possibility of such a thing happening would require the United States to turn into a worse police state than Hitler's Germany. That is something the American people, courts, and U.S. Congress just won't stand for. Removing the bulk of illegal aliens in this country will require a process and that process is not going to happen in less than a year. IMO, it'll take the next President of the United States, assuming he does absolutely everything in this power, at least one or maybe even two terms to reverse the damage that has taken decades to permeate this country.

Originally Posted by MW

Judy wrote (excerpt):



Your timeline is extremely unrealistic. The reality of the situation is, those 20-30 million illegals didn't just appear here in a years time and they aren't going to vanish in a year or less. Honestly, I wish it could be so, but to even suggest such is just not reality based. Even the remote possibility of such a thing happening would require the United States to turn into a worse police state than Hitler's Germany. That is something the American people, courts, and U.S. Congress just won't stand for. Removing the bulk of illegal aliens in this country will require a process and that process is not going to happen in less than a year. IMO, it'll take the next President of the United States, assuming he does absolutely everything in this power, at least one or maybe even two terms to reverse the damage that has taken decades to permeate this country.

Well, MW. You are wrong about that. Very wrong. I've already illustrated mathematically numerous times on this forum how easy it is to deport all 20 million illegal aliens in less than a year. But I'll explain it again.

There are over 800,000 state and local sworn, trained, equipped police officers in the United States. According to FBI Arrests per State and Local Police Officer Averages Per Month, they arrest 1.5 criminals a month per officer. If they each on average arrest 2 illegal aliens per month, then they have arrested 1.6 million illegal aliens per month for 12 months plus 1 extra illegal alien in 1 of those months for 3 illegal aliens in 1 month per officer, and that amounts to 20 million illegal aliens.

2 x 800,000 = 1,600,000 x 12 = 19,200,000 + 800,000 = 20,000,000.

Does anyone doubt for a second that Donald Trump won't see that the 20 million illegal aliens arrested by State and Local Law Enforcement aren't deported within hours or days, if not immediately? No doubt at all.

There is no reason or basis whatsoever to question or doubt that this can be done, done right, and done completely in less than a year. We also know that within weeks or a few months of deportation enforcement, many illegal aliens will self-deport and run away back to their home countries, which is why I say it will take less than a year.

I don't know everything about everything, but this is one thing I'm fairly certain of.

Originally Posted by MW

I don't know everything about everything, but this is one thing I'm fairly certain of.

What are you fairly certain of?

It should be done before they get a further foothold in US society. The operations that you cited happened when the illegal population was mainly involved in migrant crop harvesting. But, then the farmworker advocates helped them adjust to a steadier life in the states, and obviously they have diversified into a number of occupations. This tends to give them credence. I was just out in our county's "colonia" today, in fact where I grew up and basically they have put roots down everywhere and now demand things from the county government that people didn't get before. The nativist groups should be countering this on all fronts including legal action--because if you just work in the political spectrum they will sneak by, by other means. Too many Democrat politicians are lawyers these days that they naturally start figuring out loopholes for their cherished migrant populations to stay and get government benefits at the same time. And then when you have a big university nearby you will get full time professional advocates making things that much more complicated. It's a sick system that tends to perpetuate itself.