Results 1 to 3 of 3
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: Obama, Our Modern John C. Calhoun

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012

    Obama, Our Modern John C. Calhoun

    Obama, Our Modern John C. Calhoun

    by J. Christian Adams
    November 20th, 2014

    One of the ideas that plunged America into the bloody Civil War was the belief that federal laws could be nullified by those who disagree with them. Senator John C. Calhoun of South Carolina was a chief proponent of the doctrine that Southern states could nullify federal laws if states disagreed with them. In announcing a lawless amnesty edict tonight, President Obama is our modern John C. Calhoun.

    Elementary school civics class has taught the same thing for two hundred years: Congress makes the laws, the president enforces the laws, the judiciary interprets the laws. The reason this is so is because individual liberty thrives when government is hobbled by division of power. People live better lives when federal power is stymied.

    When President Obama announces that he will be suspending laws to bless the illegal presence of millions of foreigners in the United States, he will have adopted the most basic philosophy of John C. Calhoun: some laws can be tossed aside because his ends justify the lawlessness.


    John C. Calhoun

    Make no mistake about why Obama wants millions of foreigners to remain in the United States. He told us exactly why in 2008: he aims to “fundamentally transform” America.

    One way to transform America is to import populations with cultural and legal traditions foreign to American traditions. Central and South America has a cultural tradition of instability in government, of graft, corruption, and civil strife. People from those countries bring an expectation that the systems are rigged against them, because oftentimes they are.

    Obama wants to transform America by transforming who Americans are. Even if these millions are not granted the right to vote (immediately), their children, yet unborn, will be granted it by virtue of being natural-born citizens. Obama is playing the long game.

    Obama learned the history of the 20th Century: when radical statists take power quickly, openly, and brazenly, Americans will stand in the breach. Whether on the blazing beaches of Saipan, in the Ardennes snow, or in dark alleys in Bucharest, Americans will risk it all. But Americans are less familiar with a slow-moving threat to American values. The long game isn’t as recognizable to us.

    The long game is what Putin plays in Eastern Europe, what radical Islam plays everywhere, and what Obama now plays domestically with amnesty. Obama just had to reach back and borrow some ideas from one of the most vociferous defenders of Southern slavery, and nullify laws he took an oath to enforce.
    Take some comfort in this: executives acting lawlessly is a transgression as old as human history. Charles I similarly ignored the law when he went so far as to dissolve a Parliament with which he disagreed. When he started running out of money to conduct his wars with France and Spain, he violated Magna Carta by imposing a forced loan on the monarchs without the consent of Parliament.


    Charles I

    Magna Carta will be eight hundred years old next year. It stands for the principle that the executive is limited by the law. Kings, emperors, and now presidents have stood against the principles of Magna Carta. Tonight, Obama will add his name to the long list of consequentialists such as John C. Calhoun and Charles I who brazenly ignore laws to achieve their ends.

    What will be the Republican response? Is the risk of a government shutdown more dangerous than a transformed America? Will the GOP recognize the dangerous line Obama has crossed, or will they channel Millard Fillmore in response to our modern Calhoun? Will they use the powers the Founders gave them to reign in executive lawlessness, or will they meekly punt the problem to the courts?

    The future of much more than immigration policy is at stake.

    http://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2014/11/20/obama-our-modern-john-c-calhoun/?singlepage=true


  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,201
    I totally disagree with J. Christian Adams’ interpretation of John C. Calhoun’s philosophy equating it with Obamas abuse of federal executive power. It is not “mixing apples and oranges,” more like mixing apples and red bowling balls. The foundation of Calhoun’s philosophy is that the United States federal government was a creation of the individual states; it existed only because the states made it. The authority of the creator is superior to its creation. Ultimately the authority of the INDIVIDUAL SATES supersedes that of the federal government (pre 13th.and 14th. Amendments). The 10th. Amendment was adopted by individual states to protect their sovereignty. To simplify Calhoun’s thoughtful defense of states right into simply “ignoring laws you do not like” is incredibly wrong and insulting. Obama seeks to expand federal government power; Calhoun sought to limit it. To compare the actions of Obama’s abuse of federal executive powers with the right of individual states to exercise their legitimate sovereignty (the cornerstone of Calhoun’s philosophy) is ridiculous. We see in Texas and Arizona and other states the effort to reassert their states’ sovereignty against federal ”depraved indifference.” These states are the last defense against a run away abuse of federal power. These states are trying to protect their own citizens in defiance of federal government criminal neglect. What these states are doing is totally consistent with Calhoun’s philosophy. If he were alive today, his would be theloudest voice in defense of these states. It is Calhoun’s philosophy that defends the right of states to act on their own. And it is these states that are protecting the Construction.

    I fear the author has been totally conned because apparently he is reading modern history books that have put a liberal spin on real American history. Contemporary books seek to vilify and demean the Confederacy and what it fought for, states rights against runaway federal power (slavery was a separate issue and requires a whole other debate).

    God bless John C. Calhoun a giant of American history and a statesman. Patriots, be careful about what to accept as fact in modern “history” books.
    Last edited by csarbww; 11-20-2014 at 03:44 PM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member vistalad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    3,036
    Toxic 'Bama is all about 'Bama, and always will be.

    The question now is whether the Republican leadership can use 'Bama's edict as cover for giving their big money donors the surplus labor that they covet. Let's hope that rank and file Repubs understand that what voters did to Demos on November 4 they can do to Repubs who sell out their jobs to the coming wave of illegals that 'Bama's amnesty will produce.
    ***********************
    Americans first in this magnificent country

    American jobs for American workers

    Fair trade, not free trade

Similar Threads

  1. Obama ~ The Framing of the Modern Right-wing Extremist
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-13-2009, 09:52 PM
  2. OBAMA & McCAIN: MODERN DAY GODFATHERS
    By USAKAY in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-10-2008, 10:21 PM
  3. OBAMA & McCAIN: MODERN DAY GODFATHERS
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-10-2008, 08:20 PM
  4. Sen. John C. Calhoun Vetoes Annexation of Mexico (1848)
    By RememberGoliad in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-28-2008, 06:41 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-13-2007, 08:49 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •