IS OBAMA TRYING TO KICK START WORLD WAR III WITH AN ATTACK ON SYRIA?
IS OBAMA TRYING TO KICK START WORLD WAR III WITH AN ATTACK ON SYRIA?
Posted by Bill Bissell, Admin II on August 28, 2013 at 2:41pm in Patriot Action Alerts
From Our Own Liberty News Team
http://api.ning.com/files/9bnzZeuKAx...XPK3t/mean.jpg
What I’m about to write is something I’ve somewhat avoided for a few days now. Several of our team members here at LibertyNEWS.com (along with quite a few others in alternative media) have a very uneasy suspicion about what’s happening in Syria. We’ve discussed this in detail internally, but haven’t yet gone out with a full explanation of where we think it all may be headed. To get us started, I ask that you take a few minutes to watch yesterday’s episode of LibertyNEWS TV. Norvell Rose hit the nail on the head and this is an episode you don’t want to miss. The episode looks at Obama’s war machine and explains why Obama is the biggest wartime President in the history of the America.
There are two fronts to Norvell’s narrative. Well, two methods of war Obama is waging. The first is a war on the moral fabric that has, without question, held America together and built the greatest nation the world has ever seen. Obama and his ilk in radical leftist circles have succeeded in breaking down the idea of family, they’ve trained young generations how to accept failure and view it as normal in a bad economy, they’ve successfully taken complete control over the markets, they’ve built a political machine within government that can bully and defeat opponents, and they’ve finalized the move to control national mainstream media for propaganda purposes.
America as a society is now weakened. Those who still believe in the need to fight aren’t sure what they’re fighting or how to fight it. Those who believe a fight is not necessary are now enslaved by government, hoping the free ride can continue a little longer before the ship sinks. That’s the first method of war being waged and Obama’s efforts are beginning to reveal themselves with disastrous consequences. The second method of war is more physical. If our suspicions are correct, and God knows we hope they aren’t, Obama is about to drag the planet into a war that will reach all corners of the world. We’re not alleging it’s going to happen this way, but logic dictates we consider the following a very strong possibility.
Let’s step back in time a few years and look at what got us where we are. For the record, Obama isn’t the first President to control and dictate the actions of the middle east. Both Republicans and Democrats are guilty of meddling in the affairs of middle eastern nations. The difference between Presidents of the past on Obama is the underlying intent. I’m not saying it was right to dictate regime change when we believed it necessary, but Presidents of the past have generally taken such actions to create stability in a violent and chaotic region. Yes, we installed dictators who were less than ideal when it comes to western standards, but we made our picks based on the ability of said dictators to maintain regional order. In the case of Israel, for some years now, leading up to Obama’s takeover of U.S. government, leaders of middle eastern nations have toned down the threats and worked to stay clear of major conflict with the Jewish nation. Sure, much of this was only possible due to massive infusions of cash and aid, but it has somewhat worked when you consider its objective.
Then Obama took office. This is where it gets very, very disconcerting.
Unlike Presidents of the past, Obama immediately went to work destabilizing the middle east. He started with Libya, where he went to war against a “controllable” leader and eventually toppled the Libyan government that tolerated Israel. The CIA and State Department then went into Libya and began a massive regional arms-running operation out of Benghazi. This was all happening with Ambassador Stephens (who had a history dealing with arms in Libya) at the helm, which also helps us understand what happened when terrorist militants attacked the CIA facility in Benghazi.
The arms were being shipped through Turkey into Syria. They were being shipped to terrorist militants who have a deep desire to see Israel brought to her knees.
Meanwhile, at Israel’s southern border we watched Egypt see epic unrest and a leader who tolerated Israel was removed, followed by a takeover of government by the terrorist organization, Muslim Brotherhood. The fact the Muslim Brotherhood no longer controls Egyptian government is irrelevant. What matters is that the U.S. heavily, and I mean HEAVILY armed and funded the Muslim Brotherhood in the short period of time they controlled Egyptian government. Yes, it’s true the Muslim Brotherhood no longer controls Egyptian government, but anyone who looks at the current environment in Egypt should be able to see the country is in absolute chaos. The Muslim Brotherhood are not in check and they’re currently able to move arms, fighters and money between Iran and Israel’s southern border.
Back to Syria today. From all the reports we’re seeing, Obama is very much willing to side with terrorists and attack Syria’s current government. This all happening while terrorist militants control much of the country side and are able to work with Iran to conduct massive movement of arms, troops and money.
Robert Fisk hit hard on this, writing for The Independent.
If Barack Obama decides to attack the Syrian regime, he has ensured – for the very first time in history – that the United States will be on the same side as al-Qaida. Quite an alliance! Was it not the Three Musketeers who shouted “All for one and one for all” each time they sought combat? This really should be the new battle cry if – or when – the statesmen of the Western world go to war against Bashar al-Assad. The men who destroyed so many thousands on 9/11 will then be fighting alongside the very nation whose innocents they so cruelly murdered almost exactly 12 years ago. Quite an achievement for Obama, Cameron, Hollande and the rest of the miniature warlords.
OK, so we get that Obama has toppled several regimes and helped arm/fund terrorist militant groups.
The next question is why? I think Israel is at the heart of it. Consider everything written above and then look at this map.
http://api.ning.com/files/9bnzZeuKAx....png?width=750 Notice how there is a fairly clear path between Iran and Egypt, and Iran and Syria. For Syria Iran just needs passage through a small part of Turkey. For Egypt, Iran needs to travel Yemen and Sudan. Do you honestly think any of these countries will stop Iran from moving arms, fighters and money?
Which brings us back to Obama. Why is Obama so hell-bent on weakening leaders who oppose the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and terrorists armies in Syria? And why does he so aggressively arm the Muslim Brotherhood and terrorist armies to the teeth? Does he not realize that in doing so he is essentially helping build a military might that wishes to go to war with Israel?
If this all begins to unravel the way it looks like it might, the middle east is about to descend into darkness and bloody war that will set the record books. The impact will be global. Russia, China and many others are already looking at us with an eye of scorn. Russia pretends it wants nothing to do with this all, but Russia will be all t0o happy to supply arms into the conflict. The U.S. has been, for years now, supplying arms for the conflict.
Where will everyone else stand?
In addition, while all of this is hitting the fan, the U.S. economy is undergoing a controlled demolition via ObamaCare and a falsely propped up stock market.
What happens if and when the world is at war and the U.S. economy suffers a complete collapse?
To know how serious the threat is, all we need to do is monitor Israel’s actions. Israel is fully aware of what goes on in the region and will preemptively act. Take a look at this, just out from AP.
Israel ordered a special call-up of reserve troops Wednesday as nervous citizens lined up at gas-mask distribution centers, preparing for possible hostilities with Syria. With the U.S. threatening to attack Syria over its alleged use of chemical weapons, Israel fears that Syria may respond by attacking Israel, a close American ally. While Israeli officials believe the chances of a Syrian strike remain slim, people were clearly preparing for the possibility.
Keep in mind Obama is about to start this thing without declaring war, without Congressional approval, without any proof of who used chemical weapons, whose weapons they were, and who they were targeting. This is Obama acting alone, as a dictator with an agenda to create further chaos and unrest in the middle east. To what end? What exactly is Obama’s ultimate goal in all of this? Why would he seek actions that, in effect, very well could lead to World War III?
Liberty News
http://patriotaction.net/forum/topic...sg_share_topic